Acknowledgments 7. Scenarios for the Source of Residual Polarization 2. The Hinode SOT/SP Optical System 5. Raw (Uncalibrated) Polarization Images of Focal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
24.6 Diffraction Huygen’s principle requires that the waves spread out after they pass through slits This spreading out of light from its initial line.
Advertisements

Fundamentals of Photoelasticity
Grey Level Enhancement Contrast stretching Linear mapping Non-linear mapping Efficient implementation of mapping algorithms Design of classes to support.
HESSI’s Imaging Process. The HESSI satellite, due for launch in the Fall of 2001, ha.
Diffraction of Light Waves
10 -3 versus polarimetry: what are the differences? or Systematic approaches to deal with systematic effects. Frans Snik Sterrewacht Leiden.
OPTICS. I. IMAGES A. Definition- An image is formed where light rays originating from the same point on an object intersect on a surface or appear to.
1 Estimate on SOT light level in flight with throughput measurements in SOT sun tests T. Shimizu 1, T. Tarbell 2, Y. Suematsu 3, M. Kubo 1, K. Ichimoto.
1 Lites FPP-SP Initial Reduct SOT #17 Meeting, NAOJ, April Solar-B FPP Initial Data Reduction for the FPP Spectro- Polarimeter October, 2004 Bruce.
1 Lites FPP-SP Performance SOT #17 Meeting, NAOJ, April Solar-B FPP As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro- Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team Bruce.
Image Forgery Detection by Gamma Correction Differences.
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
A particularly obvious example of daily changing background noise level Constructing the BEST High-Resolution Synoptic Maps from MDI J.T. Hoeksema, Y.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
Search for the Gravitational Wave Memory effect with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Jingbo Wang 1,2,3, Hobbs George 3, Dick Manchester 3, Na Wang 1,4 1.
Solar Irradiance Variability Rodney Viereck NOAA Space Environment Center Derived Total Solar Irradiance Hoyt and Schatten, 1993 (-5 W/m 2 ) Lean et al.,
Microscope.
Optical characteristics of the EUV spectrometer (EUS) for SOLO L. Poletto, G. Tondello Istituto Nazionale per la Fisica della Materia (INFM) Department.
Chapter 25 Optical Instruments.
1 Components of Optical Instruments, Cont… Lecture 7.
1 Chapter 34 One of the most important uses of the basic laws governing light is the production of images. Images are critical to a variety of fields and.
Visual Angle How large an object appears, and how much detail we can see on it, depends on the size of the image it makes on the retina. This, in turns,
Pushing the limits of Astronomical Polarimetry Frans Snik Sterrekundig Instituut Utrecht BBL 710
Lenses Are classified by their Focal Length. The distance from the optical center of a lens to the front surface of the imaging device.
Understanding Persistence: A 3D Trap Map of an H2RG Imaging Sensor
Refraction is the change of direction of a light wave caused by a change in speed as the wave crosses a boundary between materials.
Ch23 Geometric Optics Reflection & Refraction of Light.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
Chapter 24 Wave Optics. General Physics Review – waves T=1/f period, frequency T=1/f period, frequency v = f velocity, wavelength v = f velocity, wavelength.
MWO MAGNETOGRAMS L. Bertello, R.K. Ulrich, J. Boyden and T. Tran Magnetogram Workshop, UCLA, April 2-4, 2007.
1. Waves and Particles 2. Interference of Waves
1 Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Lecture Emission in Flames There can be significant amounts of emission produced in flames due to presence of flame.
Optical Aeronomy Calibration Facility CEDAR WORKSHOP JUNE, 2007 Jeff Baumgardner, Center for Space Physics Boston University.
Polarization Calibration of the Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) formerly Advanced Technology Solar Telescope David Elmore Instrument Scientist.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
Figure 8.Color map of the geometric correction along the dispersion axis for segment A. Figure 4. Measured distortions for all PSA positions for segment.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
Calibration of the Polarization Property of SOT K.Ichimoto, Y.Suematsu, T.Shimizu, Y.Katsukawa, M.Noguchi, M.Nakagiri, M.Miyashita, S.Tsuneta (National.
