Estimating COMPASS Orbits And Clocks And Applying To Real-Time Precise Positioning Services Maorong Hongping Zhang, Xiaolin Jia,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nick Talbot Research Fellow, Trimble Navigation Australia
Advertisements

Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
GPS Theory and applications
2013 Western Australia Surveying Conference
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
1 1 COMPASS Satellite Navigation System Development Nov. 26 th -28 th, 2008, Beijing China Satellite Navigation Project Center SIDEREUS 2008.
The leading pioneer in GPS technology The StarFire Global Satellite Based Augmentation System Ron Hatch NavCom Technology, Inc.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology T. Takasu, T. Ebinuma and A. Yasuda 2009 International Symposium on GPS/GNSS Effect of Quasi Zenith Satellite.
A Novel Real-Time Precise Positioning Service System: Global Precise Positioning With Regional Augmentation Maorong Xingxing Li,
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
The 15th Workshop on JAXA Astrodynamics and Flight Mechanics, 2005
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Real-Time Orbit And Clock Estimation Using PANDA Software Shi C, Lou YD, Zhao QL, Liu JN GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University, China IGS Analysis Center.
13/06/13 H. Rho Slide 1 Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick Evaluation of Precise.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014 Professor Brandon A. Jones Lecture 37: SNC Example and Solution Characterization.
Geodetic Survey Division EARTH SCIENCES SECTOR Slide 1 Real-Time and Near Real-Time GPS Products and Services from Canada Y. Mireault, P. Tétreault, F.
SVY 207: Lecture 4 GPS Description and Signal Structure
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
1 GNSS Reference Station Network Applications – Status and Vision Herbert Landau Trimble Munich, Germany January 2011.
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
1 First Results of the CMONOC GNSS Network Junping Chen Bin Wu, Shuhua Ye, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
Titelmaster Geometrical and Kinematical Precise Orbit Determination of GOCE Akbar Shabanloui Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation, University of Bonn.
Recent GNSS Activities at Geoscience Australia Gary Johnston, Guorong Hu, Anna Riddell Geodesy & Seismic Monitoring Branch, Geoscience Australia.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
IGS Workshop 2008 The Galileo Ground Mission Segment Performances Francisco Amarillo-Fernandez, Massimo Crisci, Alexandre Ballereau John Dow, Martin Hollreiser,
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
The IGS contribution to ITRF2013 – Preliminary results from the IGS repro2 SINEX combinations Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, Xavier Collilieux, Zuheir.
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
IGS Workshop, June 02, Validation of GNSS Satellite Orbits C. Flohrer, G. Beutler, R. Dach, W. Gurtner, U. Hugentobler 1, S. Schaer, T. Springer.
EUREF Symposium, Paris, 6-8 June 2012 Impact of Individual GNSS Antenna Calibration Used in the EPN on Positioning Q. Baire, E. Pottiaux, C. Bruyninx,
GOCE Workshop at ESA LP Symposium, Bergen, 29./30.June, 2010 Precise Science Orbits for the GOCE Satellite – Aiming at the cm-level H. Bock 1, A. Jäggi.
Case study for the IGS ultra-rapid orbit requirements Jan Douša Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008.
Geodetic Research Laboratory Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick 01/06/27 S.Bisnath A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR GPS-BASED.
Latest GNSS results of the CMONOC network and its application in earthquake monitoring Junping Chen, Yize Zhang, Yibing Xie, Weijie Tan, Sainan Yang, Bin.
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
SP Swedish National Testing and Research Institute Real-Time GPS Processing with Carrier Phase FILTER PARAMETER INFLUENCE ON GPS CARRIER PHASE REAL-TIME.
Geocenter Variations Derived from GRACE Data Z. Kang, B. Tapley, J. Chen, J. Ries, S. Bettadpur Joint International GSTM and SPP Symposium GFZ Potsdam,
Meeting the Needs of the IGS Real-Time PPP User Community
Global Positioning System Overview
Key RO Advances Observation –Lower tropospheric penetration (open loop / demodulation) –Larger number of profiles (rising & setting) –Detailed precision.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems
AGU Fall MeetingDec 11-15, 2006San Francisco, CA Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC mission Bill Schreiner,
EUM/OPS/VWG/11 Issue /06/2011 Yoke Yoon Yago Andres Christian Marquardt COSMIC GPS Data Processing Slide: 1.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
View on GPS and Galileo ‘From across the Atlantic…’ Ruth E. Neilan International GNSS Service (IGS) Central Bureau Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California.
SHA: the GNSS Analysis Center at SHAO Junping Chen, Bin Wu, Xiaogong Hu Haojun Li, Xiao Pei, Yize Zhang Shanghai Astronomical Observatory (SHAO)
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere- free combination of code and phase observables.
USM RTK Workshop Fugro Chance Inc. Starfix HP: High Performance GPS For Offshore Marine Survey, Navigation and Positioning Richard Barker, Dr. Dariusz.
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
Real Time Stream Editor for PPP  Conventional approaches to Real Time Precise Point Position use ionosphere-free combination of code and phase observables.
On the Way to Full PPP Potential Pierre Héroux Geodetic Survey Division, Natural Resources Canada.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Armasuisse Swiss Federal Office of Topography swisstopo Determination of Tectonic Movements in the Swiss Alps using GNSS and Levelling E. Brockmann, D.
Jason-1 POD reprocessing at CNES Current status and further developments L. Cerri, S. Houry, P. Perrachon, F. Mercier. J.P. Berthias with entries from.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern Astronomical Institute, University of Bern Swarm Gravity Field Results with the CMA Adrian Jäggi, Daniel Arnold,
Formosat-3/COSMIC WorkshopNov 28 - Dec 1, 2006Taipei, Taiwan Estimates of the precision of LEO orbit determination and GPS radio occultations from the.
Updating Statistical maps with GPS. Global Positioning System Space segment Control segment Users Segment.
Investigations on (radial) offsets between different Swarm orbit solutions 8 September th Swarm Data Quality Workshop, IPGP, Paris Heike Peter (PosiTim),
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 1 Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland * now at PosiTim, Germany 5th International GOCE User.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Real-Time Working Group
Agenda Background and Motivation
Presentation transcript:

Estimating COMPASS Orbits And Clocks And Applying To Real-Time Precise Positioning Services Maorong Hongping Zhang, Xiaolin Jia, Shuli Song, and Jens German Research Centre for Geosciences GNSS Research Center, Wuhan University Xi’an Research Institute for Surveying And Mapping Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Munich Satellite Navigation Summit, March 2012, Munich, Germany

Motivation COMPASS Constellation WHU Tracking Network EPOS-RT Software Precise Orbit And Clock Estimation Applying to Positioning And GPSMET Real-time Precise Positioning Service Summary Contents

Three Phases: Phase I :Demonstration System, 2000 Phase II: Regional System, 2012 Phase III: Global System, 2020 What Can Be Achieved With Current COMPASS Constellation? Motivation

COMPASS Constellation Five GEOs: Inclination 0º,longitudes: 60ºE to 160ºE, Altitude 36,000 km. 27 MEOs: In 3 orbital planes, Inclination 55.5º, Altitude 21,500 km. Three IGSOs.

COMPASS Constellations Space Segment (Constellation) Phase II: 5 GEOs + 5 IGSOs + 4 MEOs Phase III: 5 GEOs + 3 IGSOs + 27 MEOs Current Constellation (Sept. 2011) 3 GEOs + 4 IGSOs (Data available)

Tracking Network (Wuhan Uni) A Global GNSS Network Dedicated To COMPASS Scientific Research Data Available At Stations: Beijing, Wuhan, Chengdu, Lasha, Shanghai, Urumuqi and Xi’an, Singapore and Perth Australia

Tracking Network (Wuhan Uni)

UR240 UA240 BD/GPS 四频 OEM 接收机 Recevier And Antenna

Data Availability

EPOS-RT Software  Multi-Technology GNSS SLR VLBI …  Multi-Function Real-time/Post-mission; Static/Kinematic/Dynamic

EPOS-RT: Structure  Left Side: Post-Processing. Right Side: Real-Time

Data Processing  POD& PTD  Real-Time PPP service

Dynamical Models ParameterCOMPASS Satellite GravityEIGEN GRACE02S 12 x 12 Point massEarth, Sun, Moon and Planets TidesSolid Earth tides Pole tides Ocean tide Relativistic effectsYes Solar radiationBern model with 9 model parameters Velocity BreaksOnly for maneuver modelling Satellite Attitude: As GPS PCO/PCV: Not Available

