Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA Practice Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multiple Analysis of Variance – MANOVA
Advertisements

Lecture 2: Null Hypothesis Significance Testing Continued Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Two-Way ANOVA. Two-way Analysis of Variance  Two-way ANOVA is applied to a situation in which you have two independent nominal-level variables and one.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA)-the General Linear Model (GLM)
5/15/2015Slide 1 SOLVING THE PROBLEM The one sample t-test compares two values for the population mean of a single variable. The two-sample test of a population.
Intro to Factorial ANOVA
The Two Factor ANOVA © 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
Review: T test vs. ANOVA When do you use T-test ? Compare two groups Test the null hypothesis that two populations has the same average. When do you use.
Lecture 10: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects: Practice! Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
1 Practicals, Methodology & Statistics II Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Lecture 6: Multiple Regression
Lecture 16 Psyc 300A. What a Factorial Design Tells You Main effect: The effect of an IV on the DV, ignoring all other factors in the study. (Compare.
Lecture 16: Factorial ANOVA Interactions Practice Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Chapter 10 Factorial Analysis of Variance Part 2 – Apr 3, 2008.
Complex Design. Two group Designs One independent variable with 2 levels: – IV: color of walls Two levels: white walls vs. baby blue – DV: anxiety White.
Lecture 15: ANOVA Interactions
Lecture 13: Factorial ANOVA 1 Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin.
2-Way ANOVA, 3-Way ANOVA, etc.
2x2 BG Factorial Designs Definition and advantage of factorial research designs 5 terms necessary to understand factorial designs 5 patterns of factorial.
© Copyright 2000, Julia Hartman 1 An Interactive Tutorial for SPSS 10.0 for Windows © Factorial Analysis of Variance by Julia Hartman Next.
Repeated Measures ANOVA Used when the research design contains one factor on which participants are measured more than twice (dependent, or within- groups.
Two-Way Analysis of Variance STAT E-150 Statistical Methods.
Comparing Means: T-Test PSYC 301 /SPSS SPRING 2014.
Inferential Statistics: SPSS
Factorial Design Two Way ANOVAs
SPSS Series 1: ANOVA and Factorial ANOVA
Chapter 10 Factorial Analysis of Variance Part 2 – Oct. 30, 2014.
By Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence 1. K-group between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS Factorial between-subjects MANOVA with SPSS How to interpret SPSS.
Review: T test vs. ANOVA When do you use T-test ?
1 of 46 MGMT 6970 PSYCHOMETRICS © 2014, Michael Kalsher Michael J. Kalsher Department of Cognitive Science Inferential Statistics IV: Factorial ANOVA.
A statistical method for testing whether two or more dependent variable means are equal (i.e., the probability that any differences in means across several.
Srinivasulu Rajendran Centre for the Study of Regional Development (CSRD) Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) New Delhi India
Factorial ANOVA Chapter 12. Research Designs Between – Between (2 between subjects factors) Between – Between (2 between subjects factors) Mixed Design.
CPSY 501: Class 8, Oct. 26 Review & questions from last class; ANCOVA; correction note for Field; … Intro to Factorial ANOVA Doing Factorial ANOVA in SPSS.
 Slide 1 Two-Way Independent ANOVA (GLM 3) Chapter 13.
Inferential Statistics
1 Analysis of Variance ANOVA COMM Fall, 2008 Nan Yu.
Independent t-tests Uses a sampling distribution of differences between means 1.
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE By ADETORO Gbemisola Wuraola.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Within Subjects Analysis of Variance PowerPoint.
Chapter 22: Comparing Two Proportions. Yet Another Standard Deviation (YASD) Standard deviation of the sampling distribution The variance of the sum or.
Mixed-Design ANOVA 5 Nov 2010 CPSY501 Dr. Sean Ho Trinity Western University Please download: treatment5.sav.
ANOVA: Analysis of Variance.
11/19/2015Slide 1 We can test the relationship between a quantitative dependent variable and two categorical independent variables with a two-factor analysis.
SW318 Social Work Statistics Slide 1 One-way Analysis of Variance  1. Satisfy level of measurement requirements  Dependent variable is interval (ordinal)
Slide 1 Mixed ANOVA (GLM 5) Chapter 15. Slide 2 Mixed ANOVA Mixed: – 1 or more Independent variable uses the same participants – 1 or more Independent.
Mixed ANOVA Models combining between and within. Mixed ANOVA models We have examined One-way and Factorial designs that use: We have examined One-way.
28. Multiple regression The Practice of Statistics in the Life Sciences Second Edition.
Chapter 13 Repeated-Measures and Two-Factor Analysis of Variance
Review of Factorial ANOVA, correlations and reliability tests COMM Fall, 2007 Nan Yu.
Social Science Research Design and Statistics, 2/e Alfred P. Rovai, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton Between Subjects Analysis of Variance PowerPoint.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEANS AND BETWEEN PROPORTIONS.
Chapter 9 Two-way between-groups ANOVA Psyc301- Spring 2013 SPSS Session TA: Ezgi Aytürk.
Mixed-Design ANOVA 13 Nov 2009 CPSY501 Dr. Sean Ho Trinity Western University Please download: treatment5.sav.
Analyzing Data. Learning Objectives You will learn to: – Import from excel – Add, move, recode, label, and compute variables – Perform descriptive analyses.
CHAPTER 15: THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF USING STATISTICS.
Analysis of Variance l Chapter 8 l 8.1 One way ANOVA
Comparing Three or More Means
Comparing Two Proportions
An Interactive Tutorial for SPSS 10.0 for Windows©
SPSS OUTPUT & INTERPRETATION
SPSS OUTPUT & INTERPRETATION
Statistics for the Social Sciences
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Factorial Analysis of Variance
Multiple Regression – Split Sample Validation
Exercise 1 Use Transform  Compute variable to calculate weight lost by each person Calculate the overall mean weight lost Calculate the means and standard.
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 14: Factorial ANOVA Practice Laura McAvinue School of Psychology Trinity College Dublin

CBTPsychoanalyticDrug Males Females Type of Therapy Gender Effectiveness of Therapy on Depression Software / Kevin Thomas / Factorial ANOVA dataset

The variables in SPSS… How many variables are there? –3–3 What are they? –Gender, Therapy, Depress Which are the independent & dependent variables? –Independent = Gender, Therapy –Dependent = Depress How many levels does each independent variable have? –Gender = 2 –Therapy = 3

The variables in SPSS… How many people took part in the study? –18 How many men and how many women? –9 men & 9 women How many men got CBT? –3–3 How many women got psychoanalytic therapy? –3–3

Have a look at the data… CBTPsycho- analytic DrugTotal Male Female Total Mean Number of Depressive Symptoms for Men & Women receiving Three Kinds of Therapy

Have a look at the data To obtain the ‘totals’ –Analyse, Descriptive Statistics, Explore –Dependent list = depress –Factor list = gender, therapy To obtain the cell means –Data, split file, organise output by groups –Groups based on gender –File is already sorted –Analyse, Descriptive Statistics, Explore –Dependent list = depress –Factor list = therapy

Have a look at the data… CBTPsycho- analytic DrugTotal Male Female Total Mean Number of Depressive Symptoms for Men & Women receiving Three Kinds of Therapy

Three kinds of Effects When we run the Factorial ANOVA, we will be interested in investigating if there are three kinds of effects that are causing the data to vary. What are these? –Main effect due to Gender –Main effect due to Therapy –An Interaction between Therapy & Gender

Examine the Means Table… CBTPsycho- analytic DrugTotal Male Female Total Which Means do we compare when investigating if there is a main effect of Gender?

Examine the Means Table… CBTPsycho- analytic DrugTotal Male Female Total Which Means do we compare when investigating if there is a main effect of Therapy?

Examine the Means Table… CBTPsycho- analytic DrugTotal Male Female Total Which Means do we compare when investigating if there is an Interaction between Gender & Therapy?