Interference in Thin Films, final
Unit 12: Part 1 Physical Optics: The Wave Nature of Light.
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Low Polarization Optical System Design Anna-Britt Mahler Polarization Laboratory Group College of Optical Sciences.
The HESSI Imaging Process. How HESSI Images HESSI will make observations of the X-rays and gamma-rays emitted by solar flares in such a way that pictures.
Table of Contents Light and Color Reflection and Mirrors
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
COSMO Large Coronagraph Preliminary Design Review
Visible Spectro-polarimeter (ViSP) Conceptual Design David Elmore HAO/NCAR
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 The Viewfinder Telescopes of Advanced LIGO’s Optical Levers Michael Enciso Mentor: Riccardo DeSalvo Co-Mentor: Tara Celermsongsak.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
IAS Hinode Data WorkshopThursday 15-November-2007 The Hinode Solar Optical Telescope Data & Calibration Dr. Thomas Berger Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology.
SCM x330 Ocean Discovery through Technology Area F GE.
Astronomical Spectroscopic Techniques. Contents 1.Optics (1): Stops, Pupils, Field Optics and Cameras 2.Basic Electromagnetics –Math –Maxwell's equations.
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
First Assessments of EUVI Performance on STEREO SECCHI
What Is Spectral Imaging? An Introduction
PRISMS – one of the e.g. of optical instrumentation
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Polarimetry: Waveplate Modulation; Calibration
Diffraction vs. Interference
UVIS Calibration Update
Optics Alan Title, HMI-LMSAL Lead,
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
How Cells Tiptoe on Adhesive Surfaces before Sticking
Presentation transcript:

Acknowledgments 7. Scenarios for the Source of Residual Polarization 2. The Hinode SOT/SP Optical System 5. Raw (Uncalibrated) Polarization Images of Focal Plane of SP Throughout Mission Long-Term Variability of the Polarization Response Matrix of the Hinode Spectro-Polarimeter Bruce W. Lites: HAO/National Center for Atmospheric Research†, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO , USA † The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the National Science foundation 1.Abstract The Spectro-Polarimeter 1 (SP) of the Solar Optical Telescope 2 (SOT) on the Hinode mission 3 has been providing precision polarization measurements at high angular resolution consistently since October Starting in 2009, the Hinode team has performed a sequence of annual calibration measurements aimed at determining the flat-field response of this instrument. From these measurements we not only determine the flat-field response for the entire system (telescope, optics, and detector), but using the average disk-center quiet Sun as a standard candle, we determine the history of overall changes in throughput of the instrument over its active lifetime. The throughput has decreased nearly linearly by about 26% between 2006 and the present. This decrease in throughput is also reflected in a corresponding increase in the noise present in the polarization measurements. By examining the polarization signature of the spectral continuum in the annual flat-field measurements, we are also able to measure precisely any changes in the intensity-to-polarization crosstalk of the SP over its full scan range. We find a steady increase in residual instrumental polarization, particularly in Stokes Q, starting from undetectable levels at the start of the mission to a few ✕ (relative to Stokes I) in recent years. This polarization might be explained by degradation of the anti-reflective coatings of the collimator lens. 3. Polarization calibration of the SOT/SP 6. Characteristics of the Varying Instrumental Polarization 8. Conclusions and Outlook SOT/SP is experiencing I  Q, U, V crosstalk increasing from nearly undetectable levels early in the mission to present values of a few × in Q and a few × in U,V The residual polarization is distributed in the focal plane of SOT/SP in the form of an offset, out-of- focus image of the SOT entrance pupil The residual polarization must arise from optics in advance of the polarization modulator; i.e. from either the telescope primary and/or secondary mirrors or the collimator lens Several aspects of the observed polarization suggest that it arises as a result of ghost images within the Collimator Lens Unit as a result of degradation of the anti-reflective coatings The SOT/SP throughput has decreased by about 25% since launch For now, this residual polarization is (and has been) compensated effectively by the routine SOT/SP data processing procedures (SP_PREP 5 ) We will continue to monitor the progression of this anomalous polarization Figure 5. HISTORY OF RAW STOKES Q/I,U/I,VI IMAGES: Each of the 48 images shown is a map of the full field-of-view spectral continuum polarization signal measured with SOT/SP. The gray scale saturates at ±0.2%. Images of each of the two polarization beams (Left, Right) are shown. Data from were obtained using a standard observing procedure as part of the annual flat-field sequence for SOT/SP: maps covering the full scan range of the slit with 256 equally- spaced scan steps. Data from differ in appearance from the later data because they were obtained using different observing modes. In particular, the data from 2007 have considerably less noise because the scan comprised 2048 slit positions. No comparable data were obtained during References 1.Lites, B. W., et al. 2013, Solar Phys, 283, Tsuneta, S., et al. 2008, Solar Phys, 249, Kosugi, T., et al. 2007, Solar Phys, 243, 3 4.Ichimoto, K., et al. 2008, Solar Phys, 249, Lites, B. W. and Ichimoto, K. 2013, Solar Phys, 283, 601 Thanks are extended to A. De Wijn and T. Tarbell for helpful suggestions. Support for this work was provided under NASA contract NNM07AA01C for the Hinode program at LMSAL and HAO. Figure 1. THE OPTICAL SYSTEM OF THE HINODE SOLAR OPTICAL TELESCOPE: Measurements in this work are acquired by the Spectro-polarimeter (SP), shown in magenta in the upper-left portion of the diagram. In addition to the SP, the relevant optical systems are the Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA, in red below) and the common optics to all systems (the Reimaging Lens and the Beam Distributor prisms shown at the left in yellow. From the standpoint of instrumental polarization, the SOT/SP has several important characteristics: 1.Symmetric optical system in advance of the polarization modulator: In a symmetric system it is difficult for optical devices to produce significant polarization. Linear polarization of any ray making an oblique angle with the mirror reflections will be cancelled by equivalent rays passing through the system at rotation angles about the optical axis of the telescope of ±90°. Similarly, any stress-induced birefringence that is symmetric about the optical axis will lead only to a net depolarization. 2.The polarization modulator, a rotating retarder, encodes the incident polarization state (Q, U, V ) into a temporal modulation of the linear polarization of the beam that follows. The encoded signal is temporal variations of differing frequencies and phases of the incident Q, U, V. 3.The two orthogonal linear polarization states exiting the polarization modulator are subjected to simultaneous, separate polarization analysis by the polarizing beam splitter just prior to the SP camera, and separate detection/demodulation by the SP CCD camera. This is a “dual-beam”polarimeter that doubles the overall efficiency of the system and reduces its sensitivity to polarization crosstalk arising from residual image motion. The basic polarization calibration of the SOT/SP occurred in June 2005 before integration of the SOT to the spacecraft. This calibration was accomplished by placing three large polymer sheet polarizers in front of the telescope as illuminated by natural sunlight: Figure 3. SCHEMATIC OF POLARIZATION CALIBRATION SETUP FOR THE SOT (illustration from Ichimoto et al Three sheet polarizers (linear polarizer, left- and right-circular polarizers) were alternately placed in front of the telescope aperture, then rotated to eight stations at 45° intervals. Data so collected was used to determine the instrument response matrix X for each of the dual-beam polarimeter channels (left and right), as described by Ichimoto et al : Slit Scan Direction Distance Along Slit Left Right Q/ I U/I V/I L eft ChannelRight Channel Figure 2. TECHNICIANS PLACING A SHEET POLARIZER IN FRONT OF THE SOT ENTRANCE APERTURE The inverse of X (X -1 ) is applied to the polarimeter output Stokes vector to apply the polarization calibration. The science goals of Hinode/SOT dictate the tolerence limits |ΔX| are dictated by the science goals (Ichimoto et al. 2008). Note that the response matrices are nearly diagonal and most off-diagonal elements are smaller than their corresponding tolerance limits. Were they all smaller than |ΔX|, there would have been no need to perform or apply polarization calibration. The first column of X indicates the crosstalk from I  Q,U,V. These values are not well determined by the calibration because nearly unpolarized light could not be introduced. On-orbit, however, the spectral continuum near the center of the solar disk is an excellent source of unpolarized light. The analysis presented here uses the spectral continuum to determine the first