Hungarian Association of Women Judges (HAWJ Regional Conference, Budapest 2011 Gender Equality in a European Policy Landscape: Recent Developments and Challenges Violetta Zentai Central European University
Structure of lecture: European policy space and within that gender equality thinking State of affairs, recent developments The promises and drawbacks of gender mainstreaming The puzzle of intersectionality Surprise topic
European policy making space: Community law and MSs law; soft law Decision making and governance structure (multilevel governance) Institutional architecture Financial instruments Open Method of Cooperation (good practice, peer review, monitoring, etc.); voice of civil society
Sources of and inspirations to European gender equality thinking: US human rights and anti-discrimination legal culture and policy European anti-discrimination norms and legal framework Global/transnational gender equality thinking (UN mechanisms: CEDAW, Beijing Platform of Action) and international women’s movement Broader equality considerations (welfare, social inclusion, diversity, etc.)
Main policy mechanisms and instruments: Transposition of community law (directives): monitoring of implementation EU regulations and recommendations on MS institutional machinery Soft law measures: roadmaps, reports, statistics, recommendations, etc. Consultation mechanisms (experts groups, civil society interfaces: European Women’s Lobby)
Current state of art in gender equality policy : Strategy for equality between women and men ; COM(2010) 491 final European Pact for Gender Equality ( ) 7166/11; March 2011, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims 2010/0065 COD PE-CONS 69/10 European Parliament resolution on priorities and outline of a new EU policy framework to fight violence against women (2010/2209(INI)); April 2011
Gender mainstreaming: Extraordinary (transformative) potentials Initial conditions: political will, institutional backing, human resources, monitoring, etc. Hard and soft versions vs efficiency Risks and setbacks (losing gender equality content, bureaucratizing equality thinking )
Intersectionality Conceptualizing multiple inequalities (feminist critical debates, European policy progress) Difference across the grounds of equality: on the dimension of choice the dimension of visibility, and dimension of change. The categories are also differently situated as to legal institutions such a family law and various institutionalized group-based rights to self- determination. Better fit to positive action than to anti-discrimination Institutional changes induced: single equality bodies in Europe
Ranking countries by gender equality framing index (QUING)
QUING project:
THANK YOU! Comments welcome: