Casualty Actuarial Society – Washington, D.C. September 18-19, 2008 Ian Sterling, FCAS, MAAA Risk Transfer – Actuarial Perspective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CHANGES TO SSAP #62 PROPERTY & CASULTY REINSURANCE NAIC Property and Casualty Reinsurance Study Group Chicago, IL May 10, 2005 Michael Moriarty Director,
Advertisements

Unearned Premium Reserves Change is in the Wind
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers.
Premium Liabilities – U.S. and Canadian Perspectives U.S. Perspective Ralph Blanchard 2003 CLRS – September 9, 2003, Chicago, IL 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve.
1 Math 479/568 Casualty Actuarial Mathematics Fall 2014 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Professor Rick Gorvett Session 12: Reinsurance I October.
An Issue of Use or Abuse? Adjusting for Financial and Finite Reinsurance Steven Ader, Director.
ACTUARIAL SERVICES ADVISORY Other Balance Sheet Reserves: SAO & Reinsurer Concerns Las Vegas September 2004.
Reinsurance Presentation Example 2003 CAS Research Working Party: Executive Level Decision Making using DFA Raju Bohra, FCAS, ARe.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Risk Transfer Accounting.
Reserve Variability Modeling: Correlation 2007 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar San Diego, California September 10-11, 2007 Mark R. Shapland, FCAS, ASA, MAAA.
Chapter 4: Insurance Company Operations
MANAGING ASSET/LIABILITY RISK WITH REINSURANCE AND ASSET STRATEGIES - A P/C Insurance Company Application Casualty Actuarial Society Casualty Loss Reserve.
Risk Mitigation and the Role of Reinsurance John Finston Deputy Commissioner for Corporate and Regulatory Affairs California Department of Insurance ©
C O N N I N G A S S E T M A N A G E M E N T Analyzing Reinsurance with DFA Practical Examples Daniel Isaac Washington, D.C. July 28-30, 2003.
Risk Transfer Testing of Reinsurance Contracts A Summary of the Report by the CAS Research Working Party on Risk Transfer Testing CAS Ratemaking Meeting.
Reinsurance Risk Transfer Testing Methods and Management of Process
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 NAIC Codification of Statutory Accounting Actuarial Considerations Pat Teufel,
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHAPTER RIMS RISK FORUM Thursday, September 22, 2011 Speaker - Barbara Benson Grinnell Vice President, Willis (985)
Structured Reinsurance Presentation to the NAIC Property Casualty Reinsurance Study Group February 23, 2005 Dan Malloy
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Washington, D.C. September 23, 2002 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA Am-Re Consultants, Inc.
54 th Annual June Conference Reporting entities are required to file a supplement to the annual statement titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”
1 Actuarial and Accounting Issues Surrounding FASB Statement No. 113 Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short- Duration and Long-Duration Contracts.
Finance 590 Enterprise Risk Management
Insurance Company: Functions Chapter 7. Insurance related functions Ratemaking Production Underwriting Loss adjustment Investment Reinsurance Accounting,
The Reserving Actuary’s Role in Risk Assessment: Value Added by the Reserving Actuary in Identifying and Helping Mitigate Financial Risk Both on the Balance.
1 Actuarial Evaluation of Premium Liabilities By:Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Partner – KPMG LLP CLRS - Minneapolis September 19th, 2000.
1 Practical ERM Midwestern Actuarial Forum Fall 2005 Meeting Chris Suchar, FCAS.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Minneapolis, Minnesota September 18 – 19, 2000 Actuarial Standard of Practice No. 36 Discussion of Implementation Considerations.
1 Concurrent Session: Risk Transfer (FAS 113) Presentation by Michael G. Wacek Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar September 12, 2005.
Reinsurance and Risk Transfer Recent Developments Peter Licht, FCAS, MAAA Managing Director, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP CASE Fall Meeting September 13,
Intensive Actuarial Training for Bulgaria January 2007 Lecture 11 – Reinsurance By Michael Sze, PhD, FSA, CFA.
Course on Professionalism Statement of Principles.
Click to edit Master title style Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar – San Diego, CA September 10 – 11, INSURANCE AND ACTUARIAL.
CIA Annual Meeting Assemblée annuelle de l’ICA June 29 & 30, 2006  Les 29 et 30 juin 2006 Ottawa, Ontario PC-1: Risk Transfer Claudette Cantin.
An Introduction to Reserving and Financial Reporting Issues for Non-Traditional Reinsurance Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar September 14, 2004 Derek Jones,
1 Welcome To The IEI-Sponsored Insurance Workshop MTSU June 4-6, 2007.
Loss Reserves from the Actuarial, Accounting and IRS Perspectives Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin 2003 CLRS – September 9, 2003, Chicago, IL Premium Liabilities – U.S. and Canadian Perspectives Canadian.
1 Finite Reinsurance Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, IL September 9, 2003 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA, CFA.
Risk Transfer and Why Reinsurance Contracts May Never Be the Same CAS Annual Meeting November 14, 2006.
Premium Deficiency Reserves - GAAP CLRS - September 24th Premium Deficiency Reserves under U.S. GAAP John G. Aquino FCAS MAAA Executive Vice President.
FAS 113 Considerations on Risk Transfer Testing Gary Venter & Paul Brehm CLRS 2002.
Chapter 7 Financial Operations of Insurers. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.7-2 Agenda Property and Casualty Insurers Life.
# Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services Statements of Actuarial Opinion Midwest Actuarial Forum March 23, 2004 Robert H. Wainscott, FCAS, MAAA,
2002 CLRS - Arlington, VA Reserve/Opinion Issues from a Regulatory Perspective Proposed Revision to the NAIC Annual Statement Instructions Richard Marcks,
Concurrent Session REI2 Impact of Reinsurance and Reinsurers on your Financials Evaluating Reinsurance: Different Metrics, Different Perspectives Casualty.
Kpmg 2002 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Surety Reserving Mike Rozema, ACAS, MAAA KPMG LLP.
Accounting Implications of Finite Reinsurance Contracts 2003 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, IL Session 4 – Recent Developments in Finite Reinsurance.
IRS/Actuary Actuary’s Perspective by Alan E. Kaliski, FCAS, MAAA.
Risk Transfer In The Real World Presentedby Jane C. Taylor, FCAS, MAAA Junction Consulting, Inc. Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Boston, MA September 12,
Risk Transfer – Federal Tax Perspective Casualty Actuarial Society Washington, DC September 18-19, 2008 Kevin Owens.
Swiss Re Investors, Inc. Z Z Issues Related to Insurance Securitization Dan Isaac Swiss Re Investors, Inc. Presented: 2000 CAS Special Interest Seminar.
1 A Stochastic Approach to Recognizing Profits of Finite Products Jeffrey W. Davis, FCAS, MAAA Casualty Actuarial Society Reinsurance Seminar July 2001.
1 Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Claudette Cantin, FCIA, FCAS, MAAA Munich Reinsurance Company of Canada September 14, 2004 Las Vegas Session 7 Loss Reserve.
Casualty Actuarial Society Insurance Accounting for Actuaries May 17, 2005  Presented by: Kevin Wick, FCAS, MAAA.
March 11-12, 2004 Finite Reinsurance - Where’s the Risk? David Molyneux, FCAS, MAAA PartnerRe New Solutions Inc.
JLT RE SOLUTIONS, INC. Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Las Vegas, Nevada September 13, 2004 Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA, CFA Casualty Loss Reserve.
©Towers Perrin Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Atlanta, Georgia September 11, 2006 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
Introduction to Reinsurance Reserving Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Chicago, Illinois September 9, 2003 Christopher K. Bozman, FCAS, MAAA.
1 RISK AND RETURN: DEBATING ALTERNATIVE MODELING “APPROACHES” (FIN - 10) Russ Bingham Vice President and Director of Corporate Research Hartford Financial.
1 Casualty Actuarial Society Annual Meeting FASB Invitation to Comment Bifurcation of Insurance and Reinsurance Contracts November 14, 2006 Joseph B. Sieverling.
Product Classification and DPFs Session 6
Casualty Actuaries of New England
Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar Bruce D. Fell, FCAS, MAAA, CFA
Reinsurance Introduction Types of Reinsurance Types of Reinsurers
PROFIT AND CONTINGENCIES (FIN-28)
Loss Portfolio Transfers
Risk Transfer - What Changes Are On The Horizon?
New Approach to Ratemaking & Reserving
Presentation transcript:

Casualty Actuarial Society – Washington, D.C. September 18-19, 2008 Ian Sterling, FCAS, MAAA Risk Transfer – Actuarial Perspective

Presentation titlePage 2 Agenda ► FAS 113/SSAP 62 ► Methods of Testing ► Metrics ► Next Steps

Presentation titlePage 3 Reinsurance Accounting Guidance ► GAAP ► FASB Statement No. 113, Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts ► Statutory ► SSAP No. 62, Property and Casualty Reinsurance ► Similar to FAS 113

Presentation titlePage 4 ► Risk Transfer Conditions: ► Paragraph 11 Test: ► The reinsurer assumes “substantially all” of the insurance risk relating to the reinsured portion of the underlying insurance contracts, or ► Paragraph 9 Test: ► (a) The reinsurer assumes “significant” insurance risk under the reinsured portions of the underlying insurance policies. – Transfer of insurance risk refers to:  Ultimate amount of net cash flows between parties, and  Timing of the receipt of cash ► (b) It is “reasonably possible” that the reinsurer may realize a significant loss from the transaction. ► Risk factors do not include recognition of reinsurance costs, investment risk, taxes, or credit risk Short-Duration Risk Transfer – FAS 113

Presentation titlePage 5 ► Risk Transfer Conditions: ► Indemnification of the entity company against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in reinsurance requires both of the following: ► a. The reinsurer assumes significant risk under the reinsured portions of the underlying insurance agreements; and ► b. It is reasonably possible that the reinsurer may realize a significant loss from the transaction SSAP 62

Presentation titlePage 6 ► Risk Transfer Testing Practice Note ► American Academy of Actuaries Committee on Property and Liability Financial Reporting – November 2005 Reinsurance Attestation Supplement 20-1

Presentation titlePage 7 ► (1) Reasonably “Self-Evident” ► Purpose ► Need to Document ► Considerations ► Substance of the arrangement ► Existence, impact and role of risk-limiting factors ► Use of professional judgment ► Contract Terms to make this less likely? Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 8 ► (1) Reasonably “Self-Evident” ► Examples of Safe Harbors: ► A straight QS with no risk-limiting features other than a loss ratio cap with negligible effect on the economics of the transaction ► Single year property cat and casualty clash contracts with little or no risk limiting features apart from a reinstatement premium common to these types of contracts ► Most facultative and treaty per risk excess of loss arrangements with rates on line well below the present value of the limit of coverage, or without aggregate limites, sub-limits, or contingent features Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 9 ► (1) Reasonably “Self-Evident” ► Examples of contracts not reasonably self-evident: ► Aggregate excess of loss contracts ► Contracts with experience accounts, experience rating refunds, or similar provisions, if such provisions have a significant impact on the contract’s economics ► Multiple year contracts ► QS contracts with risk limiting features Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 10 Methods of Testing Reasonably Self- Evident Yes Document No Risk Transfer Analysis Scenario Testing Simulation/Modeling Techniques

Presentation titlePage 11 ► (2) Scenario Testing ► Historical results by year ► Comparison of All Underwriting Downside Scenarios ► Comparison of Cedent and Reinsurer Expected Underwriting Deficits Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 12 ► Historical Results by Year Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 13 ► Comparison of All U/W Downside Scenarios Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 14 ► Comparison of Cedent and Reinsurer Expected Underwriting Deficits (EUD) Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 15 ► (3) Simulation Testing ► Types of Models ► Aggregate Loss Models ► Frequency-Severity Models ► Combination Models ► Considerations Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 16 ► Modeling Considerations ► Need to model: ► Contract losses ► Contingent Premium ► Commissions ► Other Contract Features ► Reinsurance Underwriting Expenses ► Potentially not considered: ► Tax impacts Methods of Testing

Presentation titlePage 17 ► (1) “10-10” Rule (Value at Risk) ► Initial rule of thumb, and still somewhat used today ► Definition ► Shortcomings ► Unintended Consequences Metrics

Presentation titlePage 18 ► (2) Tail Value at Risk (TVaR) ► Definition ► Criteria similar to “10-10” = TVaR > 10% at 10 th percentile ► Advantages ► Disadvantages ► Does this solve the shortcomings of VaR? Metrics

Presentation titlePage 19 ► Var and TVaR Example Metrics

Presentation titlePage 20 ► (3) Expected Reinsurer Deficit (ERD) ► Definition ► How relates to previous methods ► Criteria of ERD > 1% similar to “10-10” (1% = 10% x 10%) ► Avg Loss Severity = TVaR at the economic breakeven LR ► Advantages ► Does this solve “Shortcoming 2”? ► Similar to Financial? Metrics

Presentation titlePage 21 ► (4) Other Methods ► Other methods: ► 1. Right Tail Deviation (RTD) - Wang ► 2. Mean Square Adverse Deviation ► 3. Conditional Expected Downside ► 4. Some combination of (2) and TVaR ► Advantage ► Disadvantage Metrics

Presentation titlePage 22 ► Can a bright-line test be used? ► Advantage ► Disadvantage ► Guides ► “10-10”, TVaR, ERD, RTD, etc. ► Methods of Testing Risk Transfer ► “Reasonably Self-Evident”, Scenario Testing, Simulation ► Next Steps Summary