Observation Models ParametersModelConstraint ObservationLC and PCL1 0.02cycle, P1 1.0m Sampling rate60 seconds Cutoff elevation7 degree WeightElevation dependentelev > 30 o, 1; else 2*sin(elev) PCO/PCVNot available Phase wind-upYes Tropospheric delaySaastamoinen model + process10cm + 5 mm/sqrt(hour) Ionospheric delayEliminated by using LC and PC Satellite clockBroadcast + Wite noise300 m Receiver clockRange estimating + White noise300 m Station displacement Solid earth, pole tide, ocean loading Station coordinateConstraint to GPS derived valueAccordingly AmbiguityEstimated and fixed to integer Relativistic effectsYes ERPSolve for x-pole y-pole and rates and LOD Almost fixed

Three-Day Solution  Three-Day Sliding Window With One-Day Step-size.  Orbit Overlap 48 h, Sol. 1 and 2, or Sol 2 and 3 24 h, Sol. 1 and 3, or Sol 2 and 4 1 h, Sol. 1 and 4 (Blue parts) Estimation (Green), Predicted (Blue) Sol

Orbit Comparison  RMS increases along with time-lag  GEO has significant larger RMS  On average GEO 6 m, IGSO 1 m Time-lag of the solutions

 Large RMS in Along- Tracking, 23 m  Constant Bias !  < 1 m in Cross-Tracking & Radial Orbit Comparison

 Systematic Bias Except C04  Orbit Related ?  STD 0.5 ns (15 cm) Clock Comparison

ZTD RW process with PD Better than 10 mm in Horizontal 4 cm bias in vertical, 1-2 cm STD Static PPP With Estimated Orb&CLK

MEAM GPS-COMPASS = -13 mm, STD=14 mm Both PCO&PCV for Sat. and Rec. not available ZTD Estimated vs GPS Derived

 Position: 100 m + 1 m per sqrt (minute)  Epoch not shown if nsat <=4  After 1-2 hour to 1 dm, Stay at cm-level  Fluctuation at 20:00, repeated daily (?) Kinematic PPP (Forward)

 Epoch not shown if nsat <=4  Bias 12, 6, -8 mm, STD 45, mm (ENU)  Fluctuation at 20:00 ? Kinematic PPP (+Backward)

EPOS-RT For Real-Time PPP Service RT Orbit RT Clock RT PPP GPS receivers SRIF(Orb) BNCBNC2SRIFSRIF(Clk)‏ SRIF2BNS BNC2SRIFSRIF(PPP)‏ Internet connection Control Unit IGS Hourly Data RT PPP GPS receivers BNC2SRIFSRIF(PPP)‏ OBS Streaming NTRIP Products ORB/CLK/UPD Hourly D a t a RT ORB Pos&Time ZTD/STD Control Unit IGS Real-Time Analysis Center at GFZ

Orbit Prediction  Three-Day Sliding Window With One-Day Step-size.  Orbit Integration To The Fourth Day (1D Pred.)  The Step-size Can Be To 1 h For A Faster Update depending on the data availability Prediction (Green with Data, Yelllow=Predicted

 Compared With Estimated Orbits  Major Bias in Along-track Direction, Especially for GEOs  STD Are Similar, Smallest in Radial. Quality of Predicted Orbits

 Clocks are estimated epoch-wise by fixing the predicted orbits.  Both clocks&orbits are used for simulated real-time positioning  URA should be compared Quality of Estimated Clocks

Simulated Real-Time PPP Very similar to that with estimated orbits&clocks Decimeter accuracy achievable Fluctuation at 20:00 ?

3D-rms 16 m for GEOs and 2.4 m for IGSOs. Large bias in along-track, small and similar errors in radial of 1.8 m for GEO and IGSO. Static Daily PPP: 1 cm/3cm, Bias due to PCO/PCV Kinematic PPP: 5, 3 and 7 cm in ENU Simulated RTPPP service: 1-2 dm. To be improved with the full constellation of Phase II. Summary