P-1 Nuclear Power Plant Shut Down. P-2 Most Dangerous Reactors: A Compendium of Reactor Risk Assessments Units 1 & 2 “Reactors remain unstable and difficult.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Public Health and Healthcare Issues. Public Health and Healthcare.
Advertisements

National Response Plan on Natural and Man Made Emergency Situations Emergency Management Department Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) of Georgia.
VIEW TO CO2-EMISSIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES THROUGH REORGANIZATION OF ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE Gintaras DENAFAS Department for Environmental Engineering, Kaunas.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-04 Risk Perception.
Radiation pollution The aim is to show people all the danger of radiation pollution.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
Challenges to UN emergency preparedness, humanitarian coordination & response to nuclear detonation events Study released in summer 2014 Carried out in.
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
A brief history of nuclear energy technologies Barbara Rauter Daniela Wachter.
Making Aarhus work in international forums A workshop on promoting the application of the principles of the Aarhus Convention in international forums Geneva,
Emergency Evacuation.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO GENERAL RISK MANAGEMENT 2.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
Technical Meeting on Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography, 23 to 27 June 2014, in Vienna Abdulla Al Yammahi Management of emergencies, safety and.
Nuclear program of Lithuania Dr. Vidas Paulikas, Radiation Protection Department VATESI Visaginas, 29 June 2009.
PART IX: EMERGENCY EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Module IX.1: Generic requirements for emergency exposure situations Lesson IX.1-2: General Requirements Lecture.
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
1 Crisis communications: Lessons from „the learning curve” How Could We Have Done It Better? Communication of an Incident by Ágota Hanti Deputy Spokesperson.
The world’s worst nuclear power accident What happened? Chain reaction in the reactor became out of control creating explosions and a fireball which blew.
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 11—Non- Pharmaceutical Interventions What Is It And How Will We Measure It?
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-011 Good Practices for PIOs.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-013 Roles and Coordination of Information.
INCIDENT AND EMERGENCY CENTRE Department of Nuclear Safety and Security IECIEC.
DPG HEALTH MEETING USAID CONFERENCE ROOM 6 NOVEMBER 2013 International Health Regulation (2005)
1 Emergency Management and Risk Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transport Shashi Nambisan Professor of Civil Engineering Dept of Civil & Environmental.
International Atomic Energy Agency THE “EMERGENCY CONVENTIONS” Interregional Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfil National Obligations in.
Welcome to Skåne (SWEDEN) Skåne County Administrative Board HAMED ARWAND.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. McClelland, NNSA, US DOE.
0 Tadas Matulionis Lietuvos Energija AB Strategic planning manager Minsk, December 07, 2007 Environmental Impact Assessment of a New Nuclear Power Plant.
CAPSCA Europe workshop, Paris, France, September 2011 Legislative aspects for IHR implementation at airports Thomas Hofmann Division of Communicable.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Module IX Basic Concepts for Emergency preparedness and Response for a nuclear accident or radiological.
Environmental pollution Chernobyl 1986 Dudyrev Bogdan 8.
THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER AND ETHICS West Virginia University EE 481 Group #10 Spring 2014 Floyd Baker - Matt Logue - Stuart Christie.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Emergency Response Protective Actions Day 10 – Lecture 3.
Update on EPPR Radiation Projects October 2012 Ann Heinrich, U.S. Department of Energy.
Chernobyl A mass nuclear meltdown. What happened! The Chernobyl disaster reactor accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, or simply "Chernobyl"
Algerian nuclear power programme Status, needs and perspectives T/M on development of nuclear infrastructure of NP programme February, ,Vienna.
Chernobyl Sydney Curley.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN TURKISH STATE RAILWAYS (TCDD)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency EPR-Public Communications L-07 Emergency Communications.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Developing a National Capability for Response Emergency Response Plans Lecture IAEA Post Graduate.
Nuclear Power Are the benefits worth the risks?. Nuclear Energy: Benefits vs. Risks Is it worth it? Positives NegativesYour Opinions.
Hazardous Materials Business Plan Training Topic 2
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Consulate Emergency Response/Contingency Plan Training Topic 4
Ukraine. Background On April 26, 1986, a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl,
Nuclear and radiological incidents – Introduction
I - 1 Nuclear Plant Situation Crisis Prevention, Response for the Baltic States: Organizations, Policies and Procedures Nuclear Plant Crisis.
1 Crisis Management and Communication Dr. Joy Smith and Ms. Robin Denny.
Radiation Safety Regulations
Low Power and Shutdown PSA IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop City, Country.
Department for Nuclear and Radiation Safety of the Ministry for Emergency Situations (Gosatomnadzor) Leading specialist Diana Rusakevich Belarus Department.
Short how nuclear plant works how nuclear power works.
Chapter 32 Section 4. Nixon and the Environment  Silent Spring (1962): Rachel Carson, talks about ill effects of DDT (pesticide)  Environmental Protection.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
IPA 2007 – Project funded by the European Union Seveso II Directive: Articles 11 & 13 External Emergency Plans and Public Information Tom Pine United Kingdom.
Emergency Planning (Preparedness) Within The Development Of A National Infrastructure For Nuclear Power Thomas McKenna Incident and Emergency Centre Department.
2011 Pan American Health Organization Módulo NUCLEAR EMERGENCY IN JAPON 30 March 2011 Pablo Jiménez Regional Advisor in Radiological Health NUCLEAR.
Enhancement of Radiological Safety Culture within Ignalina NPP and Contractors Viktor PLETNIOV Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
Consolidated Emergency Response/Contingency Plan Training Section 4
Transposition of Requirements set out in the Basic Safety Standards for Nuclear Facilities in Lithuania Gintautas KLEVINSKAS Albinas MASTAUSKAS Radiation.
Chernobyl disaster The worst manmade disaster in human history
Coordinating with Station Emergency Response Agencies
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Czech Technical University in Prague
Nuclear Disaster: Chernobyl, Ukraine
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Presentation transcript:

P-1 Nuclear Power Plant Shut Down

P-2 Most Dangerous Reactors: A Compendium of Reactor Risk Assessments Units 1 & 2 “Reactors remain unstable and difficult to control and rely heavily on operator intervention to keep things from going out of kilter.” Ignalina Units 1& 2... Nuclear Plant Scenario Background

P-3 Ignalina Plant 2 RBMK Reactors Output of each: 4,800 thermal megawatts 1,500 electrical megawatts Produce 60-80% of Lithuania’s electricity

P-4 30km 54,000 Inhabitants 28,000 Animals Lithuanian Population within 30 km

P-5 Daugavpil, Latvia is 20 km from plant (Population = 130,000) 20km

P-6 Emergency Levels Local emergency - within structures Plant emergency - within the sanitary zone General emergency - beyond the sanitary zone

P-7 International Nuclear Event Scale Level 1- Anomaly... variation from permitted procedures Level 2 - Incident Level 3- Serious Incident... very small release of radioactivity Level 4 - Accident Without Significant Off-Site Risks Level 6 - Serious Accident... significant release of radioactivity; full implementation of local countermeasures Level 5 - Accident with Off-Site Risks... limited release of radioactivity; local countermeasures Level 7 - Major Accident... major release of radioactivity; widespread health and environmental effects

P-8 International Nuclear Event Scale Level 1- Anomaly Level 2- Incident Level 3- Serious Incident Level 4 - Accident Without Significant Off-Site Risks Level 6 - Serious Accident Level 5 - Accident with Off-Site Risks Level 7 - Major Accident Chernobyl Three-Mile Island

P-9 Chernobyl Timeline Start of Safety Test 1986 April 25 Explosion Fire Fighters Arrive April April 28 Fallout Reaches Belarus & Baltics 0130 Fallout Reaches Sweden & Poland May 2 Fallout Reaches UK Reactor Entombment

P-10 Global Coverage Normandy journalists Grenada journalists DESERT STORM journalists Hurricane Andrew (Florida) journalists 31 Satellite Transmission Trucks

P-11 The higher the proportion of victims. The more socially random the impact. The more sudden the change for the worse. The greater the sufferers are an identification group. The more the victims are blameless. Likelihood of Outside Support The greater the communications about losses suffered by victims, the more identification. Adopted from: Allen H. Barton, Social Organization Under Stress

P-12 Public Affairs Lessons from Three Mile Island Incident Before you start something, you should have a goal. Isolate your decision makers from the media. Guard against influence from agencies not part of your plan. Do not overreact to the situation. Tell the truth. Avoid trivia and trivial problems. Maintain maneuvering room.

P-13 International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Conventions Notify those states that are or may be affected...nature, time, and location. Provide information to minimize radiological consequences. Notification Assistance Overall direction, control, coordination, and supervision shall be the requesting state.

P-14 Notification Channels Civil Security Department Civil Security Department Power plant World Meteorological Organization World Meteorological Organization World Health Organization World Health Organization Food and Agriculture Organization Food and Agriculture Organization UN Environment Program UN Environment Program UN High Commission for Refugees (above 250,000) UN High Commission for Refugees (above 250,000) Non-Governmental Organizations Non-Governmental Organizations International Atomic Energy Agency International Atomic Energy Agency Member/Affected States Member/Affected States

P-15 Initial assessment is a normal functioning of plant’s emergency systems. The cause of trip under investigation Local - Lithuanian officials notify Latvia that Ignalina has been shut down by automatic reactor safety systems (reactor trip) Latvian reports of a widespread electrical blackout (within Latvia) triggered by the unexpected shutdown of Ignalina. Event May 5

P-16 Nuclear Plant Scenario Nuclear Plant Scenario Workshop 1 Evaluate situation Identify information and resource requirements and potential sources Prepare recommendations for government action, to include a public relations plan

P-17 Event Update May Local - Automatic reactor trip Blackout in Latvia Lithuania reports contact with Ignalina lost, radiation monitors between Ignalina and Daugavpil indicate higher than normal readings, and a general emergency is declared At least a class 5 event

P-18 Nuclear Plant Scenario Nuclear Plant Scenario Workshop 2 Evaluate situation Identify information and resource requirements and potential sources Prepare recommendations for government action, to include a public relations plan Identify changes from Workshop 1 and discuss reasons for changes

P-19 Nuclear Plant Scenario Scenario-a series of events at the Ignalina nuclear power plant in neighboring Lithuania that affect Latvia Objectives To understand events, and actions in response to those events, in the context of a free (and global) press To reinforce major teaching points for crisis management (recognition of crisis, information requirements, resources, need for common understanding, legal authority)