Overview of Fusion Research Activities in Japan Presented by Masayoshi SUGIMOTO (JAEA) IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jerome Pamela PWI meeting, 31 October New Horizons for EFDA PWI meeting, October 2007 Jerome Pamela EFDA Leader.
Advertisements

Fusion Power Associates Meeting, 5 December 2012 Slide 1/16 ITER Achieve 500 MW of fusion power. Demonstrate the scientific and technological feasibility.
Extension of IEA Implementing Agreement on Large Tokamak Facilities Presented to Committee on Energy Research Technologies October 18-19, 2005 Paris, France.
1 Summary Slides on FNST Top-level Technical Issues and on FNSF objectives, requirements and R&D Presented at FNST Meeting, UCLA August 18-20, 2009 Mohamed.
ASIPP Zhongwei Wang for CFETR Design Team Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto University.
PhD studies report: "FUSION energy: basic principles, equipment and materials" Birutė Bobrovaitė; Supervisor dr. Liudas Pranevičius.
Conceptual design of a demonstration reactor for electric power generation Y. Asaoka 1), R. Hiwatari 1), K. Okano 1), Y. Ogawa 2), H. Ise 3), Y. Nomoto.
EPICS Collaboration Meeting – Aix-en-Provence June 2010 Page 1 ITER welcomes EPICS WD Klotz ITER int. Organiztion That’s me.
A Roadmap to the realization of fusion energy Francesco Romanelli European Fusion Development Agreement EFDA Leader and JET Leader 17 May 2013 Acknoledgments:
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Anomalous transport / ITER.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
2010 US-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies at UCSD CA, US, Feb.23-24, Commissioning scenario including divertor.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
September 6-7, 2007/ARR 1 Power Management Technical Working Group: Status and Documentation A. René Raffray Mark Tillack University of California, San.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Japan considerations on design and qualification of PFC's for near term machines (ITER) Satoshi Suzuki 1, Satoshi Konishi 2 1 Japan Atomic Energy Agency.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Activities and Strategy in Japan on Fusion Technology for DEMO Hiroshi Horiike Osaka University Graduate School of Engineering Fusion Power Associates.
Material System Design Studies of High Temperature Gas-Cooled Solid Breeder Blanket Module A.Hasegawa (Tohoku Univ.) A.Shimizu, T.Yokomine (Kyushu Univ.)
Power Extraction Research Using a Full Fusion Nuclear Environment G. L. Yoder, Jr. Y. K. M. Peng Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN Presentation.
DEMO R&D needs M. Q. Tran based on the report by the CCE-Fu –F4E Working Group on DEMO: P. Batistoni, S. Clement Lorenzo, K. Kurzydlowski, D. Maisonnier,
Broader Approach Activities toward Fusion DEMO Reactors IT/E-2 IAEA 21 st Fusion Energy Conference (Chengdu 17 th October, 2006 ) Shinzaburo Matsuda Japan.
Case Study of Roadmap to Tokamak Demo Reactor in Japan International Workshop MFE Roadmapping in the ITER Era September 7, 2011 Princeton, New Jersey,
Developing a Vendor Base for Fusion Commercialization Stan Milora, Director Fusion Energy Division Virtual Laboratory of Technology Martin Peng Fusion.
Status and Prospects of Nuclear Fusion Using Magnetic Confinement Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany Invited Talk given.
Association EURATOM-Belgian State LPP-ERM/KMS SCK-CEN ULB M.Van Schoor, V.Massaut, D.Carati.
Kaname Ikeda, October Status of the ITER Project Status of the ITER Project Kaname Ikeda ITER Nominee Director-General October 2006.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
From ITER to Demo -- Technology Towards Fusion Power Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research.
ARIES Project Meeting, L. M. Waganer, Dec 2007 Page 1 Restructuring System Cost Accounts and Algorithms L. Waganer December 2007 ARIES Project.
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
* Backup materials can be found at
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Exploring Magnetically Confined Burning Plasmas in the Laboratory AAAS Annual Meeting Ned Sauthoff February 18, 2005 “Yearn to burn” “Burn to learn” Marshall.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 16th TOFE Madison, Sept , EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGICAL EFFORT IN PREPARATION OF ITER CONSTRUCTION ROBERTO.
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Design study of advanced blanket for DEMO reactor US/JP Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies 23 th -24 th Feb at UCSD,
1 Subprojects of IFERC K.Lackner (as Chair of IFERC Project Committee) Garching – 14 Apr 2011.
H. Bolt, Fast Track Concept in the European Fusion Programme Harald Bolt Max-Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, Garching EURATOM Association.
1 1 by Dr. John Parmentola Senior Vice President Energy and Advanced Concepts Presented at the American Security Project Fusion Event June 5, 2012 The.
Fusion Energy Sciences Program Department of Energy Perspective February 23, E xcellent S cience in S upport of A ttractive.
Programmatic issues to be studied in advance for the DEMO planning Date: February 2013 Place:Uji-campus, Kyoto Univ. Shinzaburo MATSUDA Kyoto Univ.
KIT Objectives in Fusion by 2020 Workshop on the European Fusion Roadmap for FP8 and beyond April 13 – 14, 2011; IPP Garching.
Charles C. Baker Virtual Laboratory for Technology presented at the U.S. ITER Forum University of Maryland, College Park May 8, 2003 US ITER Technology.
Scope and Project Plan of IFMIF/EVEDA Presented by Masayoshi SUGIMOTO (IFMIF/EVEDA Project Team, Deputy Leader/ JAEA) IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear.
Materials Integration by Fission Reactor Irradiation and Essential Basic Studies for Overall Evaluation Presented by N.Yoshida and K.Abe At the J-US Meeting,
US-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies February 23-24, 2010 at USCD in USA Platform on integrated design of fusion.
ITER-China Project Huo YuPing PT Leader, ITER-China Chief scientist.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Technical Readiness Level For Control of Plasma Power Flux Distribution.
Charles C. Baker Deputy US ITER Planning Officer presented at the Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting and Symposium Washington, DC November, 2003.
Fuel Cycle Research Thrust Using A Full Fusion Nuclear Environment
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
The International Workshop on Thin Films. Padova 9-12 Oct of slides Present Status of the World- wide Fusion Programme and possible applications.
1 Discussion with Drs. Kwon and Cho UCLA-NFRC Collaboration Mohamed Abdou March 27, 2006.
ITER Liquid Helium Plants Status and Test Protocol ICEC June 29th, 2015 / Grenoble / FranceY. FABRE.
US Participation in the
Overview of Fusion Blanket R&D In Japan
LIPAc Control System Reliability improvements
Advanced-Fusion Neutron Source
To be presented at Nb3Al R&D Review,
Preparation of activation experiments for ITER material characterization and data validation in the Deuterium–Tritium JET campaign T. Vasilopoulou &
Can We achieve the TBR Needed in FNF?
VLT Meeting, Washington DC, August 25, 2005
A. Ibarra and The WPENS team
Stellarator Program Update: Status of NCSX & QPS
Conceptual design of the Cryogenic System of Comprehensive Research Facility for Key Fusion Reactor Core Systems Liangbing Hu Sep.4.
IFMIF/DONES Project: opportunities for the industry
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Fusion Research Activities in Japan Presented by Masayoshi SUGIMOTO (JAEA) IAEA’s Technical Meeting on Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices (NuDL:FD) 31 October – 2 November 2007, Vienna

INTRODUCTION To focus on perspective activities in Japan related to the fusion nuclear technology toward DEMO design and construction. To introduce a presentation made at ISFNT-8 on 3 October To summarize the expected cooperation with the Nuclear Data Community in the world.

ISFNT-8 October 3, 2007 Heidelberg, Germany Japanese Perspective of Fusion Nuclear Technology from ITER to DEMO Satoru Tanaka* and Hideyuki Takatsu** *University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan **Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Naka, Japan

Contents  Introduction  Japanese Strategy from ITER to DEMO —‘National Policy of Futute Fusion R&D’ issued by ad-hoc committee and then endorsed by Japan Atomic Energy commission (Nov. 2005) —Approach from ITER to DEMO —Fission-Fusion Synergy Effect —Scope of DEMO and DEMO Studies  ITER Project —Procurement —Construction, Operation and Maintenance —Exploitation  Broader Approach Activities  Other Complementary R&Ds  Possible Road Map toward DEMO  Summary - 1 -

 ITER Project: —will start formal activities in a month - opening of a new ‘ITER Era’; —will demonstrate scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy; —is a central element of the world fusion program.  BA Activities: —will comprise three projects: IFMIF/EVEDA, IFERC and JT-60SA; —is complementary to or in support of ITER along the pathway toward DEMO.  New actions taken by the Japan Atomic Energy Commission, on the basis of ‘Third Phase Basic Program of Fusion R&D’ laid down in 1992: —set up ad hoc committee, June 2003, to review the progress of fusion R&D and to investigate future basic program in view of the progress made in the last decade and recent moves of the world fusion program; —issued a Report entitled ‘National Policy of Future Fusion R&D’, Nov Introduction This presentation largely follows the line of this Report

 Early realization of fusion energy utilization: —important to contribute to the resolution of global environmental problem and the energy supply; —necessary to make fusion system technically practical as a power generation system as well as to have economical competitiveness against other energy systems.  Three steps toward fusion energy utilization: —ITER to demonstrate scientific and technological feasibility of fusion energy: namely, demonstration of control techniques of extended burning plasmas; demonstration of technologies essential to a reactor in an integrated system; and performing integrated testing of DEMO blankets. —DEMO to realize steady-state fusion core plasmas with high Q values and to demonstrate power generation in a plant scale, with possible upgrading during its operation phase so as to demonstrate to the utility and the public attractiveness as a power generation system —Commercial Reactor by the middle of this century Key Points of the Report ‘National Policy of Future Fusion R&D’ - 3 -

Comprehensive Fusion Program from ITER to DEMO JT-60 Fusion Plasma Research Tokamak DEMO Reactor ITER ITER&DEMO Physics Support Activities Component Technology Test Blanket Module SC Magnet Tritium Handling Plasma Facing component Remote Maintenance Heating System Safety Blanket Technology Heavy Irradiation IFMIF Structure Development Structural Material Dev. Fusion Engineering Research Confinement Improvement Impurity Control Improvement of Stability JT-60 Super Advanced

Fission-Fusion Synergy Effects In the development of fusion energy system, collaborations with fission areas are getting more important. Expertise and knowledge available in the fission areas, in particular nuclear technology areas, are deemed of significant value and collaborations should be further strengthened. Supercritical Water-cooled ReactorSodium-cooled Fast Reactor Very High Temperature Reactor Gas-cooled Fast Reactor Fusion Programs Next Generation Fission Programs Typical areas:  safety and licensing;  treatment and disposal of rad-wastes;  neutron irradiation damages of materials;  nuclear data evaluations;  computational science;  thermal-hydraulic issues;  liquid metal technology

Scope of DEMO and DEMO Studies SlimCS core dimension, comparable to ITER steady state (year-long) certain level of economic viability Requirements for DEMO JAEA Two conceptual DEMO designs proposed by JAEA and CRIEPI compact low-A DEMO with reduced- size central solenoid potentially economic & low-A merit in design margins in-life upgrade strategy to bridge the gap between ITER and economic CREST Demo-CREST CRIEPI R p = 5.6 m a = 2.1 m P fus = 2.95 GW R p = 7.25 m a = 2.1 m P fus = 2.97 GW AEC report,

ITER Project - Procurement Center Solenoid Blanket Remote Maintenance System Blanket / First Wall Divertor Tritium Safety System NBI System ECH System Diagnostic TF Magnet Japanese DA is responsible for the procurement, partly, of high-tech components

ITER Project - Construction and Operation Performances of Superconducting Magnet under neutron irradiations and compatible with plasma operations; Performances of remote maintenance equipments under radiation environments; Safe and reliable operation of tritium fuel processing and related safety systems; Performances of tokamak and plant control systems consistent with plasma operations; Performances of particle and heat rejection systems consistent with heat, particle and electromagnetic loads from plasmas. Technologies essential to the DEMO can be demonstrated during ITER construction and operation as an integrated system under fusion environments. Key technologies to be demonstrated during ITER construction and operation will include: - 8 -

ITER Superconducting magnet system Jacket Nb 3 Sn cable Insulation Cutaway of ITER superconducting magnet system Toroidal Field (TF) Coil (18coils, 11.8T, 68kA) Poloidal Field (PF) Coil (6 coils) Neutron radiation; 1x10 22 n/m 2 1)Demonstration of no significant degradation of superconducting performances, 2)Demonstration of insulation system of high radiation resistance, and 3)Stable operation of cryogenic system under nuclear heating (18kW at 4K). Central Solenoid (CS) (6modules, 13T, 40kA, 1.2T/s) Pulsed operation ; 1.2T/s (-2T/s) 1)Demonstration of low AC loss and stable conductor under pulsed field

ITER Remote Handling System Demonstration and improvements of remote maintenance technologies as an integrated system for components under real radiation environments and operational history, based on the experiences of ITER. ITER Remote Handling System Divertor Divertor Cassette Remote Handling Maintenance Port Vacuum Vessel TF Coil Blanket Module Remote Handling Articulated Rail

ITER Fuel Cycle and Tritium Handling 1) The first experience to operate tokamak system with kg of tritium. 2) The first operation experiences of of integrated tritium systems in tokamak, fuel processing, and test blanket systems. - Operation and control of the integrated tritium systems, tritium accountancy, and maintainability. Fuel cycle integration Tritium confinement & Safety control system Automated Control System & (Hard Wired) Safety System Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning System Fund EU Radiation Monitoring System Fund

ITER Exploitation - TBM Program  ITER serves as a test bed for the Test Blanket Modules (TBM).  JA has an intention to take a lead for the Water-Cooled Solid Breeder TBM concept, and to participate, as partner, in advanced concepts such as liquid breeder TBMs. ITER has 3 test ports for TBMs. Max. 6 TBMs can be tested in ITER, 2 TBMs/Port, simultaneously. ITER Test Blanket Module Program Framework of TBMs International Collaborations among Parties TBM Schedule ITER Year 2007 Construction Opera- tion TBM fabrication R&Ds TBM Program Plasma Cooling System Turbine Test Blanket Modules ITER Distance from Center (m) ~2m ~1m ITER TBM Program is an essential step toward DEMO and fusion reactors as an energy producing system

R&D Progress in JA for Test Blanket Modules In-situ tritium release experiments in JMTR has shown that Tritium recovery rate becomes almost 100% over 300 °C. Strain [%] Heat Cycle [ - ] Mechanical fatigue data by IEA Round Robin (550 o C) Data by High Heat Flux Test of First Wall Mockup Strai n Heat Flux Center of Cooling Channnel The F82H First Wall mock-up made by HIP has shown sufficient thermal fatigue lifetime. Full-scale F82H First Wall mock-up has successfully fabricated by HIP. 1.5m ~0.7m First Wall Cross-section ~18cm JA Water-Cooled Solid Breeder TBM 0.5m Armour ( Be ) Structure ( F82H ) Neutron Multiplier (Be) Tritium Breeder (Li 2 TiO 3 ) 2mm 1.5m TBM R&Ds have stepped up into Engineering-Scale R&Ds

Broader Approach Activities by JA-EU cooperation in parallel with ITER Construction Fusion Plasma Research ITER Fusion Energy Production DEMO Cadarache Electricity Production IFERC (Rokkasho) Strategic Approach with Supercomputer simulation, Demo Design+R&D coordination, Remote Experimentation IFERC (Rokkasho) Strategic Approach with Supercomputer simulation, Demo Design+R&D coordination, Remote Experimentation IFMIF-EVEDA (Rokkasho) R&D and Comprehensive Design Hosting International Team IFMIF-EVEDA (Rokkasho) R&D and Comprehensive Design Hosting International Team Satellite Tokamak (Naka) Improve Core Plasma Training of Scientists/Engineers Satellite Tokamak (Naka) Improve Core Plasma Training of Scientists/Engineers Broader Approach Fusion Engineering Research Physics/Engineering Basis for ITER In Japan Early Realization of DEMO In support of ITER or Complementary to ITER toward DEMO

BA Activities - IFMIF / EVEDA Project Li Loop Fabrication/Test Diagnostics, Erosion/corrosion, Purification Remote Handling Technique System Engineering Design Prototype Accelerator- Full power Beam Test (low energy part from ion source up to the first section of drift tube linac) Accelerator Test Building High Flux Test Module Fission Neutron Irradiation Test Small Specimen Test Technique System Engineering Design Design of Buildings and Utilities Accelerator Facility Test Facilities Target Facility Design Integration Project Team Irradiation Specimens of Fusion Materials Electro- Magnetic Pump Li Flow Heat Exchanger D + Beams Li Purification Safety and Integration Issues ACTIVITIES CONCEPTUAL VIEW

Complementary R&Ds – Materials Development Data accumulation and analysis with fission reactor irradiation experiment is also necessary in addition to IFMIF project - Narrowing down materials specifications - Development of structural design methodology/criteria - Understanding of damage mechanisms for alloy improvement (conclusions of IEA Sym. on fusion materials development in 2006) Three candidate materials DEMO (RAF) DBTT-shift (PIE results) Examined up to 20dpa. Improvement of DBTT-shift Reduction of irradiation hardening by heat treatment DBTT (C)

High field and large current superconductor, at T with 100kA, is essential to realize compact DEMO design. Nb 3 Al conductor, under development at JAEA, is a promising candidate. Critical current density of major superconductors Magnetic field B (T) Critical current density j c (A/mm 2 ) YBCO Bi2212(wire) Advanced Nb 3 Sn Nb 3 Al (1990s) Nb 3 Sn(ITER) MgB 2 NbTi Bi2223 (tape) 4.2K Advanced Nb 3 Al Complementary R&Ds – Upgrade of ITER Key Comp.  Superconducting Magnet  H/CD system —higher beam energy (NB) —higher system efficiency, higher reliability and CW- compatibility (NB/EC)  Tritium system —processing system compatible with high-T and high-P medium —monitoring and control system of a large amount of tritium

BA Activities (partly) A Possible Roadmap toward DEMO Year DEMO ITER TBM IFMIF Concept Develop. Conceptual Design Eng. Design/ Constr./Oper. ITA ConstructionOperation / Exploitation TBM Testing in ITER Decision on DEMO Plasma Performances TBM Functions Qualified Materials Data Reactor Technologies DEMO Design Blanket Develop. Materials Develop. Reactor Tech. Develop. ( ex. SCM, H/CD ) EVEDA Construction Operation Advanced Tokamak Research JT-60SA, others)

Summary  Active participation in the ITER Project through component fabrication, construction and assembly, commissioning, operation, exploitation and decommissioning phases are essential to construct a sound technology basis for the design and construction of DEMO.  In exploitation of ITER, Japanese leadership and active participation in the TBM program are of highest priority.  The BA Activities are designed to be complementary to ITER toward DEMO, and smooth and effective implementation of the three BA Project are important for a timely start-up of the DEMO phase.  The other key R&Ds on 1) reduced activation structural materials, 2) higher performances of superconducting magnet and heating/current drive systems and 3) upgrading of tritium processing and safe handling system should be pursued in parallel in a consistent manner with the development of DEMO design studies. On the basis of ‘National Policy of Future Fusion R&D’ issued by the ad-hoc Committee and endorsed by Japan Atomic Energy Commission, Nov. 2005, Japanese perspective of Fusion Nuclear Technology from ITER to DEMO was presented:

OVERVIEW SUMMARY  ITER Test Blanket Module (TBM)  Water-cooled solid breeder as reference concept and liquid breeder as advanced concept.  Exact estimation of tritium breeding is required under the realistic condition of TBM.  Broader Approach (BA) activities  IFMIF-EVEDA & IFERC at Rokkasho, Aomori and Satellite Tokamak at Naka, Ibaraki.  Accurate estimation of nuclear response in the tested materials, facility equipments and resultant environmental effects during operation and decommissioning of IFMIF is important.  DEMO design in IFERC project needs an intensive studies on neutronics.  Experimental or evaluation work on the radioactivity production in the candidate materials for DEMO is also helpful to complete the designs of DEMO itself and IFMIF.