column of the SOT/SP response matrix, and its behavior during nearly eight years of operation in space. Tolerance Limit The raw polarization images of the spectral continuum for the two channels of the dual-beam SOT/SP system are shown in Fig. 5. Early in the mission the instrumental polarization was very low, indicating a nearly ideal polarimetric response. However, in recent years there has been a clear increase in polarization for Stokes Q/I having the form of a somewhat out-of-focus image of the pupil, displaced downward from the center of the field-of-view. 4. Throughput History for SOT/SP Figure 4 at left displays a nearly linear decrease of continuum intensity recorded by the SOT/SP since its launch in late In all, the throughput at 6304 Å has decreased by about 25%. This decrease has been accompanied by a corresponding increase of the rms noise measured in the spectral continuum of the polarization images Q, U, V (colored data points). Prior to mid- 2008, data were obtained with settings of the camera electronics that differed from the later data, resulting in a higher level of measurement noise. From mid-2008 onward, data at the center of the solar disk were taken each month using the Hinode/SOT synoptic “Irradiance Program” (HOP 79). Figure 4. THROUGHPUT, NOISE HISTORY OF SOT/SP: The average level of the quiet-Sun continuum at disk center as seen by the SP is shown by the black diamonds. The black, straight line represents a linear fit through these points. The vertical axis at left shows the signal levels in DN for the SP per pixel per sec. Colored squares represent the rms fluctuation in the polarization continua relative to the Stokes I continuum: Q (green), U (blue), and V (red) for the typical SP observation of 4.8 second exposure. Open squares early in the mission flag measurements with analog-digital converter offset parameter 7, whereas later in the mission the small filled squares represent observations at a different offset (offset parameter 5). The vertical axis labels at right indicate the level of fluctuation in the polarization continua. (Figure is updated version of Fig. 11 of Lites et al ) Q/IU/I V/I Figure 7. HISTOGRAMS OF RESIDUAL Q/I POLARIZATION FROM Q/I IMAGES OF FIG.6 Figure 6. HISTORY OF CALIBRATED, FLAT-FIELDED, MERGED CONTINUUM POLARIZATION. The grey scale for Q/I polarization images saturates at ±0.4%, whereas it saturates at ±0.05% for U/I, V/I. Fig. 6 shows the result of application of the calibration procedure 3 for SOT/SP to the flat-field data shown in Fig. 5, except that no residual I  Q, U, V crosstalk correction is applied. The amplitude of the residual polarization signal is about a factor of two larger than in Fig. 6 because of correction for the modulation efficiency (diagonal elements of the response matrix X). Fig. 7 shows the histograms of the residual Q/I polarization for each year’s data. The increase of the positive residual shows no evidence for slowing, and importantly, there is a component that is increasing to negative values with time. Characteristics of the Residual Polarization: Q-polarization dominant U, V residual polarization smaller than that of Q by more than a factor of 10 Residual has form of downward-displaced, out-of-focus pupil image Negative as well as positive residuals occur, but positive dominant for Q, U and negative is dominant for V The residual polarization signature is a modulated polarization signal that has occurred where initially there was none. The polarization must arise from changes in optical elements prior to the polarization modulator: either the telescope mirrors or the collimator lens. Scenario 1: SOT Primary and Secondary Mirror Degradation Mirror degradation leads to increase in polarization upon reflection Secondary mirror supported by three vanes – asymmetric illumination in the N-S direction (like off-axis telescope) Lower reflectivity would lead to +Q bias Degradation of primary does not explain appearance of pupil image in polarization Would not explain appearance of spatially-offset pupil image Would not cause enhancement of both +Q and -Q in separate regions of the image Scenario 2: Degradation and Ghost Images in the Collimator Lenses Unit (CLU) Degradation of anti-reflective coatings might increase both reflectivity of surfaces (ghosts) and polarization The CLU is known to have “a measured tilt of image plane due to a fabrication error”. This might explain the offset of the pupil image seen in polarization There is no model that provides a quantitative prediction of polarization of ghost reflections in the CLU It is not clear how both +Q (–Q) would be produced in bright (dark) regions of a ghost image as a result of degradation of multilayer antireflective coatings