Mission and Spacecraft Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

LightSail.
DOC-TAS-EN-002 ExoMars-2018 DM Entry Decent Landing LSSWS# December 2014 Turin.
All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space EXOMARS Industry Day Carrier Module Presentation Thales Alenia Space- Italia (Turin)
Lunar Lander / Orbiter CubeSats Dr. Carl Vermont Technical College (Voice) Randolph Center, VT USA
Babakin Space Center, Space Research Insitute, Makeev Rocket Design Bureau COSMOS ONE: THE FIRST SOLAR SAIL a project of The Planetary Society with Cosmos.
1 Interstellar Heliopause Probe M. Leipold, Kayser-Threde GmbHISSS 2010, New York, July 19 – 22, 2010 Interstellar Heliopause Probe (IHP) System Design.
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
07/07/2005 Coupling with PF2012: No existing PF “as is” able to accommodate Karin On going study in France to develop a new generation of PF product line.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection Scientific Rationale The first generation of stars were very important for the conditions of the early.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT; For planning and discussion purposes only 1 1 March 4-5, 2008 Evolution of Lunar to Planetary Landing A.Miguel San Martin Mars Science.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Stardust NExT Tim Larson, Project Manager EPOXI.
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 7 Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Thermal Control Ian Meginnis February 26, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems Phase Leader.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 8 Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Masses and Costs Ian Meginnis March 12, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems Phase Leader -
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
Small body sample return mission candidates at ESA
Pioneer Venus & Galileo Probe Development: Comparison/Assessment John Givens.
“ PHOBOS - SOIL ” Phobos Sample Return Mission 1. goals, methods of study A.Zakharov, Russian academy of sciences Russian aviation.
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
A Simple Entry, Descent, and Floating System for Planetary Ballooning Daisuke Akita Tokyo Institute of Technology.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps.
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
IPPW9 17/06/2012 All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN Exploring the depths of Saturn D. LEBLEU – J. PONCY.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Thermal Control.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
Bits and Pieces. Spacecraft Systems Propulsion –Already discussed Communications Science instruments Power.
The Solar System Chapter 6 COPY DOWN THE LEARNING GOALS ON PG SKIP 5 LINES BETWEEN EACH!
Back to TITAN 24/06/2008 All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN TITAN probes following CASSINI - HUYGENS Denis.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
1 Science and Robotic Exploration (SRE) ESA’s planetary probes 10 th International Planetary Probe Workshop David Agnolon & Peter Falkner, Solar System.
→ PHOEBUS a hypervelocity entry demonstrator 9 th International Planeraty Probe Workshop June 2012 Toulouse, France L. Ferracina AOES/ESA-ESTEC L.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
1 Weekly Summary Asteroid Sample Return Spring Semester March 5, 2008 Ashley Chipman.
FP7/SPACE: Activity Strengthening of Space foundations / Research to support space science and exploration - SPA The research leading.
Solar Orbiter Mission (ESA) - The near-Sun phase  approach the Sun as close as 48 solar radii (~0.22 AU). At these distances, the angular speed of a spacecraft.
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
Jan 2008 LMSSC - 1 SWEA Plume Impingements Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
CubeSat Re-Entry Experimental System Testbed C.R.E.S.T. STK 11 This software is an orbital simulator that allows the user to examine the flight path of.
Mark Beckman NASA/GSFC Code 595 August 16-17, 2005
Technical Resource Allocations
P2-SWE-X Enhanced Space Weather Monitoring System ESWW13
P2-SWE-X Enhanced Space Weather Monitoring System ESWW13
Tomas Kohout, Antti Näsilä, Tuomas Tikka, Mikael Granvik, Antti Kestilä, Antti Penttilä, Janne Kuhno, Karri Muinonen, Kai Viherkanto, Esa Kallio VTT Technical.
Scientific Mission Applications
Analysis of Two Extreme Gas Dynamic Activities
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Atmospheric Re-Entry Goal: To re-enter the CubeSat into the atmosphere and survive re-entry and hit the ground without any deceleration from parachute,
OSIRIS-REx: The Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, Security, Regolith Explorer is a.
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
The Deorbiting of GOCE – A Spacecraft Operations Perspective
Presentation transcript:

Mission and Spacecraft Design MarcoPolo-R Mission and Spacecraft Design Lisa Peacocke – 19th June 2013 IPPW 2013, San Jose, USA

MarcoPolo-R Mission ESA Cosmic Vison M-class candidate Aim: To return a sample from a primitive near-Earth asteroid Currently Phase A, down-selection in Feb 2014 Target is primitive asteroid 2008 EV5 MarcoPolo-R Assessment Study and CCN Demonstrate technical and programmatic feasibility of the mission Achieve a cost-effective and consolidated mission design Astrium team kicked off in February 2012 Team of 18 engineers currently working on the study 2

