State Drinking Water Administrators’ Current Issues NARUC Committee on Water Jim Taft, Executive Director Association of State Drinking Water Administrators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kosovo Donor Coordination
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Administration, Management, and Coordination of Supportive Housing: Guidelines from CSH’s Dimensions of Quality MHSA TA Operations Call September 1, 2010.
W HO A RE W E A group consisting of grant managers, financial specialists, government administrators and associated employees of the State of Florida.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
“Measuring Water Security Progress” 2008 Water Policy Conference AMWA Security Committee March 3, 2008 By Billy Turner, President, Columbus Water Works.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Program Federal Monitoring Update James Gray Program Specialist.
FSMA: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going Supplemental Notices of Proposed Rulemaking Public Meeting November 13, 2014 Roberta F. Wagner, B.S., M.S.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function Presented By: Michelle Diamond Community Planning & Capacity Building Coordinator FEMA.
Consumer Work Group Presentation Federal Health IT Strategic Plan January 9, 2015 Gretchen Wyatt Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Analysis.
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Office of Science & Technology Policy Executive Office of the President The National Climate Assessment Version 3.0 Kathy Jacobs Assistant Director for.
Series 2: Project Management Advanced Project Management for Behavioral Health Electronic Health Records (EHRs) 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten.
Preventive Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
Perspectives on the DWSRF CIFA Panel Discussion Jim Taft Executive Director Association of State Drinking Water Administrators.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
National Preparedness All Hazards Consortium Corey Gruber Assistant Deputy Administrator, National Preparedness National Preparedness.
All Youth Ready at 21. Connecticut Youth Futures Policy Team  Participates in: Youth Policy Institute of the National Conference of State Legislatures,
Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) Sector Specific Plan (SSP) AFDO Annual Meeting June 7, 2005 LeeAnne Jackson, Ph.D. Center for Food Safety.
Establishing Resiliency in the Water Sector The WARN Initiative Kevin M. Morley July 13, 2008 Southern Legislative Conference Oklahoma City, OK.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
© GEO Secretariat 5.2 Monitoring and Evaluation John Adamec Co-Chair, M&E Working Group GEO-XI Plenary November 2014 Geneva, Switzerland.
ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.
1 Going From Good to Great: Cooperation, Collaboration, and Continual Learning Mark A. Satorius, Director Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental.
Water Security Updates & Initiatives Asset Management Workshop May 5, 2005 Presented by: Jim Wheeler Office of Wastewater Management U.S. Environmental.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Moldova Partnership Principles Implementation Plan Presentation to Regular Donor Meeting June 24th.
Advancing Natural and Nature-Based Infrastructure Solutions through Policy and Partnerships Kim Penn, NOAA Office for Coastal Management.
Public Health Accreditation: Tribal Collaboration and Action Robin Wilcox, MPA, Chief Program Officer Public Health Accreditation Board January 23, 2012.
3/17/2008AMATS: Anchorage Metropolitan Transportation Solutions AMATS Air Quality Advisory Committee Informational Update March18, 2008.
Understanding Public Health Risks and Putting it into Context USEPA National Drinking Water Program Update for the NARUC Water Committee Presented at:
Implementing Local Action Strategies and the Puerto Rico Resolution Proposal to the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force October 3, 2003 Saipan, CNMI.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
Sustainability and Indicators at EPA Ecoinformatics Meeting June, 2007 Copenhagen William Sonntag w/credit to Ethan McMahon Office of Environmental Information.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council VII NRIC Council Meeting Focus Group 1B Network Architectures for Emergency Communications in 2010 September.
Charnwood Together AGM 1 4th September 2015 Chris Traill Strategic Director Neighbourhoods & Community Wellbeing.
Creating an Interoperable Learning Health System for a Healthy Nation Jon White, M.D. Acting Deputy National Coordinator Office of the National Coordinator.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
NATIONAL ACTION PLAN: Priorities for Managing Freshwater Resources in a Changing Climate June
GIT 6 Update on Local Leadership Management Strategy Local Leadership management strategy submitted on December 15 th to Bay Program Office Management.
NCHER Legislative Conference Washington, DC Federal Update February 2, 2016 Annmarie Weisman, Office of Postsecondary Education.
NGA Center for Best Practices January 10, 2001 Charleston, South Carolina National Environmental Information Exchange Network Kim Nelson Pennsylvania Department.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting November 19, 2013.
Innovative Solutions for Water and the Environment San Diego IRWMP Regional Advisory Committee Meeting October 9, 2007.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
Financial Services Sector Coordinating Council (FSSCC) 2011 KEY FSSCC INITIATIVES 2011 Key FSSCC Initiatives Project Name: Project Description: All-Hazards.
PFM reform – change management Module 3.2 Preparing and managing a PFM reform programme 1.
Status Report to the President under EO EPA ACTIONS 1 Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM NOVEMBER 5, Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
Cooperative Federalism 2
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
Budget and Planning Update
Presentation transcript:

State Drinking Water Administrators’ Current Issues NARUC Committee on Water Jim Taft, Executive Director Association of State Drinking Water Administrators February 18, 2008

2 Overview of Topics  Drinking Water Regulations & Regulatory Tools  Drinking Water Security  Water System Capacity Development  Source Water Protection  Data Management  Documenting and Measuring Success  State Resources  Importance of Partnerships

3 Implementing Recently Promulgated Drinking Water Rules LT 2/Stage 2 ( Microbial Contaminants/Disinfection By-Products): LT 2/Stage 2 ( Microbial Contaminants/Disinfection By-Products): Some states heavily involved in pre-primacy activities; others are preparing for post-primacy requirements. Some states heavily involved in pre-primacy activities; others are preparing for post-primacy requirements. Implementation has gone reasonably well; some of the main workloads are yet to hit with full force. Implementation has gone reasonably well; some of the main workloads are yet to hit with full force. Ground Water Rule: Ground Water Rule: States now preparing “primacy” applications. States now preparing “primacy” applications. Lead & Copper Rule Short Term Revisions: Lead & Copper Rule Short Term Revisions: States generally concur with the suite of rule “fixes.” States generally concur with the suite of rule “fixes.” Challenges: Challenges: Risked-based rules: time & resource consuming for states. Risked-based rules: time & resource consuming for states. States grapple with simultaneous compliance issues. States grapple with simultaneous compliance issues.

4 State Perspectives on Rule Development and Regulatory Tools Regulatory Determinations from CCL2: Regulatory Determinations from CCL2: States commented on the FR notice and await final decisions. States commented on the FR notice and await final decisions. Small System Affordability: Small System Affordability: States are concerned about approaches that would routinely lead to two-tier public health protection. States are concerned about approaches that would routinely lead to two-tier public health protection. 6-Year Review: 6-Year Review: States supported the 6 yr. review process by voluntarily providing occurrence data and recommending implementation changes. States supported the 6 yr. review process by voluntarily providing occurrence data and recommending implementation changes. Total Coliform-Distribution System Rule: Total Coliform-Distribution System Rule: States are actively participating in the FACA Committee and the supporting Technical Workgroup. States are actively participating in the FACA Committee and the supporting Technical Workgroup.

5 Drinking Water Security: Overview Integrating into Drinking Water Program: Integrating into Drinking Water Program: States seek to embed security into their every day programs (e.g., sanitary surveys, capacity development). States seek to embed security into their every day programs (e.g., sanitary surveys, capacity development). Areas of Emphasis: Areas of Emphasis: State believe in the importance of an “all- hazards” approach that emphasizes, in addition to prevention/detection, resiliency and recovery. State believe in the importance of an “all- hazards” approach that emphasizes, in addition to prevention/detection, resiliency and recovery. States Are the Vital Link: States Are the Vital Link: State drinking water programs will continue play a vital communication link between the Federal gov’t., other state agencies, and local entities. State drinking water programs will continue play a vital communication link between the Federal gov’t., other state agencies, and local entities.

6 Drinking Water Security: States Have Supported National Initiatives Water Sector Specific Plan: Water Sector Specific Plan: Heavy involvement in 12/06 submittal. Heavy involvement in 12/06 submittal. Mutual Aid Networks: Mutual Aid Networks: Supporting start-up of new networks. Supporting start-up of new networks. The Water Security Initiative (i.e., Water Sentinel): The Water Security Initiative (i.e., Water Sentinel): State representative on steering committee. State representative on steering committee. CIPAC Workgroups: CIPAC Workgroups: State representatives and ASDWA serve on CIPAC metrics workgroup and decontamination workgroup. State representatives and ASDWA serve on CIPAC metrics workgroup and decontamination workgroup. Participation in Government Sector Coordinating Council and Water-ISAC Board of Directors Participation in Government Sector Coordinating Council and Water-ISAC Board of Directors

7 Water System Capacity Development/Small System Focus At the national program development level, states and ASDWA have been active: At the national program development level, states and ASDWA have been active: Input on EPA’s Capacity Development Strategic Plan and Capacity Development Program Evaluation Tool (CDPET). Input on EPA’s Capacity Development Strategic Plan and Capacity Development Program Evaluation Tool (CDPET). Input on an array of guidances and training documents. Input on an array of guidances and training documents. States continue to work to ensure that systems have adequate capacity: States continue to work to ensure that systems have adequate capacity: Building small system T, M, & F capacity. Building small system T, M, & F capacity. Small system focus in implementation training. Small system focus in implementation training. Direct technical assistance and work through partners. Direct technical assistance and work through partners.

8 Source Water Assessment and Protection Partnerships and Collaboration: Partnerships and Collaboration: ASDWA & state drinking water programs continue to work with partners at all levels to develop collaborative strategies that leverage scarce resources and move from assessment to protection: ASDWA & state drinking water programs continue to work with partners at all levels to develop collaborative strategies that leverage scarce resources and move from assessment to protection: Source Water Collaborative Source Water Collaborative ASDWA/GWPC Workshop (September 2007) ASDWA/GWPC Workshop (September 2007) Representation at other workshops (e.g., AWWA January 2007) Representation at other workshops (e.g., AWWA January 2007) Updated guidance and information transfer Updated guidance and information transfer Reporting Progress: Reporting Progress: States have continued to do their best, in the face of resource constraints, to report on their voluntary source water protection programs. States have continued to do their best, in the face of resource constraints, to report on their voluntary source water protection programs.

9 Drinking Water Data Management Modernized Data Flow: Modernized Data Flow: We’ve largely completed the process of transitioning to the modernized data flow. We’ve largely completed the process of transitioning to the modernized data flow. Preparing to meet electronic reporting rule (CROMERR). Preparing to meet electronic reporting rule (CROMERR). Data Quality & Reliability: Data Quality & Reliability: We’ve been active in helping ensure accurate and reliable data with better measures of “data quality.” We’ve been active in helping ensure accurate and reliable data with better measures of “data quality.” Triennial Data Reliability Report. Triennial Data Reliability Report. Data Reliability Improvement Plan. Data Reliability Improvement Plan. Working on Data for a Variety of Users Working on Data for a Variety of Users

10 Measures of Success Logic Model To Assess Program Effectiveness: Logic Model To Assess Program Effectiveness: A state-EPA workgroup has kicked into high gear in piloting & revising logic model (meeting in D.C. in June 2007); all states will soon be involved. A state-EPA workgroup has kicked into high gear in piloting & revising logic model (meeting in D.C. in June 2007); all states will soon be involved. Improving Measures in 5 Year Plan: Improving Measures in 5 Year Plan: States have reported progress under the National Strategic Plan and 2007 National Water Program Guidance. States have reported progress under the National Strategic Plan and 2007 National Water Program Guidance. Future Measures: Future Measures: We’ve continued to be active (especially through the NDWAC) in responding to the challenge of developing “ultimate” outcome measures of success. We’ve continued to be active (especially through the NDWAC) in responding to the challenge of developing “ultimate” outcome measures of success.

11 State Drinking Water Resources Communicating Resource Needs: Communicating Resource Needs: Federal and state budgets are expected to continue to be extremely tight; it’s a sometimes discouraging picture. Federal and state budgets are expected to continue to be extremely tight; it’s a sometimes discouraging picture. States and ASDWA have continued to make the case at every opportunity for adequate state drinking water program resources. States and ASDWA have continued to make the case at every opportunity for adequate state drinking water program resources. Making Tough Choices: Making Tough Choices: States simply can’t do it all with declining resources and fuller plates; we’ve made tough choices and set priorities. States simply can’t do it all with declining resources and fuller plates; we’ve made tough choices and set priorities. We’d like to continue to work with our partners as we navigate through these difficult times. We’d like to continue to work with our partners as we navigate through these difficult times.

12 Importance of Partnerships A Key to Success: A Key to Success: States and ASDWA have continued to be willing and active partners with a variety of groups at all levels and seek to continue and improve on partnerships. States and ASDWA have continued to be willing and active partners with a variety of groups at all levels and seek to continue and improve on partnerships. Communication, Relationships, and Partnerships: Communication, Relationships, and Partnerships: We continue to seek to improve communications, find common ground, and leverage shared resources. We continue to seek to improve communications, find common ground, and leverage shared resources.