Metadata for Digital Preservation: A Status Report on PREMIS Priscilla Caplan, FCLA Nancy Hoebelheinrich, Stanford University CNI Fall Task Force Meeting December 6-7, 2004
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation OCLC/RLG Preservation Metadata Framework Working Group OCLC/RLG Preservation Metadata Working Group Convened March 2000 Looked at CEDARS, NLA, NEDLIB, OCLC Preservation metadata framework (June 2002) Synthesized elements from existing sets Based on OAIS information model Set of “prototype” preservation metadata elements
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation PREMIS June 2003: OCLC/RLG sponsored new working group: PREMIS Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies Objectives Define “core” set of preservation metadata elements, with supporting data dictionary, applicable to broad range of digital preservation activities Identify and evaluate alternative strategies for encoding, storing, managing, and exchanging preservation metadata
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Membership Priscilla Caplan, FCLA (Chair) Rebecca Guenther, LC (Chair) Michael Alexander, British Library George Barnum, GPO Charles Blair, U. of Chicago Olaf Brandt, U. of Gottingen Adam Farquhar, British Library David Gewirtz, Yale Kevin Glavash, MIT/Dspace Cathy Hartman, U. of N. Texas Helen Hodgart, British Library Nancy Hoebelheinrich, Stanford Roger Howard/Sally Hubbard, Getty Museum Pam Kircher, OCLC John Kunze, Calif. Digital Library Brian Lavoie, OCLC liaison Robin Dale, RLG liaison Vicky McCarger, LA Times Jerry McDonough, NYU/METS Evan Owens, JSTOR Erin Rhodes, NARA Madi Solomon, Walt Disney Co. Angela Spinazze, ATSPIN Stefan Strathmann, U. of Gottingen Gunter Waibel, RLG Lisa Weber, NARA Robin Wendler, Harvard Hilde van Wijngaarden, KB Andrew Wilson, NAA
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Advisory Committee Howard Besser, UCLA Liz Bishoff, OCLC (via Colorado Digitization Program) Gerard Clifton, National Library of Australia Gail Hodge, CENDI Steve Knight, National Library of New Zealand Maggie Jones, Digital Preservation Coalition Nancy McGovern, Cornell Cliff Morgan, Wiley UK Richard Rinehart, U. of California, Berkeley
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Implementation Survey Report State of the art in Winter, 2003/2004 28 libraries, 7 archives, 3 museums, and 11 other 13 different countries; 45% from U.S. 38% in planning; 33% development; 46% production
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Core Elements Mission: Define a core set of implementable preservation metadata elements.
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Core Elements Mission: Define a core set of implementable preservation metadata elements. Information that supports and documents the digital preservation process; Information that supports the the viability, renderability, understandability, identity and authenticity of digital objects over time.
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Core Elements Mission: Define a core set of implementable preservation metadata elements. What most working preservation repositories are likely to need to know.
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Core Elements Mission: Define a core set of implementable preservation metadata elements. As rigorous as possible As much explanation as possible Implementation neutral -- “This is what you have to know” Values can be automatically supplied and processed -- no lengthy textual descriptions
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Core Elements: Data Model
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Sample data dictionary entry
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Semantic units pertaining to Objects objectIdentifier contentLocation originalName preservationLevel objectCharacteristics environment
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation objectCharacteristics compositionlevel fixity size format inhibitors significantProperties creatingApplication
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Semantic units pertaining to Events eventIdentifier eventIdentifierScheme eventIdentifierValue eventType eventOutcome eventOutcomeDetail eventDetail eventDateTime relatedPermission
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Semantic units pertaining to Agents agentIdentifier agentIdentifierScheme agentIdentifierValue agentName
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Semantic units pertaining to Rights permissionStatement relatedObject grantingAgent grantingAgreement permission act restriction
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation Next steps: PREMIS ACTIVITIES Complete data dictionary (January 2005) Write narrative report Develop XML schemas for exchanging metadata FOLLOW-UP ACTIVITIES Community outreach Establish feedback/maintenance mechanism Testbeds for implementation and exchange
Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies CNI Fall 2004 Metadata for Digital Presrvation For More Information: PREMIS Web Site “Implementing Metadata in Digital Preservation Systems: The PREMIS Activity” D-Lib (April ‘04) RLG DigiNews October 2004 and December 2004 issues Priscilla Caplan: Rebecca Guenther: