1 DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Background, Requirements, and Overview DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Background, Requirements, and Overview Steve.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Minnesota Port and Waterway Security Working Group Meeting April 12, 2012.
Advertisements

Department of Homeland Security Site Assistance Visit (SAV)
Lisanne Sison Director ERM Bickmore
S3-1 © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University OCTAVE SM Process 3 Identify Staff Knowledge Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh,
Overview of Developments: Environmental Protection Agency’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Bonnie Gitlin, Acting Director, Radiation Protection.
Science & Technology Directorate Chemical Security Analysis Center George R. Famini, PhD Director Chemical Security Analysis Center.
Christa-Marie Singleton, MD, MPH Associate Director for Science
EDS Public Information Tabletop Exercise
Fiscal Year 2008 Urban Areas Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events Detlof von Winterfeldt Professor of Public Policy and Management Director, Center for Risk and Economic.
Leslie W Kennedy Director RUTGERS Newark. Sponsored by the Rutgers School of Criminal Justice, Center for Global Change and Governance, College of Nursing.
By: Ashwin Vignesh Madhu
1 What do we call Ourselves? Hazards Risk Managers of Course Greg Shaw GWU ICDRM The George Washington University Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk.
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
The National Climate Assessment: Overview Glynis C. Lough, Ph.D. National Climate Assessment US Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office.
Visual 3. 1 Lesson 3 Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Incident Response Mechanism for Chemical Facilities By Stephen Fortier and Greg Shaw George Washington University, Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk.
Maritime Security Risk Analysis Model
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT Decision Maker Workshop.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Chemicals of Interest Anti-terrorism Standard.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Lecture 32 Risk Management (Cont’d)
1 Committee on Methodological Improvement to the Department of Homeland Security’s 2006 Bioterrorism Risk Assessment 10 February 2007 Committee on Methodological.
Engineering Risk Assessments and Risk Communication Sarah Arulanandam, Hazard and Risk Group RWDI West Inc. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES:
EDS Incident Command System Tabletop Exercise [Exercise Location] [Exercise Date] [Insert Logo Here]
BSAF-BIONET Meeting Robert J. Hashimoto, CBSP University of California, Berkeley October 2, 2009.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Thomas S. Tenforde NCRP President 67 th Meeting of the NEA Committee on Radiation Protection and Public Health Paris, France May 12-14, 2009 Overview of.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon.” Napoleon Bonaparte.
The Threat of Agroterrorism Emily Baker CHSC. Importance of US Ag Sector “U.S. agriculture generates more than $1 trillion per year in economic activity.
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
1 California Public Health Preparedness: Lessons from Seven Jurisdictions R. Burciaga Valdez, PhD June 8, 2004.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Benoît ESNAULT Commission de Régulation de l’Energie 17th Madrid Forum Madrid, 15 January year network development plan ERGEG recommendations.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center Bernard C.
hydroAMP asset management framework
CC3020N Fundamentals of Security Management CC3020N Fundamentals of Security Management Lecture 2 Risk Identification and Risk Assessment.
Summary of Current and Planned Reports and Conferences of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Thomas S. Tenforde President Interagency.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D Slide 1 How DHS Currently Manages Risk Alyson Wilson, Ph.D. Statistical.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
Protective Action Guides for Radiological/Nuclear Incidents November 1, 2005 Craig Conklin Department of Homeland Security.
Security+ Guide to Network Security Fundamentals, Third Edition Chapter 9 Performing Vulnerability Assessments.
CHEVRON PIPE LINE COMPANY Risk Based Prioritization Process.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
The Integrated National Biodefense Portfolio Initiative “One-Portfolio” Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum (CBDAIF) May 6, 2009.
Infrastructure Protection
ST GABRIEL’S PREPAREDNESS INITIATIVE Planning Process Meeting 16 Jan 2013.
Engineering | Architecture | Design-Build | Surveying | Planning | GeoSpatial Solutions November 16, 2015 THE AWWA J100 - WHAT IT IS, WHY IT IS BEING UPDATED,
1 Traci Hale, Battelle Memorial Institute Committee on Methodological Improvement to the Department of Homeland Security’s 2006 Bioterrorism Risk Assessment.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Fiscal Year 2007 Urban Area Security Initiative Nonprofit Security Grant Program Investment Justification Questions, Criteria, and Prioritization Methodology.
Risk Assessment What is good about the Microsoft approach to threat modeling? What is bad about it? OCTAVE…  Advantage: ___________  Disadvantage: ___________.
Community for Risk Management & Assessment Kick-off January 20 th Brussels N. van Os Veiligheids Regio Zuid-Holland Zuid (Safety Region South-Holland South)
Risk Assessment What is good about the Microsoft approach to threat modeling? OCTAVE…  Advantage: ___________  Disadvantage: ___________ What is bad.
Subway Chemical Detection: A Proposed System Process for a Detect-to-Warn Capability to Save Lives CAPT Joselito Ignacio, MA, MPH, CIH, CSP, REHS Acting.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
HSPD-7 Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization and Protection: designates EPA as the sector-specific lead agency for critical water infrastructure.
1 Presented by David Thompson, TIA December 14, 2005 NFPA 1600 and Emergency Communications.
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
Community Health Centers of Arkansas Hazard Vulnerability Assessment Workshop August 11, 2017 Mark Fuller.
Security SIG in MTS 05th November 2013 DEG/MTS RISK-BASED SECURITY TESTING Fraunhofer FOKUS.
Figure 3: TSN Analysis Methodology
Strategic Planning Process
Strategic Planning Process
Eric Baran, WIRAB Staff April 30, 2018
Effective Risk Management in Decision Making Process
Presentation transcript:

