Critical Issues Process Assessment of SSAC Program Effectiveness Cynthia Kuck, Concordia University Chicago October 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interpreting & Applying the Standards October 4, 2006 Dr. Luis J. Pedraja, Vice President Middle States Commission on Higher Education.
Advertisements

2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Ensuring Quality Feedback Reports: The Tech Editing Process for 2014 Briefing for.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
…what Georgia schools should know, do, and understand.
Effective School Boards June 11, 2011 Sr. Kevina Keating, CCVI Superintendent Dr. George Laird Associate Superintendent Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston.
SPRC Structure The committee shall be composed of not fewer than five nor more than nine persons. One member shall be a young adult and one member may.
Campus Improvement Plans
Research Policy Practice National Dialogue: Phase III The Journey Ahead February 28, 2013.
+ Northgate High Was a great year! Northgate Focus On Learning made positive progress moving towards a Professional Community Of Teachers/Learners.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.
The Child Care Council of Onondaga County Board Effectiveness Project By Maxwell Consulting Team I James DeWan, Isaku Endo, Amy Fedigan, Elanit Rothschild,
1 KSA Section Representative Elections. 2 Overview KSA Structure 1 st Year Positions Timing Rules Results Q & A.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Quality Assurance Review Peoria Unified School District #11.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
Setting Priorities Terrell Yon
Capable leadership is vital for meeting the challenges faced by aged care provider organisations and for the continued sustainability of the industry.
Information Technology Audit
MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.
Board Retreat Discussion and Review Non Profit Board Retreat Review and Discussion April 5, :30 AM- 11:30 AM Diana A. Bing 4/5/2011.
K&C Leadership Seminar: Report Out on Initiatives and Business Plans Communications Strategies Team Members Robert Camp Lee Hawkins Elio Manes K.C. Toh.
 Explore Lead Teacher role  The “I” of IPARDC: Investigation › Research and strategies  Topics for November webinar.
HQS 2 School Leadership Glenna Heinlein and Kathy Hypes October 1, 2013.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
MN SW-PBIS Training Kevin Filter School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) 1.
LISTENING TEAM REPORT Comprehensive Review Presentation prepared by Jacob Black-Lock.
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
Strategic Improvement Planning A Continuous Improvement Model 1.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
You’ve Got What It Takes: Peer Training and Mentoring for Staff Development You’ve Got What It Takes: Peer Training and Mentoring for Staff Development.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
National Board of Directors Membership Survey Summary 2013.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013.
By Willis Norton EDLE Region 9 Head Start Program Serving: Bowie ISD Burkburnett ISD City View ISD, Electra ISD Gainesville ISD Nocona ISD Petrolia.
Chapter 11 The Project Team
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Key Stakeholder Interviews Assessing Effectiveness of Washington State Board of Education Communications with Key Stakeholders.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Based on work by R. Harrison, J. Scherer and R. Short
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Board-Superintendent Relations The School Governance Team.
218B Area and Division Governor Training Maintaining Strong Clubs.
Single-Board Leadership Structure
Developing Personal and Academic Excellence in the Catholic Tradition Developing Leaders Through the AdvancED Accreditation Process Rapid City Catholic.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
Data Driven Instructional Leadership Region 18 – Leadership Development.
Working Together to Help Our Schools What is CPC?.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
2009 Shelby County Schools District Accreditation Thompson High School.
Selecting, Reviewing, and Supporting the Administrator Governing Board Online Training Module.
Governance Review and Recommendation. Honoring Our Past In 1968, representatives from seven area Christian schools joined together to form the Grand Rapids.
KCTCS PRESIDENT’S LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE Theme: Engagement Engaged employees are those who are fully involved in, and enthusiastic about their.
Getting to the Root of the Problem Learn to Serve 501 Commons November 6, 2013 Bill Broesamle.
TM Rosemarie Day, President Sarah Matousek, Consultant.
November 26, 2004Governance Committee1 Objective:  Understand from Board Members the strengths and the weaknesses of the TWC Board.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
Strategic Budgeting Board Development Series | January 2015 Derrick R. Stair, CPA Director of Fiscal Performance and Accountability The Governor John Engler.
Preparing for a Capital Campaign
School – wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports
Presentation transcript:

Critical Issues Process Assessment of SSAC Program Effectiveness Cynthia Kuck, Concordia University Chicago October 2006

Recommendation 2: If the purpose of SSAC is to help a school in crisis (emergent problems or issues), then only those recommendations that are critical to a school’s survival should be noted. Recommendation 3: Diagnostic reports should focus tightly on the critical issues facing a school. Other less critical issues should be left to the NLSA process. Recommendation 9: Diagnostic reports for schools in crisis should be tightly focused on a limited number of issues that may or may not be related to each of the areas typically found in SSAC diagnostic reports …consideration should be given to a different report format.

Identify critical issues targets … not “shotgun approach” From SSAC Study … the most often cited “critical issues” … financial difficulties declining enrollment interpersonal conflicts in church and school unclear mission or vision ineffective (or no) strategic planning ineffective (or no) marketing plan unqualified and/or ineffective leadership declining church support for school

Critical Issues Process Requires changes in … pre-visit during the visit report writing Team D1 and D2 has tried this in four visits, modifying the process in each visit to be more effective. Other teams have tried different aspects of the CI process. Team D Model …

Pre-Visit Try to identify “critical issues” SSAC Narrative Critical Issues Survey (7-13) SSAC contact and “leaders” (application) address, phone 5 most important (or critical) issues return within 3-4 weeks of visit District Executive Survey (7-14) same “issues” rating, comments (7-15) return within 3-4 weeks of visit

Pre-Visit: Identifying CI School Board survey Teachers and staff survey get pre-visit input provides more discussion time during focus groups Online survey Scope of critical issues may dictate some schedule changes personal interviews focus groups Team consensus on “critical issues” send CI survey results to team prior to visit Saturday: identify 2 or 3 targets … less is more be flexible to change focus

Identifying Critical Issues School 4 Declining Enrollment Association Relationships Leadership and Governance School 3 Declining Enrollment Changing Demographics Leadership and Governance School 2 Declining Enrollment Finances Junior High School 1 Declining Enrollment Finances

During the Visit Personal interviews share “critical issues” for input how you determined “critical issues” stay on topic ask for other “issues” at end of discussion

During the Visit: Focus Groups Share “critical issues” for input how you determined “critical issues” give summary overview of each issue stay on topic ask for other “issues” at end of discussion

During the Visit: Focus Groups Gathering input one issue at a time vs. 2-3 issues put up all charts list some items in multiple charts be flexible to change focus Ask leading question for input … Declining Enrollment: What factors contribute to declining enrollment? Finances: What is causing some financial stress or tension? Consensus (group) vote on concerns … not critical issue

Writing the SSAC Report Less is more … quality vs quantity Team members write per “critical issue” may have overlap of relationships, governance, or programs and personnel focused writing

Writing the SSAC Report Monday evening work on one set of charts (critical issue) at a time team consensus on concerns … limit to 3-4 per CI determine who is most comfortable writing the respective CI concerns and recommendations If there are 3 critical issues … each team member writes on one CI group consensus on commendations If there are 2 critical issues … two team members write on the critical issues team member #3 writes commendations and serves as “editor”

Writing the SSAC Report Declining Enrollment No marketing or recruitment plan Poor preschool to kindergarten transition Limited remedial or enrichment programs Association Relationships No shared vision for the school Church ownership and control … who’s in charge? Poor communication between church and school Church and school staff visibility Leadership and Governance Unclear roles and relationships Decision-making and grievance procedures Poor inter-staff and board communication

Writing the SSAC Report Report format: one section for commendations one section for each critical issue + overview paragraphs state case for CI Report summary: major commendations list each critical issue + summary paragraph (condensed overview)

Critical Issues Process Summary Helps keep critical issues focus for school Gives manageable number of recommendations … not too overwhelming More beneficial to school improvement