Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct. 23-25, 2002, SLAC Experience with and expectations for the drive laser for the APS PC gun Yuelin Li Advance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photoinjector Lasers for Ultra-Bright Electron Sources
Advertisements

Ultrafast XUV Coherent Diffractive Imaging Xunyou GE, CEA Saclay Director : Hamed Merdji.
2004 CLEO/IQEC, San Francisco, May Optical properties of the output of a high-gain, self-amplified free- electron laser Yuelin Li Advanced Photon.
Philippe Hering October 30, 2007 Drive Laser Commissioning Results and Plans 1 Drive Laser Commissioning results and plans Philippe.
1 Injector Lasers Overview Sasha Gilevich, SLAC April 29, 2004 Drive Laser Specifications Challenges System Description Laser Procurement R&D Effort UV.
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee October Injector Drive Laser Update 1 Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting.
Bill White Drive Laser April 16, Drive Laser Commissioning Experience Reminder of requirements on Drive Laser.
Sasha GilevichFacilities Advisory Committee April Injector Drive Laser Update Facilities Advisory Committee Meeting April.
SLAC XFEL Short Bunch Measurement and Timing Workshop 1 Current status of the FERMI project (slides provided by Rene Bakker) Photoinjector laser system.
Time-Bandwidth Products getting the average power of ultrafast DPSS lasers from hundreds of mW to tens of Watts by Dr. Thomas Ruchti CERN, April 2006 SESAM.
Recent developments for the LCLS injector Feng Zhou SLAC Other contributors: Brachmann, Decker, Ding, Emma, Gilevich, Huang, Iverson, Loos, Raubenheimer,
Siegfried Schreiber, DESY The TTF Laser System Laser Material Properties Conclusion? Issues on Longitudinal Photoinjector.
30. Nov I.Will, G. Klemz, Max Born Institute: Optical sampling system Optical sampling system for detailed measurement of the longitudinal pulse.
The ILC Laser-wire system Sudhir Dixit The John Adams Institute University of Oxford.
DMP Product Portfolio Femtosecond Lasers Trestles Ti:Sapphire lasers …… fs; nm, mW Mavericks Cr:Forsterite lasers
New Electron Beam Test Facility EBTF at Daresbury Laboratory B.L. Militsyn on behalf of the ASTeC team Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Science.
W.S. Graves, ASAC Review, Sept 18-19, 2003 Accelerator Overview Goals for proposal Description of technical components: injector, linac, compressors, etc.
The UCLA PEGASUS Plane-Wave Transformer Photoinjector G. Travish, G. Andonian, P. Frigola, S. Reiche, J. Rosenzweig, and S. Telfer UCLA Department of Physics.
A 5 fs high average power OPCPA laser system for attosecond pulse production Philip Bates, Yunxin Tang, Emma Springate and Ian Ross Central Laser Facility,
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
CTF3 photo injector laser status CERN 17 July 2009 CLIC meeting.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
C. Vicario LCLS ICW SLAC Oct. 9-11, THE DRIVE LASER: EXPERIENCE AT SPARC Carlo Vicario for SPARC collaboration.
Recent Experiments at PITZ ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-RAY FELs August 18-22, 2003 at DESY-Zeuthen,
Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Distortion of single-shot EO sampling techniques.
Institute of Atomic and Molecular Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Taiwan National Central University, Taiwan National Chung.
W.S. Graves ASAC Review Sept 18-19, 2003 R&D at Bates William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presentation to MIT X-ray laser Accelerator Science Advisory.
Workshop on New Aspects of Quark Nuclear Physics with Polarized Photons, Feb , Honolulu Possibility of bright, polarized high energy photon sources.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Advancement in photo-injector laser: Second Amplifier & Harmonic Generation M. Petrarca CERN M. Martyanov, G. Luchinin, V. Lozhkarev Institute of Applied.
Phto-injector laser chain NEWS Massimo Petrarca & Marta Divall.
Laser System Upgrade Overview
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Bill White Commissioning October 9, 2006 Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans Requirements Where do we stand today?
Electron Sources for ERLs – Requirements and First Ideas Andrew Burrill FLS 2012 “The workshop is intended to discuss technologies appropriate for a next.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
Workshop for advanced THz and Compton X-ray generation
Drive Laser Introduction ‘ir’ master oscillator power amplifier chain (MOPA) uses standard chirped pulse amplification scheme (CPA) third harmonic generation.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
February 17-18, 2010 R&D ERL Brian Sheehy R&D ERL Laser and laser light transport Brian Sheehy February 17-18, 2010 Laser and Laser Light Transport.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility FEL Power Achieved.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Sasha Gilevich, Alan Miahnahri Drive Laser 11/4/2004 Agenda General Information Project Status Transport Tubes Design.
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
An H- stripping laser using commercial, diode-pumped Nd:YAG amplifiers Russell Wilcox Laser Stripping Workshop, April 11, 2011.
LASER SYSTEM STATUS G.Gatti, A. Ghigo, C.Vicario, P.Musumeci, M. Petrarca, S. Cialdi, D. Filippetto REVIEW COMMITTEE 16/11/05.
Yb:YAG Regenerative Amplifier for A1 Ground Laser Hut Rui Zhang ACCL Division V, RF-Gun Group Nov 20, 2015 SuperKEKB Injector Laser RF Gun Review.
Status of the SPARC laser and “dazzler” experiments
Summary of SPARC first-phase operations
Drive-Laser Commissioning Status and Plans
Laser System Upgrade Overview
ILC/ATF-2 Laser System Sudhir Dixit (JAI, Oxford)
An X-band system for phase space linearisation on CLARA
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
Principle of Mode Locking
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
RF-Gun for Phase-II RF Gun 10, June, 2016.
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
LASER SYSTEM STATUS G.Gatti , A. Ghigo , C.Vicario , P.Musumeci ,
Drive Laser Facility Layout Drive Laser Architecture Technical Issues
INJECTOR (WBS 1.2.1) Jym Clendenin, SLAC April 23, 2002
Injector Experimental Results John Schmerge, SSRL/SLAC April 24, 2002
Drive Laser Commissioning Status
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
Injector Drive Laser Update
High energy 6.2 fs pulses Shambhu Ghimire, Bing Shan, and Zenghu Chang
Injector Drive Laser Technical Status
Presentation transcript:

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Experience with and expectations for the drive laser for the APS PC gun Yuelin Li Advance Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Layout * Current APS drive laser Configuration, and features Problems and solutions Current performances, and surprises Summary * Expectation for the next drive laser Operation and performance requirement Some commercial systems, new ideas Adaptive emittance optimization loop Summary * Acknowledgement

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Role of the APS pc gun drive laser 1 nC ps 3 mm mrad MeV LEUTL: the free electron laser project Saturated at wavelength as short as 150 nm fs pulses, energy  J

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC APS pc gun drive laser Single-shot autocorrelator Scanning Autocorrelator Spectrometer Head 1 6 Hz, nm 1.8 nm bandwidth 1-10 ps pulse duration Time jitter, 2 ps spec (?) Flash lamp-pumped Nd:Glass Chirped pulse amplification laser BBO Imaging aperture Divergence control

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Features Environment Monitoring Temperature and humidity Laser monitoring Oscillator Energy (off line), pulse duration (off line), mode, spectrum, Amplifier Cavity buildup, mode, pulse duration, FROG (offline) UV Energy, mode, virtual cathode Laser control Off line: Pulse duration, divergence, spot size on VC On line: Pulse energy, trajectory Semi automatic cathode cleaning

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC FROG traces of the laser Raw Reconstructed

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Semi automatic cathode cleaning Before After

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Problems and solutions Poor beam profile mode inhomogenity higher order mode Poor pointing stability 50% rms Poor output up to 50% rms not enough energy Poor reliability mechanical broken rods optical damage Intense maintenance Replacing KDP with BBO Adding pinholes at both end of the cavity Sealing the transport line Imaging Sealing the transport line Replacing stretcher-compressor gratings (From originally unknown 1800 l/mm, 76% efficiency to JY 1740 l/mm, 90% efficiency) Scheduling flash lamp replacement Switching cathode from Cu to Mg Switching Kigre rods to Schott rods Adding pinholes to cavity Hiring a baby sitter

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC IR Spatial Profile  x =1.14 mm  y =0.79 mm Hz

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Virtual cathode images Size: variable Profile:30% flat top Pointing stability: ~2% Direct beam Hard edge image

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Frequency conversion The power in the second harmonics at matched phase is (with pump depletion) FHG SHG d eff (pm/v)n  nn   m  For BBO, type I critical phase match At low intensity P 4   P  4 At high intensity P 4   P 

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Frequency conversion Expected Conversion efficiency Measured Green/IR53% UV/green20% Wavelength bandwidth (nm cm) 4.051Temperature bandwidth (K cm) Angular acceptance (mrad cm)  m1.064  m UV/Green Green/IR Old gratings New gratings

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC UV Energy stability Lamps at 10 million shotsLamps at 1 million shots

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Surprise: Timing stability 119 MHz rf waveform Laser rf waveform Laser rising edge 171 ps p-p, 19 ps rms Laser falling edge 56 ps p-p, 7 ps rms Laser oscillatorTBWP GLX-200 oscillator at 119 MHz Lock device TBWP CLX-1000 timing stabilizer with spec <2 ps RF sourceGigatronics 2856 MHz/24 orCrystal oscillator 119 MHz

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Summary on current laser *Finally usable in stability and profile However: it is stretching its limit …. *Flash lamps age quickly 10 million shots is the margin we use now 3-weeks of 24-7 operation at 6 Hz Needs careful attention for stable operation at the end *Laser rods break at about 15 million shots or less Time consuming Changes laser characteristics: divergence, mode size, optical path, etc…. No room for further improvement Energy stability, reliability, etc..