Run the ANOVA… Analyse>General Linear Model>Univariate –Dependent Variable: depression –Fixed Factors: these are our two IVs (gender & therapy) Plots –Horizontal axis: put one IV on this axis (typically, put IVs that have more than two levels here) –Separate Lines: put the other IV in this window (typically, put IVs that have only two levels here) –Don’t forget to click Add Options –Descriptive statistics and –homogeneity tests Continue OK

Scroll through the output… Between-subjects factors –The independent variables in the analysis & the number of levels in each Descriptive Statistics –Means, SDs & n for each level of the independent variables Levene’s test –Test for homogeneity of Variance Test of Between-Subjects Effects –Significance of Main Effects & Interactions Profile Plots –Plot of the means

Examine the Means Plot Does there appear to be a main effect of gender? Does there appear to be a main effect of Therapy? Does there appear to be an interaction?

Check the Assumptions Is Levene’s statistic significant? What can we conclude from this?

Examine the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Is there a main effect of Gender? –No! Report this… –There was no effect of Gender, F (1, 12) = 2, p =.183

Examine the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Is there a main effect of Therapy? –Yes! Report this… –There was a main effect of Therapy, F (2, 12) = 62, p <.001

Examine the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Is there a significant interaction between Gender & Therapy? –Yes! Report this… –There was a significant interaction between Gender & Therapy, F (2, 12) = 56, p <.001

Example 2, Eysenck’s Study Factorial ANOVA dataset –Variables: age, condition, recall Have a look at the dataset… What is the dependent variable? –Recall What are the independent variables? –Age & Condition What are the levels of Age? –Old & Young

Example 2, Eysenck’s Study What are the levels of Condition? –Counting, Adjective, Imagery Describe this ANOVA in two ways –Two Way Factorial ANOVA –2x3 Factorial ANOVA How many people participated in this experiment? –60 How many old & how many young? –30 old & 30 young

Example 2, Eysenck’s Study Eysenck was interested in the effects of Age & Depth of Processing on Recall. He obtained a sample of 60 old & young participants and randomly assigned them to three groups. All three groups were given a list of words to study. The first group was asked to count the number of letters in each word, the second group was asked to think of an adjective that could be used with the word and a third group was asked to form an image associated with the word. What are the null and research hypotheses for this study?

Hypotheses H o regarding Age: –There is no effect of age –Old and young participants have the same mean level of recall across all conditions of processing H alt regarding Age: –There is a main effect of age –Old & young participants’ mean level of recall differs significantly across all conditions of processing

Hypotheses H o regarding Depth of Processing: –There is no effect of depth of processing –For both young and old participants, mean recall is the same under each condition of processing H alt regarding Depth of Processing: –There is a main effect of depth of processing –For both young and old participants, at least one processing condition mean is significantly different from the others

Hypotheses H o regarding an Interaction between Age & Depth of Processing: –There is no interaction between age & depth of processing H alt regarding an Interaction between Age & Depth of Processing : –There is a significant interaction between age & depth of processing –Age & depth of processing have a combined effect on recall

Run the ANOVA… Analyse>General Linear Model>Univariate Plots Options –Descriptive statistics Continue OK

Have a look at the data… CountingAdjectiveImageryTotal Old Young Total Mean Level of Recall for old & young participants learning material under three conditions

Have a look at the data… CountingAdjectiveImageryTotal Old Young Total Mean Level of Recall for Old & Young Participants learning Material under Three Conditions

Does there appear to be a main effect of age? CountAdjImageTotal Old Young Total

Does there appear to be a main effect of learning strategy? CountAdjImageTotal Old Young Total

Does there appear to be an interaction between age & learning strategy? CountAdjImageTotal Old Young Total

What does the ANOVA tell us? Main effect of age –F (1, 54) = 11.08, p =.002 Main effect of Condition –F (2, 54) = , p <.001 Interaction between Age & Condition –F (2, 54) = 4.012, p =.024

In your own words, explain what is happening in these data? There is a main effect of Age and Condition and a significant interaction between Age & Condition. It seems that overall, greater depth of processing leads to better recall. Also, older participants tend to show poorer recall than younger participants. However, this is only during conditions of deeper processing of material. In the counting condition, which involved a very shallow level of processing, older and younger participants performed equally well. This finding suggests that older participants do not benefit as much as the younger participants do from deeper processing of the material.