2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Presentation to MAFAC Recreational Fisheries Working Group April 13, 2011 Sabrina Lovell Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Use of Automated Telephone Reminders as an Alternative to Postcard Reminders in Survey Data Collection United States Department of Agriculture National.
Advertisements

The future of GAMEFISH is in the hands of informed an “The future of GAMEFISH is in the hands of informed anglers….” William Mote Founder, Snook & Gamefish.
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Louisiana’s Commercial and Recreational Coastal Fisheries Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
DR. ANTHONY W. DIXON DR. MARK HENRY Economic Significance of College Football as a Tourism Attraction.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
April 2015 Preliminary Report: Economic Impact of Public Natural Resource Lands JLARC Staff John Woolley Stephanie Hoffman Rebecca Connolly Legislative.
Changing Demographics in Texas
CE Overview Jay T. Ryan Chief, Division of Consumer Expenditure Survey December 8, 2010.
Texas: Demographic Characteristics and Trends Texas Association of Healthcare Interpreters and Translators August 19, 2011 Dallas, TX.
Measuing Preferences, Establishing Values, The Empirical Basis for Understanding Behavior David Levinson.
Beyond Health Care: The Economic Contribution of Hospitals July 2006.
NOPP Regional Ocean Observing Systems Benefits Project: Center for Economic Forecasting and Analysis (CEFA) Economic Impact Analysis of the Gulf of Mexico.
Integrating Representative Sample and High Net Worth Survey Data on Giving René Bekkers Center for Philanthropic Studies VU University Amsterdam.
Recreational Fisheries Engagement Initiative Update MAFAC Recreational Fisheries Working Group April 13, 2011.
The Changing Population of Texas Government Finance Officers Association of Texas October 25, 2012 San Marcos, TX.
How America Shops & Spends 2014
Chart 6.1: National Health Expenditures as a Percentage of Gross Domestic Product and Breakdown of National Health Expenditures, 2011 Source: Centers.
FSU Center for Economic Forecasting and Analysis (CEFA) Economic Impact Study for the GFMC By Dr. Tim Lynch, Director Dr. Julie Harrington, Asst. Director.
Grassroots Arts Program Partnership between local arts councils and NC Arts Council. All 100 counties in NC receive Grassroots arts program funds. In.
How Media Works: Advertising and the Purchase Funnel
IMPROVING MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING INFORMATION Gordon Colvin MAFAC July 2008 Update.
1 Kenneth E. Wallen a,b,c, Adam C. Landon a,b, Gerard T. Kyle a,b,c, Michael A. Schuett a,c, Jeremy Leitz d, & Ken Kurzawski d a Department of Recreation,
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Social Sector Statistics Department Tourism Statistics Group
The Economic Importance of the Chicago Harbors Marinas.
Eccles Housing Market Report Community Committee Meeting 25 th January 2005 Shahla Zandi Strategy and Planning (Partnerships and Planning)
San Joaquin County’s Health Profile: Useful Data to Improve Our Future Sponsored by the San Joaquin County Community Health Assessment Collaborative
Local Arts Council Subgranting Workshop. Grassroots Arts Program Partnership between local arts councils and NC Arts Council. All 100 counties in NC receive.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
The Uninsured in Alameda County 2010 December 2010.
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
Marine Recreational Information Program Update Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council April 9, 2013 Rob Andrews Office of Science and Technology.
Discovery Phase: where do we go from here? Co-directors contact information: Dr. Maureen Powers, Department of Cell Biology,
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
2011 Burlington/Plattsburgh Area Consumer Research Presented By: WPTZ-TV Internet Presentation.
N.C. DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES Coastal Angling Program PROGRESS REPORT N.C. Marine Fisheries Commission March 25, 2010.
West Virginia Division of Tourism Matching Advertising Partnership Program (MAPP)
Caribbean Fishery Management Council December 15, 2010.
June 3, 2016 Research & Monitoring Activities. 2 Overview Research — Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs)/Scientific Research Permits (SRPs) — Selected Research.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
Design and Analysis Work Group Issue : Bias in catch and effort estimates Projects : –STATISTICAL ESTIMATION: Assess appropriateness of estimation procedures.
Census 2000 Supplementary Survey: An Operational Feasibility Test Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau July 2001.
VerdierView Graph # 1 OVERVIEW Problems With State-Level Estimates in National Surveys of the Uninsured Statistically Enhancing the Current Population.
Increasing Efficiency in Data Collection Processes Arie Aharon, Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
PROVISIONS OF H.R SECTION 3: SCIENCE BASED IMPROVEMENTS TO MANAGEMENT [303(a )] Page 3, lines 22-25, Page 4, Page 5, lines 1-9 Paragraph 15 is.
Marine Recreational Information Program Update April 13, 2011.
American Community Survey (ACS) Using Census Data by Block Group January 21, 2016 Presentation at the National Community Development Association Winter.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
Presentation to the Oregon Retirement Security Board Anek Belbase and Geoffrey Sanzenbacher Center for Retirement Research at Boston College March 2015.
Natural Resources: An economic driver Jon Spieles, Acting UP Regional Coordinator.
Parves Khan Andrew Gostelow 7 October 2009 Tourist Information provision A national economic impact review Tourism Management Institute National Conference.
A MARINE RECREATIONAL FISHING LICENCE FOR ATLANTIC CANADA AND QUEBEC Consultations
The Winter Texan Report Winter 2006 Highlights…. Valley Markets and Tourism Research Center © UTPA 2006 Three studies were conducted…  Study 1 – Questionnaire.
Marketing & Brand Research AAA Member Poll 2011 Summer Travel and Entertainment Auto Club of Southern California May 2011.
History of the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) U.S. Virgin Islands Marine Recreational.
University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results
Marine recreational fishing licence regime for Eastern Canada
Presentation to the Nevada Commission on Tourism
2007 Household Travel Survey
Conversely Mixed Mode in the Swedish Crime Survey Sanna Wallin, researcher The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention Thank you! It’s very nice.
Challenges of Natural Resource Economics and Policy 2010
The Angling Attraction
Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) Regional Implementation Plan for the U.S. Caribbean Region SERO Proposed Amendment to the Reef Fish FMP.
Intern and Trainee Program Independent Review
More Americans Fishing
Progress in the implementation of RTMCF1 Action Plan.
MSP Regional Travel Behavior Inventory Program
Multi-Mode Data Collection
Presentation transcript:

2011 National Marine Recreational Fishing Expenditure Survey Presentation to MAFAC Recreational Fisheries Working Group April 13, 2011 Sabrina Lovell Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division

Why Collect Economic Data? Legislative mandates require economic assessments of proposed recreational fishing management actions –Associated change in angler expenditures and supporting businesses activity (economic impacts) Provides decision-makers with information to make more informed decisions Disaster preparedness and assessments

Who Can Use The Results? Fisheries Management Councils (e.g., for potential use in council decisions) NMFS Regional Offices and Science Centers (e.g., in review of proposed regulations; research) Non-profit organizations (e.g. analyses of projects or programs) Academic research (e.g., for use in improving recreational fisheries economic models) Recreational fishing community Any organiztion with an interest in marine recreational fisheries

2011 National Expenditure Survey Objectives Provide consistent and reliable estimates every 5 years - first nationwide survey conducted in 2006 In 2011, provide updated nationwide estimates of marine recreational angler expenditures Determine the economic impacts associated with marine recreational angling based on updated expenditures and more recent information on the structure of the economy

Collaborators NMFS, Office of Science and Technology, Fisheries Statistics Division Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission (AL, FL, LA, MS) Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission (CA, OR, WA) California, Alaska, Hawaii, and Texas NMFS Science Center economists

Population Sampled Anglers who are intercepted as part of the NMFS recreational fisheries data collection program –Atlantic states (Maine to East Florida) –Gulf states (West Florida to Louisiana) –Hawaii (shore and private boat modes) Fishing license holders in: –California –Oregon –Washington –Alaska –Texas Hawaii –National Saltwater Angler Registry

Survey Methodology For intercept states (Atlantic and Gulf, Hawaii) –Anglers will be asked trip related and trip expenditure questions as short extension of regular intercept survey –Anglers asked for contact information for follow up mail or internet survey on annual expenditures –Surveys will be sent out monthly For license frame states, names and contact information will be provided by states –Both most recent trip and annual expenditure questions will be asked on a mail or internet survey –Surveys will be sent out bi-monthly

Conducting the Survey invitations for online survey sent out to all anglers with an address – reminder sent 3 days later to anglers who have not yet completed survey –Second reminder sent 1 week after first –Secure, unique link to online survey included for each angler Mail surveys sent to 1) anglers who provided only a postal mailing address and 2) anglers not responding to online invitation within 1 week who also provided a mailing address –First mailing includes a cover letter and survey questionnaire –Reminder postcard after 1 week –Third mailing at 3 weeks with another cover letter and another copy of the questionnaire, if the angler has not yet returned the survey –Cover letter will include a link to the online survey website with a secure, unique access code

Information on Current/Last Trip Mode of fishing –Shore –Private/rental boat –For-Hire Top two target species Date of trip Location of trip (nearest city or town) Day trip or multi-day trip Number of nights away from home, number of days fished on trip Main purpose if on a multi-day trip (fishing, vacation, business)

Trip Expenditure Data Trip expenditures will be collected by state/mode/resident status 17 Daily trip expenditure categories: transportation (private, public, airfare, auto rental) food (from grocery stores or restaurants) boat fuel and oil boat rental charter fees, tips, and catch processing access and parking bait ice lodging tournament fees gifts and souvenirs Percent of expenditures made in state of trip

Trip Expenditure Table: Field Interview Anglers asked for expenditures for entire time away from home, not just the time spent fishing.

Surveys will have the appropriate state name throughout the text and appropriate pictures for the region. Sample Cover Page from Mail Survey

Annual Durable Expenditure Data Expenses during past 12 months Durable expenditures collected by state/resident status 32 annual fishing equipment and durable expense categories including: Tackle, rods and reels, other gear Camping equipment, clothing, binoculars Taxidermy Magazine subscriptions Club Dues License fees Boat purchases, boat accessories, and related expenses Vehicle purchases and related expenses Second home purchases and related expenses

Questions on expenditures related to fishing tackle.

Questions on expenditures related to boats. Similar questions for vehicles and second homes.

Demographic and Other Data Demographic questions Saltwater fishing avidity (2 months and 12 months) Highest level of education Gender Age Number of years they have been fishing Ethnicity Race Household income Number of hours per week they typically work How many days in the past 12 months that they fished for highly migratory species Space for additional comments

Results Expenditure results will include: –Mean trip expenditure by mode/state/resident status –Total trip expenditures by mode/state/resident status –Mean durable expenditures by state/resident status –Total durable expenditures by state/resident status –For each expenditure category, and total across trip or durable expenses Economic impact results will include: –Jobs –Sales/output –Value-added (contribution to GDP) –Income –For each trip and durable expenditure category and total

Implementation Data Collection: January 2011 to March 2012 (covering angler trips taken Jan-Dec 2011) Preliminary Analysis: starting in May 2011 Final Analysis: late 2011 to late 2012 (approximately) Report: Early 2013 ?

Products "The Economic Contribution of Marine Angler Expenditures in the United States, 2011" Fisheries Economics of the U.S. (annual) Interactive Fisheries Economics Impacts Tool report available at: _angler.html

Example Product: Angler Expenditures in Mid-Atlantic Fishing ModeTrip ExpendituresDurable EquipmentExpenditures Non- Residents ResidentsFishing Tackle896 For-Hire4458Other Equipment254 Private Boat165375Boat Expenses693 Shore136166Vehicle Expenses1,133 Total Trip Expenditures Second Home Expenses246 Total Durable Equipment Expenditures 3,222 Trip and Durable Equipment Expenditures4, (millions of dollars)

Another Example Product Interactive Fisheries Economics Impacts Tool Available on the NMFS website Same data as in Fisheries Economics of the US All coastal states and total U.S. recreational expenditures and impacts

How Can We Work Together? What information are you most interested in? What other data or products would you like to see? Are there opportunities for us to work together on products? Is there something else you would like included in the survey? How would you like to be updated on the progress of the survey and results? What is the best means of encouraging your members to participate in the survey if selected? Other thoughts or comments?

Thank You! Questions? For more information on the angler survey, please contact: – , ext 101