2002 Agilent Technologies Europhysics Prize Lecture on Bernard Barbara, L. Néel Lab, Grenoble, France Jonathan R. Friedman, Amherst College, Amherst, MA,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Int. Conf. II-VI 2007 Coherent Raman spectroscopy of Cd 1-x Mn x Te quantum wells Lowenna Smith, Daniel Wolverson, Stephen Bingham and J. John Davies Department.
Advertisements

Some New Geometric Phase Effects in Mn 12 Variants Jonathan Friedman Eduardo H. da Silva Neto Michael Foss-Feig Amherst College Funding: NSF, Research.
Iron pnictides: correlated multiorbital systems Belén Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC) ATOMS 2014, Bariloche Maria José.
Observation of a possible Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state in CeCoIn 5 Roman Movshovich Andrea Bianchi Los Alamos National Laboratory, MST-10.
DIFFERENT TYPES OF MAGNETIC MATERIAS (a) Diamagnetic materials and their properties  The diamagnetism is the phenomenon by which the induced magnetic.
Nanomagnetism: from atomic clusters to molecules and ions. First microwave experiments in the quantum regime. PhD students L. Thomas (Versailles, IBM),
. Absorption of microwaves  Max ~ 5 s -1 W. Wernsdorfer et al, EPL (2003)
Dynamics of the nuclear spin bath in molecular nanomagnets: a test for decoherence Andrea Morello Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Leiden University UBC Physics.
Magnetism in systems of ultracold atoms: New problems of quantum many-body dynamics E. Altman (Weizmann), P. Barmettler (Frieburg), V. Gritsev (Harvard,
Dynamics and thermodynamics of quantum spins at low temperature Andrea Morello Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Leiden University UBC Physics & Astronomy TRIUMF.
Dilute anisotropic dipolar systems as random field Ising ferromagnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp Nicolas Laflorencie Moshe Schechter University.
 From a single molecule to an ensemble of molecules at T ~0 : Both tunneling rate and decoherence increase  LZ probability: P LZ = 1 – exp[-  (  /ħ)
Quantum phase transitions in anisotropic dipolar magnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp, Nicolas laflorencie Moshe Schechter University of British.
Stephen Hill, Saiti Datta and Sanhita Ghosh, NHMFL and Florida State University In collaboration with: Enrique del Barco, U. Central Florida; Fernando.
Initial goal: 70’s: Search for « macroscopic » quantum tunneling in magnetism Measurements on « narrow domain walls », ensemble of nanoparticles… Outline.
Chaos and interactions in nano-size metallic grains: the competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism Yoram Alhassid (Yale) Introduction Universal.
PCE STAMP Physics & Astronomy UBC Vancouver Pacific Institute for Theoretical Physics QUANTUM GLASSES Talk given at 99 th Stat Mech meeting, Rutgers, 10.
QUANTUM SPIN DYNAMICS OF RARE-EARTHS IONS B. Barbara, W. Wernsdorfer, E. Bonet, L. Thomas (IBM), I. Chiorescu (FSU), R. Giraud (LPN) Laboratory Louis Néel,
Dilute anisotropic dipolar systems as random field Ising ferromagnets In collaboration with: Philip Stamp, Nicolas Laflorencie Moshe Schechter University.
Topics in Magnetism III. Hysteresis and Domains
Strongly Correlated Systems of Ultracold Atoms Theory work at CUA.
Magnetism in Chemistry. General concepts There are three principal origins for the magnetic moment of a free atom: The spins of the electrons. Unpaired.
2002 London NIRT: Fe 8 EPR linewidth data M S dependence of Gaussian widths is due to D-strainM S dependence of Gaussian widths is due to D-strain Energies.
Spin Tunneling and Inversion Symmetry E NRIQUE DEL B ARCO Department of Physics – UCF Orlando QCPS II Vancouver.
Nuclear spin irreversible dynamics in crystals of magnetic molecules Alexander Burin Department of Chemistry, Tulane University.
Coherent Manipulation and Decoherence of S=10 Fe8 Single- Molecule Magnets Susumu Takahashi Physics Department University of California Santa Barbara S.
Rodolfo Jalabert CHARGE AND SPIN DIPOLE RESONANCES IN METALLIC NANOPARTICULES : collective versus single-particle excitations R. Molina (Madrid) G. Weick.
Symmetry Issues E NRIQUE DEL B ARCO, C HRISTOPHER R AMSEY (UCF) S TEPHEN H ILL ( NHMFL and Physics Department, FSU – Tallahassee ) S ONALI J. S HAH, C.
Introduction to Single Molecular Magnet
Magnetic Data Storage. 5 nm Optimum Hard Disk Reading Head.
Magnetic properties of a frustrated nickel cluster with a butterfly structure Introduction Crystal structure Magnetic susceptibility High field magnetization.
Molekuły magnetyczne Przykłady, zastosowanie, modelowanie Wojciech Florek (na podstawie prezentacji D. Tomeckiej) Zakład Fizyki Komputerowej, Wydział Fizyki,
Magnetic Material Engineering. Chapter 6: Applications in Medical and Biology Magnetic Material Engineering.
Spin Dynamics and Magnetic Properties of Molecular Magnets
Ying Chen Los Alamos National Laboratory Collaborators: Wei Bao Los Alamos National Laboratory Emilio Lorenzo CNRS, Grenoble, France Yiming Qiu National.
Internal Degrees of Freedom and Quantum Tunneling of the Magnetization in Single-Molecule Magnets E NRIQUE DEL B ARCO Department of Physics – UCF Orlando.
Microscopic nematicity in iron superconductors Belén Valenzuela Instituto de Ciencias Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC) In collaboration with: Laura Fanfarillo.
Magnetic Properties Scott Allen Physics Department University of Guelph of nanostructures.
Experimental Approach to Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization in Single Domain Nanoparticles H. Mamiya, I. Nakatani, T. Furubayashi Nanomaterials.
Dynamics of the nuclear spin bath in molecular nanomagnets: a test for decoherence Andrea Morello Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Leiden University UBC Physics.
Elastic collisions. Spin exchange. Magnetization is conserved. Inelastic collisions. Magnetization is free. Magnetic properties of a dipolar BEC loaded.
The approach of nanomagnets to thermal equilibrium F. Luis, F. Bartolomé, J. Bartolomé, J. Stankiewicz, J. L. García- Palacios, V. González, and L. M.
Macroscopic quantum effects generated by the acoustic wave in molecular magnet 김 광 희 ( 세종대학교 ) Acknowledgements E. M. Chudnovksy (City Univ. of New York,
Quantum response in dissipative environments University of Tokyo S. Miyashita 5 Nov Linear Response 50 Equilibrium & NE response collaborators: Akira.
B. Barbara, R. Giraud, I. Chiorescu*, W. Wernsdorfer, Lab. Louis Néel, CNRS, Grenoble. Collaborations with other groups: D. Mailly (Marcoussis) D. Gatteschi.
Microscopic origin of the adiabatic change of the magnetization Hans De Raedt Applied Physics-Computational Physics, Materials Science Centre, University.
Introduction to Molecular Magnets Jason T. Haraldsen Advanced Solid State II 4/17/2007.
Single Molecule Magnets:
Quasi-1D antiferromagnets in a magnetic field a DMRG study Institute of Theoretical Physics University of Lausanne Switzerland G. Fath.
Single Molecular Magnets
Single-Molecule Magnets: A Molecular Approach to Nanomagnetism George Christou Department of Chemistry, University of Florida Gainesville, FL ,
Syntheses of high-spin and cluster molecules Hiroki OSHIO (University of Tsukuba) Syntheses and Magnetic measurements Dr. M. Nihei, A. Yoshida, K. Koizumi,
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
Experimental Quantification of Entanglement in low dimensional Spin Systems Chiranjib Mitra IISER-Kolkata Quantum Information Processing and Applications.
Universität Karlsruhe Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, (2006)
Effects of Arrays arrangements in nano-patterned thin film media
NMR study of a mixed-metal molecular magnet Yutaka FUJII (University of Fukui) Contents  Introduction (Magnetic properties)  Experimental results  1.
Spin-lattice relaxation of individual lanthanide ions via quantum tunneling Fernando LUIS Orlando December 20 th 2010 Quantum Coherent Properties of Spins-III.
NMR Studies of nanoscale molecular magnets Y. Furukawa Y. Fujiyoshi S. Kawakami K. Kumagai F. Borsa P. Kogerler Hokkaido University (Japan) Pavia University.
Dynamics of novel molecular magnets V-ring and rare earth compounds Okayama Univ. H. Nojiri Introduction Magnetization step in V-rectangular ring Short.
NTNU 2011 Dimer-superfluid phase in the attractive Extended Bose-Hubbard model with three-body constraint Kwai-Kong Ng Department of Physics Tunghai University,
Image © NPG Rogério de Sousa
Strong Coupling of a Spin Ensemble to a Superconducting Resonator
Alternating Antisymmetric Interaction in Nanoscale Iron Ring
Magnetization processes in V15
S. Hill, N. Anderson, A. Wilson, S. Takahashi, and J. Lawrence
Stephen Hill, Rachel Edwards Nuria Aliaga-Alcalde and George Christou
Quantum tunneling by Hyperfine interaction Origin of adiabatic change of the magnetization and the symmetry of the molecules Seiji Miyashita, Hans de.
Magnetic Properties of Coordination Compounds
Hiroyuki Nojiri, Department of Physics, Okayama University
Presentation transcript:

2002 Agilent Technologies Europhysics Prize Lecture on Bernard Barbara, L. Néel Lab, Grenoble, France Jonathan R. Friedman, Amherst College, Amherst, MA, USA Dante Gatteschi, University of Florence, Italy Roberta Sessoli, University of Florence, Italy Wolfgang Wernsdorfer, L. Néel Lab, Grenoble, France Budapest 26/08/2002 Quantum Dynamics of Nanomagnets

the miniaturization process Single Domain Particles coherent rotation of all the spins

 EE

Quantum effects in the dynamics of the magnetization First evidences of Quantum Tunneling in nanosized magnetic particles (difficulties due to size distribution) Quantum Coherence in ferrihydrite confined in the ferritin mammalian protein (inconclusive due to distribution of iron load)

= metal ions= oxygen= carbon

The molecules are regularly arranged in the crystal

Mn(IV) S=3/2 Mn(III) S=2 Total Spin =10Mn12acetate T. Lis Acta Cryst. 1980, B36, 2042.

high spin molecules and low spin molecules

Uniaxial magnetic anisotropy H=-DS z 2 H=0 M M=+S M=-S+1 M=S-1 0 E -S+S If S is large

H=-DS z 2 +g  B H z S z H0H0 M=-S M=S

thermal activated mechanism return to the equilibrium thermal activated mechanism H=0  E= DS 2 M=-SM=S  =  0 exp(  E/k B T)  0   E=63 K time=0 J. Villain et al. Europhys. Lett.1994, 27, 159

thermal activated mechanism return to the equilibrium thermal activated mechanism H=0  E= DS 2 M=-SM=S  =  0 exp(  E/k B T)  0   E=63 K time= 

 Sessoli et al. Nature 1993, 365, 141  0 =2x10 -7 s  E/k B =61 K Temperature dependence of the relaxation time of Mn12acetate

Mn12acetate: Hysteresis loop magnetic hysteresis without cooperativity

High Spin Clusters Single Molecule Magnets

  0 =2x10 -7 s  E/k B =61 K Temperature dependence of the relaxation time of Mn12acetate deviations from the Arrhenius law Barbara et al. J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 1995, , 1825

tunnel mechanism return to the equilibrium tunnel mechanism H=0 M=SM=-S terms in S x and S y of the spin Hamiltonian

tunnel mechanism return to the equilibrium tunnel mechanism H=0 M=SM=-S terms in S x and S y of the spin Hamiltonian

What is the difference ? Four fold axis Tetragonal (E=0) Mn12 Fe8 H =  B S.g.B - D S z 2 + E (S x 2 -S y 2 ) + BS z 4 + C (S + 4 +S - 4 ) Stot=10

What is the difference ? Four fold axis Tetragonal (E=0) Two fold axis Rhombic (E  0) Mn12 Fe8 H =  B S.g.B - D S z 2 + E (S x 2 -S y 2 ) + BS z 4 + C (S + 4 +S - 4 )

Hysteresis loops for Mn 12 Friedman et al., PRL, 1996; Hernandez et al, EPL, 1996; Thomas et al., Nature, 1996

Hysteresis loops for Mn 12 Friedman et al., PRL, 1996; Hernandez et al, EPL, 1996; Thomas et al., Nature, 1996

Uniform spacing between steps Step spacing: ~4.5 kOe

Hysteresis loops for Mn 12

Enhanced Relaxation at Step Fields Higher energy barrier Yet faster relaxation!

Enhanced Relaxation at Step Fields

Thermally Assisted Resonant Tunneling m = -10 m = -9 m = 10 m = 9 Thermal activation Fast tunneling Tunneling occurs when levels in opposite wells align.

Hamiltonian for Mn 12 The field at which (in the left well) crosses (in the right well): Steps occur at regular intervals of field, as observed. Step occurs every 4.5 kOe  D/g = 0.31 K Compare with ESR data: D = 0.56 K, g = 1.93D/g = 0.29 K (Barra et al., PRB, 1997)

Hamiltonian for Mn 12 Spectroscopic studies revealed a 4 th -order longitudinal anisotropy term B ~ 1.1 mK. (ESR: Barra et al., PRB, 1997 and Hill et al., PRL, 1998; INS: Mirebeau et al., PRL, 1999, Zhong et al., JAP, 2000 and Bao et al., cond- mat, 2000)  Different pairs of levels cross at slightly different fields.  Allows for the Examination of the Crossover from Thermally Assisted to Pure Quantum Tunneling.

