Robert McCabe, Chief Education Officer. Company Confidential A National Consensus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Our World Begins with Reading Robert McCabe Vice President and Chief Education Officer Lexia Learning Systems, Inc.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
1 R-2 Report: Read and write at the end of third grade Work session on Strategies to meet Results Targets A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *systematically assessing.
Response to Intervention: A Different Look
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Response to Intervention (RtI)
©Joan Sedita School-Wide Literacy Planning Grades 4-12 Joan Sedita.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will score a level 3 or 4 on the Math and Reading End of Grade.
2011/2012.  ERI is supported through federal and state grant funds.  ERI is an essential component to Response To Intervention (RtI) which requires.
Tools for Classroom Teachers Scaffolding Vocabulary activities Graphic organizers Phonics games Comprehension activities Literature circles.
Overview Training Cohort B June 23, 2005 Open Court Rhonda Wolter Bethel School District Reading Coordinator.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Lexia Reading Core5 Launch Module
By: Rachel Ana Reding and Mitch Steckbauer Teachingfor theFuture.
Lee County’s Just Read, Florida! District Plan K-12 Comprehensive Research-Based Plan Dianne Johnson, Ali Conant C. Keith Woodfin, John Scheller.
1 Differentiated Instruction Massachusetts Reading First Plan and John Silber Early Literacy Initiative Advanced Seminar Dorothy S. Strickland, Ph. D.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Webinar 3 Core Instruction (Tier 1). Assessments: – Screening – Evaluating effectiveness of core instruction Research-based/Evidence-based Instructional.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
Assessment to Improve Reading: Response To Intervention (RTI) Model
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
RtI/DI Intervention Model for The Public Schools of Petoskey Building Strong, Life-long Learners.
1 RtII: Response to Instruction and Intervention Wissahickon School District.
MODULE 4 – Topic 403 Intervention Analysis Toolkit for Learners who are Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Module 4: Effective Instructional Practices.
RTI: Response to Intervention An Evidence-Based Practice.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Reading Intervention Debbie Wood Elementary Literacy Facilitator.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
K-3 Move on When Reading January 29, 2014 Becky Ridge Carmen Fernandez.
Literacy Programs System 44 Exit Criteria: SPI Advancing, 40+ Fluency Score, series 13 + READ 180 Exit Criteria: SRI 4th 595; 5th 760;
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Literacy Framework: What Does It Look Like at Shawnee Heights? Tamara Konrade ESSDACK Educational Services and Staff Development Association of Central.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED. *providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to individual student needs *using a researched-based.
Response to Instruction and Intervention. The Big Picture Anita L. Archer, Ph.D. Educational Consultant
Response to Intervention (RtI) The Third Year Richboro Elementary School.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Granite School District Multi-Tiered System of Support Part I: Moving Between Tier 1 Differentiation and Tier 2 Interventions and Extensions Teaching and.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
WORKING TOGETHER TO HELP CHILDREN SUCCEED
Supporting All Readers in Small Group Instruction Providing Equity in Literacy Instruction Beth Estill.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Elizabeth Levene, The HELPS Program can Provide YOU with the Tools to Help Struggling Readers Welcome Elizabeth Levene,
Supplemental and Intervention Reading Programs
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Robert McCabe, Chief Education Officer

Company Confidential A National Consensus

Company Confidential 15 Years Earlier! Lexia’s Company History Founded in 1984 by a Team of Reading and Technology Specialists Funded by two Federal Grants from National Institute of Health (NICHD) Pioneered the Use of Technology to Deliver Explicit, Systematic Skills Based Instruction for Reading

Company Confidential SUPPORT - Support core reading programs for on-level and advanced students through accelerated independent practice REMEDIATE - Remediate reading disabilities by providing extended practice to develop foundational reading strategies TIER I TIER III TIER II PREVENT – Prevent reading failure by strengthening reading skills for students who need additional practice in essential reading skills Builds Mastery of Essential Reading Skills

Company Confidential Beneficial Attributes of Computers Identified in Published LiteratureLexia Individualized Supplementary Instruction Intrinsically Motivating Explicit Training Fidelity of Treatment Accurate Word Reading Speeds up Skill Acquisition Extends Teacher Resources

Company Confidential Systematic, Structured and Sequential Addresses the five Components of Reading Correlated to Core Reading Curricula, Selected State Standards and DIBELS Intrinsically Motivating with Immediate Feedback and Reinforcement Focused Learning Environment to Maximize Time on Task Differentiated, Age-Appropriate, Independent Practice with Targeted Review Student Content

Company Confidential

Collects Information on Each Student's Performance Identifies Strengths and Weaknesses Based on Student Performance Provides Feedback and Hints Along the Way Supplies Additional Practice when Necessary “Intelligent Branching”

Company Confidential Web-enabled – Access from Anywhere Reports Identify and Group Students for Targeted Instruction Ongoing Progress Monitoring Capabilities Management Access for Class, School, and District Home-to-school Connection

