Student Growth 2.0 Fall, 2014 1.  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
Advertisements

Student Growth Goals Sorting it out. Over- arching Goal 2.
STUDENT GROWTH PART 3 10/16/14 ASSESSMENTS. REVIEW 1.Who are we going to target? 9 th grade 2.How much do they need to grow? Based on MAPS testing 1.5.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing. Agenda  Student Growth  Alignment  Student Growth Revisited.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall, 2014 Note to Facilitator – See Facilitator Directions on Agenda Document.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
TPEP November 2, 2012 RIG 1 & TPEP Districts Session 1,
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
ISLN January Domain 1: Planning & Preparation Domain 2: Classroom Environment Domain 3: Instruction Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities Domain.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards Connections  District Agreement.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting January, 2014.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 1: MSFE TEPG Rubric.
Rhode Island Innovation Evaluation & Support System (RIIESS) for Support Professionals Fall 2013.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
KVEC Principal Goal Development July 29, Administer Val-Ed (Refer to CEP-District Timeline and number of administrations ) Site-Visit by Superintendent.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
STUDENT GROWTH UPDATE LEARNING GOALS FOR TODAY - Teachers will be able to clearly delineate between the 4 levels of expectations on student.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEP 1 1 Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Facilitators: Effectiveness coaches.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Student Growth Focus on… PROCESS NOT CONTENT.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Breathitt County Schools
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Part 1 Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Professional Learning and Collaboration Burlington Edison School District April 7 th, 2014.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Inquiry Team and Student Growth. “Best” Practices Think about some best practices within the last 20 years in the field of science. In the field of education,
The Evaluator's Role in the SLO Process Module Three Summative Conference Presented by the SCDE Office of Educator Effectiveness.
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
Targets I can identify elements that need to be revised in SGG drafts.
Presentation transcript:

Student Growth 2.0 Fall,

 Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards Connections  A Virtual Presentation  Sharing Electronic Resources 2 TPEP Sessions for

 Pausing  Paraphrasing  Posing Questions  Putting Ideas on the Table  Providing Data  Paying Attention to Self and Others  Presuming Positive Intentions 3 Session Norms

Today’s AgendaLearning Target 4  Welcome Back!  Reflecting on Our System  State Identified SGG Examples and Review of Attributes of Effective Goals  District Sharing of Examples of Practice  Implementing: District Planning  Lunch  Team Planning  Reflect on current practice to support student growth goals  Identify/Review/Apply attributes of effective growth goals  Extend thinking to include strategies that other districts have used to implement the revised system.

Essential Question(s)  Has your district:  Developed a common understanding of sound student growth goals?  Communicated this understanding to all staff?  Created a system to support staff implementation?

1 Reflecting on Our System A Review 6

 Student Achievement: The status of subject-matter knowledge, skills, understanding or performance at a given point in time.  Student Growth: The change in student achievement between two points in time. 7 Reviewing Key Terms It is student growth, not student achievement, that is relevant in demonstrating impacts teachers and principals have on students.

8 Student Growth Rubric for use in Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning needs and developing strategies to address those needs. Student Growth 3.1: Establish Student Growth Goal(s) Unsatisfactory – 1Basic – 2Proficient – 3Distinguished – 4 Does not establish student growth goal(s) or establishes inappropriate goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) do not identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) do not identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full learning potential. Goal(s) identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Establishes appropriate student growth goal(s) for subgroups of students not reaching full potential in collaboration with students, parents, and other school staff. Goal(s) identify multiple, high-quality sources of data to monitor, adjust, and evaluate achievement of goal(s). Student Growth 3.2: Achievement of Student Growth Goal(s) Unsatisfactory – 1Basic – 2Proficient – 3Distinguished – 4 Growth or achievement data from at least two points in time shows no evidence of growth for most students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show some evidence of growth for some students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show clear evidence of growth for most students. Multiple sources of growth or achievement data from at least two points in time show evidence of high growth for all or nearly all students.

 What is working for you?  What are the conversations you are hearing in your district around Student Growth Goals?  What are the questions you are hearing and what do you anticipate as questions? *Please be ready to post chart. 9 District Reflection

Job-Alike: What makes our state examples “sound?” 10 2 Identify Attributes of Effective Student Growth Goals, Analyze State Identified SGG Examples

Determine the academic needs for the pertinent group (all-grade, one class, sub-group) Determine which of those needs are enduring or transferable knowledge or skills The Goal 11 Follow a Sequence:

 Consider the available data.  Consider the differences between classrooms/groups.  What are the learning gaps?  What instructional practices might you use to address those gaps? 12 Step 1: Determine the academic needs of the group. What does the data reveal?

 For any subject taught in school, we might ask if it’s something an adult would need to know AND whether knowing it makes someone a more ‘Career and College Ready’ adult.  If something is ‘enduring’ it is worthy of transfer – the learner should be able to use what has been learned in new and sometimes confusing settings.  (Wiggins & McTighe) 13 Step 2: What do we mean by ‘Enduring’?

14  Is found in multiple sources of student data  Is aligned to Washington State Learning Standards  Relevant to 3.1, 6.1, or 8.1  Substantial Impact? Scope of Teacher Responsibility?  Does it identify, measure, and state expected growth?  Not too narrow or broad?  Is it a SMART Goal? Step 3: The Goal

SMART Goal Process for Student Growth S Specific- The goal addresses student needs within the content. The goal is focused on a specific area of need. M Measurable- An appropriate instrument or measure is selected to assess the goal. The goal is measurable and uses an appropriate instrument. A Appropriate- The goal is clearly related to the role and responsibilities of the teacher. The goal is standards-based and directly related to the subject and students that the teacher teaches. R Realistic- The goal is attainable. The goal is doable, but rigorous and stretches the outer bounds of what is attainable. T Time-bound- The goal is contained to a single school year/course. The goal is bound by a timeline that is definitive and allows for determining goal attainment. 15

Student Growth Examples In your Job-Alike Group:  Read through the SGG examples in your packet (also posted on OSPI’s TPEP website).  Use the list of qualities of Sound Student Growth Goals to review examples.  As a group, select two or more to review (additional review sheets available). Collect evidence, and then make note of commonalities between sound examples.

Break Time Following Break: Return to District Team to share your learning! 17 See you in 15 minutes

18  Your new learning about “sound” student growth goals  Common “noticings” found in the examples  Qualities of a “sound” growth goal  Other considerations District Team Share

3 District Example of Practice monitoring, collecting evidence and reporting on Student Growth 19

 Example: Camas School District  Student Growth Goal Process including Video Example What ideas does this example and the experiences spark for your district plans to support Student Growth Goal Development, Implementation and Monitoring? 20 Camas School District

 Collect your district chart “District Reflection” and bring to your table  Add to chart to capture the following conversation:  As a team, please discuss any learning, ideas or strategies you have learned from today that you think you might adapt or modify to meet the needs of your district plan.  Be prepared to share out at least one idea with the group. 21 How have we learned from each other today?

Implementing: District Planning Review/Revise the best approach, tools, and timeline for your district 22DAY 1

 How can districts review/revise plans for the student growth component of the revised evaluation system?  What do we need to clarify or define?  How do we provide support for teachers and principals to set quality, rigorous goals that are aligned to content standards?  Data: Do all staff have access to relevant student data prior to the time goals are due? 23 District Planning Tool –

Student Growth Next Steps Who needs to learn about this? What do they need to learn? How are they going to learn it? When do they need to learn it? Students Parents New Teachers Experienced Teachers Coaches Assistant Principal(s ) Principal (s) District Office Staff Superintendent School Board

 Take a few minutes and create at least three sticky notes for the Stop/Start/Continue Chart on your way out.  Stop: What didn’t work in this session? What should not be included in the future?  Start: What didn’t happen that should have in this session? What should be planned for future sessions?  Continue: What worked well and should be continued in future sessions like this? 25 Debrief StopStartContinue

26 LUNCH! Clock Hours: Instructor: Mike Esping “Regional Learning Network Session” VAD Hours Thank you!