LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW PURPOSE DISCUSS POSSIBILITY OF COMPLETING REMAINING ROAD UPGRADE PROVIDE FACTS TO INFORM COMMUNITY TO MAKE DECISION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The unpopularity of property taxes and the simplicity and perceived fairness of sales taxes have made the Local Option Sales Tax for Education a popular.
Advertisements

Capital Improvement Plan Financial Options September 12, 2013 Presented by: City Administration Finance Department.
Tymber Skan Update Orange County BCC August 5, 2014.
REFERENDUM 2014 Building Maintenance. Referendum 2014 Focused on providing a safe and healthy learning environment for students Fiscally responsible:
2013 Budgets Lower Paxton Township
City of South Burlington City Council Adopted January 12, 2013 FY 2014 Budget - Keys to Financial Success Prepared by Sandy Miller, City Manager and Bob.
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Topic 4 Financing Strategies. Topic 4: Financing Strategies Learning Objectives – (a) Analyze the various sources of borrowing available to a client and.
2011 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX RATE Funding the 2011/12 General Fund Budget Public Hearing – August 9, 2011.
Pavement Evaluation Survey Results and Understanding Condition Values PCI February 19, 2014.
Mattoon Community Unit School District #2 MCUSD# Tax Levy Presentation Presented: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Board Action: Tuesday, November 13, 2007.
Hide-A-Way Lake, Inc. Low Pressure Sewer System Prepared by Dungan Engineering, P.A.
Chapter 3: Budgetary Accounting for General and Special Revenue Funds
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizations Chapter 3 Budgetary Accounting for the General and Special Revenue Funds McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Saving & Investing Achieving Financial Success. What does it mean? Saving  Putting money aside for future use Investing  Using money so that it earns.
What is the proposed ballot issue? Referred measure 3B: Increased funding for education in School District 51 only Shall taxes on peoples’ property (house,
TOWN OF HAMPDEN 2011/2012 PROPOSED BUDGET INFORMATION.
Alliance Management Group Tax Year 2012 Update 1.
Financing Your CIP …and Planning Ahead for New O&M.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Overview of 2011 proposed budget.  Defunded Five Positions  Maintained Service Levels  Continued Infrastructure Improvements  Cut spending early to.
1 TOWN OF LOCKPORT FINANCIAL REVIEW Focus on the Sewer Plant and Sewer Collection Service.
City of South Burlington City Council Adopted January 12, 2013 FY 2014 Budget - Keys to Financial Success Prepared by Sandy Miller, City Manager and Bob.
Proposed Benefit Assessment District Overview Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority (TRLIA) TRLIA.ORG March 10,
Street Maintenance. The Town of Bayfield maintains centerline miles of road.
Long Range Facility Planning assisted by Silver Falls School District.
2012 – 2016 FINANCIAL PLAN OVERVIEW City of Pitt Meadows DM #94656.
How do local governments get their money and what is it used for?
CHAPTER 7: SECTION 1 About Business Firms
Wilderness Rim Association Water Rate and Reserve Study Board Meeting April 23, 2014 Presented By: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager.
City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota Financing Plan Highlights Citizens’ Charter Review Task Force March 29,2007 Pavement Management Report Financing Plan Presenter:
Chapter 1 Financial and Economic Concepts 1. Chapter One Objectives 2.
Debt Management Overview Presentation to Board of Estimates August 29, 2011.
Chapter 22: Rents, Profits, and the Financial Environment of Business
1. 2 Managing stormwater Stormwater runoff is generated when rain and snowmelt flows over land or impervious surfaces and does not percolate into the.
© Oklahoma State Department of Education. All rights reserved.1 Housing Alternatives Standard Renting vs. Buying.
C1 C2 The Center of all Financial Decisions  Check in wherever you are.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Jennifer Wislocki, Board of Finance Thomas E. Marsh, First Selectman Pamela Christman, Chester Elementary School 10/20/20151.
Building the Future of Learning. Start with the Why Aging Facilities Phase Two of a master plan Safety concerns at McCamley Field Expand opportunities.
1 Community Facilities District & Redevelopment Overview January 19, 2008.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
2015 Financial Plan. PROCESS Staff began work on this budget in September 4 meetings including today are scheduled – Jan 26, 28 and Feb 2 and further.
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizations Chapter 3: Budgetary Accounting for General and Special Revenue Funds.
Feasibility Study.
Utility Financial Management AWWA Intermountain Section Leadership Forum Session Two November 10, 2015.
Willow Road Interchange Project Funding Alternatives Department of Public Works January 2009.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
Piqua City Schools Good Schools……Good Value Piqua City School District Permanent Improvement Levy Renewal Presentation May 6, 2014 Superintendent of Schools:
BUDGET WORKSHOP FY13 April 4, City of Hendersonville Budget Workshop – April 4, 2012 GOALS and OBJECTIVES for 2013 To present a balanced budget.
Buying a Home Unit Two—Budgeting Financial Literacy Standard 4 Mrs. Morrey.
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
City of Joliet 2016 Proposed Budget November 30, 2015.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
1. Budget Process 2  Preliminary budgets submitted by Department Directors in early July  Budget reviewed by Finance Director and City Manager in late.
West Contra Costa USD General Obligation Bond Program Status Presentation to the Facilities Subcommittee June 11, 2013.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
Public Infrastructure Funding Request Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Special Assessments.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Proposed School Bond Referendum September 26, 2017
League of Wisconsin Municipalities Urban Policy Forum June 8, 2017
Finance Advisory Committee – October 17, 2017
Blackhawk School District
Queen Anne’s County Commissioners FY2018 Proposed Budget April 11, 2017 Gregg A. Todd, County Administrator Jonathan R. Seeman, Director, Budget,
Road Improvement Presentation
Unified Government of Wyandotte County & Kansas City, Kansas
Idyllwild Water District
Town Council Strategic Planning Session
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW PURPOSE DISCUSS POSSIBILITY OF COMPLETING REMAINING ROAD UPGRADE PROVIDE FACTS TO INFORM COMMUNITY TO MAKE DECISION ABOUT PROCEEDING TO POTENTIAL BOND ISSUE VISION FOR FUTURE OPPORTUNITY TO DREAM ABOUT WHAT OUR COMMUNITY COULD BE LIKE OTHER DREAMERS (WATER PLANT,SEWER TREATMENT, RETURN WATER), LONG TERM IMPROVEMENTS BENEFIT FUTURE GENERATIONS PAST LEADERS OF THE COMMUNITY HAVE SERVED TO MAKE BLUE LAKE A PREMIER LAKE COMMUNITY

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW HISTORY STARTED WITH DIRT ROADS IN EARLY 60’S THE BLUE LAKE COMMUNITY NOT THE DEVELOPER BUILT THE PAVED ROADS IN 1965 THE ROADS WERE THE PRECURSOR OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY AVERAGE PER YEAR $27,368 FOR MAINTENANCE ONLY AND RISING (NO PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT IN INFRASTRUCURE). 47 YEARS OF AGE. PROBLEMS/NEEDS REPAIRS ARE TEMPORARY SOLUTION AND REOCURR ROADS ARE NARROW AND RIGHT OF WAY SHRINKING PATCHES AND RESEALING BECOMING CONSTANT AND EXPENSIVE ENTERING AN ECONOMIC PERIOD OF RISING COST AND INFLATION SAFETY ISSUES IN SOME CASES CAN ONLY BE FIXED THROUGH MAJOR EXPENSE

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW RECENT ROAD PROJECT Recently completed about 1 mile (~6 miles in community) at cost of ~$500k Funds from accumulated reserves in Streets and Lights account MUD Board decision based on engineering input on best construction method Recognition of need for permanent solution versus temporary repair

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW Basis for Decision Primary issue with roads is loss of width from edge deterioration caused by water; width not sufficient for safe traffic flow Repair and patching is only a temporary fix Need for culvert work in two locations where heavy rain overran roads; prevented emergency vehicle traffic Chose location of 1 mile based on most travelled routes and most benefit for community use Soft construction environment and relatively low asphalt prices

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW Construction Technique Construction engineers considered alternates for construction based on cost and longevity Final solution used flat concrete curbs to prevent edge deterioration and re-use of existing surface and base to minimize cost (Bomag process) Cost about 50% of traditional construction Process video

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW Pro/Con Analysis of Alternates Option 1 Complete total 5 miles Pros: Benefit all residents equally Save/defer maintenance funds (partial offset of tax increase) Take advantage of soft market (construction and interest) Upgrade road width to current standards All community roads are at recommended width for safety concern Improve community property values Cons: Higher tax rate increase than other alternates Loss of control over future HSB expansion decisions

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW How Roads are Paid for and Maintained Llano County Mud #1 has sole responsibility of the roads. Required by Texas Law to Maintain Separate Accounts Appraisals of property responsibility of the Llano Central Appraisal District. Tax Rate Responsibility of the Llano County MUD #1- Board of Directors Board maintains a 3 month reserve level on the General Fund and Streets and Lights Fund Maintenance and Repair paid from same account Bond funding from additional tax revenue

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW Option 2 Do nothing Pros No long-term debt Short-term savings slowly build reserves at historical maintenance levels If incorporated by City of Horseshoe Bay sometime in future they may or may not upgrade roads to their standard (some cost to homeowners) Cons Continue to lose road width from edge deterioration Safety is a consideration as width narrows Continue to spend maintenance money on surface and spot edge repair Risk of increased cost of later project (prices and interest rate)

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT PROJECTED COST 4.7 miles of road remaining $2.6 million estimated total cost Includes: Engineering fee Financial services fee Legal fee Does not include: Interest Administration fee

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT PROJECTED COST Financial Advisor Estimates bonds to be % in early 2013 Bond to be issued for 28 years to coincide with termination of other long term debt Bond service date would be All marketing and sales of bonds would be performed by Financial Advisor Fee 2.0% (included in $2.6 million)

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 Tax Rate Analysis for Bond Issue Estimate of Tax rate required to fund road project $2.6 $ %=.152 Tax AccountCurrent RateNew Rate(.152) V$ O&M Fire Streets & Lights Tax & Debt Total Average Taxable Home Value Llano County Mud 2011 $324,665= increase of $ if Bond proposal adopted

LLANO COUNTY MUD #1 ROAD PROJECT REVIEW DECISION PROCESS CONDUCT STRAWMAN PROCESS SEND BALLOTS(COLOR CODED) TO ALL BLUE LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS (REGISTERED AND NON REGISTERED VOTERS) MAIL 5/28 RETURN 6/11 PUBLISH RESULTS(WEB AND ) DECISION TO PLACE BOND ISSUE ON NOV BALLOT MADE BY 6/30/2012