The Puzzle of an Elementary Master Schedule Putting the Pieces Together!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
No Wasted Time: PBIS Meetings That Work. Our School Durham Elementary School Durham Elementary School Tigard, Oregon Tigard, Oregon 550 students in grades.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
The Puzzle of an Elementary Master Schedule Putting the Pieces Together!
North East School Division An Introduction to Response to Intervention (RTI)2009.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
RtI Response to Intervention April 2, 2008 Board Presentation.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort B.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: RTI Schedule: A Proposal to Implement a New Schedule Cathy Poppen, Oregon City School District, Ogden Middle.
Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal.
Buzz Aldrin Elementary School. Ethnic Background at Aldrin.
Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Master Schedules:
RTI 2 Murfreesboro City Schools Lessons Learned Linda Gilbert, Director of SchoolsLinda Gilbert, Director of Schools Caresa Brooks, Coordinator, Reading/InterventionCaresa.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Ensuring Effective & Consistent Tier 1 Core Reading Instruction Kim Maher Ryan McWilliams Manhattan School District 114 Strengthening the Core.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
EFFECTIVE SCHEDULING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Planning for Special Education Service Delivery in the Least Restrictive Environment.
How It’s Being Done in Burlington Public Schools! Susan Astone Ellen Johnson John Lyons Deborah Dressler Dr. Eric Conti Superintendent of Burlington Public.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Scheduling Tier II.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.
Universal Design for Learning School-wide Math Response-to-Intervention Plan By Laura Clarke Special education teacher.
BRETT BRODEEN, PRINCIPAL KELLY DUFFY, RTI LEAD TEACHER SCHOOL DISTRICT OF SUPERIOR Putting It All Together A Responsive School Approach.
Office of Special Education: Vision Statements Parent Advisory Council – Specialized Services November 05, 2012 Gina Ross - Elementary Megan McCullough.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
A Mission of Restoration
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Impacting Reading Fluency Through a Structured Intervention Program ELA Leadership Project Pepperdine University Celene Alvarado.
Professional Learning Communities Board Update February 2012.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Tier II & III Training Scheduling.
Oregon Reading First Leadership Session October 20, 2005 (Cohort B) October 21, 2005 (Cohort A) Erb Memorial Union University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
How North Clackamas Has Implemented RTI September 30, 2010 at the Eugene Hilton  Vivian Garrison, Director of Special Education  Matt McDermott, TOSA.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
January 25, 2012 Special Education Opportunities Review Progress Report.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Master Schedules: A window to the soul of the school
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
Oregon Reading First Leadership Session
RTI: Response To Instruction
Presentation transcript:

The Puzzle of an Elementary Master Schedule Putting the Pieces Together!

Goals During this session you will understand the importance of a school-wide schedule to support multi-tiered instruction. We will discuss the importance and application of consistency in the instructional day, protection of instruction, time for interventions, the use of data, flexibility, collaboration time for staff and how each fits into an elementary master schedule.

Outcomes Understand how culture and vision impact a master schedule Identify legal and contractual requirements and how they impact a schedule Identify key attributes of a strong master schedule Prioritize what is important in your school and use data to support this decision Identify methods for improved collaboration and communication Evaluate sample master schedules and calendars

Why???? Maximize resources Connect priorities to actions Focus on coherence Strive for our school vision Increase student achievement

DOES THE SCHEDULE DRIVE THE SCHOOL OR THE SCHOOL DRIVE THE SCHEDULE?

Culture Shared Goals/ Mission/ Vision Assessment/Data Instruction/ Systematic Response Leadership Professional Development Culture of Commitment/ Team

Culture Great organizations “simplify a complex world into a single organizing idea, a basic principle, or concept that unifies and guide everything…. (they) see what is essential, and ignore the rest.” Jim Collins

CONSIDERATION IN A MASTER SCHEDULE

First, let’s do the math 177 instructional days x 6 hours/day = 1062 hours total Lunch = 115 hours Recess = 45 hours Transitions = 90 hours Assemblies/other activities = 20 hours Attendance = missed 10 days (60 hours) = approximately 762 hours of instruction per year

What do with this time???? 762 hours per year! ELA/Math instruction = hours 231 hours remaining –What if they are behind? Interventions –30 minutes per day (88 hours) 143 hours remaining About 45 minutes per day!!!!

Legal/ Contractual Requirements Division 22 Standards Contract BOLI guidelines Teacher/IA hours

What has to fit…… Nonnegotiable  ELA Core – 120+ Minutes  Math Core – 60 + Minutes  Other Required curriculum  Special Education  Specials  Interventions Flexible?  Bus Schedules  Itinerant Teacher  Lunch Room  Music/Band/Orchestra  High School  Sports  Community  Early Release

Priorities Elementary Schedule –Identify priorities – What is nonnegotiable? –Identify variables – What is flexible? Student Data –Where is your biggest need? Increase time? Staffing?

Other needs….. Interventions – flexibility Collaboration time for staff Regular Ed and SPED support

Oregon RTI Infrastructure Checklist How does this help support a master schedule? What questions does it help you address?

How do we fit it all in?

Benefits All students receive the same Teachers have protected time Interventions will occur Data used to make decisions/drive schedule Flexibility as needed for increased instruction Collaboration time built in

A MASTER CALENDAR

Calendar of Professional Learning and Teaming How does this relate to the master schedule?

Calendaring Time Professional Learning Calendar Team meeting calendar How do you plan for what your data tells you is important? Who leads? How often?

Calendaring Time Staff Meeting Professional Learning, Early Release Professional Learning Communities Benchmark Meetings Grade Level Team Meetings Group Intervention Planning Team Meetings Assessments – DIBELS, MAP, OAKS, Core

Calendaring Time Assessment –DIBELS – Benchmark, Progress monitoring – weekly, bi-monthly –MAPs – Fall and Spring, Some winter –CBAs – core assessments, Common Assessments - Writing Performance –Math Performance –Reading in Program, Benchmark –OAKS

Calendaring Time Group Intervention Planning Time/ 20% meeting –Focus on groups of students in interventions –Team – SPED, Learning Specialist, Child Development Specialist, School Psychologist, Principal, Teacher Point, ELL, Grade Level Teacher –Weekly – Scheduled

Calendaring Time Grade Level Team Meetings – Focus on Core –Meeting Weekly 15 – 45 Minutes –Focused Time – SPED, Attendance/Behavior, Math, Reading, Writing –Tight – Focused, Team, Logs copied and shared –Loose – Teacher Lead

Calendaring Time Staff Meetings are Professional Learning – planned weekly (depending on school need), Lead by Teacher Leaders PLCs – planned as grade levels (half day in-service time that is structured by the district Benchmark Meetings – Team review of school-wide data, focus on health of the core, 3 times a year

Who is the Leader? What is your role in these types of meetings? Do you attend, facilitate, participate in? How are decisions made if you are not there? How do these meetings connect to our mission and vision?

SAMPLE SCHEDULES

Questions? Ideas???