EML 4550: Engineering Design Methods

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
P roblem S olving I nnovator Solving Tomorrows Problems Today Overview of how the 5 why automatically generates an FMEA & Control Plans 5 Why - FMEA Relationship.
Advertisements

COE 444 – Internetwork Design & Management Dr. Marwan Abu-Amara Computer Engineering Department King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals.
Is your FMEA performing for you? Measuring FMEA Effectiveness Kathleen Stillings – CPM, CQE, CQA, MBB Quality is not an act – it is a habit (Aristotle)
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Effect Mode Analysis
FMEA Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Reliability Risk Assessment
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Tom Hannan & Kevin Kowalis Eastern Illinois University School of Technology Total Quality Systems INT 5133 (FMEA)
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Popcorn Sample PFMEA: Process Flow
Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
PTY (Ltd)Reg No: 2007/019351/07. FAILURE MODE & EFFECT ANALYSIS 4 th Edition (Including Control Plans) WHAT IS AN FMEA? FMEA is an analytical technique.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Lucas Phillips Anurag Nanajipuram FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS.
Program Management Satisfy requirements of all individual projects with minimal resources Human resource is the most expensive Leadership Methods of documenting.
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
F.M.E.A (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
What is Fault Tree Analysis?
P roblem S olving I nnovator Solving Tomorrows Problems Today The Fault Tree will automatically be generated once the Team has Completed the 5 th Why.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis FMEA
Presented to: [Date] By (Insert Name) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology.
Quality in Product and Process Design Pertemuan 13-14
Quality Risk Management Methodology Anthony Cumberlege SAPRAA meeting - Randpark golf club, 20 March 2009.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 7 Quality and Innovation in Product and Process Design.
Class Exercise: Accidents & errors
WHAT IS SYSTEM SAFETY? The field of safety analysis in which systems are evaluated using a number of different techniques to improve safety. There are.
Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA). 2 Definition of FMEA Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) is a structured approach to: Predict failures and prevent.
FAULT TREE ANALYSIS (FTA). QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS Some of the commonly used quantitative risk assessment methods are; 1.Fault tree analysis (FTA)
Chapter 4 System Reliability Analysis of Structures.
Lecture: Reliability & FMECA Lecturer: Dr. Dave Olwell Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, CSEP System Suitability.
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
Safety-Critical Systems T Ilkka Herttua. Safety Context Diagram HUMANPROCESS SYSTEM - Hardware - Software - Operating Rules.
1 Safety - definitions Accident - an unanticipated loss of life, injury, or other cost beyond a pre-determined threshhold.  If you expect it, it’s not.
Safety-Critical Systems 7 Summary T V - Lifecycle model System Acceptance System Integration & Test Module Integration & Test Requirements Analysis.
Reliability Data Collection and Analysis Benbow and Broome (Ch 15, 16 and 17) Presented by Dr. Joan Burtner Certified Quality Engineer Associate Professor.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
1 3. System reliability Objectives Learn the definitions of a component and a system from a reliability perspective Be able to calculate reliability of.
ME 4054W: Design Projects RISK MANAGEMENT. 2 Lecture Topics What is risk? Types of risk Risk assessment and management techniques.
1 Criteria for a Successful FMEA Design & Process.
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis FMEA Lecture 11. What is FMEA? Failure mode and effect analysis is an Advanced Quality Planning tool that: examines potential.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Toward a New ATM Software Safety Assessment Methodology dott. Francesca Matarese.
Fault Tree Analysis for the BLEDP Student meeting Vegard Joa Moseng.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
SAFETY AND HEALTH IN PROCESS INDUSTRIES(MKKK1653) 2015/2016 ASSIGNMENT Failure mode, effect and critical analysis (FMECA) By Yahya Gambo (MKK152006) SUBMITTED.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Medical Device Software Development
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Fault Trees.
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
Total Quality Management Quality Risk Management
FMEA.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
Safety and Risk.
IENG 461 – System Safety I Lecture 8 – Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) James R. Harris, Ph.D., P.E.
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The Certified Quality Process Handbook Chapter 22: Preventive Action
The benefits to perform FMEA
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis
Presentation transcript:

EML 4550: Engineering Design Methods Probability and Statistics in Engineering Design: Reliability, FMEA, FEMCA Class Notes Hyman: Chapter 5 EML4550 2007

System reliability EML4550 2007

Reliability of Series Systems 0.99 0.85 0.98 EML4550 -- 2007

For constant per-unit failure rates Per-unit failure rate of series system is constant and equal to the sum of the component failure rates EML4550 -- 2007

Reliability of Parallel Systems 0.99 0.85 0.98 EML4550 -- 2007

Example Find the system reliability of the following combinational system with both serial and parallel arrangements. Assume all sub-systems have a reliability of 0.9 1 4 5 6 2 3 EML4550 -- 2007

For constant per-unit failure rates (example: two systems in parallel) System does not have constant per-unit failure rate even if components do System reliability for parallel systems is always greater than the most reliable component Most systems are not designed in parallel (redundancy) due to cost considerations (unless needed due to safety and life-protection considerations) Series Transmission line, Power train Parallel Multiple airplane engines, Two headlights EML4550 -- 2007

Reliability of Large Systems Most systems are neither parallel nor series, but a hybrid combination Calculation of overall system reliability, however, is done following the simple principle shown before Parallel systems are used when extremely high reliability is needed (by use of redundancy) EML4550 -- 2007

Cost of Reliability Cost  Reliability  Total cost Minimized cost Cost due to design and manufacture Cost  Cost to customer: failed products, reputation, etc.. Reliability  EML4550 -- 2007

FTA Fault Tree Analysis Work from the overall system backwards towards the component level (top down approach) Identify system fault modes and possible causes Assign probabilities to each fault mode Build a ‘tree’ and use it to evaluate overall reliability, availability, etc. A Fault Tree Analysis Handbook (from US Nuclear Regulatory Commission) The basic elements of a fault tree in pp. 34-44 EML4550 -- 2007

FMEA and FMECA Failure Modes and Effects Criticality Analysis Work from the component level and identify all possible fault modes at the component level (a team effort and bottom-up approach) Assess criticality of each component fault and its effects on overall system performance Build a ‘table’ with all fault modes, assign probabilities, severity, determine interactions, possible actions, etc. Three factors for failure analysis: The severity of a failure (Sev), The probability of occurrence of the failure (Occ), The likelihood of detecting the failure (Det) RPN (risk priority number)=(Sev)(Occ)(Det): quantify overall risk for a specific failure Use the table to asses overall reliability (see an example) EML4550 -- 2007

Step-by-step Procedures The design is broken down into components with a block diagram showing their interrelations. Identify functions for each individual components (1st column) List the potential failure modes (2nd column) Describe the consequences/effects due to the failure (3rd column); frequently coming from customers, regulation, and/or experienced designers  Use the severity table to determine the numerical value (Sev). Identify potential causes (root cause analysis, column 6)  Find Occurrence value (Occ) Determine how one can detect the potential failure (colume 8)  Find detectability (Det) Calculate the risk priority number (RPN) Determine the corrective actions to remove potential failures. Assign responsibility to appropriate person(s) for the removal of each failure. Estimate the RPN after the corrective actions. EML4550 -- 2007

Implications Incorporate availability, reliability, and maintainability on the product specification Prepare a mathematical model to assess system reliability (e.g., FMECA) Design with reliability and maintainability in mind Exercise FMECA each time a design change is needed, or to explore incremental improvements to the design that may improve reliability without critically affecting functionality and cost EML4550 -- 2007

EML4550 -- 2007

EML4550 -- 2007