1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Registries Work Package 2 Requirements, Science Cases, Use Cases, Test Cases Charter: Focus on science case scenarios, and use cases related specifically.
Advertisements

1st Meeting of the Working Party on International Trade in Goods and Trade in Services Statistics - September 2008 Australia's experience (so far) in.
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
National Environmental Research Institute, University of Aarhus, Denmark GIS Guidance update.
Watershed Approaches and Community Based Planning
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 We Are Here => Work Plan Recap 1 st Plenary Meeting Sacramento October 22-23, 2007.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
Bureau of Reclamation Mid-Pacific Region Regional Criteria for Evaluating Water Management Plans for the Sacramento River Contractors.
California Water Demand Scenarios David Groves Pardee RAND Graduate School Scott Matyac and Tom Hawkins Department of Water Resources * * * California.
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
TSS Architecture Definition Context. TSS Scoping Study Context Detailed Requirements Specification (products, functionality) High Level Architecture Description.
Chapter 3: The Project Management Process Groups
1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Advancing the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Project (AEEA) Research Agenda Mark Eigenraam Senior.
CHAPTER 19 Building Software.
Chapter 7: The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
1 Analytical Tools, Data & Scenarios Workshop July 29, 2004 California Water Plan Update 2004.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Project Management Process Overview
Estimating and Comparing Costs and Benefits of Adaptation Projects in Africa – Project AF47 Participating organisations: Energy and Development Research.
1 Improving Analytical Capabilities of the California Water Plan Rich Juricich, California Dept. of Water Resources.
1 Quantitative Information Activities California Water Plan Analytical Tools and Data Workgroup June 3, 2005.
Presentation to Contra Costa County Climate Leaders October 3, 2013.
1 California Water Plan Update 2009 Where We’ve Been Where We Are Going South Lahontan Regional Workshop Palmdale July 10, 2007.
Business Analysis and Essential Competencies
Agricultural and Urban Water Use Scenario Evaluation Tool
AdriaMed Expert Consultation Interactions between capture fisheries and aquaculture Rome, Italy November st Coordination Committee (2000)
Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan North Bay Watershed Association Meeting November 3, 2006 Working together to enhance sustainable water.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
The Texas Instream Flow Program Barney Austin Surface Water Resources Division Texas Water Development Board Halloween 2005.
Freshwater Interoperable Modelling Project Daniel Rutledge, Sandy Elliott, Simon Guest, Alexander Herzig, Trevor Knopp, Alistair Ritchie, Paul Smale, Val.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Creating a Shared Vision Model. What is a Shared Vision Model? A “Shared Vision” model is a collective view of a water resources system developed by managers.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
American Community Survey (ACS) Program Review Webinar March 6, 2012.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
THE REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER for Central and Eastern Europe Integrated planning and Assessment of National Development Plan of the Czech Republic.
1 Scenarios and More California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting April 14 th, 2005.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
Agenda 1.Review and confirm areas of convergence & divergence 2.Review draft 1-page workshop summary 3.Review and prioritize next steps 1.
HELCOM HOLAS II ESA WS, Helsinki EU Horizon 2020 Coordination and support action Ville Karvinen / SYKE Enhancing ecosystem services mapping for.
WISE User Workshops Three user workshops held in 2012 Introduction and context Hands on exploring the tool Quantifying scenarios and exploring results.
Sonoma Valley Groundwater Management Planning. 2 Presentation Overview SCWA/USGS Groundwater Study Stakeholder Assessment Groundwater Management Work.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
UTA/ARRI. Enterprise Engineering for The Agile Enterprise Don Liles The University of Texas at Arlington.
State Water Board’s FAAST State Board’s Public Search Page –Search by Watershed, County, Applicant –Search by Keyword in project description –Search for.
Santa Rosa Plain Groundwater Management Planning Update Fall 2013.
Project Management Processes for a Project Chapter 3 PMBOK® Fourth Edition.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
RECOVER PDT Workshop COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN April 18, 2002.
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Using indicators for program management and program assessment Draft framework with examples Donna Podger (916)
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
Advanced Higher Computing Science The Project. Introduction Worth 60% of the total marks for the course Must include: An appropriate interface using input.
Introduction and Overview
Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for California Fisheries
SLCP Benefits Toolkit:
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Herman Smith United Nations Statistics Division
A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation
What is a Learning Collaborative?
Introduction to CREAT Braden Rosenberg, The Cadmus Group, Inc.
IT Governance Planning Overview
Introduction and Overview
Natural water Retention Measures
Planning process in river basin management
Presentation transcript:

1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005

2 Objectives for Presentation ● Highlight goals for tools and data ● Show accomplishments ● Describe possible screening approach ● Demo of EXTEND software ● Next steps

3 Goals for Analytical Tools and Data

4 Goals ● Describe expectations for evaluation. ● Inventory and document data and tools consistently. ● Apply existing data and tools for Update ● Develop a long term plan for improvement. ● Coordinate with CALFED Program.

5 Desired End-Product ● Evaluate multiple future conditions (Scenarios and Responses) ● Explore wide range of benefits and costs (Evaluation Criteria) ● Support integrated regional planning ● Support statewide planning

6 Accomplishments

7 Recent Progress ● Collaborated with David Groves to quantify 3 scenarios of 2030 water demand ● Developed conceptual framework ● Held workshop with Modeling Work Group ● Submitted coordinated funding proposals to CBDA Science Program ● Documenting existing tools ● Participating in CALSIM model improvements

8 Developed Conceptual Framework ● Can be applied at different spatial scales ● Describes complex system using simple categories ● Illustrates inputs, outputs, and relationships ● Draft HTML version available on CD

9 Water Management System Geophysical Parameters Evaluation Criteria (Economic, Management, Societal) Evaluation Criteria (Economic, Management, Societal) Human and Environmental Water Demands Management Strategies Demand Drivers Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Resources and Management Water Management Objectives Organization Definitions Overview

10 Developed Tool Descriptions ● Scope and Application ● Conceptual basis ● Theoretical basis ● Numerical basis ● Data ● Data management ● Software

11 Completed Tool Descriptions ● CALSIM ● CALAG ● LCPSIM ● IGSM2 ● SIMETAW ● CUP ● ETAW-CAWU ● DSM2 ● CALVIN ● IMPLAN ● UPLAN ● LAWS ● CU

12 Possible Screening Approach

13 Water Management System Geophysical Parameters Evaluation Criteria (Economic, Management, Societal) Evaluation Criteria (Economic, Management, Societal) Human and Environmental Water Demands Management Strategies Demand Drivers Conceptual Framework for Assessing Water Resources and Management Water Management Objectives Organization Definitions Overview

14 Need to Represent the Water Management System at Different Spatial Scales From Statewide …

15 …To Hydrologic Region or Planning Area

16 Using the Flow Diagram …

17 … to Define Data & Relationships

18 Using the Best Available Analytical Tools and Data to Quantify Flow Diagram ● Published data and surveys ● Estimates derived from simple relationships ● Estimates derived from models

19 Using an Analytical Environment ● Developing pilot of flow diagram using EXTEND software package ● Features  Transparent and relatively easy for others to review and use  Can use in “real-time” interactions with stakeholders  Customize to include relationships from best current knowledge  Explore different possible outcomes

20 Demo of EXTEND Software Demo of EXTEND Software

21 Next Steps – Update 2010 ● Prioritize key components of flow diagram ● Define / refine key theoretical relationships ● Quantify detailed scenario factors ● Develop evaluation criteria details ● Develop response package details ● Develop work plan for detailed approach

22 Next Steps - Beyond Update 2010 ● Implement long-term plan to improve analytical tools (detailed approach) ● Fill data gaps ● Develop Water Plan Information Exchange (Water PIE)

23 Summary ● We are working to accomplish specific goals for tools and data ● Good progress has been made ● Much more to be done ● Need to meet soon and often with Water Plan Advisory Committee

24