Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERSPECTIVE ON APPLICATION OF A PAIR OF PLANNING AND MICRO SIMULATION MODELS: EXPERIENCE FROM I-405 CORRIDOR STUDY PROGRAM Murli K. Adury Youssef Dehghani.
Advertisements

NICHOLS SCHOOL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS STUDY. Existing Operations Examined Data Collection  On-site Count Collection of Representative Traffic Conditions.
Case Study 2 New York State Route 146 Corridor. This case study is about a Traffic Impact Assessment for a proposed site development in Clifton Park,
How Do Traffic Control Measures Affect Vehicle Gas Emissions Presented by: Ryan O’Connell Co-Authors: Kevin Lu Dr. Wen Cheng Dr. Xudong Jia.
Byron Becnel LA DOTD June 16, Microscopic simulation models simulate the movement of individual vehicles on roads It is used to assess the traffic.
Using Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models to Represent Day-to-day Variability Dirck Van Vliet 20 th International EMME Users’ Conference Montreal October.
Introduction to VISSIM
Optimized Signal Timing Plans vs. InSync ® Adaptive Traffic Signals The Results of a New Microsimulation Study by Aleksandar Stevanovic, Ph.D, PE RhythmTraffic.com.
Miroslav Vujic University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 10 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN 8.2. Public Transport Priority and Traveler.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. October 11,2007 Application of Dynameq in Montréal: bridging the gap between regional models and microsimulation Application.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
Route 28 South of I-66 Corridor Safety and Operations Study Technical Committee Meeting #2 June 25,
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Traffic Signal Warrants
Lec 24: Ch1.(T&LD): Urban transportation planning vs. Site planning Review the transportation-land use cycle (Read examples in Ch.1 & compare the development.
15 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, New Jersey Joyoung Lee, New Jersey Institute of Technology Byungkyu Brian Park, University.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic Programming Optimal Adaptive Signal Control for Diamond Interchanges Using Dynamic.
Automatic loading of inputs for Real Time Evacuation Scenario Simulations: evaluation using mesoscopic models Josep M. Aymamí 15th TRB National Transportation.
Microsimulation for Rural and Exurban Regions: Lake County, California David Gerstle (presenting) & Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation.
A Calibration Procedure for Microscopic Traffic Simulation Lianyu Chu, University of California, Irvine Henry Liu, Utah State University Jun-Seok Oh, Western.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Operations Webinar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. June 28, 2006.
Evaluating InSync Performance in Microsimulation Aleksandar Stevanovic, PhD, PE Florida Atlantic University Transpo 2012 Bonita Springs, FL October 29,
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Aaron B Wilson, EIT WesTech Engineering, Inc., SLC, UT Mitsuru Saito, PhD, PE Brigham Young University, Provo, UT ITE Western District Annual Meeting Santa.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
From EMME to DYNAMEQ in the city of MALMÖ. THE COMPANY Founded in early 2011 Currently located in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö Small company (currently.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
+ Creating an Operations-Based Travel Forecast Tool for Small Oregon Communities TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 20, 2009.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION: A Coordinated Effort Tom Dancey, P.E. Signal System Engineer City of Springfield CITY OF SPRINGFIELD & MISSOURI DEPARTMENT.
Interpreting Demand and Capacity for Street and Highway Design Lecture 6 CE 5720 Norman Garrick Norman W. Garrick.
2010 Fall Transportation Conference A Guideline for Choosing Cycle Length to Maximize Two-Way Progression in Downtown Area Saeedeh Farivar Zong Tian University.
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
Measuring Travel Time Reliability of Transportation Systems Abstract When traveling people want to be on time and avoid any traveling delays. We worked.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. City of Montreal TRB Technical Conference May 9, 2007 A Multi-resolution Modelling Framework in the Montréal Area A Multi-resolution.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Stochastic Optimization Method for Coordinated Actuated Traffic Control May 16, 2008 Joyoung Lee and Byungkyu “Brian” Park, Ph.D Presented at VISSIM UGM.
 Links the optimized settings to VISSIM, the operational analysis results is: Synchronization of Intersections This study employs the core logic of MAXBAND.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Portland State University 11 By Maisha Mahmud Li Huan Evaluation Of SCATS Adaptive Traffic Signal Control System.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Roundabout Feasibility: Analysis Framework and Design Considerations Presented By: Jason D. Pack, P.E. Fred Choa, P.E.
Introduction Study area Existing problem Objective Methodology Results and Conclusions Recommendations.
SHRP2 Project C05: Final Report to TCC Understanding the Contribution of Operations, Technology, and Design to Meeting Highway Capacity Needs Wayne Kittelson.
September 15, 2011 Presented by: Clay Harris, PMP - City of Austin Federico Mendoza, PE, PTOE – Brown & Gay Engineers, Inc. Todd Lane Alternative Geometric.
Rainier Avenue South Pilot Project Update Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board Project Manager Jim Curtin September 2, 2015.
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Presented by NTOC Webcast Gary Piotrowicz, PE, PTOE OAKLAND COUNTY SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION PROJECT.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Pedestrian Crossing Speed Model Using Multiple Regression Analysis.
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Pedestrian-vehicle Conflict Analysis
Traffic System Management for “Tulkarem”
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Applied Technology and Traffic Analysis Program(ATTAP) MIDCAP & MUID
Tasnim Rabee’ Nagham Dmaidi
Maryland Unconventional Intersection Design Analysis Tool
Traffic Impact of Pedestrianisation in Stellenbosch
Michael Mahut, Michael Florian and Nicolas Tremblay INRO
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Robustness of Signal Timings for Conditions of Varying Traffic Flows 2013 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium – August 16, 2013 – 9:30AM – 12:00PM Cameron Kergaye, PhD, PE, PMP Director of Research Utah Department of Transportation

Traffic Signal Optimization  Should signal timings be optimized for high- than-average traffic counts?  How should signal timing optimization accommodate multiple counts?

Summary  Signal timing plans perform best based on average traffic flows  mean, mode, and median  when exposed to day-to-day traffic flow variability  Optimizing signal timings for higher traffic demand is better than for lower traffic demand  Should be used only when sufficient traffic data are unavailable.

Introduction  Optimization of signal timings is considered to be one of the most effective tools to improve traffic operations on urban arterials.  However, once traffic signal systems are retimed and implemented, quality of their performance largely depends on day-to-day variability of traffic flows in the field.  As soon as traffic patterns change significantly, performance of the signal timings deteriorates.  Current signal timing practice recommends development of separate signal timing plans for major day-to-day traffic patterns (weekday, weekend, special events, etc.).

Introduction  When adaptive traffic control is implemented it is impractical to develop plans for every traffic pattern that warrants a separate signal timing plan.  Therefore, it is important to develop signal timing plans that will minimize disbenefits of implementing signal timing plans in variable traffic conditions.

Research Background  Signal timing plans are based on traffic data that are usually collected during a short term effort (e.g. 1-week).  The data includes 24-hour weekly volume profiles, turning movement counts, vehicular speeds, and travel time runs.  The data is analyzed with other sources to ensure that they are representative of common field conditions.

Research Background  What is a representative traffic volume pattern?  It is the one that generates signal timings that work best in a variety of traffic conditions.  Finding such a traffic volume pattern and optimizing signal timings in field experiments requires significant resources.  Therefore, we use traffic simulation and other methods that do not require field experiments.

Research Contribution  Weekday PM-Peak hour traffic flows from the field are modeled in microsimulation for a year.  Two factors made this modeling approach possible:  Comprehensive set of field traffic flows collected during an entire year  Special tool to validate and balance traffic flows for the model.  Signal timing plans are optimized for each of the representative traffic flows resembling the process that usually occurs in practice.  Each of the signal timing plans is evaluated for the entire set of traffic flows to determine the best representative set of traffic flows.

Study Area Park City, UT 14 Intersections Long Corridor and Small Business District

Validation Results – Southbound

Validation Results – Northbound

Methodology Accurately model day-to-day traffic variations in microsimulation Collect and Process Field Traffic Volumes Traffic Volumes Recorded by SCATS Traffic Volumes Collected by Automatic Traffic Recorders Manually Collected Traffic Volumes Verify SCATS Traffic Volumes Build, Calibrate, and Validate the VISSIM Model Model Variability of Traffic Flows in VISSIM Prepare for Modeling Variability of Traffic Flows in Microsimulation Verify the reasonableness of SCATS traffic volumes Balance traffic flows in the network Verify VISSIM Traffic Flows Develop signal timing plans based on traffic flows of representative days Select scenarios of ‘representative-day traffic volumes’ Optimize signal timings in VISGAOST Evaluate Optimized Signal Timings in VISSIM

Scats Output with Traffic Volumes

Variation of Traffic Flows

Balancing Traffic Flows

Peak-Hour ATR & Scats Data

Verifying Reasonableness of Scats Traffic Volumes

Verifying Match of Scats & Vissim Traffic Flows

Optimizing Signal Timings In Visgaost VISSIMVISGAOST Signal Timings Performance Measures

“Representative Days” of Traffic Volumes AVERAGE MAX MEDIAN MIN MODE 75 th PERCENTILE 85 th PERCENTILE

Reduction of PI During Visgaost Optimizations

Variations in Performance Indices

Performances Based on Various ‘Representative-Days’

Conclusions Signal timings optimized for median traffic flows were best. Similar results were found for other average traffic flows (i.e. mean and mode). Findings show that signal timings developed for traffic flows that most frequently occur in the field bring more benefits than those that are developed for less frequent but higher traffic flows. Basing signal timings on higher-than-average traffic demand still generates better results than those developed for lower traffic flows. This is justified where there is a shortage of reliable traffic flow data from the field and when demand is expected to grow significantly.