Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans +44 20 7444 2110 Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNITARY PATENT Challenges for the EPO - Advantages for the users Georg Artelsmair6 September 2012.
Advertisements

The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Justice in the field of protection of intellectual property rights mission and objectives Overview of practice of Intellectual property related dispute.
EU secondary law Regulation 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) Regulation No 864/2007 on the law applicable to non- contractual.
1 Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes VenueNovotel Bauhinia Shenzhen Hotel, China Date15 October 2008 Presented by Charmaine KOO Partner, Intellectual.
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Bifurcation before the UPC Dr. Jochen Pagenberg Attorney-at-law, Munich/Paris Past President EPLAW Prinzregentenplatz
The EUROPEAN PATENT SYSTEM AND ITS FUTURE PROSPECT
The Court of Justice European Law in the Making. Terminology Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Venue Venue Standing Standing Chambers Chambers Plenary Session.
UPC STRUCTURE & JUDICIAL COMPOSITION CFI, Divisions & Court of Appeal including composition of the panels 1.
Prof. Andrew F. Christie Cross-border Online IP Disputes WIPO, January 16, 2015 Prof. Andrew F. Christie Cross-border Online IP Disputes WIPO, January.
23 October 2014 • AIPLA Annual Meeting Washington, DC Pierre Véron
London Brussels Hong Kong Beijing Countdown to the Unitary Patent system in Europe Susie Middlemiss 8 June 2015.
| Intellectual Property, in particular Patent Litigation in Switzerland Dr. iur. Andri Hess April 22, 2013.
Introduction to the Unified Patent Court
The Evolution of English IP Litigation within the European Union Stephen Jones Solicitor-Advocate, UK and European Patent Attorney Baker & McKenzie LLP.
LANGUAGE AND PATENTS Gillian Davies Montréal, July 2005.
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq. Gavin Law Offices, PLC GRIPLA October 28, 2010 International Trademark Treaties and.
Framework of IPR Introduction International IP Law - Course Professor Niklas Bruun IPR University Center University of Helsinki 25 October 2010.
Meyerlustenberger Rechtsanwälte − Attorneys at Lawwww.meyerlustenberger.ch European Patent Law and Litigation Guest Lecture, Health and Intellectual Property.
The Unitary Patent One single patent covering 25 EU members October 2013 Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido Patent Examiners,
Criminal and Civil. Jurisdiction over the court system is divided between federal and provincial governments. The provinces organize and maintain their.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Oppositions and enforcement related to the European Community Trademarks - practical issues Markpatent Seminar, Ahmedabad, February 2010.
Sub Title Our Vision A world class innovation agency that supports and enables technological innovation to achieve socio-economic benefits for South Africa.
H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t Pharmaceutical settlement agreements and competition law A litigation.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
The world leader in industrial and medical gases SPEEDY AND PROPER LITIGATION ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The 3rd JIPA INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY SYMPOSIUM Thierry.
International Conference on Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Europe Prague 22 May 2009 Practical Experience with Intellectual Property Rights.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
Inventing the Future – The Role of Patents and Utility Models in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Ron Marchant CB FRSA Implementation.
Patents and Trade Marks: Belgian Law on injunctive relief Eric Laevens.
Patent Litigation in Europe – Now and in the future 12 June 2013 Kings College London Trevor Cook
November Lovells Trademark and Design Right Enforcement in the European Union Part I France Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Paris.
Public law governs:  relationships between individuals and the state/government; and  the structure, administration and operation of the state/government.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
The Unified Patent Court
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Agreement on Patent Litigation. Jan Willems Still going strong.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
An Overview of European Patent Litigation and Enforcement Measures for AIPLA Corporate Practice Committee Susan Kirsch, Partner October 2015.
1 CEIPI Conference Towards a European Patent Court 17 April 2010.
The UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: 25 Years 4 June 2010 “The Influence of the UNCITRAL Model Law in Hong Kong and China”
ip4inno Module 4C IP Licensing Name of SpeakerVenue & Date.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
Patent litigation in Europe Gordon Harris Partner, Head of Intellectual Property.
Anita Zikmane June 10-12, 2015 Jūrmala 1 This presentation is Co-funded by the Civil Justice Programme of the European Union Project JUST/2013/JCIV/AG/4691.
Judicial System in Germany for IPR Protection presented at the 2009 International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR 10 September 2009, Chengdu,
European Patent Litigation
CHAPTER 2 LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
Intellectual Property and An introduction to a patent strategy webinar ALLILONnet 21 July 2016 Dr. Dimitris Kouzelis Director, European Patent Office.
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
SME's and Trademarks OHIM's initiatives for raising of awarenes on the importance of Trade Mark protection Beate Schmidt – Cancellation and Litigation.
Don’t get Burned: How to Protect Your Intellectual Property
Efficient and Balanced European Patent System Comments from U. S
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Unitary Patent Court: Strategising in advance to maximise IP asset protection London IP Summit – October 2015.
Business benefits and advantages of protecting intellectual property
Trade Secrets 2018: International
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights
Dispute resolution in the nordic countries
Audiovisual Sector Social Dialogue Committee
Global Business & Legal Issues
Jean Bergevin European Commission GROW.F5 –
& LAIPLA Spring Seminar
Presentation transcript:

Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP

European Market

IP Rights within the EU Trade Mark Rights (branding) Community National registered National unregistered Design Rights (shapes mainly) Community registered Community unregistered National registered National unregistered Patent Rights (e.g. special fabric) National European patent with unitary effect (coming soon) Copyright (e.g. surface decoration) National unregistered

EU-wide laws Court of Justice of EU determines questions of interpretation of EU law Community Trade Mark Directive/Regulation Community Design Directive/Regulation Copyright Directive (aka InfoSoc Directive) European Patent Convention Trade Secrets directive – coming soon

EU-wide laws and measures IP Enforcement Directive –Who can enforce IP rights –Evidence (including, disclosure/discovery and preservation of evidence) –Interim/provisional measures –Remedies (including injunctions, damages, legal costs, infringing product recall and publication of decision) –But Major Procedural Differences

Where can you sue for infringement? For national registered or unregistered right, generally where the right is registered/exists: –E.g. for a EP(UK) patent, it is the UK High Court or alternatively the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (for smaller, more streamlined cases, where damages and costs are capped) –E.g. for a EP(DE) patent, it is one of the courts of Germany and also note proceedings are bifurcated in Germany –E.g. for a EP(FR) patent, it is the French court (which does not have specialist patent judges)

Where can you sue for infringement? Community right (e.g. CTMs, CDRs) (1)Where the defendant is domiciled (in the EU) (2)Where the defendant has an establishment (3)Where plaintiff is domiciled (4)Where the plaintiff has an establishment (5)Alicante OR where the parties have agreed to litigate OR where the infringing act has been committed

Cross-border injunctions (Community rights) –EU-wide injunctions are obtainable if the jurisdiction has been based on domicile and not place of infringement. –The scope of the injunction may be limited Where the right-holder has restricted the territorial scope of its action Where the defendant proves that its acts does not affect the scope of the IP right at issue

Cross-border injunctions (National rights) All proceedings relating to the validity of a patent must be decided by national court (GAT v Luk [2006]) Cross border injunctions not available if the validity of the right, registered in another MS state is in issue Exception for interim relief in some places(?) – not commonly invoked An EU national court may not grant cross border injunctions against companies domiciled in other EU states in respect of infringements in other EU states (Roche v Primus [2006]) Only possible if there is no challenge to validity in foreign jurisdiction; and defendant is domiciled within national Court’s jurisdiction Although cross-border interim relief is available in some jurisdictions – e.g. the Netherlands, special criteria apply and not commonly invoked

Broad-brush comparisons of key EU Courts

Where should you sue? Commercial, legal & strategic considerations –Where is the largest volume of infringement? –Where are the infringing goods entering the EU? –Where is your right is registered? –Where can you get an EU wide injunction? –Which country’s legal procedure is most advantageous to you? –Sentiment of the judges

The UPC: The Unitary Patent System

What the UPC system will look like Court of Appeal (Luxembourg) Judges: 3 Legal, 2 Technical Jurisdiction: All matters Court of First Instance Local divisions (max 4 per MS) & Regional divisions (2 or more MS together) Judges: 3 Legal (+ 1 Technical, optional) Jurisdiction: Infringements and preliminary injunctions etc; and revocation counterclaims – but division can: (i) proceed together; (ii) bifurcate and proceed/grant a stay of infringement; or (iii) refer whole case to Central Division if parties agree Central Division (London: Chem / Life Sciences, Munich: Auto/Mech, Paris: Everything else incl. IT/Telcoms) Judges: 2 Legal, 1 Technical Jurisdiction: DNIs and revocation actions – also referrals from Local / Regional divisions of: (i) revocation counterclaims (bifurcated proceedings) or (ii) entire proceedings involving a revocation counterclaim N.B. Parties can vary which division hears an action by agreement. “MS” means member state of EU.

More concerns for the future…….. Nature of infringements Competition law Theft of knowledge and secrets Is the law fit for purpose? How to protect Big data?

Thank you for listening! Questions?