Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code 480105 1 Program Quality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
Advertisements

Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
SLO Assessment Departmental Tools and Examples from the Field Sacramento City College Fall Flex Workshop 8/21/08 8/21/08Presenters: Alan Keys Faculty Research.
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Department of Biological Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Biology CIP code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Department of Biological Sciences Bachelor of Science in Medical Technology CIP Code: 570 Program Quality Improvement Report
Student Internships and Learning Outcomes Assessment By Harpal S. Dhillon, AGSB University Helmut Pusterer, AGSB University Manpreet K. Dhillon, Hult International.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Assessing Students Preparedness to Compete and Succeed in a Global Economy Through Written Communications Robert A. Chin & Carolyn Dunn Donna Hollar Department.
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
Presented by: Dr. Sue Courtney Janice Stoudemire, CPA, ATA, ABA Associate Degree Board of Commissioners Copyright Protected: Material can not be use or.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Cameron University School of Business Accounting Program CIP Code Program Code 305 Program Quality Improvement Report
Computing & Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Information Technology CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
Department of Education School of Education and Behavioral Sciences Master of Education Program CIP Code : Program Code: 650.
STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT PLANNING Presentation to CLAS Unit Heads Nov. 16, 2005 Maria Cimitile Julie Guevara Carol Griffin.
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Masters in Business Administration CIP Code: digit Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Industry Advisory Board Department of Computer Science.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Assessing Students Ability to Communicate Effectively— Findings from the College of Technology & Computer Science College of Technology and Computer Science.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Innovative Educators Webinar December 1, 2010 Jan Norton, Presenter.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Assessment at UW-Platteville What we are doing to assess student learning? What improvements we have made as a result?
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Principles of Assessment
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Department of Music School of Liberal Arts B.M.Ed In music CIP Code (681) 1 Program Quality Improvement Report
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Multimedia Design Department School of Science & Technology BS in Multimedia Design CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report
Department Name and School or Service Division Example Department of History School of Liberal Arts Example Office/department of Student Development Division.
Education Department M. Ed. in Reading CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report Fall 2010.
Department of Mathematical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.A. in Mathematics CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Science (CS) CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality.
Department of Communication School of Liberal Arts B.A. in Communication CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement Report
Department of English & Foreign Languages B.A. in English CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
Department of Education
Computing and Technology Department School of Science and Technology BS in Information Technology CIP Code Program Code 414 Fall 2010 Program Quality.
Department of English & Foreign Languages B.A. in International Languages CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Department of Business School of Business Associate of Science in Business CIP Code: Program Code:
Department of English and Foreign Languages School of Liberal Arts B.A. in English Education CIP Code Program Code Program Quality Improvement.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology Bachelor of Science Technology CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Electronic Engineering Technology (EET) CIP Code: Program Code:
1 Bachelor of Fine Arts Program Code 111 Report on Academic Year
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Department of Secondary Education Program Assessment Report What We Assessed: Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and CA State Teaching Performance.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Department of Theatre Arts School of Liberal Arts B.A. in Theatre Arts Local Code: 170 CIP Code : Fall Program Quality Improvement Report.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
Refresher Course on Assessment A Workshop for Department Chairs, Program Directors, and Others January 22, 2016.
Incorporating Program Assessment into Your Annual Program Review June 29, 2006.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Department of Education School of Education and Behavioral Sciences
Objectives & Outcomes Chuck Cone ERAU Oct 30, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation Create a baseline of clearly defined program outcomes based on Bloom’s Taxonomy to better establish student learning objectives. For each of the expanded and focused program outcomes, a careful analysis has been performed and we are implementing a plan to measure effectiveness of student learning for each outcome which will be utilized in future assessments so that trend data may be obtained. Continue to utilize the Industrial Advisory Council membership and include their input in the assessment process. Program Quality Improvement Report

