Text, Chapter 11, Pages 165-177 and Indiana’s Procedural Safeguards MEAGHAN WHEDON, KATIE SMITH, & RACHEL COHEN Procedural Safeguards Part 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Protection of privacy for all Students!
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
Surrogate Parent Training
Yes No Is the student 18 years old or older? ? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart.
Due Process of Law decisions regarding the education of students with disabilities must be made within the boundaries of due process of law that are established.
Procedural Safeguards Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 Procedural Safeguards Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Q and A Regarding 34 CFR § (b)(4). On December 1, 2008, USDOE issued a series of new regulations for IDEA. These newly amended regulations took.
1 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS. 2 Texas Education Agency provides Notice of Procedural Safeguards Rights of Parents of Students with Disabilities Download this.
September/October Prerequisite Skills Policies Governing the Services for Students with Disabilities NC IEP Team….  (4) A representative.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Students with Disabilities Parentally Placed in Nonpublic Elementary or Secondary Schools VESID Special Education Services New York State Education Department.
DISCIPLINE & DUE PROCESS 2007 Changes to NYS’ Special Education Laws and Regulations.
PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT. 11/10/05 22 Parent Involvement2 A parent is… (300.30)  Natural or adoptive parent of a child  A foster parent  A guardian but.
Rights for for Dads A Non Emotional Outcome Based Approach To Collaborative Business.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Las Cruces Public Schools Technical Assistance Training Department of Learning, Teaching and Research.
A presentation by the El Dorado County Office of Education Charter SELPA (adapted from a presentation developed by Riverside County SELPA)
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
Confidentiality and Public Information Act LISD Special Education Department Training SY
707 KAR 1:360 Confidentiality of Information. Section 1: Access Rights 1) An LEA shall permit a parent to inspect and review any education records relating.
Planning together for service
Be an Expert! Using and Explaining ESIT's New Procedural Safeguards Forms Joicey Hurth, Kathi Gillaspy, Anne Lucas Cathy Buchanan & Rene’ Denman 1.
2012 Change Documents ARD Process Guide & Notice of Procedural Safeguards.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
HOOVER CITY SCHOOLS In-Service Training: Annual Review of.
What are Parent’s Rights in Georgia Special Education? Parents and students over age eighteen have the right … To Participate You have the right to refer.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Lions, and Tigers, and Due Process, Oh My! An Overview of Dispute Resolution.
CONFIDENTIALITY Q & A’s for School Staff. What Laws Apply to Records of Students? ► 2 Federal Laws  Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) 
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year
AEA Special Education Procedures Special Education Records Pages
Confidentiality A Training Without the Video. Laws FERPA (1976) or the Buckley Amendment (1994) IDEA (1991) KY Safe Schools (1998)
1 CONFIDENTIALITY. 2 Requirement Under IDEA 34 CFR Sec (c) All staff collecting or using personally identifiable information in public education.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 IDEA 2004 Part B Regulations: Critical Issues Margaret.
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
1 IDEA REAUTHORIZATION PRESENTATION OF COMPLAINT A district must have a procedure that gives any party the opportunity to present a complaint.
The New IDEA in Special Education
2/23/06 SURROGATE PARENT TRAINING Laurie VanderPloeg Kent ISD.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 7 Liability.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
Welcome to Parent’s Rights SEPAC Meeting September 26, 2016.
Section 504 training.
Procedural Safeguards
Tomball Independent School District Annual Confidentiality Training
Russellville Independent School District
Parents’ Basic Rights Notice of Procedural Safeguards For students who have been referred or are currently receiving Special Education Services. January.
A Guide to Understanding Rights and Responsibilities
Options for Dispute Resolution
Options for Dispute Resolution
? Surrogate Parent Decision-Making Flowchart
Options for Dispute Resolution
Options for Dispute Resolution
Presentation transcript:

Text, Chapter 11, Pages and Indiana’s Procedural Safeguards MEAGHAN WHEDON, KATIE SMITH, & RACHEL COHEN Procedural Safeguards Part 1

Foundations Procedural safeguards are the rights and responsibilities of parents and schools. They are given to parents at least once a year and also upon these occasions:  Initial referral or parent’s request for evaluation;  Filing of the first complaint during the school year;  Filing of the first due process hearing during the school year;  The date the school decides to take disciplinary action that constitutes a change of placement, including removal to an interim alternative educational setting for weapons, drugs, or serious bodily injury; and  Parent’s request. 2

The Right to Be Notified: Written Notice A school must give a parent written notice when it:  Proposes to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, special education placement or anything related to providing a FAPE to your child; or   Refuses to initiate or change the identification, evaluation, special education placement or anything related to providing a FAPE to your child. 3

The Right to Be Notified: Parental Consent 7 circumstances that require parental consent: 1. Before your child is evaluated for the first time 2. Before the school can provide special education and related services. 3. Before the school reevaluated your child, unless the school can demonstrate that it has taken reasonable steps to obtain your consent but you have failed to respond 4. Before the school can access your child’s public benefits or insurance programs or private insurance proceeds. 5. Before the school can release the student’s educational records to officials of any participating agency that is providing or paying for transition services or invite to the CCC meeting a representative from any participating agency (other tha a public agency) who may be providing or paying for transition services. 6. Before the school district of legal settlement and the school district where the nonpublic (private) school is located can exchange information about a student who has been unilaterally enrolled in a nonpublic school. 7. Before the public agency representative, teacher of record, general education teacher, or instructional strategist (individual who can interprets instructional implications of the evaluation) may be excused from attending and participating in all or part of a CCC meeting. 4

The Right to Be Fully Informed: Evaluations If you suspect your child has a disability and requires special education and related services, you may request that the school conduct an initial educational evaluation of your child. A comprehensive evaluation must be conducted before the CCC can determine if a student is eligible for special education and related services. Your written consent is required before the school can conduct the evaluation. You may request that the school conduct an initial educational evaluation of your child by:  sending a signed written request to licensed school personnel (e.g., teacher, principal, guidance counselor, or school psychologist), or  making a verbal request to licensed school personnel. The initial evaluation must be conducted and the CCC convened within 50 days from the day you received your consent. If the child has participated in RTI and has not made improvement then they have 20 days from the day they receive written consent. 5

The Right to Be Fully Informed: CCC  You have the right to participate in all CCC meetings for your child until he or she reaches 18 years of age. You have the right to participate after the student turns 18 if you have obtained guardianship of or have been appointed as the educational representative for the student.  You have the right to request that the CCC meet if you believe that a required component of the student’s IEP needs to be changed to ensure the provision of a FAPE.  You have the right to have the CCC meeting scheduled at a mutually agreed upon date, time, and place.  If you want to participate, but cannot attend the CCC meeting in person, you may participate by telephone or other means. 6

The Right to Be Fully Informed: Confidentiality Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA), is the law that regulates confidentiality of student’s records. The right to inspect and review educational records includes the right to:   an explanation and interpretation of your child’s record from school personnel;   have other arrangements made to review and inspect, including obtaining a copy of the record, if the school’s failure to provide those copies deprives you of the opportunity to review and inspect the record;   a copy of the record if you are involved in a pending due process hearing 7

The Right to a Surrogate The IDEA regulations allow for a foster parent to have the legal standing of a parent. The law has included the requirement that the state or local educational agency (SEA or LEA) or other state agency assign a surrogate parent for educational purposes when no parent can be identified, the public agency is unable to locate a parent, or the child is a ward of the state under the laws of the particular state. If the definitions of a parent and foster parent still fail to generate a parent for the child, then the agency must assign a surrogate parent for educational purposes. 8

The Right to Dissent The law requires that the due process complaint notice include a description of the nature of the child’s problem as it relates to whatever it is that the LEA proposes or refuses to initiate or change, including all relevant facts relating to that problem, and a proposed resolution for the problem. The 2004 amendments to the IDEA added three new features within section 615.  Right to complain not only for parents but any party, including school system.  New terminology: “Due process complaint notice”  Included a statute of limitations for two years for bringing an action The due process complaint notice was added through three major notices; prior written, procedural safeguards, & due process complaint. 9

The Right to Nonadversarial Conflict Resolution The mediation provisions require that the SEAs and LEAs maintain procedures to “allow all parties to dispute”. Both the cost and the general management of the mediation function must be borne by the SEA; the law requires that the state maintain an up-to-date list of qualified mediators who are also required to be conversant in federal and state laws and regulations governing special education and related service. Using mediation to resolve disputes under the IDEA is entirely voluntary on the part of all parties.  A district cannot use it to deny or in any way delay the parents’ rights to a hearing. 10

The Right to a Hearing The IDEA has always deferred to state policy with respect to which agency the LEA or the SEA will conduct the hearing. Until 2004, IDEA referred only to the parents’ right to a due process hearing. The time line for requesting a hearing now contains a statute of limitation.  Parent must request a hearing within two years within the date the agency or parent “knew or should have known about the alleged action that forms the basis of the complaint”. 11

Burden of Proof The IDEA does not address which party carries the burden of proof when someone challenges the effectiveness of an IEP. There were four main court cases that emerged.  Kerkam v. McKenzie (1988)  Roland M. v. Concord School Committee (1991)  Oberti v. Board of Education (1993)  Clyde K. v. Puyallap (1994) 12

The Right to a Qualified, Impartial Hearing Officer In the 2004 rendered edition of IDEA it stated that: “No hearing conducted pursuant to the requirements of this paragraph shall be conducted by an employee of such agency or unit involved in the education or care of the child” In the early years, a hearing officer typically may have been a competent educator, human services provider, or other professional who was subsequently trained in the basic rules and procedures of a hearing. Not so today, now through legal expertise is the paramount qualification. 13

The Right to Appeal The IDEA regulations stipulate that a final decision shall be made by the hearing officer within 45 days of when a party filed a due process complaint. A hearing officer’s ruling shall be considered final. Since 1975, IDEA’s inception both parents and educational agencies with particular emphasis on parents have the right to pursue judicial remedy in court. 14

The Right to Reimbursement The 1986 amendment to IDEA included the right to attorneys; fees amendments to the IDEA authorized the court to award attorneys’ fee s to SEAs and LEAs when either prevails against the attorney or the parent. The parent of a child with a disability obtains favorable verdict in his or her court action.  May require the losing party (the district) to pay the cost of the parents’ attorneys throughout the appeals process. 15