NJAIS/Middle States Accreditation For Kent Place School Presented by: James Palmieri & Kathy Zagorski August 31, 2010.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PAINLESS PERIODIC REVIEW Cynthia Steinhoff Anne Arundel Community College Arnold, Maryland.

Advertisements

Overview of Institutional Accreditation AASCU Conference, Beijing, China 20 October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission on Higher.

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools

Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.

How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.

Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.

 2009– LA Delta Initially Accredited by SACS  July 2010 – Tallulah & Lake Providence Consolidated with LA Delta  July 2012 – LA Delta & NELTC Legislatively.

WELSSA – Advancing the Gospel of Jesus Christ First Lutheran Lake Geneva, WI.

Why Institutional Assessment is Important for Middle States Adapted (with permission) From Andrea Lex, Who Presented at Stockton September 20, 2010 Facilitated.

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.

District 5750 Presidents-elect Training Seminar Moush Tourian District Governor Nominee Weatherford Rotary Club Roles and Responsibilities 1.

 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.

By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the New Members of the Board of Trustees, September.

Medical School Preparation for LCME Accreditation The University Toledo College of Medicine August 24, 2011 Barbara Barzansky, PhD, MHPE LCME Secretary,

Intervention and Referral Services Linda Remolino, LPC, NCC Director of School Counseling North Plainfield School District.

 Mission College Preparation of the Accreditation Self-Evaluation WVMCCD Board of Trustees November 19, 2013.

New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Public Elementary and Middle Schools The Accreditation Process.

ACCJC SPECIAL REPORT DUE TO FINANCIAL REVIEW CONTACT: DR. VICTOR JAIME, ED.D DUE: APRIL 15, 2014.

Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.

Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

By Elizabeth Meade Our Reaccreditation through Middle States Commission on Higher Education Presentation to the Board of Trustees, May 11, 2012.

New England Association of Schools and Colleges Commission on Public Elementary and Middle Schools.

The Plan without End!!!. What is Middle States? Middle States is the Association of Colleges and Schools that was established in It is one of six.

Program Review & Evaluation Processes CSUSB 508/09/10 Presented by Kit Alvarez.

National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.

University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.

ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.

Why Accreditation? “There is no power greater than a community discovering what it cares about. Be brave enough to start a conversation that matters. Our.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.

SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Los Angeles Southwest College LACCD Trustee Accreditation Subcommittee Self-Study Overview December 14, 2005.

Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Standards 1,6, & 9 Bill Bonaudi Big Bend Community College.

New England Association of Schools and Colleges The Accreditation Process A Report Guide.

Middle States Reaccreditation Process at The Catholic University of America.

Teaching at the University of Luxembourg: Organization, quality assurance and evaluation of student achievements

Los Angeles Mission College Institutional Self Study for Reaffirmation of Accreditation

Envisioning Accreditation October 10, 2008 TEAM 2010.

Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

Preparing Your Self Study

Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.

School Name Visiting Team Exit Report Month, days, year Insert School’s logo or photo of school building.

Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”

Establishing and Maintaining Effective Safety Committees.

Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Process Update.

Fall 2006 Faculty Evaluation and Tenure Review Process Tenure Review Process Riverside Community College District.

Accreditation Self-Study Progress Update Presentation to the SCCCD Board of Trustees Madera Center October 5, 2010 Tony Cantu, Fresno City College Marilyn.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.

October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva

National Lutheran School Accreditation encourages, assists, and recognizes schools that provide quality Christian education and engage in continuous improvement.

Board of Trustees Presentation Foothill & De Anza Colleges Accreditation 2011 April 5, 2010.

Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.

Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.

CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,

Self-Study 2010: Review, Reflect, and Renew. The Accrediting Process  A means of self-regulation  Intended to strengthen and sustain the quality higher.

1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.

Performance-Based Accreditation

Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation

SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION

Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process

AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.

Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update

Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018

Accreditation: Working towards the self-study

Presentation transcript:

NJAIS/Middle States Accreditation For Kent Place School Presented by: James Palmieri & Kathy Zagorski August 31, 2010

How NOT to feel about accreditation…

How NOT to go about accreditation…

What is accreditation? -The process of accreditation is based on self- evaluation, followed by a peer review. -It is a careful, intensive study by the school of its entire operation. -Every element of the school community must be involved and examined. -The purpose is to determine to what degree KPS is staying true to its mission and is KPS providing a thorough education to its students?

What does it involve? - Clarifying the school’s purpose and goals for its students - Assessing all areas of the school’s operations - Developing an action plan as well as an accountability system for monitoring the plan’s implementation

What are the benefits of being accredited? Allows member schools to strengthen themselves as they go about serving their own missions Strengthens the school's independence Provides a credential for private, corporate and foundation fund raising

Background on NJAIS Recognized by the National Association of Independent Schools (NAIS). Evaluating member schools since 1995 Acts as solo evaluating agency or jointly with the Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools Helps schools review and clarify their mission and goals for achieving that mission Jointly; Primary (NJAIS) and Secondary (Middle States) How? Acceptance of Protocols &Team Formation

The Nine Standards We Will Be Evaluated On Are: Philosophy/Mission School and Community Counseling/Health Program/Instruction Technology Personnel School Governance School Finance School Plant/Safety/Equipment/Services

Steering Committee & Sub-Committees (9 Standards) Committees may include administrators, faculty, staff, coaches, students and/or board members. Committee Information Updates

Planning Timeline (Before Visit) months prior Each section of self-study assigned to sub-committee. Sub-committees collect and record required data months prior Chair of Visiting Team is selected. 3-4 months prior Visiting team members are selected. 1 month prior KPS mails out completed self-study to Visiting Team. KPS mails out completed study to NJAIS office.

Follow-up Timeline (After Visit) 1 month after  The Chair sends the team report to NJAIS.  The NJAIS Accreditation Coordinator summarizes the report and transmits it to the Accreditation Committee for its review. 2 months after The Accreditation Committee meets to review the team report. The visiting team Chair presents an oral report on the school and the visit, summarizes the standards and presents the team’s recommendation on accreditation.

Long-Term Timeline 1 Year After Visit KPS completes Action Plan which includes 2-4 goals to focus on in the coming years. KPS responds to all recommendations made by Visiting Team. 5 Years After Visit State of the school and goals are once again reviewed. A 1 day visit is made and a decision on whether to continue/renew accreditation is made.

Together we will have a wonderful accreditation! Thanks for your help! Questions?