Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. COUNTY AND LOCAL ROAD NEEDS 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Advertisements

So You Want To Buy A Decision Support System? An overview for maintenance managers wanting to invest in advanced road weather information systems (RWIS)
Deterioration of Concrete Roads
Pavement Management Engineer
Wyoming County Paved Roads Management and Monitoring Khaled Ksaibati, Ph.D., P.E. STIC June, 2014.
Pavements. Concrete –Rigid pavement Used where strength is an issue Runways, interstates and major roads –Continuous reinforcing Must have a good base.
The Dyer Partnership Engineers and Planners City of North Bend Pavement Management Plan & Street Utility Fee Analysis February 11, 2014.
Pavement/Infrastructure Management Program Review April 6, 2009 Remington & Vernick Engineers.
NDACo Conference County Needs for Long Term Highway and Bridge Funding Jason Benson Cass County Engineer.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Transportation Infrastructure Technical Assistance Survey (oil counties)
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
To Pave or Not to Pave? Making Informed Decisions on When to Upgrade a Gravel Road.
Monday, May 13 Radisson Hotel Bismarck 1. ► Challenges ► Federal Funding ► State Funding – Legislative Session ► Historic Construction Program ► County.
Meade County Experience with Alternatives to Paving Ken McGirr Meade County Highway Supt Sturgis, SD.
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
FDOT Aviation Pavement Inspection Training Module 2 – Pavement Fundamentals – Overview Florida Department of Transportation Statewide Pavement Management.
Pavement Analysis and Design
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
2014 NDACo. Annual Convention Bismarck, ND Dan Brosz, Past President ND Association of Oil and Gas Producing Counties October 14, 2014.
Preventive Maintenance
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Highway Capacity Software (HCS) – Part II
Functional Classification CE 453 Lecture 3. Objectives Summarize general highway design process Identify different roadway classification systems Identify.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Street and Local Roads Inspection and Acceptance of Alternative Pavements.
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
Additional Road Investments Needed to Support Oil & Gas Production and Distribution in North Dakota Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute North Dakota.
Presented by: Ken Skorseth, Program Manager
Grant Levi, NDDOT Director ND ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES 1.
TAM ETG Webinar #3 Network Life Cycle Analysis Part 1: Introduction and Overview Wednesday, July 8,
NDACo Legislative Wrap-up Funding for Non-Oil Producing County Highways and Bridges Jason Benson Cass County Engineer.
Pavement Preservation Preventive Maintenance
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
Condition Assessment & Funding Needs for North Carolina’s Highway System Report to the Joint Legislative Transportation Oversight Committee December 12,
Webinar Texas Department of Transportation : Costs Associated with Conversion of Surfaced to Un-Surfaced Roads August 30, 2012.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
User perceptions of highway roughness Kevan Shafizadeh and Fred Mannering.
Asset Management Maintenance Management System
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
State of Freight Data & Models: Rail, Truck-Load (TL) & PickUp & Delivery (PUD) Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
Managing Road Maintenance Efficiently and Economically (Doing it Right the First Time) 2015 SDATAT Annual Road Conference Mr. Ken Skorseth SDLTAP Special.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Jeopardy Roads, Routes, and HighwaysYou Call It! Cause and EffectMiscellanousPotpourri Distress ID 101 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
UPGRADATION PLANNING OF RURAL ROADS IN G.I.S. ENVIRONMENT UNDER PMGSY.
Expanded Shave and Pave Program Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division October 23, 2012.
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MAINTENANCE RATING PROGRAM.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
Protecting Your Pavement Investment Jeff Stokes. 4 R’s for Paving Success 1 Risk Management Identifying and minimizing your risk factors 2 Right Repair.
Huston, Texas | June Jing Zhang, AICP, PTP, LCI, LEED AP ND AccommodatingCyclists in Accommodating Cyclists in Highway Maintenance Projects -- an.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Roadway Pavement Management Plan
Chapter 13 Transportation in a Supply Chain
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
Segment Crash Analysis
Town of Clayton 2016 Pavement Condition Survey
Paving a Gravel Road Case Study
Pavement condition index calculation
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
ITTS FEAT Tool Methodology Review ITTS Member States Paula Dowell, PhD
Introduction to Pavement Design
PASER Ratings for TwinCATS Planning Area
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. COUNTY AND LOCAL ROAD NEEDS 2012

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Previous Studies( )  Additional Road Investments Needed to Support Oil and Gas Production and Development in North Dakota  Rural Road Investment Needs to Support Agricultural Logistics and Economic Development in North Dakota

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. SB 2325  “The purpose of updating and maintaining reports for transportation infrastructure needs for all county and township roads in the state, for the biennium beginning July 1, 2011 and ending June 30, 2013”

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Analysis Process  Traffic Volume  Existing Structure  Existing Condition  Costs and Practices

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Traffic Volume  Locations  Volumes  Forecasts  Routing  Optimization  Results

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Traffic Types Modeled  Oil Development  Agricultural Movements

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Location Assignment  Data Collection  Network: Federal, State, Local  Locations: Spacing Units (Oil & Gas) Input Sources (NDDOT, Oil & Gas, SWC) Output Destinations (NDDOT, Oil & Gas, SWC) Elevators (UGPTI) Townships (Census)  Volumes: Oil – (Oil & Gas) Agriculture (NDPSC Grain Movement)  Forecasts: Oil – (Oil & Gas) Agriculture (NDSU – Ag Extension)

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Volumes  Oil  Based upon NDDOT white paper (2,300 trucks per well)  Overloads estimated based upon internal assumptions and verified using weigh station data  Oil Related ESAL assumptions taken from NDDOT estimates  Agriculture  Based upon average truck yield and throughput data from NDPSC Grain Movement Database

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Forecasts  Oil  Developed from forecasts provided by Oil & Gas  Agriculture  Based upon discussions with NDSU Extension, Industry organizations

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Future Well Locations  Drilling  Zonal Plan/Forecasts  Area Density  Frequency of Drilling in a Spacing Unit  Age of Well  Subject to  Zonal Plan/Forecasts  Number of Wells in a spacing unit

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Route Generation  ESRI Network Analyst was used to generate routes between:  Spacing Units (fronthaul and backhaul) Freshwater Oil transload facilities Sand locations Cities SWD Spacing Units  Townships (fronthaul and backhaul) Elevators Ethanol Facilities Processors  Elevators (fronthaul and backhaul) Elevators Ethanol Facilities Processors Final Destinations

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Sample Routing  Inbound  Sand  Water  Pipe  Outbound  Oil Rail Transload Pipe Transload  SWD

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Inbound Sand

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Inbound Water

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Inbound Pipe

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Outbound Oil - Rail

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Outbound Oil - Pipe

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Outbound SWD

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. All Inbound

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. All Outbound

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. All Traffic

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Agricultural Analysis 22 Crop Production Elevator & Plant Demands Known Truck Trips and Routes Predict Segment Specific Traffic Estimate Data: Crop Production (NASS), Elevator Volumes (NDPSC), In-State Processors (Survey), Road Network (NDDOT-GIS Hub), Local Road Data (2008 Survey)

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Crop Production and Location

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Distribution Model 24  Each township connected to nearest 150 elevators  Elevators connected to each other  Elevators connected to plants  Fastest and shortest route algorithms  Objective: meet the demands at elevators and in- state processing plants with minimal hauling distances (trucking cost)

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Network Optimization  Constrained Optimization Model  Freshwater to Wells  Sand to Wells  Gravel to Wells  Pipe to Wells  Equipment to Wells  Supplies to Wells  Agricultural Commodities to Elevators and Processors Wheat Soybeans Corn Lentils/Dry Edible Beans Barley Oats Sunflower

