LINKING STANDARDS, ASSESSMENTS, AND INSTRUCTION IN MATHEMATICS Presented by Gabriela Orozco Gonzalez April 5, 2014 Stockton Common Core Seminar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LESSON-DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT REFLECT THE COLLEGE-AND CAREER- READY STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICS AND THE STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE. CCRS IMPLEMENTATION.
Advertisements

o Nearly all 50 states have adopted the Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards. o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Alan Bancroft UCMO PLC Resource Specialist
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
Montana Common Core Standards (MCCS) 10 Minute University.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Your “LAMP” presenters Erin Stolp: Hopewell Tabitha Thomas: Tabernacle Introductions & Norms Norms Please.
Module 2: Content and Curriculum, K-8 Mathematics.
Common Core Elementary Symposium Transitioning to the Common Core
Planning & Practice MNPS Numeracy Coaches Ernestine Saville Brock Mathematics Coordinator.
Melissa Christie March 30, 2012 Curriculum Leadership Council.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
Principal Network Series Lisa Andrew, Ed.D Martha Martinez District and School Support Services.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
LEARNING GOAL: Teachers will have an overall understanding of Common Core State Standards, understand the timeline for implementation and understand the.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
South Dakota Department of Education Spring 2011.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
California Common Core State Standards… General Information Original Presentation to the Governing Board November 8, 2011 E. Hardcastle, J. Hayhurst,
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Module 1 What is Common Core?. Goals Develop an understanding of Common Core Standards and the PA commitment  English Language Arts  Mathematics Explore.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Using SVMI & SDCOE Resources to Support Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Common Core Mathematics Standards Curriculum Network October 7, 2011.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Discovery Education Common Core Academy: Making Common Sense Out of the Math Common Core January 23-24, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Fostering Vocabulary Development and Deeper Conceptual Understanding in the Mathematics Classroom Melissa Christie September 16, 2013.
Common Core State Standards Back to School Night August 29, 2013.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
MATHEMATICS YEAR TWO LEADERSHIP SERIES IMPLEMENTING STRATEGIES TO ENGAGE STUDENTS AND RAISE ACHIEVEMENT FEBRUARY 19, MARCH 26, MAY 21, 2014.
Palmyra Area School District Summer Goals  Develop an understanding of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in the area of Math, including the.
SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENT PARA LOS NIÑOS APRIL 30, 2013 Transitioning to the Common Core.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Smarter Balanced Scores & Reports. The new assessment, Smarter Balanced, replaces our previous statewide assessment, the New England Common Assessment.
Bridgehampton November 16 th. Introductions Name Tent: –Print your first name in the center in large letters. –Identify your educational role (e.g., grade.
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
How Assessment Supports RTI2 and Closing the Achievement Gap
Curriculum Leadership Council
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

LINKING STANDARDS, ASSESSMENTS, AND INSTRUCTION IN MATHEMATICS Presented by Gabriela Orozco Gonzalez April 5, 2014 Stockton Common Core Seminar

WELCOME  Educator, I have taught K-6 th Grade, currently teach 1 st & 2 nd Grade Combination class  Language Arts Performance Task Writer & Mathematics Item Reviewer for the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium  CTA Teacher Leadership Cohort and Professional Learning Trainer  NEA Teacher Ambassador for SBAC Representing California Presentation Materials on my blog: Commoncorecafe.blogspot.com Commoncorecafe.blogspot.com 2

LEARNING TARGETS  Gain an awareness of the content and structure of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics  Understand the meaning of the Mathematical Practices in the CCSSM and apply the practices to your current classroom instruction  Become familiar with a performance task and task planner

A BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Common Core State Standards specify K - 12 expectations for college and career readiness Common Core State Standards specify K - 12 expectations for college and career readiness All students leave high school college - and career- ready Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction

SIX ITEM TYPES Selected Response Short Constructed Response Extended Constructed Response Performance Tasks Technology-Enabled Technology-Enhanced Focus for today

THE ASSESSMENT CHALLENGE How do we get from here to here? All students leave high school college- and career-ready Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness... and what can an assessment system do to help?

Standards based NOT textbook based Your text book is an AWESOME resource/ reference book. SMARTER BALANCED ASSESSMENTS ARE:

Standard Activities that address Standard Assessment

STANDARDS BASED INSTRUCTION  Standards-based education is a process for planning, delivering, monitoring and improving academic programs in which clearly defined academic content standards provide the basis for content in instruction and assessment.  Standards help ensure students learn what is important, rather than allowing textbooks to dictate classroom practice.  Student learning is the focus - aiming for a high and deep level of student understanding that goes beyond traditional textbook-based or lesson-based instruction.

TEACHERS GUIDE INSTRUCTION BASED ON STANDARDS “The standards come alive when teachers study student work, collaborate with other teachers to improve their understanding of subjects and students’ thinking, and develop new approaches to teaching that are relevant and useful for them and their students.” - Linda Darling-Hammond, 1997

CURRICULUM Curriculum MappingCurriculum Mapping is a long-range plan captured in a graphic organizer that represents a collection of Standards- based units. It is informed by the benchmarks and curriculum objective, student data, including an analyses of student work and projected assessment timelines. It is a document that should be modified based on student needs and reviewed and revised yearly.

