Overview Who is AusRegistry? Why use the existing infrastructure? What this means for you? Questions raised and Important points.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEDEFs View on Dot EU Domain Day – 5 novembre 2002 – Palazzo Stelline – Milano Catherine GABAY – Director Innovation and Research - Medef.
Advertisements

GNSO goals Bruce Tonkin Chair, GNSO Council Sao Paulo, 4 Dec 2006.
Whois Task Force GNSO Public Forum Wellington March 28, 2006.
2001_03_28 SG A contribution– 1 Dept of State ITAC-T Advisory Committee SG-A Ad Hoc Meeting on ENUM March 28th & 29th, 2001 ENUM CONTRIBUTION TITLE: ENUM.
Hosted Revolution Ltd Hosted Exchange October 2009 V2.01.
Managing IP addresses for your private clouds 2013 ASEAN CAS Summit Bangkok, Thailand 7 February 2013 George Kuo Member Services Manager.
MUNIS Platform Migration Project WELCOME. Agenda Introductions Tyler Cloud Overview Munis New Features Questions.
Akamai DNS Offerings RSA © Conference ©2013 AKAMAI | FASTER FORWARD TM Akamai DNS Solutions Enhanced DNS (eDNS) Scalable, outsourced, DNS solution.
© 2003 Public Interest Registry Whois Workshop Introduction to Registry/Registrar Issues Presented by Bruce W. Beckwith VP, Operations June 23, 2003 Serving.
Bangkok October 2005 Slide 1 Whois Services Jaap Akkerhuis
Registrar experiences with WHOIS Bruce Tonkin Melbourne IT Ltd.
A Technical Overview of the.ng Registry Ope Odusan Chief Operating Officer Nigerian Internet Registration Association
Marcel Schneider The Swiss Education and Research Network.
ENUM Trial Implementation and results ENUM Workshop ETSI HQ Sophia Antipolis, France February 2004.
UK ENUM Jay Daley, Nominet UK. ENUM explained Nominet and ENUM.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable Technical/Networking Presentation March 19, :00 a.m. – noon.
The Domain Name System Overview Introduction DNS overview How DNS helps us? Summary.
Introduction to ICANN’s new gTLD program. A practical example: the Dot Deloitte case. Jan Corstens, Partner, Deloitte WIPO Moscow, 9 Dec 2011.
ENUM Primer November 4, 2004 Tom McGarry - NeuStar
1 IETF – ENUM US Government Briefing Richard Shockey IETF ENUM Work Group Chair Senior Technical Industry Liaison NeuStar, Inc Vermont Avenue N.W.
Interim Report Review Inter-Registrar Domain Name Transfers ICANN DNSO Names Council Task Force on Transfers Public Discussion on Transfers of gTLD Names.
Overview What are the provisioning methods used in the Australian registry system? How are these provisioning systems secured?
JVM Tehnologic Company profile & core business Founded: February 1992; –Core business: design and implementation of large software applications mainly.
IDN over EPP (IDNPROV) IETF BOF, Washington DC November 2004.
Organic Names Ltd.ORG Proposal Steve Dyer.
1 Platform for Success of.aero Dot Aero Council Geneva March 23, 2006.
ENUM? “ Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM or Enum, from TElephone NUmber Mapping) is a suite of protocols to unify the telephone numbering system E.164 with.
THE INTERNET INTERNET REGISTRIES & INTERNET REGISTRARS.
RIPE64 Enum Working Group DE-CIX NGN Services.
CcTLD Best Practices Michuki Mwangi AfriNIC5 - INET/AfTLD Meeting, Balaclava, Mauritius 30th Nov 2006.
VoIP and ENUM The Austrian Trial IETF #57 Vienna July 2003 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG/TELEKOM AUSTRIA, Postbox 147, 1103-Vienna enum:
Security and Stability of Root Name Server System Jun Murai (From the panel on Nov. 13 th by Paul Vixie, Mark Kosters, Lars-Johan Liman and Jun Murai)
Industry Canada 1 Bob Leafloor Colman Ho Peter Chau Industry Canada January 2003 (ENUM) T E lephone NU mber M apping.
X-Road – Estonian Interoperability Platform
1 Chapter 12: VPN Connectivity in Remote Access Designs Designs That Include VPN Remote Access Essential VPN Remote Access Design Concepts Data Protection.
1 ICANN update Save Vocea APSTAR retreat, Taipei, TW 24 February 2008.
© 2005, SWITCH ccTLD „.CH“ (Switzerland), part 2 Marcel Schneider Dipl. El. Ing. FH/STV/EUR-ING Manager Special Operations and International Relations.
1 ENUM’s Role in VoIP IP Telephony Conference & Expo Miami February 12, 2004 Sheri Jenkinson VeriSign Communication Services Product Manager - ENUM
Simplify and Strengthen Security with Oracle Application Server Allan L Haensgen Senior Principal Instructor Oracle Corporation Session id:
International Telecommunication Union ENUM Implementation Robert Shaw ITU Internet Strategy and Policy Advisor International Telecommunication Union ICANN.
Kenya Network Information Centre (KENIC). Introduction KENIC is the registry for the.KE ccTLD. Local and non-profit organization Mandate is to Manage.
IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224
Registries and Registrars Dr Bruce Tonkin Chief Technology Officer Melbourne IT Ltd 3 March 03.
Global Name Registry Proposal to Modify Appendix O: WHOIS Data Access.
Mar 3, 2006APNIC 21 Meeting -- Perth, AU1 IANA Status Report David Conrad, ICANN IANA General Manager.
Adrian Kinderis – AusRegistry International Best Practices of a ccTLD Registry BEST PRACTICES OF A ccTLD REGISTRY ADRIAN KINDERIS AUSREGISTRY INTERNATIONAL.
1 Adrian Kinderis, General Manager Chris Wright, Chief Technology Officer.
Adrian Kinderis – AusRegistry International Domain Name Registration System – Buy vs. Build Domain Name Registration System.
Securing Future Growth: Getting Ready for IPv6 in 2010 APTLD 1 March 2010 Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC.
The DR Datacentre - is there a more Cost-Effective way? Dennis Adams a s s o c i a t e s UK Oracle User Group Conference 2007 Dennis Adams 3rd December.
Results on.info Presented by: Desiree Miloshevic, Director, Business Development Milan – November 5, 2002 –
Cold Fusion Hosting The 5 “S”s for Success July 29, 2000 Presentation by Christine Pascarella Virtualscape.
APNIC Security Update APSIRCC 2002 Tokyo, 25 March 2002.
Securing Future Growth: Getting Ready for IPv6 NOW! ccTLD Workshop, 8 th April 2011 Noumea, New Caledonia Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC.
Registry Functions Essential components for operating a ccTLD registry.
RDAP Andy Newton, Chief Engineer. Background WHOIS (Port 43) – Old, very old – Lot’s of problems Under specified, no I18N, insecure, no authentication,
MCSE Guide to Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 Administration Chapter One Introduction to Exchange Server 2003.
&. & DNS and IPv6 IPv6 Summit, Canberra 31st October & 1 st November 2005 Chris Wright, Chief Technology Officer &
Workshop Overview & Registry Model Model by Jaap Akkerhuis Related by Daniel Karrenberg.
Office of Administration Enterprise Server Farm September 2008 Briefing.
Concerns of Noncommercial Users Constituency Privacy Conference November 29, 2005 Kathryn A. Kleiman, Esq. Internet Law and Policy Specialist, McLeod,
Dr. Ir. Yeffry Handoko Putra
Bob Jones EGEE Technical Director
BEST CLOUD COMPUTING PLATFORM Skype : mukesh.k.bansal.
Domain Name Registration, ICANN, Registrars & Hosting Options
CCNET Managed Services
SAN and NAS.
Unit 27: Network Operating Systems
SpiraTest/Plan/Team Deployment Considerations
Presentation transcript:

Overview Who is AusRegistry? Why use the existing infrastructure? What this means for you? Questions raised and Important points

Who is AusRegistry?