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Time to dream for a new drive laser

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC The future APS drive laser Role Primary electron beam source for both LEUTL and APS in routine operation (LEUTL is becoming a user facility) Key operational requirement Turn key system Reliable: no break down during normal operation Stable over long time Minimum maintenance Deliver up to 5 nC per shot for injection to APS

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC The role of cathodes Cathode(E gap + E A )/eVQ.E. (263nm)Life Laser energy/nC Cu eV 2  (APS) 3  (Nguyen, LANL) 4  (GTF) Long 2.4 mJ 160  J 120  J Mg 3.78 eV 1.3  (Spring-8) 1.3  (APS) 3  (Nguyen, LANL) Long 36  J 3.6  J 1.6  J Cs 2 Te3.5 eV 5% (Nguyen, LANL) 1% (FNAL) Months CsI6.4 eVEst Long K 2 CsSb2.1 eV10%Hours Cs 3 Sb2.05 eV6%Unstable

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Laser: Dream vs reality CurrentDreamReality Pulse energy on cathode a <500  J100  J Pulse repetition rate b 6 Hz60 Hz Energy stability2% rms0.5% rms 5-10% p-p2% p-p Pulse length2-10 ps2-10 ps Pulse shapingPossibleY  R&D needed Profile shapingSemiY  R&D needed Spatial homogeneity50%10%  R&D needed Pointing stability1-5% rms1% p-p R&D needed Timing jitter to rf6 ps rms<0.5 ps  Demonstrated (2 ps spec) Advanced features Active hydrothermal control NY Automatic energy control PossibleY Automatic emittance optimization NYYY  R&D needed a.Based on APS QE for a Mg cathode of about 1.3  10 -3, for 1 nC of charge from the gun. b.With long life cathode, single pulse per rf cycle. For a SC rf with higher duty factor the requirement is different.

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Commercial Ti:Sa amplifier systems Advertised performances Make and modelRep rateEnergyStabilityMode Clark MXR, CPA kHz, >0.6 mJ, 1%TM00 (Built in active hydrothermal Stabilization) Spectra Physics, Spitfire 1-5 KHz 0.7 mJ1% (p-p)TM00, 1.5 diffraction limit Spectra Physics, Hurricane1-5 KHz0.7 mJ1.5% (p-p)TM00, 1.5 diffraction limit Femto Lasers, FemtoPower1 kHz0.8 mJ 2% (p-p)TM00, 2 diffraction limit Coherent RegA kHz4  J2% (p-p)TM00, 2 diffraction limit Energy stability <1.5% p-p, 0.24% 1k Hz ( ) Performance Example Spectra Physics-Positive Light Hurricane

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC An idea: Gain less amplifier Seed: high rep, low energy pulses f, E s Cavity with length matching the rep rate of the seed, L=1/f Low rep output E out =nE s =E s /loss Advantages Ultra stable:E out =n Linear device:easier to shape Low jitter:no jitter between seed and output Jones and Ye, Opt Lett 27, 1848 (2002) Example: 300 mW, 100 MHz, for loss=10 -4, E out =30  kHz

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Commercial lockable oscillators Make and modelrep ratejitter spec TBWP TIGER 200/CLX1100up to 150 MHz<1 ps Femto Laser Femto Source/Femtolockup to 150 MHz<1 ps Spectra-Physics Lok-to-Clock Tsunamiup to 100 MHz<1 ps Coherent Mir Synchro-Lockup to 100 MHz<2 ps Advertised performance Laser TBWP TIGER 200 oscillator at 119 MHz LockingTBWP CLX1100 RF sourceHP 8665B at 119 MHz Test results8 ps “Subfemtosecond timing jitter between two independent, actively synchronized, mode locked lasers” Shelton et al, Opt Lett 27, 312 (2002)

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Adaptive pulse manipulation Single shot Emittance measurement Transverse profile measurement Deformable mirror Laser Electron beam SLM pulse shaper Single shot longitudinal profile measurement Longitudinal and transver profile control

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Measurement techniques Laser longitudinal profile FROG is the choice in IR, green, SHG in UV, Polarization gating Single-shot emittance measurement Multi slit mask FROG example

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Summary Laser Laser technology is mature enough for the basic requirement Advanced features R&D is needed to adapt existing adaptive pulse shaping and waveform control technologies

Laser Issues for Electron RF Photoinjectors, Oct , 2002, SLAC Acknowledgement Gil Travish (former laser commander) Ned ArnoldSandra Biedron Arthur Grelick Mike Hahne Kathy Harkay Rich Kodenhoven Robert Laird John Lewellen Greg Markovich Stephen Milton Antothny Petryla Supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences Contract No. W ENG-38