CCSSM PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION  Planning meetings with grade level representatives:  Examine Standards, then Prioritize  Pacing Overviews  Assessment Calendar  Unit Overviews and/or Unit Plans  Create Assessments  Revise Assessments

DESIGN AND ORGANIZATION Standards for Mathematical Practice  Carry across all grade levels  Describe habits of mind of a mathematically expert student Standards for Mathematical Content  K-8 standards presented by grade level  Domains:  Number and Operations  Counting and Cardinality  Operations and Algebraic Thinking  Number and Operations in Base Ten  Number and Operations—Fractions  Measurement and Data  Geometry

DESIGN AND ORGANIZATION Content standards define what students should understand and be able to do Clusters are groups of related standards Domains are larger groups that progress across grades

FOCAL POINTS & CRITICAL AREAS Focal Points Critical Area

PRIORITIZING THE CCSS STANDARDS 16

WEBB'S DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK) BLOOM'S TAXONOMY VS. NORMAN WEBB'S DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE  The Common Core Standards are the cornerstones of the Smarter Balanced assessments, Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (scale of cognitive demand) and Blooms Revised Taxonomy (levels of intellectual ability) are the framework and the structures that will be used to evaluate students.  Depth of knowledge, and complexity of knowledge is the heart of the more rigorous assessments being implemented in They share many ideas and concepts yet are different in level of cognitive demand, level of difficulty, complexity of verbs vs. depth of thinking required, and the scale of cognitive demand. 17

During the planning process, refer to the DOK Levels 18

19

3 rd Grade Big Ideas Standard Activities that address Standard Assessment

 FORMATIVE : checking on learning as students progress  SUMMATIVE: checking on learning at the end of the learning experience  “When the cook tastes the soup, that’s formative; when the guests taste the soup, that’s summative.” (Stake, 2005) UNDERSTANDING ASSESSMENTS

CHALLENGES  Curriculum  Collection of Resources  Assessments  Professional Learning TEACHER STUDENT  Collaboration  Explain/Justify  Problem Solving

Students experience inquiry-based methods of understanding key concepts Use of concrete representation when introducing new concepts Problem-based interactive learning should be the foundation in teaching for understanding Teachers implement strategies that help students develop understanding Utilize resources and methods beyond the adopted textbook Opportunities to work with small group instruction, enrichment, etc.

PERFORMANCE TASK PLANNER

PERFORMANCE TASK PLANNER (SECOND PAGE)

COMMUNICATION, ENGAGEMENT, AND LEARNING

Model (Draw a picture or diagram, or make a list, table, chart, or graph). Numbers (Show how worked each part of the problem). Words To solve this problem, first I had to _____________________________. Then, I________________________. Next, I _______________________. After that, I ___________________. Finally, I found out that __________ ______________________________. Answer

CCSSM AND REAL LIFE APPLICATIO N

I get a…If I… 0  do nothing -or-  just copy the prompt. 1  write a number sentence that doesn’t go along with the prompt.  do not write an explanation. 2  use numbers from the prompt with an operation included.  write an explanation telling what I did. 3  use numbers from the prompt.  write number sentences that make sense, even if they are not the right answer.  write a simple paragraph explaining what I did. 4  correctly answer most of computation that I write.  write a paragraph explaining what I did. It can have minor mistakes, but it still makes sense. Anyone should be able to understand how I solved the prompt. 5  get the correct answer.  make more than one table, diagram, chart, etc.  write a detailed paragraph telling step-by-step what I did to solve the problem… and include what I was thinking as I solved it! (“I did this because…”) Student Problem Solving Rubric

STUDENTS NEED TO ENGAGE WITH  Grade-appropriate materials for exposure to structures, content, vocabulary;  Instructional-level materials that allow them to progress;  Easy materials that allow them to practice. If familiar/interesting, material can be more challenging. – More at K-12 Teachers: Building Comprehension in the Common Core 31

TIMING MATTERS  Greater scaffolding is provided at the beginning of tasks.  Scaffolding supports an increasing level of complexity.  Include a plan for removing the scaffolding. 32

ADVICE  Time for Planning  Ongoing Professional Development  Follow-up Coaching  Patience and Understanding

CCSSM RESOURCES Books Magazines Technology Resources

DPI Wiki

CCSSM RESOURCES Common Core State Standards Live Binder:  Resources:  21 st Century Skills  Common Core State Standards & Essential Standards  Crosswalks  Unpacking Documents  Investigations & CCSSM  Websites

MATH RESOURCES Aegom Interactive Smartboard Lessons

Video Resources  Annenberg Media Videos & Resources  browse. html?discipline=6  Discovery Education/United Streaming 

MATH RESOURCES  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM)  Teaching Children Mathematics Magazines

COMMON CORE RESOURCES  Tools for the Common Core Standards  Illustrative Mathematics (CCSS Tools & Resources)  Common Core Wiki (by Drew Polly)  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics