Cohort Graduation Rate: Compared to Leaver Rate Muscogee County School District April 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Understanding the New Graduation Rate Sample Presentation 1.
January 10, 2013 Report on the Virginia Early Warning System (VEWS) Education Commission of the States June 27, 2013 Virginia Department of Education.
Cohort Graduation Exit Code Review December 18, 2014.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
March 29, Agenda Section A: The Four Year Adjusted Cohort Graduation Rate Section B: Graduation Rate Goals and Targets Section C: Reporting Section.
Graduation, Completion, & Dropout. Re-Alignment Accountability Graduation Completion Dropout District Practice PEIMS Reporting.
Center for Educational Performance and Information The Tortured Path of Data Through Policy and Politics January 22, 2007 Margaret Merlyn Ropp, Ph.D. Director.
Escambia County School District. Q.1.7 Increase the graduation rate as measured by the Federal Uniform Rate. Year District State % 70.6%
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
How Does Oregon Report Graduation Rates? Cohort Graduation Rate This year’s release reports on graduation rates for students who first entered high school.
The Case of the Mysterious, Moving Calculations … Counting High School Graduates and Dropouts Prepared by the Community Service Council, with support from.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
A Century of Academic Excellence and Achievement DELANO HIGH SCHOOL.
Cohort Graduation Rate. Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort graduation rate will affect schools and districts Objectives.
Implementing the 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate. Projected Four-Year Dropout Rate – A measure of the cumulative proportion of the 9 th grade class that.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Wayne County High School Interventions for Student Achievement Marlene Griffith Mathematics Department Chair Wayne County High School (912) , ext.
Title I Comprehensive LEA Improvement Plan CLIP Federal Support for Jasper County Schools.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
FY RACE TO THE TOP
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES The “Tween” Years — Increasing Academic Rigor Administrators’ Management Meeting for Exceptional Education and Student Services.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Presentation to the Board December 17,  Spring 2011 – Economically Disadvantaged subgroup – Reading  Warning List – Begin to Develop Plan  Spring.
AN OPPORTUNITY FOR 3 RD GRADERS MOVE ON WHEN READING Welcome STATE BOARD OF EDUCATIONK-12 ACADEMIC STANDARDS&
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Update on Secondary Learning Center Transition March 23, 2010.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2015.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
January 15, Utilization of the Personal Curriculum.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
1 Cohort Graduation Rate October 1, 2010 Jonathan Wiens and Sara Berscheit Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.
Cohort Graduation Rate. 1/8/2016Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
HSA, Dropouts, Graduation and AYP Report to the Board of Education October 25, 2011.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Understanding Kansas Graduation and Dropout Calculations Jessica Noble, Education Program Consultant Kansas State Department of Education September 2012.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
B Team Lead Orientation Strengthening Success Team Lead Capacity
Graduation Rate Changes Under ESSA
Graduation Rate Changes Under ESSA
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Bennett County School District
ABCs/AYP Background Briefing
Joann Hooper Patty Rooks Paulette Richmond Gary Wenzel
Rockville Centre Schools
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
English Learning Meeting June 12th, :00 – 2:15 pm
Navigating the Maze of Assessment and Accountability Reporting
Presentation transcript:

Cohort Graduation Rate: Compared to Leaver Rate Muscogee County School District April 2012

Purpose of the Change Why is a new graduation rate being reported? ▫The U.S. Department of Education is requiring all states to begin publicly reporting comparable high school graduation rates using its new four-year adjusted cohort rate calculation method. In October 2008, a regulation by the U.S. Department of Education [section 1111(h) of ESEA] was amended, which included a requirement for all states and local educational agencies (LEAs) receiving Title I funds (money for schools with a certain percentage of low-income students) to begin calculating and reporting the more uniform rate beginning with data. ▫Historically, states have calculated graduation rates using varying methods, creating inconsistent data from one state to the next. The transition to a uniform high school graduation rate requires all states to report the percentage of freshmen students who graduate in four years with a regular high school diploma. This rate will reflect a uniform method for reliable comparisons among states. The same number of students are graduating. Not all students will be counted as graduates.

Georgia’s Graduation Rates  Leaver Graduation Rate: The data above the line divided by the data below the line # of students who graduate with regular diplomas _____________________________________________________________________ # of dropouts in 9 th, 10 th, 11 th, 12 th from appropriate years + graduates + other completers  Cohort Graduation Rate: The data above the line divided by the data below the line Number of cohort members who earned a regular high school diploma by the end of the school year ____________________________________________________________________ Number of first-time 9th graders in fall 2007 (starting cohort) plus students who transfer in, minus students who transfer out, emigrate, or die during school years , , , and Copied from official Department of Education Documents

Difference in Formula Leaver Rate and Cohort Rate The element that distinguishes the Leaver Rate from the Cohort rate is the students who are included in the numerator. Numerator ▫Leaver includes all students who received a regular diploma ▫Cohort includes only the students who received a regular diploma and began with their cohort 4 years prior. Denominator ▫Leaver and Cohort include all of the same elements (although stated a little differently). The difference is that students who receive a regular diploma but did not enter with the cohort are not counted in the numerator because they are not in the 4-year cohort. Therefore, they count against the school in the same way a dropout counts. They are never counted as a graduate because they did not graduate in four years. ▫These students may have been retained. ▫They may have missed school for some reason and not acquired enough credits.

Georgia Comparison of Leaver Rate and Cohort Rate 2011

Impact of Change Under the old Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) protocol, high schools were identified as not passing AYP by an increasing percentage of students who graduated using the leaver rate which increased from 65% in 2007 to 85 % in Under the new waiver plan, schools are identified as Priority or Focus Schools if the graduation rate is less than 60% using the cohort rate over 2 years among other criteria.

Data Review Analysis of data is conducted at each school by Principal, Leadership Team, and Academic Coaches using: Standardized test scores Attendance Graduation rate Discipline Communication with principals regarding appropriate documentation including withdrawal and transfer codes Identification of at-risk students in each school by School Counselors and Leadership teams to create intervention plans

Increased Learning Time Offer credit recovery: during summer during the school day after school at Academic Success Center Extend Learning Time (45 minutes) for our School Improvement School Grant (SIG) schools and Race to the Top (RT3) Lowest Achieving Schools Provide Instructional Extension Program (IEP): Saturday During and after-school tutorials

Instructional Tools Meet Learner Needs Focus on Standards-Based Classroom Instruction Emphasize Research Based Strategies (Principal discussion on strategies for economically disadvantaged) Identify middle school student interest/needs and plan for high school courses through GAcollege411 Provide 8 th grade students with Next Step booklet Utilize instructional software for individualized instruction: Classworks Study Island USA Test Prep NextNavigator Read 180 Compass Learning Summer Bridge Program at SIG and RT3 Lowest Achieving Schools Creation of District common assessment, with principal input, provides instructional data to monitor student progress

Professional Development Increase professional development opportunities to address the new standards Common Core Georgia Performance Standards (CCGPS) Provide professional development opportunities with RT3 funding: inquiry-based learning common assessments instructional rigor co-teaching differentiated instruction Offer workshops with a focus on students with disabilities, economically disadvantaged and implement specific programs to provide support to students