1 DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Background, Requirements, and Overview DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Background, Requirements, and Overview Steve Bennett, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Program Manager Department of Homeland Security Committee on Methodological Improvement to the Department of Homeland Security’s 2006 Bioterrorism Risk Assessment 28 August 2006 Steve Bennett, Ph.D. Risk Assessment Program Manager Department of Homeland Security Committee on Methodological Improvement to the Department of Homeland Security’s 2006 Bioterrorism Risk Assessment 28 August 2006

2 A Brief History of DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment  Spring 2003: DHS (and NBACC) stand up  Fall 2003: Requirement for a “Biological ‘Threat’ Assessment” provided to the Biological Assessment Support Center (BASC) within NBACC.  November 2003 – March 2004: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) approach kicked off to produce the required ‘threat assessment’  2 large subject matter expert (SME) workshops (~ 200 SMEs)  4 taxonomically-divided workshops (~50 SMEs each)  Extensive biological threat agent data collected  Extensive lists of biological agent experts for a number of biological threat agents generated and stored.  April 2004: HSPD-10, Biodefense for the 21 st Century published

3 A Brief History of DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment (cont.)  Based on HSPD-10, a new process was initiated

4 Bioterrorism Risk Assessments are an Integral Part of the DHS Biodefense Mission “…We need to adopt a risk-based approach in both our operations and our philosophy. Risk management is fundamental to managing the threat… The most effective way to apply risk-based approach is by using the trio of threat, vulnerability and consequence as a general model for assessing risk and deciding on protective measures we undertake.” - Michael Chertoff, Secretary, DHS “…the United States requires a continuous, formal process for conducting…assessments to guide prioritization of…investments in biodefense-related research, development, planning, and preparedness.” - Biodefense for the 21 st Century

5

6 Bioterrorism Risk Assessments Must Include Both Likelihood and Consequence Components Likelihood is defined as the probability that an adversary acquires, produces, and disseminates a biological weapon Consequence is defined as the expected public health impact of a biological attack

7 Current Bioterrorism Risk Assessments Must Build Upon Previous Assessments  United States CDC’s Public Health Assessment of Potential Biological Terrorism Agents – based largely on public health consequence  United States Army Medical Risk Assessment of the Biological Threat – focused on force health protection and included only medical/public health criteria Bioterrorism risk assessments must be ‘end-to-end,’ integrating likelihood and consequences of bioterrorism events

8 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Bioterrorism Risk Assessments Must Incorporate a Wide Range of Inputs and Accommodate Significant Uncertainty

9 Overview of the 2006 DHS Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Approach Agent Production Scenario Consequences Mitigation Selection Probability Agent Mass Bioagent Dissemination Efficiency Event Detection Initiation Frequency RISK Selection Probability Selection Probability Scenario Probability Agent Release Modeling Agent Risk Ranking Event Tree Quantification AGENT RELEASE Target Threat Group Mitigation Response Dispersion Disease Spread

The DHS Integrated Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Is Anchored by a PRA-based Approach  Ability to adjust parameters to address different questions  Ability to query system at consequence level of interest

11 The Risk Analysis Produces a Family of Risk Curves That Can Be Summarized in a Number of Ways

12 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The Risk Assessment Generates Three Primary Products

13 Biological Threat Agents Can Be Evaluated by Comparing Relative Risk

14 Overview and Structure of the Committee Meeting Presentations Agent Production Scenario Consequences Mitigation Selection Probability Agent Mass Bioagent Dissemination Efficiency Event Detection Initiation Frequency RISK Selection Probability Selection Probability Scenario Probability Agent Release Modeling Agent Risk Ranking Event Tree Quantification AGENT RELEASE Target Threat Group Mitigation Response Dispersion Disease Spread

15 The National Academies Will Play an Important Role in the Bioterrorism Risk Assessment Program  DHS is committed to a transparent process that provides for iterative update and improvement to its risk assessment approaches.  NAS/NRC review of the risk assessment is important to ensure a quality product and provide critical recommendations for future assessments.  NAS/NRC review and evaluation of the 2006 assessment:  Near-term comments and recommendations needed in time to impact the 2008 assessment.  Longer-term review will impact the program as a whole as well as specific assessments starting in 2010 and beyond.

16