Product Authorisation Workshop on REACH and EU Biocidal Product Legislation in practice (Experiences from EU Industry) INT MARKT 48493 Belgrade, Serbia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 European Commission The role of regional networks in the EU policy making process Disclaimer: This contains the personal opinions of the author.
Advertisements

Introduction to Article 45 (5) of the CLP Regulation
Klicken Sie, um das Titelformat zu bearbeiten TÜV Product Service Ltd © Open Day 24 June 2010 Phil Dolling REACh: What is it and how does it affect you?
Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
Interactions between IED and REACH Exploring the opportunities for cooperation Valletta, Malta October 2013 Geert Dancet Executive Director Conference.
Health and Safety Executive Regulator’s expectation in implementation of comparative assessment Jayne Wilder Chemicals Regulation Directorate, Health and.
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Reviewing the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 Crop Protection European Regulatory Conference
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Chemicals Policy in Europe: New Directions Rachel Massey Policy Analyst April 2006.
Léa RIFFAUT ANSES PPP Coordination Unit
Product Authorisation Workshop on REACH and EU Biocidal Product Legislation in practice (Experiences from EU Industry) INT MARKT Belgrade, Serbia.
© 2005 Notification and Reporting on Food Incidents: Irish Approach Food & Drugs Authority Bangkok Thailand Dorothy Guina-Dornan.
The Substitution Approach in the “White Paper on the Future EU Chemicals Policy” European Conference on Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals Hamburg, 13.
1 REACh Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals and Restriction! Ohio Valley SOT Wednesday, August 26, 2009 REACh: The New Toxicology Frontier.
Identifying and addressing chemicals of concern under REACH and CLP.
Introduction to REACH Awareness and Compliance Assistance Workshop for the Exporters of Apparel Date: 3rd August 2011 Venue: India Habitat Centre, New.
The Biocidal Products Directive Presentation to the European Aerosol Federation 28 September 2005 Athens Greece Steve Smith, SC Johnson.
June 2008 Proposal for a Regulation to replace Directive 91/414/EEC July 2008 T Lyall.
Final core presentation, 05/01/2001 A European new joint initiative between: A.I.S.E (International Soap, Detergent and Maintenance Products Association)
Preparing for REACH implementation: The RIP process Dimosthenis A. Sarigiannis, PhD Institute for Health and Consumer Protection DG Joint Research Centre.
REACH New requirements for introduction of chemicals on EU market Jana Kovačičová Centre for Chemical Substances and Preparations Bratislava, Slovakia.
1 REACH, the Future EU policy for Chemicals European Conference in Eretria April 27, 2004 Tony Musu – European Trade Union Technical Bureau/ETUC.
European Commission 1 TSM Regulation: Spectrum Briefing on Telecoms Single Market Package Anthony Whelan Head of Unit – Spectrum Electronic Communications.
The European Engineering Industries Association How Downstream Users REACH? Impacts and challenges of REACH for EU Cutlery, Flatware, Holloware, and Cookware.
& H AS HEALTH AND SAFETY AUTHORITY REACH and Downstream Users Marie McCarthy REACH GI Inspector Health and Safety Authority.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
CHEMSTEWARDS SOCMA COMPLIANCE MORE FOR MEMBERS - VISIT SIEF and Consortium Management Issues under REACH Dr. C. T. Helmes Senior Director.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
WHO Workshop on Prequalification of Medicines Programme, Abu Dhabi, October, 2010 Regulatory principles reflected in practice of WHO PQP Milan Smid,
REACH A modern chemicals policy Anya Oram Head of the Economic and Commercial Affairs Section Delegation of the European Commission in Canada.
REACH: state of art and base definitions WERCS 2007 US User group Albany 27/06/2007 Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy.
REACH – Consequences of CLP Lars S. Rasmussen, The Wercs 2009 Global User Group June 2009 The Desmond Hotel, Albany, NY (WATER ●
ECHA activities relating to Nanomaterials
Health and Consumers Health and Consumers Commission view on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 ECPA/ECCA Brussels Regulatory Conference.
REACH: state of art and base definitions Dr. Erwin Annys Sr. Advisor Product & Innovation Policy WERCS 2007 EU User group Napoli 31/05/07.
1 State of Play Prioritisation of Substances By modelling Hazard & Exposure Klaus Daginnus Institute for Health & Consumer Protection Joint Research Centre,
ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, Croatia, December 2006 EU Notification Scheme (New Substances) and New Chemicals Database ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, December.
IMPLEMENTING MEASURES GM FOOD – FEED REGULATION (EC) N° 1829/2003 -Articles 5 and 17 concerning the presentation and preparation of the application -Articles.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency,
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Introduction to REACH Flavie Guérin U.S. Mission to the EU 15 November 2011.
CLP and biocides:classification and labelling issues Maristella Rubbiani CSC-ISS Roma.
We personally care 31 May 2016 – Working Group on Cosmetic Products EU Cosmetics Regulation – Article 15.2 Criteria for exempting CMR1A and 1B from being.
Key elements of the concepts and approaches within the EU in the chemical sector Dr. Marcus Moreno-Horn TAIEX: Workshop, Yerevan 2-3 May 2011 Federal Office.
TAIEX, Workshop on BPR and Practices, Ankara 6-7 June REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH CHEMICALS OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA Transitional.
REACH & CLP Downstream user overview 1. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by.
Identifying and addressing chemicals of concern under REACH and CLP
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
R4BP 3.9 key users testing Introduction 4-5 May 2017 Roberto Gilioli
R4BP 3.10 and SPC editor key users testing
UA – Same biocidal product SPC translation review
CCMI 9 September 2015 Public Hearing: Nanotechnology for a competitive chemical industry Social aspects: education, health and safety.
Applications for same biocidal products (NA-BBP)
(Follow-up of the discussion at the 66th CA meeting)
Management of product authorizations for in situ cases
Management of product authorization for in situ cases (IGS)
Notifications for poison centres according to Annex VIII CLP
Hazardous substances on the EU market
Biocides Dissemination
Substitution of substances of high concern
State of play endocrine disruptors
State of play in the EU for criteria to identify endocrine disruptors
Conclusions from the Review of REACH
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
? i BPD BPR Annexes TNsG Annex related Regulatory & Procedural content
Update on EU draft Regulation
Presentation transcript:

Product Authorisation Workshop on REACH and EU Biocidal Product Legislation in practice (Experiences from EU Industry) INT MARKT Belgrade, Serbia Raf Bruyndonckx 1 June 2012 Procedures and Requirements

Outline General principles Procedures Application Data requirements Fees Role of industry associations 2

Cefic 3 Cefic – European Chemical Industry Council Membership 28 national chemical federations > 600 companies > 20 affiliated sector associations Horizontal - vertical EU Policy Centre: REACH, International trade, energy and climate change, HSE, logistics, R&I … 104 Sector Groups

EBPF 4 European Biocidal Products Forum Sector group of Cefic Regulatory developments of EU biocides legislation AS producers & BP formulators 70 members: companies, associations, federations Recognised stakeholder & observer Implementation BPD: AS evaluation – BP authorisation New Regulation

EBPF – European Biocidal Products Forum General Assembly Management Committee General Issues Advocacy Team Communication Issues Team Data Sharing WG Product Authorisation WG Sustainable Use WG Dietary RA ISG Sector-Specific Issues Disinfectants WG Insecticides WG Rodenticides WG RDDG Best Practice WG

BPR - New era starting Sep 2013 Updated EU biocides law applicable 1 Sep 2013 Regulation – directly applicable to all EU Same principles, improved procedures – mutual recognition, changes to products New concepts – EU authorisation, product family Extended scope – treated articles European Chemicals Agency 6

Abbreviations BPDBiocidal Product Directive 98/8/EC BPRBiocidal Product Regulation ASactive substance BPbiocidal product PTproduct type PAproduct authorisation MRmutual recognition LoAletter of access MSmember state(s) 7

Product Authorisation General Principles 8

General principles 9 Authorisation is required before placing on the market Authorisation is granted for max. 10 years Authorisation can be granted if all conditions are fulfilled: AS is approved for relevant PT + AS source is on positive list The product is effective No unacceptable effects on target organism (resistance) No unacceptable effects on HH, ENV or animal health Chemical identity is known (impurities/residues) Phys-chem properties acceptable for transport and use

General principles 10 A BP cannot be authorised for use by general public if: It is classified acute tox. (dermal, oral, inhalation); It is classified CMR 1 or 2; It has PBT properties; It has endocrine disrupting properties or It has developmental neurotoxic or immunotoxic effects

General principles 11 Dossier elements: AS data: LoA or complete dossier BP data: complete dossier (or LoA) Assessment of hazard, risk (through relevant exposure) and efficacy Draft Summary of the biocidal Product Characteristics (SPC)

SPC – the ID card of a BP 12 Trade name Authorisation holder – authorisation number Date of authorisation & expiry date Manufacturer of BP and AS Qualitative and quantitative composition Type of formulation – categories of users Instructions for use and safe disposal

Product Authorisation Procedures 13

Different procedures 14 (National) authorisation – provisional authorisation Mutual recognition (in parallel or in sequence) BPR: Union authorisation Coordination by ECHA, evaluation by MS, decision by COM Simplified authorisation procedure Parallel trade authorisation “Same product” authorisation

Timelines 15 2 years to submit dossier 2 years to grant, amend or withdraw authorisations 3 months for completeness check 12 months for first authorisation 2 months to apply for mutual recognition 4 months to recognise first authorisation 3 months to resolve diverging opinions

31/12/10 1/01/07 1/01/09 8/09/06 3 months completeness check (01/01 to 31/03/09) 2 months application for mutual recognition (01/04 to 31/05/10) 12 months 1 st evaluation and authorisation (01/04/09 to 31/03/10) 4 months recognition of 1 st authorisation (01/06 to 30/09/10) 3 months (01/10 to 31/12/10) † † No application/notification (30/06/09) Failed completeness check (30/09/09) Timelines 16

Union authorisation - scope 17 Valid across all MS at once Similar conditions of use across the Union - guidance Excluded: Art 5 – PTs 14, 15, 17, 20 and 21 Sep 2013: new AS - PTs 1, 3, 4, 5, 18 and 19 Jan 2017: PTs 2, 6 and 13 Jan 2020: all categories Assessment report by 31 Dec 2017

18 Conditions: AS in Annex I (BPR), no SoC, no nano, no PPE, sufficiently efficient No requirement for a LoA to AS dossier Submission to the Agency Evaluation by a MS within 90 days Once authorised, notification to other MS is sufficient – no MR Simplified authorisation procedure

“Same product” authorisations 19 Identical products Existing practice (NL, FI, CH, SE, DK, PT, BE, IT...) Mutual recognition within a MS between companies Faster procedures Principle in BPR, follow-up regulation

Product Authorisation Application 20

R4BP 21 Register for Biocidal Products Electronic database – “EU catalogue of products” Application form – Applicant & product Decision and assessment report BPR: Electronic submissions – no more paper Central communication and process management tool Covers both AS and BP

R4BP 22

Product Authorisation Data requirements 23

General outline 24 Data on the active substance(s) – LoA to Annex I dossier Substances of concern Data on the biocidal product Use description – exposure assessment Analytical methods Properties/Effect/hazard assessment (PC, TOX, ENV) Risk assessment Efficacy

25

Data waiving 26 A data requirement is not relevant to the product and/or the intended use A study cannot be performed because the test is not feasible The outcome of a study can be accurately predicted based on a scientific argumentation The outcome of the study is in no way relevant to the risk assessment, classification and labelling or intended use

Principle approach 27 Collate info on components - AS and SoC Start with detailed use description Derive possible exposure (exclude specific routes) Properties/Effect/hazard assessment Risk assessment – Risk reduction measures Efficacy

Availability of data 28 Active substance dossier (LoA required) Co-formulants: REACH – MSDS Public literature

Product Authorisation Fees 29

Fees 30 Broad variation across MS First authorisation: – Euro Changes: 500 – Euro Renewal: 500 – 50% of original fee Annual fee: fixed or related to sales

Role of industry associations 31

Role of industry associations 32 General representation of industry Endeavour to be recognised stakeholder Consensus driven position taking Competition law considerations No specific role regarding data sharing

Useful sources of information 33 Note for guidance to applicants for PA and MR - linklink EU Evaluation Manual - linklink TNsG on data requirements – linklink TNsG on product evaluation – linklink Joint Research Centre – biocides section - linklink

Raf Bruyndonckx