Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learner-Centered Education Course Redesign Initiative Builds upon work of prior LCE grants Will award grants of $40,000 - $50,000, with the option.
Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Culminating Academic Review Adams State College Department of Teacher education graduate programs.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Engaging Online Faculty and Administrators in the Assessment Process at the American Public University System Assessment and Student Learning: Direct and.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Summer Institute, May16,  Peer review process that evaluates educational programs and services for quality.  Transferability of credit hours.
Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.
22 May Session Overview Purposes: Provide an overview of the assessment plan for Foundational Studies Discuss Phase I of the assessment plan – assessing.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Making Your Assessments More Meaningful Flex Day 2015.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
1 Dissertation Process 4 process overview 4 specifics –dates, policies, etc.
NSE Assessment (Session 1): The Academic Plan Assignment for MEP
1 C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs C-99 Assessing Student Learning in Graduate Degree Programs Bob Smallwood, University of.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
GEO Course Mapping Dr. Mary Menzel - Germanson Director Myna Frestedt Support Analyst
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
Engaging the Arts and Sciences at the University of Kentucky Working Together to Prepare Quality Educators.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Achieving the Dream Status Report Mentor Visit February 5-6, 2009.
SENSE Fall 2007 Pilot Orientation Conference Calls.
Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.
Faculty Evaluation Committee Workshop. Overview Evaluation Timeline Portfolio as a Whole Portfolio Organization –Teaching –Service (Students, College,
Developing a Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plan for the Virginia Grade Level Alternative (VGLA) Adapted from the Virginia Department of Education Division.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Competency Assessment Advisory Team (CAAT) QUANTITATIVE REASONING DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS REP – ROB NICHOLS 1.
© 2007 SRI International CPATH Principal Investigators Meeting: Program Evaluation Update March 26, 2010 By the Center for Education Policy Dr. Raymond.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Summer Institute Session Team Leaders Check-In April 10 th, 2013 Re Mute Your Computer!!! Welcome! We will begin at 10:00 am I will move you to panelist,
Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.
AAC&U VALUE Project: Minnesota Collaborative Demonstration Year 2 ( ) Demonstration Year 3 ( ) 1.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.
MAY 1, 2014 THE LOOK AND FEEL OF TASKSTREAM. PERCEPTION OF ASSESSMENT: COMPLIANCE Accreditation Write Outcomes Identify Assessments Gather Results PackageResults.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Module 8: Effective Innovation Review and Selection Process
Dr. Ruth Newberry February 16, 2015
A Learning Analytics Approach to Academic Assessment
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Writing the Institutional Report
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Critical Inquiry (Goal A):
Critical Inquiry (Goal C):
District discipline lead spring meeting agenda
Critical Inquiry (Goal B):
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012

ASSESSMENT LEADER TRAINING

The purpose of General Education Assessment is to measure student learning based on student work from an aggregated, institutional perspective. The six GEOs focus on institutional level student learning outcomes which may be assessed across the curriculum and co-curriculum. CAC will NOT use GEO assessment results to evaluate instructors. PURPOSE

ASSESSMENT LEADER RESPONSIBILITIES 1.Serve as communication point person for the Assessment Team (AT) to GEO Chair and SLA Director 2.Coordinate team efforts to identify, collect, score student artifacts using the GEO Rubric and submit results a. Lead Evaluation Subteam to score artifacts b. Complete and submit data results 3.Facilitate analysis of results, share results at Open Forums; Lead identification of improvement to student learning 4. Write the GEO Assessment Executive Report (preliminary) and Final Report and recommend process improvements

Sample Size (30 students or 10% of total student enrollment in the course) Testing/Assessment Parameters Evaluation Team members (3): Timeline: Date of Assessment, Date Artifacts sent to Assessment Leader Date of Norming Session/Evaluation Session Date Raw Data submitted to SLA Director Meeting Schedule ( /phone/itv/live): include planning, follow-up analysis of Data Report, Open Forums, decision phase and report writing phase PROCESS DECISIONS

ASSESSMENT Spring 2012 Spring 2012 Conduct Spring 2012 assessment of all 27 GEO Standards across the curriculum Share with Academic Leadership Fall 2011 GEO Course Assessment Executive Report, the preliminary results; participate in Open Forums to further analyze results and submit Fall 2011 Final GEO Course Assessment Report to GEO Chair and SLA Director (DUE: March 19) Assessment Leader submits GEO Raw Data to SLA Director Assessment Team analyzes Data Report from IPR and assists Assessment Leader to write report; DUE: May 11

Summer Sessions I and II 2012 Conduct Summer 2012 assessment of all 27 GEO Standards across the curriculum CAC presents the results of four year Action Project on Assessment of Student Learning of six General Education Outcomes on June 6-8, 2012 at HLC Conference GEO Raw Data Submissions form to SLA Director DUE: Aug. 8 Preliminary GEO Assessment Report DUE: Aug. 15 Spring 2012 Final GEO Course Assessment Report to GEO Chair and SLA Director (DUE: Aug. 17) ASSESSMENT Summer 2012

Spring 2012

Summer 2012

1 Fall 2012 Conduct Assessment per plan finalized spring 2012 Spring 2013 Further analysis, Open Forums, Improvement identified with sustainability plan which culminate in report and presentations Summer 2013 through Spring 2014 Implement improvement plan and pilot Summer with full implementation Fall semester Ongoing assessment of student learning to evaluate improvement plan results REPEAT for Year 2 GEOs 3-YEAR ASSESSMENT CYCLE

Fall

STUDENT ARTIFACT SELECTION With course content experts, review the course syllabi and existing assignments. Identify the best one which aligns with the GEO Standard that occurs near the semester end. Slight rewording or framing questions may need to be crafted to achieve the desired essay/assignment demonstrating the skill/knowledge.

Determine: 1. Date/week artifacts are due, taking into account modality limitations. 2. If students may use the text or other resource/reference tool such as a dictionary or if the quiz is closed book. 3. If a team of students may create/deliver the project/presentation. Common parameters include: students must independently complete the assignment/quiz/presentation during class during week Or, students are required to complete Exam 3 in a proctored setting during week 12. SET ASSESSMENT PARAMETERS

STUDENT SAMPLE Determine total student enrollment in all course sections a.If 30 students are enrolled, include all 30 in your sample. a.If more than 30 students are enrolled, include 10% of total enrollment in your sample. For example, if there are 500 students enrolled in all sections, your sample is 50 students drawn from all sections. Based on alpha-ordered class rosters, include student 1, student 11, student 21 and 31. NOTE: All student GEO artifacts must include CAC student identification number.

SCORING STUDENT ARTIFACTS Use the CAC Institutional GEO Rubric to score artifacts. Norming Session – conducted prior to Scoring Randoming select two samples With a team of three Evaluators, each individually reviews and scores the student work and places a score on the back of the last sheet (essay/quiz/one-minute paper) The Evaluation team reconvenes to share scores given each sample and to provide their rationale. If scores are very diverse, score two more and norm.

SCORING STUDENT ARTIFACTS, Part II Determine one score from 0 to 3 per student artifact, per GEO Standard. If 30 student artifacts, divide the stack into thirds so that two evaluators score each artifact by attaching a slip/sticky note to the back with a solid score from 0 to 3 and the evaluators initials. Evaluators do not look at the other evaluator’s score. After all artifacts have two scores on the back page, flip them over and determine if there are any with discrepancies, i.e. different scores from the two evaluators. If different scores, the third evaluator scores the artifact. Upon completion, team may choose to discuss or the third evaluator determines the final score. An average rounded up or down may be the artifact’s final score. For example: evaluator 1 scores it a 2, evaluator 2 scores it a 3, then evaluator 3 scores it a 2. Final score for the artifact: 2.

RAW DATA SUBMISSION FORM COMPLETION

Refer to page 32 in the Guide DATA REPORT Sample

REPORTS

GEO Assessment Executive Report

Upcoming Deadlines Mar. - Aug. 2012

Use the Blackboard: Evidence of Student Success site for resources, meeting minutes and tools Participate in training opportunities GEO Course Map completion and use CAC Institutional GEO Rubric PowerPoint Presentations on the C&SLA site GEO Assessment Success TIPS

Thursday, February 9, 10:30, 4:30 & 6 pm Course Assessment Leader Training Friday, February 17, 10:30 am Course Assessment Leader Training Tuesday, February 21, Superstition Mountain Campus, prior to Governing Board Meeting (noon to 1:15 pm) Friday, February 24, Faculty Development Day – GEO Roundtable Tuesday, March 20, Signal Peak Campus, prior to Governing Board meeting (noon to 1:15 pm) Tuesday, April 17, Aravaipa Campus, prior to Governing Board Meeting (noon to 1:15 pm) TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES

Thank You! Coming soon: How to Analyze Data and How to Write Assessment Reports. The ongoing evaluation of General Education Student Learning contributes to the success of all our degree and AGEC certificate completers.

THE END