Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Aeroderivative Combustion Turbine Planning Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spinning Reserve from Load Consideration of a Trial at Xcel Energys Cabin Creek Station Presentation to CMOPS January 7, 2005 John Kueck ORNL Brendan Kirby.
Advertisements

Will CO2 Change What We Do?
What’s the only thing that moves slower than the a glacier? An IOU Power Generation Technologies.
CVP Cost Allocation Public Workshop – January 18, 2013 “PLEXOS Methodology and Assumptions”
Ad Hoc West-wide Resource Assessment Team (WRAT) : Assessment of Western System Adequacy in the Short-term Jeff King Northwest Power Planning Council Presentation.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Actual vs. Modeled Operation of Combined-Cycle Combustion Turbines in the Pacific Northwest Maury Galbraith.
1.  Purpose  To present Staff’s Preliminary Findings on the 2012 Integrated Resource Plans of:  APS – Arizona Public Service Company  TEP – Tucson.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
Why We Made the Decisions We Made and Where We Are in Building New Generation February 17, 2005 Prepared by Nilaksh Kothari, P.E. General Manager Manitowoc.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Effects of Alternative Scenarios on Sixth Power Plan Northwest Power and Conservation Council Whitefish, MT June.
1 The Impact of Using LNG-Derived Natural Gas in the South Coast Air Basin January 2006.
Electricity Supply in Alaska Frank Abegg, PE Fairbanks, Alaska April 2006 Frank Abegg, PE Fairbanks, Alaska April 2006.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
1 The Effects of Integrating Wind Power on Transmission System Planning, Reliability, and Operations Phase 1 Preliminary Overall Reliability Assessment.
Overview of Distributed Generation Technologies June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Cogeneration at UC July 18, Welcome 3 Transformation of the Power Plant POWER PLANT CENTER OF CAMPUS CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT 2007.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
March 19, 2009 Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Central-station Solar Photovoltaic Resource Assessment Jeff King Northwest Power and.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
Russell City Energy Center Voluntary GHG BACT Determination Bay Area Air Quality Management District June 14, 2011 Brian Lusher Senior Air Quality Engineer.
Freeport Generating Project Project Description Modernization projects at Power Plant #2 Developers – Freeport Electric and Selected Development Company.
Draft Avoided Cost Forecast and Marginal CO 2 Offset Value of Conservation Regional Technical Forum Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
February 10, 2008 Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Woody Biomass Resource Assessment Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Avoided Costs of Generation
Pasadena Water and Power APPROVE A PROJECT CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $2,500,000 FOR EXISTING CONTRACTS RELATED TO THE LOCAL GENERATION REPOWERING PROJECT -
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Combined-cycle Power Plant Capital Cost Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation.
STATIONARY FUEL CELLS Economics 101 Jane Price Hill, P. E.February 13, 2003.
Wholesale Power Price Forecast 01/28/03 Current Trends Update March 11, 2003.
Sixth Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Plan Generating Resource Assessments Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, OR July.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Resource Development Parameters Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating Resources.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generating.
GHG BACT Analysis Case Study Russell City Energy Center May 2010 Donald Neal Vice President, EHS.
Transmission Equivalence Richard V. Kowalski Manager, Transmission Planning ISO New England.
Wholesale Power Price Forecast 01/28/03 Current Trends Update Jeff King January 31, 2003.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
December 9, 2008 Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Integrated Coal-fired Gasification Plant Resource Assessment Jeff King Northwest Power.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Heavy-duty Combustion Turbine Planning Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Wind Plant Capital Cost Assumption Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland,
Wholesale Electricity Price Forecast Draft Current Trends Forecast Jeff King Conservation Resource Advisory Committee September 30, 2002.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Geothermal Power Generation Resource Assessment Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Power.
California’s Proposed DR Cost-Effectiveness Framework January 30, 2008.
Kevin Hanson Doug Murray Jenell Katheiser Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update April, 2012.
Northwest Power Planning Council, January 2001 Electricity Price Forecast Sensitivity Analysis Jeff King Regional Technical Forum January 9, 2001.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
Winter Power Supply Adequacy/Reliability Analysis Power Committee Briefing October 17, 2001.
July 17, GRAC 7/17/08 - Wrap-up I 1)Are the reference plant assumptions reasonable? More or less specificity? Important variations? 2)Should other.
Southern California Edison The San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station April 14, 2011.
Northwest Wind Integration Action Plan Jeff King Northwest Power & Conservation Council June 27, 2007.
PNW RoofTop Unit Working Group - RTUG – RTU Savings Research Project Phase 3 December 15, 2009.
1 Cross-Cutting Analytical Assumptions for the 6 th Power Plan July 1, 2008.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Interim Wholesale Electricity Price and Carbon Dioxide Production Forecasts Maury Galbraith Northwest.
The Iowa Stored Energy Plant A Project Review and Update May 2005 Bob Haug, Executive Director Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities.
1 8. OPERATING, REACTIVE AND BLACK START RESERVES Asko Vuorinen.
1 11. PROFITABILITY EVALUATION OF NEW POWER PLANT ALTERNATIVES Asko Vuorinen.
1 10. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ANCILLARY SERVICE MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
Northwest Coal Retirement Reduction Study Development of Base Case Assumptions and Scenarios PNUCC Meeting October 15,
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
First in Service First in Value
Jeff King Northwest Power & Conservation Council July 28, 2010
NYS Department of Public Service
Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council
Presentation transcript:

Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Aeroderivative Combustion Turbine Planning Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, OR July 17, 2008

2 Reference plant Twin 47 MW (nominal) natural gas-fired gas turbine generators and ancillary equipment, control building and switchyard. Inlet air evaporative cooling. Dry low- emission combustors and SCR for NOx control and CO oxidizing catalyst for CO and VOC control. Located in utility service territory near load center. Characteristics generally based on GE LM6000PD Sprint.

July 17, Aeroderivative GT applications:  Energy generation  Cogeneration (requires heat recovery & integration equipment)  Regulating reserve (requires AGC)  Load-following (requires AGC)  Spinning reserve (requires AGC)  Non-spinning reserve  Replacement reserve  Voltage control (VAR support) (requires clutch)  Black start (requires auxilliary diesel generator)  Local emergency service Status: Commercially mature

July 17, Aeroderivative GT operating characteristics I 5 th PlanProposed Base rating (net ISO MW, lifecycle average) 2 46 MW/unit 2 45 MW/unit ISO rating less 2% plant losses, less 2% degradation Rating at reference PNW locations PNW Westside (200’) PNW Eastside (700’) S. ID (3000’) E. MT (5500’) Minimum load (% rated power)25%Same Ramp rate (%/hr)>100%SameCold start to min. load < 10 min Minimum run time (hr)1 hour< 1 hr Minimum down time (hr)1 hour< 1 hr

July 17, Aeroderivative GT operating characteristics II 5 th PlanProposed Scheduled outage factor3.6% (10 days/yr ave) SameGE maintenance schedule:  Annual – 7 d  6 yr Hot gas path – 10 d  12 yr Major - 28 d Equivalent forced outage rate3.6%/10%??NERA is 3.7%. Review GADS Mean time between failures--528 hrGADS GT value ca: Will review GADS Mean time to repair80 hoursSameGADS GT value ca: Will review GADS Heat rate (HHV, full load, lifecycle ave) 9960 Btu/kWhSame1% degradation during hot gas path maintenance interval; 50% retoration; 100 % restoration at Major Vintage heat rate improvement- 0.5%/yr averageSame5% learning rate Service life30 yearsSame

July 17, Aeroderivative GT costs (2006 dollar values) 5 th PlanProposed Overnight construction cost$700/kW$860/kW2008 NTP/2009 service Vintage capital cost escalation-0.5%/yrSee subsequent slides Non-fuel Fixed O&M$9.30/kW/yrGRAC discussion Exclusive of property taxes & insurance Non-fuel Variable O&M$9.30/MWhGRAC discussion Startup Cost--Fuel for 10 min operation at min load 110 MMBtu/start, w/SCR (NERA) Shutdown Cost--Fuel for 5 min operation at min load Transmission CostNoneSameAssumed load center location Transmission LossesNoneSameAssumed load center location

July 17, Aeroderivative GT construction cost analysis NPCC database contains reported construction cost for 17 WECC plants comprising 54 units, Purged plants w/more than four units. Purged SF & SCE peakers. Remaining: 9 plants, units ea., 22 units total Normalize capital costs using MICROFIN Assume cost is vintaged as of beginning of construction (YOL - 1) 2006 dollar values "Overnight" construction + development cost Nominal ISO capacity Unit (capacity) -weighted (we need an average cost value for a potential mix of plant configurations)

July 17, Normalized aeroderivative GT cost Proposed 2008 cost: $860/kW "Overnight", 2006$, 2009 service

July 17, Our preliminary thinking on forecast construction cost escalation Escalation continues at declining rate through 2009; levels off Real costs decline to ~ 130% of 2004 values Recent cost escalation 2015 > Resumption of historical real cost reduction

July 17, Schedule, Cash Flows & Option phases Portfolio Risk model development phases > Development“Optional” Construction “Committed Construction” MilestonesFeasibility study through completion of permitting Notice to proceed to major equipment foundations complete Accept major equipment to commercial operation Time to complete18 mo12 mo(3) 6 mo Cash expended2 %93 %5 % Cost to suspend ($/kW)Negligible-- Cost to hold ($/kW/yr)$ 1.16 ($95,000/yr)-- Maximum hold time60 mo -- Cost of termination following suspension ($/kW) Negligible-- Cost of immediate termination ($/kW) Negligible--

July 17, Environmental 5 th PlanProposed Particulates0.09 T/GWhValues from recent permit? NPCC does not use & few if any requests SO T/GWh ''NPCC does not use & few if any requests NOx T/GWh ''NPCC does not use & few if any requests CO T/GWh ''NPCC does not use & few if any requests Hydrocarbons/VOC0.08 T/GWh''NPCC does not use & few if any requests CO2 – Embedded--??? CO2 – Direct operation582 T/GWhSame117 lb CO2/MMBtu NG CO2 – Indirect operation--???