Furthering America’s Research Enterprise Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council The National Academies Press.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
21 st Century Science and Education for Global Economic Competition William Y.B. Chang Director, NSF Beijing Office NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION.
Advertisements

Demonstrating the Legal Sustainability of Effective STEM Diversity Programs Wanda E. Ward Ph.D., Discussant Sr. Advisor to the Director Office of the Director.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:
Presented by: Jerry Legge Associate Provost for Academic Planning (Interim), and Professor of Public Administration and Policy (SPIA) Provost Advisory.
The subcommittee recognizes the profound changes in US demographics and skill levels that currently exist, and the changes that are predicted for the.
Excellence with Impact Declan Mulkeen January 2011.
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
Vitality Institute Commission Forum Business for Health: Fostering Healthy Workplaces The Vitality Institute's mission is to advance knowledge about the.
1 Performance Assessment An NSF Perspective MJ Suiter Budget, Finance and Awards NSF.
The Industry-University Cooperative Research Program ( IUCRP ) University of California 1996 – 2010 Lovell Jarvis University of California, Davis.
Session 5 Intellectual Merit and Broader Significance FISH 521.
NSF Webinar Partnerships for Innovation Programs (Solicitation: NSF ) Karlene A. Hoo, Ph.D. Sara B. Nerlove, Ph.D. Program Directors Industrial Innovation.
The President’s Lecture Series: Excellence in Academia Re-defining the Teaching-Research Nexus: Building the CityU Discovery-enriched Curriculum Arthur.
The Newton Fund Research and Innovation for Growth and Prosperity.
1 Battelle: International Partnership Strategy Richard C. Adams Senior Vice President, Battelle February, 2007.
August 2013 School of Medicine Strategic Planning Community Engagement Committee.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
CEC Advisory Council October 25, 2013 Miami 2020 Plan: Moments that Transorm.
U.S. Science Policy Cheryl L. Eavey, Program Director
External Reports Overview Presentation for the ENG Advisory Committee By Michael Reischman Deputy Assistant Director for Engineering.
All Extension Conference Welcome. Extension Mission Washington State University Extension engages people, organizations and communities to advance knowledge,
1. Subhash Kuvelker Senior Program Officer Policy and Global Affairs Division National Research Council May 21, 2012.
1 INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES INVESTING IN ARIZONA’S UNIVERSITIES Presentation by The University of Arizona, May 5, 2008.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry TOWARDS MORE WORLD-CLASS CLUSTERS – IMPLICATIONS FOR MARITIME INDUSTRIES 27. April 2009 Jean-Noël Durvy Director.
1 Sustaining Technical Programs The NSF’s Advanced Technological Education Program and American Competitiveness Mike Lesiecki, MATEC A Member of the Academic.
The CIHR Perspective on Impact Measurement
A Northern Science Policy for Canada David Hik Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta & Canadian International Polar Year Secretariat.
Company LOGO Broader Impacts Sherita Moses-Whitlow 07/09/09.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
Entrepreneurship in Missouri  Business Recruitment  Business Expansion  Entrepreneurism/New Business Formation Strategies for Economic Development.
Affirming Our Commitment: “A Nation Free of Health and Health Care Disparities” J. Nadine Gracia, MD, MSCE Deputy Assistant Secretary for Minority Health.
E2 Tech Forum November 15, 2011 Andrew Wilson, Executive Director.
1 The Prevention Research Centers Program: The Case for Networks Eduardo Simoes, MD, MSc, MPH Program Director Prevention Research Centers National Center.
10:30 a.m. Welcoming Remarks - Alan Leshner, PhD New Congress, New Administration: New Possibilities The Honorable John E. Porter Partner Thanks - Mary.
Designing the Microbial Research Commons: An International Symposium Overview National Academy of Sciences Washington, DC October 8-9, 2009 Cathy H. Wu.
Partnerships and Broadening Participation Dr. Nathaniel G. Pitts Director, Office of Integrative Activities May 18, 2004 Center.
Students Becoming Scientists in the World: Integrating Research and Education for Sustainable Development Dr. James P. Collins Directorate for the Biological.
Community Psychology: A Brief Introduction Society for Community Research and Action (American Psychological Association, Division 27) Council of Education.
NSF Committee of Visitors (COV) Report Review of Bioengineering and Environmental Sciences (BES) Division of the Engineering Directorate 2005.
A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
National Academy of Sciences (1863) National Academy of Engineering (1964) Institute of Medicine (1970) National Research Council (1916) The National Academies.
Bio in Arizona Joe Caspermeyer Laura Gladney PAF 591 Policy Briefing April 1, 2003.
"Here Is Pooh Bear Coming Downstairs Now; Bump, Bump, Bump, On The Back Of His Head, Behind Christopher Robin. It Is, As Far As He Knows, The Only Way.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
AICUP Economic Development Institute Cluster, Ecosystems and Collaborators (OH MY!) Prepared by: Fourth Economy Consulting Rich Overmoyer President & CEO.
The Professional Science Master’s: A Key Piece of the Competitiveness and Innovation Agenda Northeastern Association of Graduate Schools 3 April 2009 Carol.
Knowledge Exchange and Impact in the AHRC Susan Amor Head of Knowledge Exchange Conny Carter Impact and Policy Manager University of Exeter 7 April 2011.
Identifying the Impacts of Technology Transfer Beyond Commercialization FPTT National Meeting, June 12, 2007.
1. The Research Process Research New Research New Ideas Solve Problems Commercialization Enhanced Scientific Literacy Updated Learning Materials Increased.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
Congress created the NSF in 1950 as an independent federal agency. Budget ~$7.0 billion (2012) Funding for basic research.
Michigan State University Angel. About Michigan State University  Michigan State University Spartans work every day to advance the common good in uncommon.
Chapter Thirteen Copyright, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Chapter Thirteen three Learning Concepts – Chapter Understand the increasing benefits and challenges.
1Mobile Computing Systems © 2001 Carnegie Mellon University Writing a Successful NSF Proposal November 4, 2003 Website: nsf.gov.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
Why Write A Grant? Elaine M. Hylek, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Director, Education and Training Division BU CTSI Section of General Internal.
A 10 YEAR OUTLOOK A REPORT BY THE NSF ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH & EDUCATION SPONSORED BY THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION SEPTEMBER.
Ulf Sandmark KTH och Springboard Commercialization of research… To create an entrepreneurial culture To stimulate a deal flow of research that impacts.
The David Sinclair Award American Association for Aerosol Research.
Affiliates Inaugural Discovery Breakfast May 24, 2007.
Who – Committee of National Academies of Science, Engineering What – Advise Congress about US competitiveness When – 2005 Where – US, international competition,
1 American Competitiveness Initiative John H. Marburger, III President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology March 28, 2006.
Balancing Objectives and Needs of Industry and Academia: the Role of Government Presentation by Mary Cryan Meeting of National Councils for S&T Policy.
Learning Beyond the Classroom: Mentoring and Engaging Students Through the Residential College Model Presented by Eric Kaufman and Jay Read.
Research Canada’s 2016 Annual General Meeting
EPSCoR means “Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Furthering America’s Research Enterprise Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council The National Academies Press A PDF of the report is available without cost at the above Website. or at For further information: Committee on Assessing the Value of Research in Advancing National Goals Richard F. Celeste, Ann Griswold, and Miron L. Straf, Editors 1