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Network Optimization  Thirteen separate optimization models were estimated for each year of the analysis (260 in total)  Volumes from all optimization runs were aggregated to individual roadway segments

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Existing Structure  Surface Type obtained from GIS Shapefiles  Surface Type verified by county officials  Independent verification  Graded roadway width – survey

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Existing Condition  1,000 miles of paved CMC roads were scored using the NDDOT deduct scoring system  The approximately 4,500 remaining paved CMC roads were given condition ratings by county officials using a 5 category condition assessment  Both condition assessment methods were converted to Present Serviceability Rating (PSR) scores

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. PSRDESCRIPTION Only new (or nearly new) superior pavements are likely to be smooth enough and distress free (sufficiently free of cracks and patches) to qualify for this category. Most pavements constructed or resurfaced during the data year would normally be rated in this category Pavements in this category, although not quite as smooth as those described above, give a first-class ride and exhibit few, if any, visible signs of surface deterioration. Flexible pavements may be beginning to show evidence of rutting and fine random cracks. Rigid pavements may be beginning to show evidence of slight surface deterioration, such as minor cracking and spalls The riding qualities of pavements in this category are noticeably inferior to those of the new pavements and may be barely tolerable for high-speed traffic. Surface defects of flexible pavements may include rutting, map cracking, and extensive patching. Rigid pavements may have a few joint fractures, faulting and/or cracking and some pumping Pavements have deteriorated to such an extent that they affect the speed of free-flow traffic. Flexible pavement may have large potholes and deep cracks. Distress includes raveling, cracking, and rutting and occurs over 50 percent or more of the surface. Rigid pavement distress includes joint spalling, faulting, patching, cracking, and scaling and may include pumping and faulting Pavements are in extremely deteriorated conditions. The facility is passable only at reduced speed and considerable ride discomfort. Large potholes and deep cracks exist. Distress occurs over 75 percent or more of the surface.

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Costs and Practices  Data collected through survey of county road managers

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Costs and Practices

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Improvement Types

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Costs and Practices

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Improvement Types  Paved  Condition scores converted to PSR  SN information, where available, calculated or estimated based upon past responses/typical structure  AASHTO models used to simulate pavement deterioration and improvement types

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Timeliness of Improvements

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Improvement Types  Paved  Resurfacing  Reconstruction due to condition  Sliver widening due to roadway width

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Improvement Types - Gravel  Types of Practices  Graveling and Blading Normal Levels (Example: regraveling every 5 years, blade once per month) Increased Levels (Example: regraveling every 3-4 years, blade twice per month) High Levels (Example: regraveling every 2-3 years, blade once per week) Usage of Dust Suppressant on Impacted Roads  Graveling and Base Stabilization Base 1 Permazyme Concrete  Graveling and Base Stabilization with Armor Coat Base 1 Permazyme Concrete  Asphalt Surface

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Improvement Types - Gravel  Traffic model results will be segmented based upon traffic levels  Levels broken into increments of 50 AADT  0-50      250+  County specific practices will be used as the base maintenance practices  Life cycle costs of each maintenance practice will be calculated (i.e. 20 year cost of graveling)  Maintenance Type/Improvement selected for each AADT class based upon minimum life cycle cost

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Results – Paved Roads PeriodOil CountiesRest of StateStatewide Total $278$84$ $146$155$ $111$166$ $54$145$ $43$102$ $200$460$ $832$1,113$1,946

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Results – Unpaved Roads PeriodOil CountiesRest of StateStatewide Total $243$227$ $243$227$ $255$231$ $267$234$ $267$234$ $1,376$1,228$2, $2,652$2,382$5,033

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Results – All Roads PeriodOil CountiesRest of StateStatewide Total $521$311$ $389$382$ $366$397$ $321$379$ $310$336$ $1,576$1,688$3, $3,484$3,495$6,979

Enhancing mobility of people and goods in rural America. Draft Report  The full report can be found at – look in the upper right portion of the webpagewww.ugpti.org  Alan Dybing  