A Primer on Growth Percentiles 2009-10 Elementary/Middle School Progress Reports January 29, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Stanford 10 Results
Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
VALUE – ADDED 101 Ken Bernacki and Denise Brewster.
Options for School Grades, AYP, and MAP/STAR FCAT Advisory Committee Meeting June 13, 2007.
Chapter 9: The Normal Distribution
State testing is one important way to demonstrate that our students are learning at Bristol. The following slides show how Bristol ranks with state proficiency.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
Portfolio Mid-Year Accountability Status Report March 3 rd, 2013.
Different Skills? Identifying Differentially Effective Teachers of English Language Learners Ben Master, Susanna Loeb, Camille Whitney, James Wyckoff 5.
Introduction to the Georgia Student Growth Model Student Growth Percentiles 1.
12.4 – Measures of Position In some cases, the analysis of certain individual items in the data set is of more interest rather than the entire set. It.
Reading Your Child’s Cognitive Abilities Test Profile Bonnie O’Regan Advanced Learning Program Facilitator Greenwich Public Schools February 5, 2014 (snowdate:
UNDERSTANDING HOW THE RANKING IS CALCULATED Top-to-Bottom (TTB) Ranking
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
How Can Teacher Evaluation Be Connected to Student Achievement?
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
School Performance Framework Sponsored by The Colorado Department of Education Summer 2010 Version 1.3.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
Data Review. Consecutive Year Grade Grouping Comparisons READING Proficiency 3 rd to 4 th 73% to 87% UP 14% 4 th to 5 th 69% to 62% Down 7% 5.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
TVAAS Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System
Understanding ITBS Scores A Guide for Parents Created By: Ginger Psalmonds/CST New Prospect Elementary.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting September 21, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Task Force Meeting: September 21, 2010.
Measures of Variability Percentile Rank. Comparison of averages is not enough. Consider a class with the following marks 80%, 80%, 80%, 90%, 20%, 70%,
Student Achievement Dashboard Training. Objectives ●PWBAT understand the purpose for using the dashboard to analyze student achievement ●PWBAT understand.
Understanding the Rhode Island Growth Model An Introductory Guide for Educators May 2012.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
NH Commissioner’s Task Force Meeting August 10, 2010 NH DOE 1 Commissioner's Force Meeting: August 10, 2010.
DVAS Training Find out how Battelle for Kids can help Presentation Outcomes Learn rationale for value-added progress measures Receive conceptual.
Welcome to MMS MAP DATA INFO NIGHT 2015.
Presented by: Andy McDermott Principal-Willow Elementary School Title I Annual Meeting.
MCAS Results Merrymount Elementary School “The toughest thing about success is that you’ve got to keep on being a success.” -Irving Berlin.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. How Do They Do That? EVAAS and the New Tests October 2013 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) MDE - AdvancED Michigan 2014 Fall School Improvement Conference November 18, 2014.
A-F G RADING M ODEL Presented: January 5, 2012 What we know…
February 2016 Our School Report Cards and Accountability Determinations South Lewis Central School District.
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
The Normal Distribution and Norm-Referenced Testing Norm-referenced tests compare students with their age or grade peers. Scores on these tests are compared.
October 24, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Accountability and Reporting Oregon Department of Education.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
The READY Accountability Report: Growth and Performance of North Carolina Public Schools State Board of Education November 7, 2013.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Accountability Report Example Elementary/Middle Level ELA Performance.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
Leader slts PRIOR TO : Principal set a minimum of two goals, which express an expectation of student growth. SPS available for use.
Understanding ITBS Scores
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
INVEST An Outcome Based Model
ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Data Tables Packet #19.
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
READY Accountability November 2013.
12.4 – Measures of Position In some cases, the analysis of certain individual items in the data set is of more interest rather than the entire set. It.
Irvington Public Schools
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
SGP What is it and where did it come from?.
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

A Primer on Growth Percentiles Elementary/Middle School Progress Reports January 29, 2010

222 Introduction There are several ways to measure student growth year-to-year The Progress Reports have historically compared a student’s proficiency this year to his proficiency last year to make a growth determination This growth measurement creates the right incentive for every student (i.e., maximize growth), but does not fully account for the contours of the performance-progress relationship; specifically more low performing students make one year of progress than high performing students Other districts have chosen different ways to measure student growth; in particular, Colorado has adopted a growth model that has been approved by the U.S. DOE which uses growth percentiles Growth percentiles, as we’ll show in the presentation, represent the next generation of student progress measurement, as they control for each student’s starting proficiency New York State has openly expressed an interest in learning more about the Colorado model as it seeks to adopt its own growth model; this may present an opportunity for NYC and NYS to align their school evaluations for Elementary/Middle Schools over time ( Performance Percentage of students making one year of progress Not proficient Proficient

33 Growth percentiles control for a student’s starting proficiency rd grade 3.7 (90 th percentile) 2.4 (10 th percentile) 3.4 (70 th percentile) Illustrative4 th grade … Assume there were 1,000 students who scored a 3.0 in 3 rd grade; we could then rank each student’s improvement based on his/her growth percentile A student who progresses from 3.0 to 3.4 would be in the 70 th percentile for all students who started with a proficiency rating of 3.0 in 3 rd grade 3.0 (35 th percentile) … …

4 Growth percentiles defined A student’s growth percentile indicates the percentage of students, starting at the same place, that the student’s growth exceeded A 50 th percentile outcome means that a student made more growth than 50% of the students who started at the same place

5 Percentiles are used in many contexts Example: pediatric growth charts Child A, at 55 inches, is in the 50 th to 75 th percentile for his age Child B, at 50 inches, is in the 5 th to 10 th percentile for his age

6 Conceptually, our approach would be the same, except that we would be mapping starting proficiency against growth in proficiency Starting proficiency Next year’s proficiency

77 Growth percentiles control for how likely students are to make one year of progress given their starting proficiency (90 th percentile) 2.4 (10 th percentile) 3.0 (35 th percentile) (90 th percentile) 3.7 (10 th percentile) 4.2 (50 th percentile) Going from a 3.0 to a 3.0 may be a 35 th percentile outcome, while going from a 4.2 to a 4.2 may be a 50 th percentile outcome. In the current system however, both students are viewed equally as making one year of progress, even though many fewer students who start at 4.2 make one year of progress

88 So, for , the progress measures would be based on the median growth percentile for students at each school MeasureExistingProposed Student Progress1. Percentage of students making one year of progress 1. Median growth percentile for all students 2. Percentage of students making one year of progress (lowest third) 2. Median growth percentile for all students (lowest third) 3. Average change in proficiency for Level 1/2 students 4. Average change in proficiency for Level 3/4 students Note: we will also eliminate sharing of progress for students who transfer schools (in previous years, we have shared progress for transfers 60%/40% between the sending and receiving schools; we believe this is no longer necessary now that the State tests have been moved to the end of the year)

999 Impact on schools Growth percentiles preserve the progress incentives for schools: specifically, maximize the amount of progress made by each student A larger gain in proficiency for any individual student will always translate to a higher growth percentile

10 Example: Growth percentiles for 4 th grade math Differences in growth percentiles correspond to very different proficiency gains/losses 4 th Grade Proficiency Percentile outcomes for students starting at a proficiency rating of 3.0 in third grade Growth Percentile