Crossover to Ground-state Tunneling Abrupt “first-order” transition between thermally assisted and ground state tunneling. Theory: Chudnovsky and Garanin, PRL, 1997; Exp’t: Kent, et al., EPL, 2000, Mertes et al., JAP, Level crossing fields:

Fe 8 Hamiltonian in Zero Field Easy AxisHard Axis Spin wants to rotate in the y-z plane

Two Paths for Magnetization Reversal Easy axis Hard axis Z Y X H  A B Clockwise Counterclockwise

Destructive Topological Interference Easy axis Hard axis Z Y X H  A B Equivalence between paths is maintained when H is applied along the Hard Axis. Topological (Berry’s) phase depends on solid angle  enscribed by the two paths. Complete destructive interference occurs for certain discrete values of . Theoretical Prediction: A. Garg., Solid Angle 

Destructive Topological Interference A. Garg., Modulation of Tunnel Splitting: where  depends on the field along the Hard Axis. When S  =  /2, 3  /2, 5  /2…, tunneling is completely suppressed! Interval between such destructive interference points:

Measured Tunnel Splitting experimental calculated with D = -0.29, E = 0.046, C = -2.9x10 -5 K W. Wernsdorfer and R. Sessoli, Science, 1999.

Parity Effect: Odd vs. Even Resonances W. Wernsdorfer and R. Sessoli, Science, 1999.

What Causes Tunneling and Why the Parity Effect in Fe 8 Tunneling is produced by terms in the Hamiltonian that do not commute with S z. For Fe 8, these terms are Selection rule: Every other tunneling resonance is forbidden!

What Causes Tunneling and Why the Parity Effect in Fe 8 n = n = Tunneling AllowedTunneling Forbidden

Parity Effect: Odd vs. Even Resonances W. Wernsdorfer and R. Sessoli, Science, 1999.

Crossover From Classical to Quantum Regime Activated Tunneling Measured ( ) and Calculated ( ) Resonance Fields Barbara et al, JMMM , 1891 (1995) and J. Phys. Jpn. 69, 383 (2000) Paulsen, et al, JMMM , 379 (1995); NATO, Appl. Sci. 301, Kluwer (1995) Classical Thermal Activation T blocking Ground-state Tunneling T c-o (Mn 12 -ac)

The Tunnel Window: An effect of weak Hyperfine Interactions Chiorescu et al, PRL, 83, 947 (1999) Barbara et al, J. Phys. Jpn. 69, 383 (2000) Kent et al, EPL, 49, 521 (2000) Inhomogeneous broadening of Two resonances: Dipolar fields Data points and calculated lines Level Scheme Homogeneous broadening of nuclear spins: Tunnel window Wernsdorfer et al, PRL (1999)

Effects of Strong Hyperfine Interactions: Tetragonal symmetry (Ho in S 4 ) J = L+S = 8; g J =5/4 Dipolar interactions between Ho 3+ << mT Case of Rare-earth ions: Ho 3+ in Y Ho LiF 4 H CF-Z = -B 2 0 O B 4 0 O B 4 4 O B 6 0 O B 6 4 O g J  B JH B l m : acurately determined by high resolution optical spectroscopy Sh. Gifeisman et al, Opt. Spect. (USSR) 44, 68 (1978); N.I. Agladze et al, PRL, 66, 477 (1991)

Hysteresis loop of Ho 3+ ions in YLiF 4 Mn 12 -ac Thomas et al, Nature (1996) Giraud et al, PRL, 87, (2001) Friedman et al, PRL (1996), Hernandez et al, EPL (1996) Steps at Bn = 450.n (mT) Steps at B n = 23.n (mT) Tunneling of Mn 12 -ac Molecules Tunneling of Ho 3+ ion Ho 3+ Comparison with Mn12-ac

Role of Strong Hyperfine Interactions H = H CF-Z + A.I.J -7/2 7/2 5/2 -7/2 7/2 3/2 5/2 3/2 -5/2-3/2 -1/2 1/2 -5/2-3/2 Induce Tunneling of Electronic Moments -1/21/2 Avoided Level Crossings between | , Iz  and |  +, Iz’  if DI= (Iz -Iz’ )/2 integer Co-Tunneling of Electronic and Nuclear Spins: Electro-nuclear entanglement

Exchange-biased quantum tunnelling in a dimer of Mn 4 molecule W. Wernsdorfer et al, Nature 416, 406 (2002)

V 15 : The Archetype of Low spin Molecules A Mesoscopic Spin S=1/2 Anisotropy of g-factor: ~ 0.6% Ajiro et al, J..Low. Temp. Phys. to appear (2003) Barra et al,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 8509 (1992) Exchange interactions: Antiferromagnetic ~ several 10 2 K Müller, Döring, Angew. Chem. Intl. Engl., 27, 171 (1988)

Barbara et al, cond-mat / v1; submited to PRL. V 15 M(H) : Reversible and out of equilibrium   80 mK Adiabatic Landau-Zener Spin Rotation « Isolated V 15 » : A two-level system « without dissipation » M(H) = dE(H)/dH Fast sweeping rate / Weak coupling to the cryostat Nuclear Spin-Bath : Weak Level Broadening

Low sweeping rate / Strong coupling to the cryostat « Non-Isolated V 15 » : A two-level system « with dissipation » Measured Calculated Chiorescu et al, PRL 84, 3454 (2000) M(H): IrreversibleLZS transition at Finite Temperature (dissipative) Phonon-bath  bottleneck model Abragam, Bleaney, 1970; Chiorescu et al, Nuclear spin-bath  level broadening Stamp, Prokofiev, 1998.

V 15 : a Gapped Spin ½ Molecule Dzyaloshinsky-Moriya interactions: H DM = -  D ij S i xS j The Multi-Spin Character of the Molecule (15 spins) + Time Reversal Symmetry D = 0 (Kramers Theorem)

Magnetism: From Macroscopic to Single atoms clustersspinsmoleculesNano-particlesNano-wiressubmicron Ho

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization of Single Nanoparticles easy axis Barium ferrite Nanoparticle (10 nm) Wernsdorfer et al. et al, PRL, 79, 4014, (1997) T c =0.31 K Stoner-Wohlfarth astroid Miguel and Chudnovsky, PRB (1995 )

Dissipation control of LZS Molecule spins 1/2 : Gapped V 15 Ho 3+, Mn 4 pairs: Cross-spin transitions, Co-tunneling Mn 4 Fe 8 Quantum Dysnamics Berry Phases Quantum Classical crossover Quantum Dynamics, Spin Bath Mn 12 -ac Conclusion and Perspectives Quantum Tunneling at the Mesoscopic Scale (Environmental Effects on Quantum Mechanics) Evidence for Quantum Coherence (  , Rabbi oscillations, … ) Manipulations of Quantum Spins, Spins Qbits (Quantum Informations and Computers) Tunneling of single Ho 3+ ions Entangled I-J states Ho 3+

Acknowledgements Univ. Florence & Modena: Andrea Caneschi Claudio Sangregorio Lorenzo Sorace Angelo Rettori Anna Fort Andrea Cornia L. Neél Lab. CNRS Grenoble E. Bonet I. Chiorescu R. Giraud L. Thomas C. Thirion R. Tiron CCNY: Myriam Sarachik Yicheng Zhong U. Barcelona: Javier Tejada Joan Manel Hernandez Xixiang Zhang (now Hong Kong) Elias Molins Xerox Ron Ziolo Lehman College ­ CUNY Eugene Chudnovsky Univ. Rio de Janeiro M. Novak

Italian INFM A. Lascialfari F. Borsa R. Caciuffo G. Amoretti M. Affronte CNRS Grenoble J. Villain A. L. Barra C. Paulsen V. Villar A. Benoit CNRS Bagneux D. Mailly Lehman College ­ CUNY Eugene Chudnovsky Univ. Calif. ­ San Diego: David Hendrickson Sheila Aubin Evan Rumberger E. Yang Los Alamos: Rob Robinson (now ANSTO, Australia) Tim Kelley Heinz Nakotte Frans Trouw (Argonne) Wei Bao Univ. Florida N. Aliaga, S. Bhaduri, C. Boskovic, C. Canada, C._Sanudo, M. Soler, G. Christou Univ. P. et M. Curie, Paris V. Marvaud, M. Verdaguer, Univ. Bielefeld H. Bögge, A. Müller U. St. Petersburg A.M. Tkachuk Univ. Manchester R.E.P. Winpenny Univ. Kyoto H. Ajiro, T. Goto, S. Maegawa Univ. Okkaido Y. Furukawa

Acknowledgements J. F. Fernandez A. Garg M. Leuenberger D. Loss, A. Mukhin S. Miyashita N.V. Prokof'ev A. Zvezdin L. J. de Jongh J. Schweizer P.C.E. Stamp I. Tupitsyn