I. Boutillon – November 2012 - CEIPI1 Course on the International Patent Filing System: The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) -- November 2012 -- By: Isabelle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
Advertisements

1 Practical Impact of Recent PCT Changes on US Practice Maria Eliseeva Houston Eliseeva LLP American Intellectual Property Law Association October 15,
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects STCU/NATO Workshop From Science to Business Kiev, Ukraine October 11, 2006 Judson R. Hightower.
WIPO Recentdv03-1 Changes to the PCT Regulations which came into effect on 1 January 2004.
Key Decision Points in the PCT System
PCT Supplementary International Search Service (PCT Rule 45bis applicable from January 1, 2009)
Changes to the PCT Regulations which came into effect on 1 April 2005 The Smart Patenting Solution.
Changes to the PCT Regulations which entered into force on 1 April 2006 The Smart Patenting Solution.
Changes to the PCT Regulations that entered into force on 1 April 2007 The Smart Patenting Solution.
Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 January 2009 New publication languages Supplementary international search.
THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) Practical Considerations in Managing PCT Applications Geneva, November 26, 2008.
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
The International Patent System Amendments to the PCT Regulations as from 1 July 2014.
VIEWS ON THE NEW INTERNATIONAL PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PATENTABILITY PROCEDURE (“MERGER OF PCT CHAPTERS I AND II”): ADVANTAGES, PROBLEMS AND FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Building a Competitive Edge: Protecting Inventions by Utility Models and / or Patents : Case Studies By P. Kandiah KASS International Sdn.Bhd. KASS.
Introduction to the Patent Cooperation Treaty
Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Amendment & Response Practice
Patents: The PCT at the center of the International Patent System --- South Africa --- February (1 of 60) Patents: The Patent Cooperation Treaty.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Second Session Tokyo, February 4 to 6, 2015.
Canada OPICCIPO Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada Un organisme d’industrie Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office An Agency of Industry.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
Practical tips and Strategies for US applicants before EPO
1 PATENT FILING NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL at Pharmexcil, Ahmedabad 26 th July, 2012 by Andreya Fernandes Gopakumar Nair Associates.
WELCOME TO ALL PARTICIPANTS BY A.T.PATRE. ASSTT. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & DESIGNS PATENT OFFICE, MUMBAI.
PCT Search & Publication. PCT Timetable Months from Earliest Priority DateDeadline/Action 16 th MonthInternational Searching Authority (ISA) Prepares.
PCT- Short Flow Chart Priority PCT Application Filed Restoration of Priority Deadline Search by ISA Int’l Publication + ISR Deadline to File Demand for.
Dr. Michael Berger, European Patent Attorney © Michael Berger Intellectual Property (IP): Patents for Inventions.
PATENT FILLING PROCESS CASES NATIONAL PCT Prepared by: Prof. Anil K. Gupta, Joshi, A. and Chandak V. S
Patent Cooperation Treaty and Application Conference September 24, 2012 Neal L. Slifkin 99 Garnsey Road Pittsford, NY (585)
Patent Protection in Europe
Patents- Practical Aspects of International Patent Procurement/Prosecution June 2015 Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Practice Overview.
Protecting your knowledge and creativity, the basis of your success. Patents in European Union national, European, unitary Presentation for.
Nice TE. FICPI/AIPLA COLLOQUIUM ON REFORM OF THE PCT (NICE, 8-9 APRIL 2003) “PROBLEMS AND ADVANTAGES THE PCT HAS FOR OFFICES”
Highlights of the PCT Reform December User demand (= Patent Office workload) PCT filings.
Corrections/Amendments and Priority/Benefit Claims in International and National Stage Applications
21th August, 2004MarkPatent.Org1 Patent at International Level By Dr. Rajeshkumar Acharya.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Canada OPICCIPO Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada Un organisme d’industrie Canada Canadian Intellectual Property Office An Agency of Industry.
AIPLA/FICPI Colloquium on Reform of the PCT Hotel Radisson SAS, Nice April 8-9, 2003 OVERVIEW OF RECENT CHANGES Claus Matthes Head, PCT Reform Section,
PatentScope - Electronic Publication World Intellectual Property Organization.
2007/11/181 PCT in 2007 Takao Ochi Member of Patent Committee November 18, 2007 APAA PATENT COMMITTEE ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA I PCT Reform II WIPO Assembly.
PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 PCT Reform - FICPI views Jan Modin Chair, FICPI CET Group 3 Colloquium on PCT –Nice, 9 April.
PCT PATENT COOPERATION TREATY By: Nico Reyes & Keziah Tan.
The International Patent System Overview of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Thursday February 11, 2016 Mr. Quan-Ling SIM Head, PCT Outreach and User.
BUSINESS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGISTRATION IN GHANA BY MRS. SARAH NORKOR ANKU, STATE ATTORNEY REGISTRAR-GENRAL’S DEPARTMENT 27/1/2016.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
February 2016Patent Procedures Management PCT Direct Cost effective strategy for global patenting.
Niclas Morey, Director International Co-operation PCT developments at the EPO Partnership for Quality, Washington D.C.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
INTRODUCTION: The Berne Convention
PCT-FILING SYSTEM.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
The Smart Patenting Solution
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Best practices in the national phase Session 3
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
PPH at the Israel Patent Office
Course on the International Patent Filing System:
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fifth Session Madrid February 21 to 23, 2018.
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Fourth Session Reykjavík February 8 to 10, 2017.
Supplementary International Search (SIS) (PCT Rule 45bis)
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Third Session Santiago January 20 to 22, 2016.
Article 34 Paperwork (Response to WO)
PCT Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-Sixth Session Cairo February 13 and 14, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI1 Course on the International Patent Filing System: The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) -- November By: Isabelle BOUTILLON Adjunct Professor, CEIPI Joint Degree Master Programme in Intellectual Property Law SS. Cyril and Methodius University Iustinianus Primus Law Faculty and University of Strasbourg (UdS) Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI)

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI2 Document established partly on the basis of articles published by the author in « JurisClasseur, LexisNexis, France » and partly on the basis of documentation published by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI3 Table of contents I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI4 I.- Introduction: about the « PCT » The « PCT » is an international multilateral treaty The « PCT » as a treaty is the foundation for the « PCT system »

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI5 I.- Introduction: the PCT system … is a patent FILING system simplifying and streamlining the patent procedure for obtaining patent protection in multiple countries for applicants worldwide is NOT a patent GRANTING system there are no « PCT patents » or « international patents » is THE ONLY INTERNATIONAL patent filing system existing today [PCT Preamble]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI6 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI7 II.- A few important dates Conclusion of the Treaty: June 1970 Entry into force: January 1978 Start of operations: June 1, Contracting States same day as the European Patent Convention (EPC) Today: 146 Contracting States More than 100 offices and International Authorities ~180,000 new PCT applications filed per year worldwide

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI8 The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (MK) is a PCT Contracting State since August 10, 1995 is a European Patent Convention (EPC) Contracting State since January 1, 2009 is therefore accessible in a PCT application filed by any PCT applicant worldwide either for a national MK patent or a EP patent designating MK

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI9 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI10 III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework International TREATY in the field of patents "Special agreement " under Article 19 of the Paris Convention Administered by WIPO The PCT Contracting States constitute a UNION "International Patent Cooperation Union" The ASSEMBLY of the Union consists of the Contracting States [PCT Art. 1] [PCT Art. 53]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI11 About … Treaty, Cooperation and Patents Treaty Contracting States - which must be countries party to Paris Convention Cooperation between - national / régional offices - International Authorities - International Bureau of WIPO Patents - field of patents (protection of inventions) - « patentability » ? [PCT Art. 1] [PCT Art. 1, 2]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI12 Existing national / regional Offices which act also under the PCT as: receiving Offices (RO) International Searching Authorities (ISA) International Preliminary Examining Authorities (IPEA) designated Offices (DO) International Bureau of WIPO (IB) PCT Offices and International Authorities [PCT Art. 2, 10, 16, 22, 32] [PCT Art. 55]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI13 receiving Office International Searching Authority International Preliminary Examining Authority designated Office elected Office Role of offices and authorities in the PCT procedure PCT system administration in general international publication access to the files competent as any national / regional receiving Office, - but in all cases - and also as a safeguard RO ISA IPEA DO/EO filing International search and (unilateral) examination examination (with possible intervention by applicant) national phase IB RO/IB International Bureau of WIPO International Bureau acting as « universal » and « safeguard » receiving Office

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI14 The PCT, part of the « Patent space » « Patent space » consist of: more than 10 instruments - international, such as Paris Convention, PCT, etc. - regional, such as EPC - bilateral - technical multiples national / regional legislations [PCT Art. 27] [PCT Art. 1, 44, 45]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI15 EPC EAPC OAPI ARIPO CH - LI TREATY TRIPS Agreement PLT Bilateral Agreements with EPO Budapest Treaty Strasbourg Arrangement National laws PCT Paris Convention « Patents Space »

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI16 The PCT Texts 8 main types of text articulated in 5 hierarchical levels Main legal texts expressly provided for by the Treaty: Regulations, Gazette, Agreements, Administrative Instructions, Fees Guidelines Other essential texts (legal and/or technical) developed within the framework of the main texts, to assist: offices, authorities and applicants, patent agents, attorneys [PCT Art. 58, 55, 16, 32, 58.4; Reg R. 15, 16, 57]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI17 The PCT Texts structure Regulations AgreementsGazette Guidelines on fees Administrative Instructions Guidelines for international search and examination Guidelines for receiving Offices PCT Applicant’s Guide PCT Newsletter PCT Treaty

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI18 The main two PCT Texts The Treaty concluded in June 1970 modified in September 1979, February 1984 and October 2001 Current version is in force since October 3, 2001 Regulations adopted in June 1970 modified 34 times since Current version is in force since July 1, 2012 Next version will be in force as from January 1, 2013

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI19 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI20 [months] First filing of the patent application at the national or regional stage * Subsequent filings of national or regional * applications claiming the priority of the first filing In the framework of regional arrangements (ARIPO, EAPC, EPC, OAPI) * * National or regional * granting procedures of various length, complexity and cost * 012 IV.- General overview of the procedure: … recalling the traditional patent system under the Paris Convention

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI21 [months] National phases before designated offices International phase PCT Filing with priority claim First national or regional filing The PCT system

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI22 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI23 National phases (months) priority st step --- PCT filing 2nd step --- international search and examination (unilateral) 3rd step --- international publication 5th step - optional step international preliminary examination (continuation of examination with possible intervention by applicant) V.- Procedure step-by-step: the international phase in 5 steps th step - optional step international supplementary search Chapters I and II of Treaty Chapter I of Treaty

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI24 Only TWO critical events: at 12 months : file a PCT application ? at 30 months : national phases ? And if so, where ? Exceptionally: at 18 months : international publication ? at 19 months : international supplementary search ? at 22 months : request for international preliminary examination (under PCT Chapter II) ? Main time limits to monitor

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI25 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI26 V.-A- Filing of the international application The applicant natural person legal entity Where to file: the receiving Office national Office regional Office International Bureau acting as receiving office [PCT Art. 9; Reg R. 18; Art ] [PCT Art. 10; Reg R. 19]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI27 The applicant is the national of a PCT Contracting State or has his residence in a PCT Contracting State The application is filed with a competent receiving Office The application (i.e., description, claims) is filed in an accepted language The application contains the minimum elements : indication « PCT » the designation of at least one PCT State name of applicant description at least one claim Requirements for an international filing date [PCT Art. 11.1]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI28 Designations of PCT Contracting States Global and automatic filing of request = all designations available on the date of filing Choice of types of protection : at national phase stage national / regional patent patent / other title No designation fee required [PCT Art. 4; Reg R. 4.9, 49bis] [PCT Art. 4.2; Reg R. 15] [PCT Art. 4, 11.1(iii)(b); Reg R. 4.9]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI29 Still about the filing Important elements not required upon filing of the application, which can be submitted subsequently : fees translation signature, power of attorney abstract National security requirements to be complied with by applicant before filing at the International Bureau (as universal and safeguard office for all applicants) or at the European Patent Office (as regional office) [PCT Art. 14] [PCT Reg R. 19.1, 19.4]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI30 Effects of the international application International filing = regular national filing International filing date = effective filing date in each designated State = starting point of the international phase = potential priority date (Paris Convention) [PCT Art. 11.4, Paris Conv.] [PCT Art. 11.3, 11.4]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI31 [months] International phase National phases before designated Offices International phase PCT = filing under priority PCT = first filing or filing outside of priority period First national or regional filing PCT filing with priority claim or without [PCT Art. 8; Reg R.4.10]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI32 « Priority date » Priority date is: [if one priority claimed] = the filing date of the application whose priority is claimed [if more than one priority is claimed] = filing date of the earliest application whose priority is claimed [if no priority is claimed] = PCT filing date Used for the calculation of important time limits [PCT Art. 2(xi)]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI33 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI34 Entry into national phases Written opinion International Search Report Supplementary International Search Report 28 International Preliminary Report on Patentability IPRP International publication PCT Filing Priority V.-B- Search and examination: an overall view