The Current Environment for Research The nation faces increased global competition for new technologies and other innovations, even as it confronts growing economic exigencies. Congress wants to enhance the benefits of science and to keep the nation at the forefront of the global competition for new technologies and other innovations. 2

The Charge to the Study Committee  Congress asked the National Academies to study measures of the impacts of research on society.  Of particular interest were measures that could serve to increase the translation of research into commercial products and services.  With NSF funding, a committee was appointed with a broader charge of investigating how research contributes to our economy and well-being and serves other national goals.  The purview was all federally supported research, including that of NSF, NIH, the Department of Energy, and other agencies. 3

The Committee on Assessing the Value of Research in Advancing National Goals The Honorable Richard F. Celeste (Chair), Colorado College (Emeritus) Rodney A. Brooks (NAE), Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alicia Carriquiry, Iowa State University Christopher M. Coburn, Partners HealthCare, Boston, Mass. Stephen E. Fienberg (NAS), Carnegie Mellon University Bronwyn H. Hall, University of California, Berkeley and University of Maastricht, The Netherlands John E. Kelly, III, International Business Machines Corporation Josh Lerner, Harvard Business School David C. Mowery, University of California, Berkeley Jason Owen-Smith, University of Michigan The Honorable John Edward Porter (IOM), Hogan Lovells, Washington, D.C. Stephanie S. Shipp, Virginia Tech Gregory Tassey, University of Washington Jeffrey Wadsworth (NAE), Battelle Memorial Institute David Ward, University of Wisconsin—Madison (Emeritus) Study Director: Miron L. Straf, The National Academies 4

Findings and Conclusions  Current measures are inadequate to guide national-level decisions about what research investments will expand the benefits of science.  Nevertheless, the American research enterprise is capable of producing increased benefits for U.S. society, as well as for the global community. 5

Why America’s Research Enterprise has Been so Successful It has evolved as a complex, dynamic system with many characteristics of American free enterprise:  Decentralized  Pluralistic  Competitive  Meritocratic  Entrepreneurial 6

Increased Benefits of the Federal Investment in Research are far More Likely to Flow:  Not just from promoting the commercialization of research discoveries.  Not by trying to predict the scientific fields that would lead to commercial products and services.  But instead by promoting the conditions for the research enterprise to thrive. 7

Three Pillars of the Research Enterprise  A talented and interconnected workforce.  Adequate and dependable resources.  World-class basic research in all major areas of science. 8

Why World-Class Basic Research in all Major Areas of Science is Important  Transformative scientific discoveries increasingly depend on research in a variety of fields.  The competitive advantage may go not to the nation in which the discovery was made but to the nation that can use it more effectively to develop new technologies and other innovations by relying on a broad foundation of knowledge, talent, and capacity derived from basic research in a diversity of scientific fields.  World-class basic research attracts scholars from around the world who further enhance excellence in research. 9

Federally-Funded Research Needs to Meet Today’s Circumstances  We need better metrics to inform policy decisions about research.  No institution evaluates the nation’s research enterprise as a whole, assesses its performance, and develops policy options for federally funded research.  Measures of research activities, outputs, and technology transfer are important, but greater benefit will come from measures to guide the pillars of the research enterprise— talent, resources, and basic research—and to better understand the relationships among them. 10