Program Actions Since Last Assessment Presentation (Continued) For faculty assessment of student capstone portfolios, a rubric has been developed for direct measurement. It is also planned to utilize opinionaires from industry professionals as an indirect measurement of student capstone portfolios. Sponsor and promote various activities of the CADD Club to promote positive student retention. CADD Club activities will be assessed with indirect measurements of student learning outcomes. Program Quality Improvement Report

Student-Learning or Service Outcomes General Student Learning Outcomes PO-1: Students will have an understanding of Computer Aided Drafting Design (CADD) techniques and practices by using various CAD software tools. PO-2: Students will be capable of solving basic mathematical and design problems in the capacity of technical supervisors for a design drafting industry. PO-3: Students must possess the ability to communicate effectively using oral, written, and multimedia techniques. 4 Program Quality Improvement Report

Student-Learning or Service Outcomes (Continued) Specific Student Learning Outcomes LO-1: Students will be able to solve 2D and 3D drafting problems involving points, lines, planes and contoured surfaces in addition to producing these solutions based on industrial standards. LO-2 - Students will demonstrate their capability to design manufacturing tools such as jigs and fixtures and produce these drawings by examining parametric design procedures related to data structures and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM). LO-3: Students will solve applied mathematical problems related to Surveying, Statics, Materials and Strength, Motion analysis, and basic electricity. Program Quality Improvement Report

Alignment of Outcomes The A.A.S in CAD program, as well as all programs in the CaT Dept., support the University Mission in the Cameron University Plan 2013 as stated below… “Cameron University provides a diverse and dynamic student body access to quality educational opportunities; foster a student-centered academic environment that combines innovative classroom teaching with experiential learning; prepare students for professional success, responsible citizenship, life-long learning, and meaningful contributions to a rapidly changing world; and is a driven force in the cultural life and economic development of the region.” Program Quality Improvement Report

Alignment of Outcomes Outcomes PO-1, PO-2, PO-3, LO-1, LO-2, LO-3  experiential learning Outcomes PO-1 PO-2, PO-3, LO-1, LO-2, LO-3  professional success Outcome PO-1, PO-2, PO-3, LO-2, LO-3  meaningful contributions to a rapidly changing world Program Quality Improvement Report

Measures of Learning and Service Outcomes Sample project drawings, class assignments and laboratory exams will be evaluated by faculty for quality and proper usage of industrial standards. This also includes pretest- posttest assessment. A sample of these assignments/project drawings/exams will be maintained in a portfolio for evaluation (on a rubric scale based on the program objectives) by the advisory council members. The prototype of a manufacturing tool will be checked for feasibility in production using CAM procedures. This assessment will be in a form of a random sampling of course projects. Program Quality Improvement Report

Student-learning or service outcome and measurements PROGRAM OUTCOME CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Students will be able to solve 2D and 3D drafting problems involving points, lines, planes and contoured surfaces in addition to producing these solutions based on industrial standards. Example: CAD 1013, CAD 1023, CAD 1073, CAD 2603, CAD 2123 Locally developed test (direct) Norm-referenced scores A rubric will be applied to these samples and graded for the following: CAD 1013, CAD 1073, CAD 1023 Once a year during the Advisory Council Meeting Annually, Fall Semester 99 Program Quality Improvement Report

Display of assessment data A locally developed test was administered in a posttest format for students in CAD1013: Computer Aided Drafting. 70 questions were given on the final exam, and out of those questions were underlying Student Outcomes concerning the Programs Objectives for the AAS Computer Aided Design and Drafting Degree. The test was administered in Fall 2009 semester, the results for which are as shown below. 10 Program Quality Improvement Report

Analysis of assessment data Program Quality Improvement Report The questions for this assessment came from the outcomes that are associated with ADDA accreditation in the area of Introduction to CAD. It appears from the results of this exam that students fared well and: All of the students are close to mastering CAD software with enough skill to be known as a novice Draftsman There were 2 areas at which students placed lower than 80% There were 6 areas at which students placed only 80%. Action Items for this Assessment 1.More emphasis on the items mentioned above will be made in CAD 1013 Introduction to CAD 2.An additional assignment or project will be made in class to reinforce the weak areas.

