The Bucks County Montessori Charter School 2009-10 PSSA Results, Local District Comparisons, and Year to Year Progressions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
No Child Left Behind’s Impact on Career and Technical Education Julie Chadd, Ph.D., Eastern Illinois University Karen Drage, Ph.D., Eastern Illinois University.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Horace W. Porter September 4,2012. Grades 3-8 Grade Below Basic ProficientGoalAdvanced % At/Above Proficiency (AYP Goal) % At/Above Goal (State Goal)
Department of Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Kahle Charles, Director of Curriculum.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Annual Report Presented by Mary Zigman, Administrator Melissa Hicks, Assistant Administrator Stephanie Hinkle, Business Manager.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
JUNE 26, 2012 BOARD MEETING Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
PSSA: Pennsylvania System of Schools Assessment Robert Valeria.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Overview of the Title I Program at Hopewell Area School District Mrs. Patricia DelGreco, Title I Coordinator September 2013 Margaret Ross Elementary School.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
AT-RISK YOUTH: A DATA PORTRAIT Washtenaw County -- March 2014.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015 EL SEGUNDO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Challenging Curriculum and Organizational Structures Oct. 23, 2013 Jesse White.
Curriculum Development for Students with Cognitive Disabilities Access to General Education Content Core Curriculum Standards, & IEPS Denise Clark and.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
October 6, SubjectGrade Level(s)Benchmark Reading3-575% Math3-570% VA History470% Science570% Discontinued State Tests (As of Spring 2015) 3 rd.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Artifact 12 A PowerPoint on Understanding by Design. This artifact was developed during my graduate class School Curriculum: Elementary EDE 6205 Fall 2006.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
 SYSTEM - an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole  KPREP testing is one measure of our school system.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), – Is part of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) – makes schools.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Strategic Plan 2017 How will you contribute to our success?
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Curriculum Night Elementary. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1 Testing Various Models in Support of Improving API Scores.
PARCC 2015 Summary Twin Peaks Academy.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Danvers Public Schools: Our Story
Data Overview Shiver Elementary School Faculty and Staff July 21, 2013
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

The Bucks County Montessori Charter School PSSA Results, Local District Comparisons, and Year to Year Progressions

Challenges to the Montessori Student in the traditional testing environment:  Allotted Montessori kinesthetic materials allowed to be utilized vs.  Pencil and paper as primary source, calculators and rulers only tools allowed  Pencil and paper as primary source, calculators and rulers only tools allowed  Tests set at child’s academic level vs.  Everyone testing on the same thing  Students free to select testing subject and order vs.  Mandated selections of assessments  No limitation on the time testing sections are to be completed vs.  Selected sections needing to be completed in order fashion

Just as the BCMCS Mission Statement states: …the philosophy of [BCMCS] is to offer a Montessori based environment that will facilitate intellectual, emotion and social growth…(with the) goal to enable its students to become young adults possessing strong, independent and analytical thinking skills, and an enduring love and passion for learning and the learning process.

So, what is the PSSA’s role? What is the PSSA test? The PSSA test is a series of standardized tests given to all public school students. Currently, students are tested on Reading, Math, Writing and Science. What is the purpose of the PSSA? The PSSA is a test on the core standards state and federal officials feel students should know. The No Child Left Behind Law expects that all students must be 100% proficient on the test by What are the ramifications to the PSSA? A school’s existence, comparable performance measures, and graduation to list a few.

Therefore, please remember that… “Learning must never focus on the end result, as true understanding would not be able to flourish…(for) if the process is fully developed, the desired outcome will naturally take care of itself.” ~M. Montessori

MATH BCMCS Results – Overview of ALL Grade Levels AYP met at all grade levels, with current NCLB target at 56% 96.6% of students scoring Proficient or Advanced in 6 th grade; 0% Below Basic in 3 rd & 6 th

READING BCMCS Results —Overview of All Grade Levels AYP met at all Grade levels, with NCLB target set at 63% 95.4% of 6 th year students testing Proficient or Advanced No 3 rd, 4 th,or 6th year students testing Below Basic

BCMCS Science and Technology Results: 4 th Grade *No Below Basic scores *93.8 Advanced and Proficient

PSSA BCMCS Writing Results: 5 th Grade PSSA BCMCS Writing Results: 5 th Grade *No Below Basic score *Very low levels of Advanced scores in local and state aggregates

3rd Year Math: PSSA Math Comparisons to Local District Scores are 32.5 percentage points above NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: Further refinement of the implementation of the Montessori math curriculum across the Lower Elementary focusing on hands on didactic materials leads to deeper understanding of the core mathematical principals. This process takes time but pays great dividends in the later years and contributes to the goal of creating life long learners.

