Evidence-based Practices in the Design of Interactive Multimedia for Learners with Cognitive Learning Disabilities Julia Allen University of North Texas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Media Psychology? APA Division 46 – Media Psychology.
Advertisements

UDL Institute West Contra Costa Unified School District Day 1: UDL Overview Presented by Kavita Rao February 25, 2015.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING N ANCI L EE. Introduction to Universal Design Universal Design was a term coined by architect Ronald Mace. Design Principles.
Support for Personalized Instruction Universal Design for Learning
Assistive Technology Competencies for Educational Personnel.
Understanding Behavior Show and Tell #2 Diana Abraham, Adam Brando, Gavin Darby and Donald West West Virginia University.
6.1 Chapter 6 Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia Tools M. D. Roblyer Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 4/E Copyright © 2006 by Pearson.
Teaching Strategy Karen Stewart EMR INCLUDESDOES NOT INCLUDE  Perceptual handicaps  Brain injury  Minimal brain dysfunction  Dyslexia  Developmental.
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
Learning Disabilities
June 2014 “College and Career Readiness” for Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities 1.
Introduction to Using Visual Representations in Math.
Beatrice Isaac Post University. The three misconceptions analyzed in this report include:  learning as a cognitive process only, ignoring the experience.
Educational Psychology/ Special Education Class #2 Agenda 1. Ministry document: Education for All 2. Group work: Chapters 2 and 3 of Education for All.
UNIVERSAL DESIGN FOR LEARNING FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD June 13, 2014 Gary Glasenapp Teaching Research Institute Center on Early Learning Western.
Teaching Through Problem Solving Part 2 – Bermuda Framework for Teaching Mathematics Gilbert Institute Ongoing PD commencing the week of March 3, 2014.
Module 4: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Effective Differentiated Instruction for All Students
Teach Me Language A language manual for children with autism, Asperger’s Syndrome and related developmental disorders. By Sabrina Freeman, Ph.D. Lorelei.
Universal Design for Learning Cindy M. Szulewski-Booth, M.S. CCC/SLP AT Specialist.
Sarah Smith Rainey Bowling Green State University Val Erwin Southern Methodist University Universal Design for Learning and Feminist Pedagogies.
Universal Design for Learning
Universal Design for Learning Guidelines – Version What are expert learners? 2.What is meant by the term “curriculum?” 3.What does it mean to say.
UDL Principles.  “UDL is a research-based set of principles for creating curriculum— including instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments—that.
© 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. Planning for Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum Chapter 3.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
ICI 2009 Presenters: Dr. Beth Moore & Vicki Mast Franklin College.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Sharing and Building Ideas Fayette Long Walden University Sherry Lambertson Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology, EDUC-6714 D-2 November.
Case Study Presentation
Content Area Reading Nakia Gardner Grand Canyon University RDG 583 The Role of Reading in Content Area Classrooms November 4, 2009.
WestEd.org DisabilitiesToolsUDLInstitute Trivia CVTE Jeopardy.
Tiffany Harrell “The goal for every student is to learn, but not every child learns in the same way.” (Firchow, 2011)
Universal Design for Learning Alison Driekonski Walden University S. Lambertson EDUC-6714D-1 Reaching and Engaging All Learners Through Technology October.
EDUCATIONAL TECHONOLOGY & INNOVATIVE TEACHING
Project based teaching/learning as a tool for students' empowerment Center for Citizenship Education (CCE) Marianna Hajdukiewicz.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 3http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Math PRIDE Support Workshop
Universal Design for Learning Ricki Sabia National Down Syndrome Society
Organizational Structure and Instructional Delivery: Using Technology in Special Education Teacher Preparation May 15, 2009 J. Emmett Gardner, University.
ASSURE Model of Instructional Design
Positive School Climate Dr. Shanda C. Crowder Clinical Assistant Professor and Director The Positive Schools Center University of Maryland, School of Social.
Universal Design for Learning
Reading & Viewing are Problem Solving Reading & viewing are interactive processes using problem solving techniques (strategies) to make meaning. In education.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL). What is UDL?  “UDL is a research-based framework for designing curricula—that is, educational goals, methods, materials,
Textual Literacy with Various forms of Text and Increasing sources of Information.
Universal Design for Learning Cindy M. Szulewski-Booth, M.S. CCC/SLP AT Specialist.
EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Dr. Tamara Carter District Educator Community Event (Final Project) 4/25/16.
Robin Burke Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology EDU 620 Instructor Dusty Clark November TECHNOLOGY FOR LEARNING ROBIN BURKE DISTRICT.
The Creative Curriculum for Preschool
UDL and Differentiation EDU 673 Dr. Myisha Warren Rita Scott January 28, 2014.
Monterey County Community Event Leslie A. Barreras Teacher and Community Advocate EDU 620 Instructor Melissa Phillips 23 November, 2015.
Technology Awareness Role: DISTRICT EDUCATOR Yovanka Kelly EDU620 Professor Deborah Naughton 3/28/16.
Community Event Twanna Bradford Professor Williams Final Project June 5, 2016.
EDU 620 By: Kawonda Starling Submittied to: Instructor Neely
UDL Guidelines: Examples and Resources Stephanie Allen EDU 620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology Dr. Amy Gray.
Accommodations for Struggling Learners- Elementary Allison Stephens Jillian Boshkoski.
Kimberly Hannon-Diczhazy EDU620 Instructor: Deborah Moerland.
{ Community Event: District Educator Dawnita Westover EDU: 620 Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology Instructor Conner July 6, 2015.
Community Event: Technology Makes a Difference District Educator: Stephanie Allen EDU 620: Meeting Individual Student Needs with Technology Instructor:
Provide Multiple Means of Representation Kisha Douglas EDU620: Meeting Individual Student Needs With Technology (NME1606A) Instructor: Dusty Clark February.
Shannon O’Reilly EDU 673 Universal Design for Learning, and Differentiation.
UDL & DIFFERENTIATION (DI) Melody Murphy Week 4 Discussion.
M. D. Roblyer Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching, 4/E Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All.
Universal Design for Learning Guidelines
Using Mobile Media Devices and Apps to Promote Young Children’s Learning Sharon Judge, Ph.D. Old Dominion University.
Using Mobile Media Devices and Apps to Promote Young Children’s Learning Sharon Judge, Ph.D. Old Dominion University.
Purpose Introduction to Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Presentation transcript:

Evidence-based Practices in the Design of Interactive Multimedia for Learners with Cognitive Learning Disabilities Julia Allen University of North Texas

Introduction ● Clark (1983) says it’s the design, not media, which influences learning. ● Kozma (1991) claims the constructivist properties of media may benefit some students. ● This study extrapolates design principles from studies which show positive benefit with use of interactive multimedia for students with cognitive disabilities.

Evidence-Based Practice: Signaling ● Hetzroni and Schanin (2002): Children with severe disabilities used interactive storybooks. ● Key words were highlighted as the story was read. Children displayed increased word identification over time. ● Per Mayer’s (2002) multimedia designs for learning, signaling tells learners that something is important.

Evidence-Based Practice: Personalization ● Deliyannis and Simpsiri (2008) taught MAKATON method to children with communication difficulties using interactive multimedia. ● Devices were personalized to speak child’s name and display same-gender actor as the child. ● Mayer (2002) and Hartley (2004) discuss benefits of personalization to increase learning.

Evidence-Based Practice: Dual Channel Use ● Abtahi (2012): Children with dyslexia used interactive multimedia learning objects (IMLO) to improve math skills. ● Children felt IMLO assisted them in learning the topic. They were motivated to use IMLO. ● This along with other studies demonstrates Mayer’s (2002, 2005) principle of Dual Channel Use.

Evidence-Based Practice: Collaborative Learning Environment ● Marino, Gotch, Israel, Vasquez, Basham, and Becht (2013): Studied use of interactive video games for students with dyslexia as part of universal design for learning (UDL) middle school science curriculum. ● Gameplay was most effective as learning tool when played with peers. ● Collaborative discourse was effective as a debrief to gameplay. ● Students felt would have been more effective assessment than paper tests.

Evidence-Based Practice: Self-Paced Instruction ● Schelling and Rao (2013): Used interactive multimedia to improve self-advocacy skills of secondary students with intellectual disabilities. ● Students used Self-Advocacy Compact Disc (SACD) at their own pace to complete training. Built-in quizzes check for learner comprehension. ● This and other studies demonstrate effective use of self-paced instruction, which can be paced based on the learner’s skill and performance.

Evidence-Based Practice: Integrated Assessment ● Lopez-Basterretxea, Mendez-Zorrilla, and Garcia-Zapirain (2014): used interactive games to help students with Down’s syndrome learn money management skills. ● Game results were reported back to psychologists and specialists working with the students. ● Assessments built in to the multimedia; results reported back to the instructors. Can personalize instruction based on strengths and weaknesses.

Evidence-Based Practice: UDL ● Book chapter by Kinney and Kinney (2003): Discuss using interactive multimedia and UDL to meet the needs of all learners, especially those with disabilities. ● Many studies utilized UDL (CAST, 2011): o Alternatives for auditory or visually presented information o Customizable displays o Built-in support o Options for learners with limited physical ability o Return to the main menu at any point of game play o Options for self-regulation o Intrinsically motivating o Sustained the learners’ interest through built-in rewards

Discussion ● Benefits of multimedia instruction include: ○individualized instruction ○self-paced anytime anywhere instruction ○instructor’s time freed to provide more direct, one-on-one instruction ● Most effective practices include those consistent with Mayer’s (2002, 2005) theory of multimedia learning: ○dual channel use, ○signaling, ○personalization ● A collaborative learning environment ● Self-paced instruction ● Formative assessment tools ● UDL

Questions? Insights? Post them to the Discussion forum

References Abtahi, M. S. (2012). Interactive multimedia learning object (IMLO) for dyslexic children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1206–1210. CAST. (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. Deliyannis, I., & Simpsiri, C. (2008). Interactive multimedia learning for children with communication difficulties using the makaton method. In Readings in Education and Technology: Proceedings of ICICTE 2008 (pp. 408–417). Hartley, J. (2004). Designing instructional and informational text. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Educational Communications and Technology (2nd Ed., pp. 917–947). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum. Hetzroni, O. E., & Schanin, M. (2002). Emergent literacy in children with severe disabilities using interactive multimedia stories. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14(2), 173– 190.

References - Continued Kinney, D. P., & Kinney, L. S. (2003). Computer-mediated Learning in Mathematics and Universal Instructional Design. In J. L. Higbee (Ed.), Curriculum Transformation and Disability: Implementing Universal Design in Higher Education (pp. 115–125). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Research on Developmental Education and Urban Literacy. Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212. Lopez-Basterretxea, A., Mendez-Zorrilla, A., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. (2014). A telemonitoring tool based on serious games addressing money management skills for people with intellectual disability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(3), 2361–80. Marino, M. T., Gotch, C. M., Israel, M., Vasquez, E., Basham, J. D., & Becht, K. (2013). UDL in the middle school science classroom: Can video games and alternative text heighten engagement and learning for students with learning disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 87–99. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41(1), 85–139. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 31–48). Schelling, A. L., & Rao, S. (2013). Evaluating self-advocacy strategy instruction for students with an intellectual disability using an interactive hypermedia program. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(17), 1–11.