Student-learning or service outcome and measurements Program Quality Improvement Report PROGRAM OUTCOME CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Students will demonstrate their capability to design manufacturing tools such as jigs and fixtures and produce these drawings by examining parametric design procedures related to data structures and Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM). Example: EDT 2053, EDT 2173 The prototype of a manufacturing tool will be checked for feasibility in production using CAM procedures. Random SamplingA rubric will be applied to these samples and graded for the following: EDT 2053, EDT 2173 Once a year during the Advisory Council Meeting Annually, Fall Semester

Display of assessment data Program Quality Improvement Report A locally developed test was administered in a posttest format for students in EDT 2053: Manufacturing Processes. 80 questions were given on the final exam, and out of those questions were underlying Student Outcomes concerning the Programs Objectives for the AAS Computer Aided Design and Drafting Degree. The test was administered in Fall 2009 semester, the results for which are as shown below.

Analysis of assessment data Program Quality Improvement Report The questions for this assessment came from the outcomes that are associated with ADDA accreditation in the area of manufacturing. It appears from the results of this exam that students fared well and: 80% of the students are close to mastering Manufacturing CAD/CAM software with enough skill to be employed at an entry level job as a Draftsman in Industry There were 7 areas at which students placed lower than 80% There was 1 area at which students placed only 50%. Action Items for this Assessment 1.More emphasis on the items mentioned above will be made in EDT 2053 Manufacturing Processes. 2.An additional assignment or project will be made in class to reinforce the week areas.

Student-learning or service outcome and measurements Program Quality Improvement Report PROGRAM OUTCOME CURRICULUM AREA OR TARGET AUDIENCE MEASUREMENTS OF STUDENT LEARNING OR SERVICE OUTCOME Measurements Methods used to determine validity of measurement instruments Methods used to determine reliability of measurements Schedule for measurements Students will solve applied mathematical problems related to Surveying, Statics, Materials and Strength, Motion analysis, and basic electricity. CAD 1023, CAD 2603, EDT 2103 Locally developed exit exam (capstone) will consist of a separte section in mathematical problem solving. A topic in analytical solution to a problem will be included during the question answer session of the Advisory Council mock interviews. Questions chosen by individual members of faculty and Advisory Council Members A rubric will be applied to these samples and graded for the following: CAD 2603, EDT 2103 Once a year during the Advisory Council Meeting Annually, Fall Semester

Display of assessment data Program Quality Improvement Report A locally developed test was administered in a posttest format for students in CAD 1023: Descriptive Geometry. 50 questions and a final drawing were given on the final exam, and out of those questions were underlying Student Outcomes concerning the Programs Objectives for the AAS Computer Aided Design and Drafting Degree. The test was administered in Fall 2009 semester, the results for which are as shown below.

Analysis of assessment data Program Quality Improvement Report The questions for this assessment came from the outcomes that are associated with ADDA accreditation in the area of descriptive geometry. It appears from the results of this exam that students fared well and: 80% of the students are close to mastering CAD software with enough skill to be employed at an entry level job as a Draftsman in Industry There were 3 areas at which students placed lower than 80% There were 2 areas at which students placed only 80%. Action Items for this Assessment 1.More emphasis on the items mentioned above will be made in CAD 1023 Descriptive Geometry. 2.An additional assignment or project will be made in class to reinforce the week areas.

Action plan for Student-Learning or Service Outcomes Work toward obtaining ADDA accreditation for the A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting Degree program. Continue to sponsor and promote various activities of the CADD Club to promote positive student retention. CADD Club activities will be assessed with indirect measurements of student learning outcomes. Continue to utilize the Industrial Advisory Council membership and include their input in the assessment process. Program Quality Improvement Report

QUESTIONS?? Program Quality Improvement Report