3rd Year Reading: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Scores are 29.3 Percentage points above NCLB baseline benchmark. Curricular Notes: : Further refinement of the implementation and integration of the Montessori language arts, Making Meaning and Great books programs, along with integrated writing skills creates deeper understanding of texts. As a byproduct, this allows the students to tackle test taking situations with confidence. 1 st of 4 Top Ranking out of 10 District Comparisons

4 th Year Math: PSSA Comparison to Local District Scores are 12.8 Percentage Points Above NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: Due to attrition and other factors this population has an unusually high proportion of children with learning challenges and/or IEP’s. Continued integration of the Montessori mathematics curriculum and programs developed with the Special Ed. department should continue to help these children flourish.

4th Year Reading: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Scores are 18 Percentage Points Above NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: Due to attrition and other factors this population has an unusually high proportion of children with learning challenges and/or IEP’s. Despite this, the implementation and integration of the Montessori language arts, Making Meaning and Great books programs, along with integrated writing skills creates deeper understanding of texts. As a byproduct, this allows the students to tackle test taking situations with confidence.

5th Year Math: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Scores are 11.6 Percentage Points Above NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: Due to attrition and other factors this population has a high proportion of children with learning challenges and/or IEP’s. Continued integration of the Montessori mathematics curriculum and programs developed with the Special Ed. department should continue to help these children flourish.

Scores are 7.6 Percentage Points Above the NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: Due to attrition and other factors this population has a high proportion of children with learning challenges and/or IEP’s. Despite this, the implementation and integration of the Montessori language arts, Making Meaning and Great books programs, along with integrated writing skills creates deeper understanding of texts. As a byproduct, this allows the students to tackle test taking situations with confidence. 5th Year Reading: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District

5th Year Writing: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Proficient Scores outrank all local serving districts Curricular Notes: Score is 2 nd highest among local serving districts

6th Year Math: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Scores are 39.5 Percentage Points Above the NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: The integrated Montessori curriculum creates a deeper level of understanding in all subject areas that leads to higher achievement as the children’s skills and world view as life long learners, begins to coalesce in the 6 th year. A byproduct of this is our consistently high scores on the PSSA 6 th grade test. 2 nd of 4 Top Ranking out of 10 District Comparisons

Scores are 32.5 Percentage Points Above the NCLB baseline benchmark Curricular Notes: The integrated Montessori curriculum creates a deeper level of understanding in all subject areas that leads to higher achievement as the children’s skills and world view as life long learners, begins to coalesce in the 6 th year. A byproduct of this is our consistently high scores on the PSSA 6 th grade test. 3 rd of 4 Top Ranking out of 10 District Comparisons 6th Year Reading PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District

4th Year Science and Technology: PSSA Reading Comparison to Local District Curricular Note: 4 th of 4 Top Ranking out of 10 District Comparisons

Reading and Math Year to Year progression

Reading and Math— Year to Year Progression

Math— “True-Apples to Apples” Math: * 77% of our 6th Grade Students Scored Advanced in Math compared to 27% in 3rd Grade. * A 283% increase in students moving into the Advanced range in Math from 3rd to 6th grade. * Of the 17 Students that scored Advanced in 6th Grade Math, 76% attended BCMCS for at least six years and 100% for at least five years.

Math— “True-Apples to Apples” Math: * 77% of our 6th Grade Students Scored Advanced in Math compared to 27% in 3rd Grade. * A 283% increase in students moving into the Advanced range in Math from 3rd to 6th grade. * Of the 17 Students that scored Advanced in 6th Grade Math, 76% attended BCMCS for at least six years and 100% for at least five years.

Reading— “True-Apples to Apples” Reading: * 73% of our 6th Grade Students Scored Advanced in Reading compared to 18% in 3rd Grade. * A 400% increase in students moving into the Advanced range in Reading from 3rd to 6th grade * Of the 16 Students scoring Advanced in 6th Grade Reading, 75% attended BCMCS for at least six years and 100% for at least five years.

Reading— “True-Apples to Apples” Reading: * 73% of our 6th Grade Students Scored Advanced in Reading compared to 18% in 3rd Grade. * A 400% increase in students moving into the Advanced range in Reading from 3rd to 6th grade * Of the 16 Students scoring Advanced in 6th Grade Reading, 75% attended BCMCS for at least six years and 100% for at least five years.

An Interesting Perspective:

 A Youtube clip from the Barbra Walters special: xpX-Kw xpX-Kw xpX-Kw