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI35 International Searching Authorities (ISA) International Preliminary Examining Authorities (IPEA) International agreements between each ISA/IPEA and the International Bureau PCT Search and Examination Guidelines General framework for search and examination [PCT Art. 16, 32]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI36 18 ISAs/IPEAs appointed by PCT Union Assembly of which 15 are in operation National Offices of the following 13 PCT States: AT Austria, AU Australia, BR Brazil, CA Canada, CN China, ES Spain, FI Finland, IL Israel, JP Japan, KR Republic of Korea, RU Russian Federation, SE Sweden and US and the following 2 Offices: EPO and Nordic Institute [The national Offices of EG Egypt, IN India and CL Chile have not yet announced when they will be operational] Each receiving Office specifies the Authority or Authorities it wishes to make available to its applicants If several Authorities are competent for a given application, the applicant chooses International Authorities (ISAs/IPEAs) available [PCT Art. 16, 32; Reg R. 35, 59]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI International Search Report (ISR) modifications of the claims 2 months 18 Written opinion by ISA International search and written opinion by International Searching Authority (ISA)

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI38 Purpose of search relevant state of the art relevant date (PCT filing date) Documentation to be used by ISA minimum PCT documentation other documentation held by ISA International Search Report (ISR) citations of relevant documents indication according to the International Patent Classification (IPC) fields on which the search was carried out International search [PCT Art. 15; Reg R. 33] [PCT Art. 18; Reg R. 43] [PCT Reg R. 34]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI39 Characteristics preliminary, non binding novelty ? inventive step ? industrial application ? First step of the examination procedure obligatory and unilateral on the basis of the PCT application as filed Relevant date = priority date Written Opinion by the ISA [PCT Art. 34; Reg R. 43bis] [PCT Reg R. 43bis]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI40 Amend the claims ? Request international preliminary examination (under Chapter II of the Treaty) ? If preliminary examination is not requested, conversion of the written opinion into the International Preliminary Report on Patentability under Chapter I of the Treaty (« IPRP Ch. I ») Applicant’s reply, reaction, next step [PCT Art. 19; Reg R. 46] [PCT Art. 31] [PCT Reg R. 44bis]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI41 (months) 30 Written opinion by ISA International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP ch.I) 1618 Preliminary examination requested ? 22 no If international preliminary examination is not requested

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI42 30 International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP ch.II) Demand for international preliminary examination 28 (2 nd ) Written opinion by IPEA (1 rst ) Written opinion by IPEA Amendments or arguments (in response to written opinion by ISA) Amendments or arguments (in response to (2 nd ) written opinion by IPEA) [preferably with] Preliminary examination requested ? 22 yes Written opinion by ISA If international preliminary examination is requested