1996 FG3 Primary and Secondary Mission Design Launch on Soyuz-Fregat to 2008 EV5 Launch years 2022, 2023, 2024 All outward trajectories require an Earth GAM Mission durations 4.5-6.5 years 2008 EV5 DeltaV’s relatively low Plasma propulsion architecture becomes feasible Reduced return velocities for Earth re-entry Other benefits of 2008 EV5 Smaller asteroid => less surface area to map Less extreme orbit with more consistent Sun distance Lower mass asteroid => lower gravity environment 1996 FG3 Primary and Secondary 2008 EV5 3

Science Operations Operations phases give ~140 GB data 8 hours data downlink per day is feasible ESA’s 35 m ground stations 4

Spacecraft Design 5

Spacecraft Design Mechanical Propulsion Thermal AOCS Electrical Solar Orbiter derived structure, modifications to support plasma thrusters Propulsion Three Snecma PPS1350 plasma thrusters (1.5 kW) with pointing mechanisms and PPUs – SMART 1 Two Xenon tanks and a high pressure regulator – BepiColombo MTM Aeolus derived monopropellant system with 20N thrusters and hydrazine tanks Thermal ‘Standard’ design with heaters and MLI, detailed analysis ongoing One panel with embedded heat pipes to aid PPU heat dissipation AOCS Off-the-shelf European IMU, star tracker, reaction wheels and sun sensors Electrical Two rotating solar array wings (7.5 m2 each) with drive mechanism – Sentinel 1 & 2 Lithium-ion battery and TerraSAR-X2-based 50V PCDU Mars Express 1.6 m high gain antenna; MGA and LGAs with 80 W RF TWTA and deep space transponder – BepiColombo/Solar Orbiter/LISA Pathfinder Gaia-based on-board computer with mass memory, and Solar Orbiter RIU 6

Spacecraft Design 7

Payload Accommodation All instruments mounted on same structure panel Facilitates integration and mutual alignment Accommodated inside spacecraft with views through cutouts 8

Key Technologies Proximity GNC Visual navigation uses Wide Angle Camera based on NPAL development and a Radar Altimeter Simulations performed for descent/touchdown Sample Acquisition, Transfer and Containment Rotary brush sampling mechanism developed and tested Touchdown damping from boom back-driven motor Minimal forces at 10 cm/s Earth Re-entry Capsule Hard landing, no parachute or beacons/battery Hayabusa-shape aeroshell 9

Proximity GNC/AOCS 10

Touchdown Dynamics 11

Sampling and Transfer 12

Sampling Mechanism Early Testing 13

Sampling Mechanism 14

Earth Re-entry Capsule Main requirements Maximum entry velocity = 12 km/s Maximum heat flux = 15 MW/m2 Maximum total pressure at stagnation point = 80 kPa Fully passive, no parachute – cost and MSR demonstration Ensure impact loads to sample are less than 800 g No beacon or battery on board Land at Woomera, Australia Entry flight path angle of -10.8 degrees selected Based on entry dispersion and appropriate landing ellipse Hayabusa aeroshape selected Stable and meets g-load, aerothermo requirements θc = 45 deg, RN/D = 0.5 4‑3 Dispersion at impact as a function of the FPA dispersion Huygens aeroshape can be considered if g-load limit is relaxed to 2000 g 3 June 2013 - 15

Earth Re-entry Capsule Design Properties Diameter = 0.880 m, Mass = 45.6 kg, Centring = 28.75% D (Max ~33% D) TPS: 56 mm ASTERM on frontshield (low density carbon phenolic, 280 kg/m3) 11 mm Norcoat Liége on backcover (low density cork phenolic, 470 kg/m3) 170 mm Aluminium foam crushable material, PU foam surrounds container Aluminum panels with lateral stiffeners ensure a free path for sample container, even with an impact at 20 degrees Using a stroke efficiency factor (70%) and a safety margin (15%) the absorbing material thickness is 170 mm. An interface material is necessary to link the TPS onto the structure and to stuff the empty joints between the Norcoat liege tiles. The silicone glue ESP495 is proposed (ExoMars material). 3 June 2013 - 16

Earth Re-entry Capsule 2 rpm min spin-up 3 June 2013 - 17

Earth Re-entry Capsule Landing ellipse is 68 km along longitudinal axis 3 June 2013 - 18

Conclusions Phase A study finishing at the end of July Preliminary Requirements Review in Oct/Nov Selection will occur in February 2014 Astrium’s mission & spacecraft design is feasible Key technologies are well into development Extensive unit re-use or modification Keeps development costs to a minimum, reduces cost risk MarcoPolo-R is a very promising M-class mission candidate New target has simplified engineering & design significantly Serendipitous short mission trajectories – right time for asteroid sample return 19

Questions? MarcoPolo-R Team: Steve Kemble, Héloise Scheer, Jean-Marc Bouilly, Antoine Freycon, Steve Eckersley, Brian O’Sullivan, Jaime Reed, Martin Garland, Mark Watt, Marc Chapuy, Kev Tomkins, Howard Gray, Bill Bentall, Andrew Davies, Chris Chetwood, Andy Quinn, Alex Elliott, Mark Bonnar, David Agnolon, Remy Chalex, Jens Romstedt 3 June 2013 - 20