Professional Learning Communities BEYOND THE TERM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities At Glasgow High School.
EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS CORRELATES 1. Strong instructional leadership 2. Clear-focused mission 3. Safe and orderly environment 4. Climate of high expectations.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
School Leadership that Works:
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Parents as Partners in Education
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Professional Learning Communities at Work
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
User Guide Elaine Brouwer and Robert Koole, 2006 a collaborative project of Alta Vista/NWCSI and SCSBC,
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Professional Learning Communities OKGEAR UP Public Schools April 2, 2015.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The First Step in Building a Professional Learning Community Austin G. Buffum, Ed.D. Senior Deputy Superintendent Capistrano Unified School District.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
P ROFESSIONAL L EARNING C OMMUNITIES AT W ORK How are we functioning? What is our purpose?
Building Our Curriculum
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Missouri Integrated Model Mid-Year Meeting – January 14, 2009 Topical Discussion: Teams and Teaming Dr. Doug HatridgeDonna Alexander School Resource SpecialistReading.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
R.B. STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL REFINING OUR FOCUS BULLDOG 20/20 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
March, 2010Clear Creek Amana CSD Building Capacity for Student Learning Brad Fox Paula Vincent March, 2010.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
© International Baccalaureate Organization 2011 Session 4 – Change School Effectiveness and Data.
BUILDING A PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY Adapted from "Professional Learning Communities at Work"- Richard and Rebecca Dufour and Robert Eaker Delsea.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
PROF190 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES. Questions to consider: 1. What is a professional learning community?
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Bradford’s SEN Strategy May A Strategic Framework Vision and intent –What do we want Strategic Foci (Delivery Areas) –How will we get there Strategic.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Middle School Social Studies September 19, 2007 Department Meeting.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Equip & Empower Our Site Supporting Over 1800 teachers Unified system of support Site Professional Learning Systems SPLS Serving over 24,849 Students Time.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Changing the Systemic Culture of a School-Based PLC
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Birmingham Primary Strategy Team Renewing the Frameworks Training Session 4 Beginning the implementation process.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Professional Learning Communities
A Roadmap to Vistas, Historical Sites, and Hot Spots on Your Journey to Becoming a PLC Janel Keating and Robert Eaker.
The Work of a Team Professional Learning Communities
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Professional Learning Communities BEYOND THE TERM

PURPOSE & OUTCOMES To explore our understandings of Professional Learning Communities and how they can support you and your students To stimulate discussion regarding educational focus and practices

EXERCISE 1 CHOOSE A PARTNER TO WORK WITH FOR THIS EXERCISE. TASK: TO ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: Which IB principles most inform my practice(Mission, values, LP)

REPORTING OUT John Ralston Saul: …..any wilful undermining of universal public education…..would be a flagrant betrayal of the basic principles of middle-class representative democracy. September 2004

EXERCISE [5 minutes] (GROUP A) List from your perspective the characteristics of an effective school (GROUP B) List from your perspective the characteristics of an ineffective school

Merging IB and PLC Given the principles of effecive/non effective schools- and what you know from IB,determine a principle which guides your practice- -Discuss common features of IB –and school effectiveness

Merging IB and PlC Design a study which will measure the degree of implementation for one of the IB Standards Design an action project which will enhance the effectiveness of that chosen standard in your setting

Merging IB and PLC Ensure that you design a study which will: >Tell what you are trying to measure (define) >Understand how you will know what it is (evidence) >Understand how you will measure it’s success (data ) >Understand when you will know if it is (sustainable)

THE ORIGINS Peter Senge, originator of the ‘Learning Organizations’ model, postulates that the future success of our public education system lies in empowering students. With reference to the students’ comments [Appendix 1] what points do you agree with? Which do you disagree with?

RESEARCH : Effective Schools Focus on student learning Effective classroom instruction High expectations Basic skill acquisition Frequent monitoring of student progress Focused feedback to students

RESEARCH : Effective Schools Emphasis on writing Multiple opportunities to learn Accountability for performance Collaborative planning Collegial relationships Student time on task

RESEARCH : Effective Schools Guaranteed and viable curriculum Distributed leadership Regular collection and analysis of data Clear goals Common vision and mission Parent involvement

RESEARCH : Effective Schools Home – school relations Sense of community Trusting relationships Safe and orderly climate – DuFour et. al. 2002

RESEARCH : Ineffective Schools Lack of vision Unfocused leadership Dysfunctional staff relationships Ineffective classroom practices - Teddie & Springfield, 1993; Reynolds, 1995; Stoll & Fink, 1996

The Six Components of the PLC Framework Shared purpose Collaborative teams School community and capacity Focus on student learning Safe, orderly climate Distributed leadership

SHARED PURPOSE Commonly held MISSION, VISION Clear, challenging SMART goals Commonly held VALUES

COLLABORATIVE TEAMS Team norms guide collaboration Collaboration embedded in routine practice Time built into school day Teams focused on critical questions associated with student learning

SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CAPACITY  Parent and Community Involvement Relationship Building  Leadership Developed Throughout Community  Student Involvement & Leadership  Home-School Links

FOCUS ON STUDENT LEARNING Opportunity to learn Student learning (what do we know about learning and what are we doing about it?) Guaranteed and viable curriculum Equitable access to learning Individual and collaborative interventions for students not meeting with success

FOCUS ON STUDENT LEARNING Effective classroom practices and strategies Formative assessment which helps inform teaching and learning

SAFE AND ORDERLY CLIMATE SENSE OF BELONGING FOR ALL – INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY A HIGH AND EVIDENT PRIORITY – PHYSICAL AND INTELLECTUAL SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY EMPHASIZED

DISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP  Shared leadership with staff, parents and students  Communal responsibility for school direction and successful attainment of school goals  Instructional Leadership

KEY QUESTIONS ON STUDENT LEARNING 1.What is it we wish all students to learn? 2.What strategies do we employ to teach students? 3.How do we know when they have learned it? (assessments) 4.What do we do (individually and collectively) when they haven’t learned it? What are our interventions?

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES FRAMEWORK Shared purpose Collaborative teams around student learning School community and capacity Focus on student learning Safe, orderly climate Distributed leadership

PREPARING Determine shared values Develop shared vision Define current reality Identify critical evidence Identify needs or opportunities Establish common direction and focus Define roles

PLANNING Consider critical evidence Determine goals Plan for collaboration

ACTING Determine strategies Develop an implementation plan Define support Collect and review critical evidence Monitor progress

RENEWING Reaffirm direction Maintain momentum Review/Revise goals Monitor critical evidence Celebrate successes Renew vision