Company Confidential Lexia and Age Appropriate Design

Company Confidential UNIT LEVEL PROGRAM ACTIVITY

Company Confidential

Lexia Product Research

Company Confidential Research Requirements Treatment and control groups Pre- and post-testing using standardized measures (Gates MacGinitie, Woodcock- Johnson III, GRADE) Equated groups on pretest scores Sufficient implementation over school year

Company Confidential Kindergarten Study Lexia Early Reading 3 treatment, 3 control classes Matched classes – same teacher, classroom, and curriculum

Company Confidential Kindergarten Results All children Low performers

Company Confidential Peer-Reviewed Publication Kindergarten findings appear in Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly v29 (3), May/June 2008 “The Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Instruction for Advancing Literacy Skills in Kindergarten Children”

Company Confidential First Grade Study 5 treatment, 5 control classes 83 students in treatment group, 84 students in control group Subanalysis – Title I (15 students in treatment group, 15 students in control group)

Company Confidential First Grade Results Title I Students Lexia Students

Company Confidential Peer-Reviewed Publication Title 1 findings appear in the Journal of Research in Reading v29 (2), May 2006 “The efficacy of computer-based supplementary phonics programs for advancing reading skills in at-risk elementary students”

Company Confidential Second Grade Study 7 treatment, 4 control classes Students in two groups (41 students in each group) matched on pretest scores Decoding Subtest Findings published in International Dyslexia Association’s Perspectives on Language and Literacy Summer 2007 issue

Company Confidential Third Grade Study 13 treatment, 5 control classes Lower performers only 46 students in treatment group, 65 students in control group Reading Comprehension Subtest Findings published in International Dyslexia Association’s Perspectives on Language and Literacy Summer 2007 issue

Company Confidential Journal Publication 2 nd and 3 rd grade findings appear in the Perspectives on Language and Literacy v33 (3), 2007 “Computer Assisted Instruction: Successful only with Proper Implementation”

Company Confidential Lexia Middle School Study Remedial reading classes: 47 subjects (31 SPED students) Identical instruction Treatment Students averaged 50 sessions using Lexia SOS Woodcock Johnson III assessment tool

Company Confidential “There is no comprehension strategy that compensates for difficulty reading words accurately & fluently.” Torgesen 2003

Company Confidential Middle School Results

Company Confidential Peer-Reviewed Publication Middle School Findings have been accepted for publication in the European Journal of Special Needs Education

Company Confidential Data Driven Results Lexia contributed to reading gains in grades Pre K - 3 and Middle School Gains most evident for low performers Results are consistent with other published data Teachers support the use of the programs

Company Confidential “High Benefit Students” Low Pre-test Scores + High Use Sessions High Gains Scores

Company Confidential Ongoing Research 1. Manuscripts in Preparation: Pre-K, Kindergarten and Sixth Grade Data Collected in School Year 2. Large-Scale Study in Ennis, TX K (N=425) 1 st (N=252) 2 nd (N=257) Subgroups of Bilingual Students

Company Confidential Kindergarten ELL

Company Confidential Kindergarten ELL

Company Confidential First Grade “High-Benefit Students” *non-SPED, non-ELL students with pretest Total Test scores below 100 and high Lexia Use Total Test Gains

Company Confidential First Grade “High-Benefit Students” *non-SPED, non-ELL students with pretest Total Test scores below 100 and high Lexia Use Reading Comprehension Gains

Company Confidential Best Practices and Implementation Tips* *You have the details in your handout

Company Confidential Program Assignment and Leveling One Program: Early Reading, Primary Reading, Strategies for Older Students One Level: Assign based upon Age and Skill

Company Confidential Frequency and Duration of Use 2 to 5 sessions per week Kindergarten: Everybody Benefits Grades 1-3: Performance drives implementation Grades 4-12: Intensive remediation/ELL Meet research-based thresholds (45+ sessions)

Company Confidential Rate of Progress Primary Reading Levels GRADE AVG. MIN to COMPLETE # of 20-MIN SESSIONS # of WEEKS Kindergarten st Grade nd Grade495259

Company Confidential Scheduling Use Time on Task Lexia and the Language Arts block Tiered Implementation Classroom versus Computer Lab Use

Company Confidential Supplementing a Strong Core Curriculum A comprehensive program, emphasizing explicit and systematic instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension

Company Confidential Lexia In The News

Company Confidential “When students learn through student- centered online technology, assessment and individualized assistance can be interactive and woven into the instruction rather than tacked on at the end of the process. Software makers can also use the feedback loop to learn how to improve their products for different kinds of learners. Lexia Learning Systems, a reading-software company in Concord, Mass., provides an example of the power of this approach. The company's product, Lexia Reading, assesses a student's understanding constantly. If the student demonstrates mastery, he moves forward. If he has not understood a lesson, the software harks back. Some students just need more opportunities to understand and practice the lesson in different ways.”

Company Confidential “Lexia Reading provides practice in the five components of reading, and the design of these materials is consistent with current research suggesting that students who struggle with reading benefit from systematic and explicit practice opportunities.”

Company Confidential Questions?