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI43 Purpose of examination preliminary non binding opinion novelty ? inventive step ? industrial application ? Examination procedure not mandatory (upon express request from applicant) not unilateral (applicant’s intervention expected) on the basis of application as filed / modified and /or with arguments Relevant date = priority date International preliminary examination [PCT Art. 31, 33] [PCT Art. 31; Reg R. 53, 54] [PCT Reg R. 64]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI44 Amend the application (description, claims, drawings) Present arguments Ask for an interview with examiner Do not reply Wait for IPRP Ch. II to decide whether to enter into national phase and how Applicant’s reply, reaction, next step [PCT Art. 34; Reg R. 66]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI45 At the end of the international phase « IPRP Ch. I » or « IPRP Ch. II » = closing of the PCT search and examination procedure there are no appeals possible during the international phase IPRP = basis for the national examination even if it does not bind the designated Offices [PCT Art. 35; Reg R. 44bis]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI46 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI47 Time limit : shortly after the expiration of 18 months from the priority date Contents international application per se and the « Gazette » (now referred to as « Official Notifications ») Language(s) of publication Effects of publication state of the art provisional protection V.-C- Publication [PCT Art. 21; Reg R. 48] [PCT Art. 55.4); Reg R. 48, 86] [PCT Reg R. 48] [PCT Art. 21, 29; Reg R. 33, 34]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI48 Electronic form of publication Communication to designated Offices Prevent publication ? Postpone publication ? Advance publication ? Cases where there will be no publication A few other questions relating to international publication [PCT Reg R. 48] [PCT Art. 20; Reg R. 47] [PCT Reg R. 90bis.1] [PCT Reg R. 90bis.3] [PCT Art. 21.2; Reg R. 48] [PCT A. 11, 14, 24, 64; Reg R. 29, 90bis]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI49 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI50 Applicant’s decision initiative where (designated office(s)) how General time limit : 30 months from priority date 31 or more reinstatement of rights Early entry V.-D- Entry into national phase [PCT Art. 22, 39; Reg R. 49, 76] [PCT Art. 22, 23, 39, 40] [PCT Reg R. 49.6] [PCT Art. 23, 40]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI51 Granted patents No national phase Rejection or abandonment National phase National phases International phase

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI52 Applicant must do the following: make an express request for entry into national phase file a translation of the application pay the national fees The International Bureau transmits to each designated Office, copies of the following documents on behalf of the applicant: PCT application as published priority document International Search Report International Preliminary Report on Patentability Acts which constitute entry into national phase [PCT Art. 22, 39] [PCT Art. 20; Reg R. 17.2, 70]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI53 Furnishing of proofs of allegations / declarations names, indications, documents Requirement for mandatory representation appointment of a local agent or attorney Substantive conditions of patentability definition of prior art evidence National requirements remaining to be complied with upon entry into national phase [PCT Art. 27.2, 27.3, 27.4; Reg R.51bis] [PCT Art. 27.7] [PCT Art. 27.5, 27.6]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI54 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI55 Who has access the applicant any person authorized by the applicant third parties To which documents contained in the file of the international application At which Office or Authority International Bureau designated / elected Offices others ? As of when V.-E- Access to the file of the international application [PCT Art. 30, 38; Reg R. 17.2, 94]

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI56 [months] As from 30 months, ACCESS to certain items relating to examination: ISA written opinion, IPRP (Ch.I or Ch.II) As from international publication, ACCESS to all items in the file other than those relating to examination (Ch. I or Ch. II) Before international publication: NO ACCESS 30 National phases: ACCESS according to national law IB DO EO Access to the file of the international application by third parties

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI57 I.- Introduction II.- A few important dates III.- The PCT: a treaty, a system and a framework IV.- General overview of the procedure V.- Procedure step by step V.-A- Filing V.-B- Search and examination V.-C- Publication V.-D- Entry into national phase V.-E- Access to the file VI.- Conclusion

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI58 VI.- Conclusion (1) From the viewpoint of the main beneficiaries of the system: the applicant and his agent advantages single procedure great flexibility predictability of the international phase main steps and main time limits guarantees minimum requirements last minute filing reasonable time limits numerous safeguards

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI59 VI.- Conclusion (2) From the viewpoint of the institutional beneficiaries of the system: the Contracting States, their offices and authorities predictability of the international phase main steps and main time limits sharing of work = reduction of unnecessary duplication in the national phase assistance for technical cooperation

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI60 VI.- Conclusion (3) The only existing international patent filing system Clear and simple principles Simple to use with numerous safeguards for applicants More complex mechanic if various options are used Major articulation in the international patent system including many treaties and conventions

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI61 VI.- Conclusion (4) Constant evolution requiring involvement of Contracting States IP offices WIPO all users (applicants, agents, other users) Potential for yet future developments

I. Boutillon – November CEIPI62 The end.