OBE Briefing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Academic Reference Standards
Advertisements

As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
© JABEE 2013 Japan Accreditation Board for Engineering Education Washington Accord And International Engineering Alliance Dr Yasuyuki AOSHIMA Executive.
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Copyright© 2009 Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan. All Rights Reserved FEIAP Guidelines and Recent Development in International Engineering Accreditation.
1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
TOWARDS EAC ACCREDITATION
B.Eng (Hons) Electronics majoring in Multimedia
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
F aculty o f NGINEERIN G E Outcome Based Education (OBE) system Getting to know the mapping of Programme Outcomes (POs), Programme Educational Objectives.
Outcome Based Education (OBE) & Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Outcome-Based Education (OBE) - Towards EAC Accreditation in 2009
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
Mohammad Alshayeb 19 May Agenda Update on Computer Science Program Assessment/Accreditation Work Update on Software Engineering Program Assessment/Accreditation.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Day 1 Session 2/ Programme Objectives
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
Outcome-Based Approach to Engineering Education B.Eng. (Hons) Electronics majoring in Computer Dr. Ian Chai, Program Coordinator Ling Huo Chong, Assistant.
The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers 香港工程師學會 1 Review of Accreditation Criteria for Engineering Degree Programmes By Albert CHOW Director of Qualifications.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
IHEQN Conference October 2006 IHEQN “AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”? CASE STUDY OF COLLABORATION 1. Engineers Ireland and University College Cork Denis.
Outcome-based Education – From Curriculum to Classroom practices
BENGKEL OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION (OBE). What are Learning Outcomes? i.Learning outcomes are statements of what students know and can do as a result of.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 28,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.2 Guidelines on: IMapping of PEOs to Mission Statement IIMapping of SOs to PEOs.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Curriculum and Programme Objectives: Mapping of Learning Outcomes Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
Mutual Recognition of Engineering Educational Programs in the Washington Accord Andrew M. Wo Deputy CEO, Institute of Engineering Education Taiwan (IEET)
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Use of Surveys N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (O.B.E) (For Students) by: OBE Sector Committee 2016, FKMP, UTHM With Wisdom We Explore Faculty of Mechanical and.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Outcome Based Education (OBE) & Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Gap Analysis Megat Johari Megat Mohd Noor Azlan Abdul Aziz
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
College of Computer Science OBE Implementation on Curriculum Revisions
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Assessment and Accreditation
Mechanical Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION (OBE) Engineering Programmes Accreditation
Materials and Manufacturing Engineering
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION – AN INTRODUCTION
MILITARY INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Engineering Programme Accreditation
Links between Mission Statement, PEO, PO and CO
Presentation transcript:

OBE Briefing

Background

Washington Accord The Washington Accord, established in 1989, is an international accreditation agreement for professional engineering academic degrees, between the bodies responsible for accreditation in its signatory countries Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Ireland, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Taiwan, UK and USA

Washington Accord (cont.) The agreement recognizes that there is substantial equivalency of programmes accredited by those signatories Graduates of accredited programmes in any of the signatory countries are recognized by the other signatory countries as having met the academic requirements for entry to the practice of engineering

Engineering Accreditation Council All engineering degrees in Malaysia are accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) EAC consists of five stakeholders Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM) The Institution of Engineers, Malaysia (IEM) Industry employers Malaysian Qualification Agency (MQA) Public Service Department (JPA)

Accreditation The objective of accreditation is to ensure that graduates of the accredited engineering programmes satisfy the minimum academic requirements for registration as a graduate engineer with BEM and for admission to graduate membership of IEM One of the requirements for accrediting an engineering programme is the implementation of the outcome-based education

Outcome-based Education (OBE)

Outcome-based Education Outcome-based Education (OBE) is a measurement of the effectiveness of a learning process by evaluating the outcome Focuses on student learning by: Using statements to make explicit what the student is expected to be able to know, understand or do; these statements should be do-able, observable and measurable Providing learning activities which will help the student to reach these outcomes Assessing the extent to which the student meets these outcomes through the use of assessment

OBE Mechanisms Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) PEOs address the graduates’ attainment 5 years after graduation Programme Outcomes (POs) POs describe what students are expected to know and be able to perform or attain by the time of graduation Learning Outcomes (LOs) LOs address the abilities to be attained by students upon completion of a subject

Programme Educational Objectives Programme Educational Objectives (PEOs) is a set of specific goals consistent with the faculty’s and university’s mission and vision, and describes the expected achievements of graduates in their career and professional life after graduation All the four undergraduate programmes have a common set of PEOs

PEOs (cont.) The 3 PEOs PEO1: Graduates who hold managerial or senior positions within their organizations PEO2: Graduates who demonstrate professionalism and a commitment to continual professional development PEO3: Graduates who are employed in engineering or related professions, or are enrolled in (or have graduated from) engineering or professional graduate school

Programme Outcomes Programme Outcomes (POs) are statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to perform or attain by the time of graduation All the four undergraduate programmes have the same POs

Programme Outcomes (cont.) The 13 POs PO1: Acquire and apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering fundamentals PO2: Acquire technical competence in specialised areas of engineering discipline to solve complex engineering problems PO3: Identify and analyse complex engineering problems, and formulate solutions based on fundamental principles of science and engineering

Programme Outcomes (cont.) The 13 POs (cont.) PO4: Design solutions for complex engineering problems that meet specified needs with relevant considerations of their impacts in society PO5: Conduct investigation and research on complex engineering problems in the chosen field of study PO6: Create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools to complex engineering activities

Programme Outcomes (cont.) The 13 POs (cont.) PO7: Demonstrate awareness of societal, safety and health, legal, and cultural issues relevant to professional engineering practice PO8: Understand the importance of sustainability and cost-effectiveness in design and development of professional engineering solutions, and their impacts in societal and environmental contexts PO9: Apply and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities of engineering practice

Programme Outcomes (cont.) The 13 POs (cont.) PO10: Communicate effectively in both oral and written contexts PO11: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in a team PO12: Recognise the need for, and acquire the ability to engage in self-improvement through continuous professional development and life-long learning

Programme Outcomes (cont.) The 13 POs (cont.) PO13: Demonstrate management, leadership and entrepreneurial skills, and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects in multidisciplinary environments

Course Outcomes Learning Outcomes (LOs) or Course Outcomes (COs) address the abilities to be attained by students upon the completion of a subject A subject usually has several LOs and the LOs are different from one subject to another

Bloom’s Taxonomy Three domains of learning method Cognitive domain Relates to the knowledge and the development of intellectual skills; includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts Affective domain Describes the way people react emotionally and their ability to feel another living thing’s pain or joy; typically targets the awareness and growth in attitudes, emotion, and feelings Psychomotor Describes the ability to physically manipulate a tool or instrument; usually focuses on the development of skills

Bloom’s Taxonomy (cont.)

Thank You