1 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP  The purpose of the workgroup centered on issues surrounding the machinability of items mailed in soft packaging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New USPS Postage Rates effective May 15, 2007 WSU Mailing Services Office of University Publishing.
Advertisements

This is the mailpiece design tutorial for Automated First Class Oversized Mailpieces. This presentation will aid you in the design and layout of this specific.
Shaping a More Efficient Future Pricing Change Effective Monday, May 14.
Short-Term Financial Management
And Learning TEAL Consulting Limited a a Meeting Customer Demand in Challenging Times July 2010.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 February 16, 2011.
Jonathan Yoo. USPS: Current System  Not OR- optimized  Based on pre- determined scheduling of trucks  Government- protected monopoly.
1 Shaping a More Efficient Future Pricing Change Effective Monday, May 14.
Cross-Docking Distribution Center (DC)
2008 Postal Rates Effective May 12, Attention We have included in our webpage a summary of the 2008 United States Postal Service rate increase effective.
2007 Postal Rates Effective May 14, Attention We have included in our webpage a summary of the 2007 United States Postal Service rate increase effective.
WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT Industrial Logistics (BPT 3123)
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement First-Class Mail Measurement July 24, 2007 FCM Subgroup Meeting.
Harrow Council Consultation on the Future Organisation of Whitchurch First School and Nursery and Whitchurch Junior School Consultation meetings - November.
FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION November 5, FLAT MAIL PREPARATION OPTIMIZATION Issue #81 MTAC November 5, 2003.
FAST for Periodicals MTAC Workgroup 95 Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
PostalOne! ® Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Electronic Mail Improvement Reporting (eMIR) Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
® MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement USPS Service Measurement Capability July 31, 2007.
Seamless Acceptance Pilot February 20, Agenda Pilot Status Pilot Findings Business Entity Identifier (BEI) Assessment Approach Feedback Options.
Corporate Automation Plan PHASE 2 February 4, 2004Washington D.C.
Recyling! (in burlingon, ON) adapted from:
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
Mailpiece Design Rose Flanagan Director of Mailing Services Transcontinental Direct.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
Corporate Flats Strategy MTAC November 7, Slide 2 Presentation Overview Background Near Term Actions (FY 2003 and 2004) Longer Term Planning (FY.
MTAC Meeting February 23, 2005 Integrated Mail Management.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance Final Presentation MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leader: Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Induction Process September 8, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
MTAC Workgroup # 83 First-Class Business Mail Measurement February 4, 2004.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process November 15, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
Workgroup 127 Move Update PS 6014 Form Redesign. Issue Statement  PS 6014 form originated from MTAC WG #75 and was designed to clearly assign liability.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail May 16, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
Lecture 16 Section 8.1 Objectives: Testing Statistical Hypotheses − Stating hypotheses statements − Type I and II errors − Conducting a hypothesis test.
Workgroup #94 Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization MTAC Meeting Presentation August 17, 2005.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 USPS RESTRICTED INFORMATION MTAC WORKGROUP #73 Soft Parcel Field Study.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation February 6, 2003.
MTAC Work Group #82 Parcel Delivery Performance Measurement Effectiveness.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
MTAC #107 Update November 1, 2006 Washington DC. MTAC #107 2 © 2006 Accenture. All rights reserved. Progress Goal  To provide key visibility points for.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Standard Mail Measurement July 30, 2007 Std Subgroup Meeting.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process TBD MTAC Workgroup 138.
1 DESIGN GUIDELINES for the Automation-Compatibility of FLAT-SIZE MAIL Joyce McGarvy & George Hurst Washington DC, February 6, 2003.
1 Operations’ Update Fall and Holiday Periods 2002 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee Meeting August 7, 2002.
BALLISTICS EVIDENCE NOTES ON PAGE 75. Warning Next slide is slightly disturbing.
1 FOOTER (10PT. ARIAL, BOLD, GREY, CAPS) TITLE OF PRESENTATION (24PT. ARIAL, BOLD, ALL UPPERCASE) Subtitle (20pt. Arial, Bold, Title Case) Western Area.
Business Mail Measurement MTAC Workgroup Issue 60 May 7-8, 2003.
PRESORT OPTIMIZATION WORK GROUP February 6, PRESORT OPTIMIZATION Issue #11 WORK GROUP LEADERS Joe LubenowMarc McCrery Industry USPS.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation May 8, 2003.
February 23, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #87 Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update.
Chapter 9: Hypothesis Tests for One Population Mean 9.2 Terms, Errors, and Hypotheses.
The Perfect Bundle Improving Bundle Preparation “A secure bundle with a fully visible address is a thing of beauty.” Presented by: (insert name here)
1 MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRESENTATION August 2, 2007 Presented By Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 November 1, 2006.
Catering Food Service Development
The 5th International Conference on Internet of Things 2015 Coex, Soeul, S. Korea Oct , 2015 Identification services through inteligent (SMART) item.
Best Practices Consortium
Manger, Processing Operations
Chief Operating Officer
The “Structall Difference”
Overview of Activity-Based Cost Systems for Management Control
Designing the Service.
Fact #1 As the article said the $32 million, 100,000-square- foot recycling center that opened last fall is accepting about five times more rubbish than.
Presentation transcript:

1 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP  The purpose of the workgroup centered on issues surrounding the machinability of items mailed in soft packaging.  It is important from an economic and efficiency perspective to limit the number of package templates in customer fulfillment operations.  Application of current machinability requirements during acceptance  Excess Selvage  The group’s first meeting was held after a tour of the Brylane fulfillment center on 9/25/02.  The group agreed that a tour of a USPS facility was the next step in the process

2 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP  The workgroup was afforded the opportunity to tour the Washington BMC on Monday, November 4,  The group viewed the incoming machinable parcel dock, the parcel sorting machines and the SSIU.  Observations seemed to indicate that the vast majority of these parcels were processed without incident, however, feedback from the BMC staff indicated that some characteristics of soft packaging could cause errors or damage.

3 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP Those Characteristics Are:  Irregularly shaped goods are difficult to apply bar-code labels.  Tree Nursery Products  Round  Bags not filled close to capacity (with inordinate amount of “selvage”) where some portion of the bag is less than ¼ of an inch may cause the package to get snagged or caught in the machinery.  Paper soft packaging is much more susceptible to damage than plastic.

4 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP Other Observations :  Separation of machinable from non-machinable parcels is very helpful during unloading since they are processed in different parts of the facility.  Induction belts on PSMs seemed slightly out of balance resulting in the larger parcels arriving slightly late on the parcel tray.  Irregularity reports are transmitted to the BSN on a daily basis for feedback to customer.  USPS informed the group that design changes to the SSIUs are planned to mitigate damage to parcels during processing.

5 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP Next Steps:  The group decided that because of the impending heavy holiday mailing season, the next meeting would be held in conjunction with the February MTAC meetings in Washington.  At that meeting, Group will develop test parcel deck requirements for testing.

6 PARCEL PROCESSING FIELD STUDY WORKGROUP Purpose of the Test:  Determine the characteristics of packages that fail to be processed as intended.  Determine what is considered “not close to capacity/ inordinate selvage.  % Selvage vs. Package Length  Total Selvage regardless of length  Identify the critical points in processing where packages are most likely to fail  Determine if modest modifications are possible or planned to significantly reduce failures/damage rate.