AusRegistry is… Registry Services Provider Registration Services (EPP and Web based) WhoIs Services (Port 43 and Web based) DNS Services

Why use the existing DNS and provisioning infrastructure for the purpose of the ENUM trials?

What is the existing infrastructure? Registry – AusRegistry Database, WhoIs Services, DNS Services, Administrative functions. Registrars – eg. MelbourneIT Policy implementers, DNS hosting providers and provisioning channel.

What is the existing infrastructure? An international network of 11 fully STD0013 compliant name servers located throughout Australia the USA and Europe. A Registry System currently successfullyserving multiple ccTLDs, with over 2 million objects and 20 Registrars.

ENUM = DNS therefore Provisioning methods should be DNS based (eg EPP or RRP)

ENUM (model) Tier 0 Registry Tier 1 Registry Tier 2 Registry.au IANA Registry Registrars =>

What are the advantages of using existing Infrastructure?

Proven System Existing proven model – Registry/Registrar Production Grade It is operational and working NOW 300,000 transactions a day (3.4tx/s) 90 million DNS queries a day 100% DNS uptime since “go-live” in July 2002

High Tier 1 Security Firewalls and DOS detection/prevention Connection limiting Systems kept up to date Physical Security 3 layer authentication  Certificate  Username/Password  Source IP address

Tier 1 Stability and Reliability Load balancing Application Clusters Oracle 9i RAC Redundant multi-homed network High grade data centre Full backup and Disaster Recovery “Best of breed” equipment

Conformance to Standards Engineered to world standards Industry standard software (eg BIND) EPP (IETF – purposed standard) RFC1034, 1035, 2181, 2182, STD0013 compliant DNS RFC954 compliant WhoIs RFC2068, 2821, IETF SECSH, STD0015 SNMP Netscape SSL v2/3 specification and RFC2246

Minimal Implementation Time The ENUM “test bed” Registry System could be fully operational in a maximum of 12 hours. In parallel to the Registry, Tier 2 operations (Registrars) could be established in a maximum of 12 hours concurrently. 12 hours for FULL implementation of Tier 1 and 2 (Pending IANA delegation)

Low Costs Minimal Build Costs + Minimal Development Costs + Minimal infrastructure Costs = Minimal Costs Overall

Interoperability “Thick” Registry model EPP provisioning Standards conformance Similar to those purposed in the US, UK and European trials

Experience and Expertise Dedicated customer support DNS is the core business of these entities Technical experts in iterative DNS and the associated pitfalls and problems High level of industry involvement representatives attend ICANN and IETF conferences

The advantages in summary Low Cost Highly Secure Stable and Reliable Production Grade Standards Compliant Interoperable

What this means for you?

This means… Access to a proven stable and secure, production grade platform that is ready to be used NOW run by professionals whom DNS is their core business. Why re-invent the wheel? Allows you to concentrate on what ENUM can do for your business and develop and test applications confidently. Allows you to concentrate on developing policies for the use and regulation of ENUM and trialling those policies.

Possible Arguments Against Limiting potential Tier 2 Registries to those already in the “know” Need to test and select a provisioning protocol and method Need to test possible DNS changes and new implementations to enhance security and privacy

Questions Raised and important points.

Questions Raised What is the purpose of the trial? What is the primary use of ENUM? Where should NAPTR records be held? How important is stability to you? Why reinvent the wheel?

Important Points There is nothing stopping people running their own trials Mainstream trial should be for the benefit of most parties involved Keep things simple

The need for a policy body Industry regulation Policy creation, revision and enforcement Prevents rail-roading - a single company or alliance dictating the direction of ENUM Provides point of contact for government, other organisations and individuals Look at the ICANN / auDA model used in the.au name space

Thank you