LIGO-G040459-00-M Advanced LIGO Assembly & Installation Plan 14 Oct 2004 Dennis Coyne.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Absolutes Green Lake
Advertisements

LIGO-G M May 17, 2006 Installation (INS) Requirements and Design Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Dennis Coyne, Caltech.
WAREHOUSING MANAGEMENT
LIGO-G D Comments: Staged implementation of Advanced LIGO Adv LIGO Systems 17 may02 dhs Nifty idea: a way to soften the shock, spread cost, allow.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
BSC Cable Trays … again: Evaluation of an LLO Proposal for an Alternative Design G v31.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Optical Layout Cavity Lengths Input Mode Cleaner (IMC) »IMC FSR = ~9 MHz »Length = ~16.6 m = ~HAM1 to HAM3 separation.
LIGO-G0200XX-00-M LIGO Laboratory1 Pre-Isolation Dennis Coyne LIGO Laboratory NSF LIGO Annual Review, at MIT 23 October 2002.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Dennis Coyne Excomm Jan 26, 2004
G M Advanced R&D1 Seismic Isolation Retrofit Plan for the LIGO Livingston Observatory Dennis Coyne 29 Nov 2001.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Seismic Isolation (SEI) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Schedule »through R&D, including near-term plans »project.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
20 Nov 2008G v21 Optical & Vacuum Equipment Layouts Dennis Coyne Mike Smith Luke Williams 20 Nov 2008 Adv. LIGO Team Meeting, Caltech, Pasadena,
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Facilities Modifications (FAC) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M Status of LIGO Barry Barish PAC Meeting Caltech 3-June-04 Upper limits on known pulsar ellipticities.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
LIGO-G D Suspensions Design for Advanced LIGO Phil Willems NSF Review, Oct , 2002 MIT.
The ESS vacuum team has overall responsibility for all technical vacuum systems used on the: Accelerator, Target and Neutron Scattering Instruments and.
SR1 ongoing workH.Pernegger21/2/02 Ongoing work in SR1 and preparations for detector macro assembly Heinz Pernegger.
Test Mass Discharging System (TMDS) Design Review 20 Nov 2014 Rich Abbott, Dennis Coyne, Eddie Sanchez, Calum Torrie 1 LIGO-G v1.
Election Commission of India
I&T and Operating and Support Hazards Martin Nordby Chief Mechanical Engineer LSST Camera Safety Review August 18, 2015 R1.
4/25/11 G v3 1 Facility Modifications and Preparations (FMP) Technical Status Annual NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project April , 2011 John.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Baseline Change Request BCR Title: EBD New 6 Ton Bridge Crane Installation BCR #: N/A Presenter’s Name: Robert Law CCB Presentation Date:
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
LIGO-G M 1 Conceptual Design Review: Initial LIGO Seismic Isolation System Upgrade Development, Implementation Plan & Schedule Dennis Coyne April.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
Livingston 16 th August 2006 LIGO-G E HAM SAS Passive Seismic Attenuation System Fabrication, Assembly, Installation Ben Abbott, Valerio Boschi,
Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design.
E v3 aLIGO SEI Testing and Commissioning Overall Plan
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
G Advanced LIGO Coating Research Overview of Optics Handling and Cleaning Procedures Helena Armandula LSC – March 2006.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Update on Activities in Suspensions for Advanced LIGO Norna A Robertson University of Glasgow and Stanford University LSC meeting, Hanford, Aug 20 th 2002.
LSC Meeting March ‘05 1 LIGO ADVANCED SYSTEMS TEST INTERFEROMETER (LASTI) Program Update: LSC Meeting, LLO Dave Ottaway for the LASTI team March 2006 LIGO-G Z.
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
LIGO- G050xxx -00-D Advanced LIGO SUS Installation into BSC Chambers: Mechanical Fixtures Dennis Coyne (with input from many) G May 4 th 2005.
1 FVTX Detector Assembly Stephen Pate New Mexico State University (FVTX Assembly Management WBS 1.7) Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
ESS WP 12 Project Management & Capabilities Overview Neil Bliss Projects & Mechanical Engineering Group Leader ESS PDR, Lund, 10 th November 2015.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
CLIC MODULE TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION Keith Kershaw CES, 8 October 2008.
MH...CH LECT-021 SYSTEMS CONCEPT Adopting a materials handling systems from overall optimization point of view. Adopting a materials handling systems.
DON LYNCH NOVEMBER 6, AGENDA November 4, BABAR Magnet Update Global Design Concept – Update Outer HCal Structural Analysis (2 nd pass) sPHENIX.
LIGO-G D Design Requirements Larry Jones Advanced LIGO, Seismic Isolation System (SEI) Structural Design & Fabrication Bidder’s Conference April.
LIGO-G M State of the LIGO Laboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech LSC Meeting, LLO March 16, 2004 State of LIGO.
 Market Survey  Design, supply, delivery and installation of a Clean Room Facility  at the entrance of the LAr detector tank,  used for the storage.
Page 1 Coles – Operating the Observatories PAC 9 Dec. 13, 2000 G L Operating the Observatories Mark Coles.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Cryomodule Interconnect Installation Issues A Comparison of XFEL to LCLSII Karen Fant 7/29/2015.
An idea of ILD general assembly plan 2015/10/8 Yasuhiro Integration Meeting 1.
LIGO Clean and Bake Best Practices
Integration & Commissioning
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
UK RFD Pre-Series cryomodule
Production & Maintenance
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
GLAST Large Area Telescope
Extraction Michael Bevins May 17, 2007
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Assembly & Installation Plan 14 Oct 2004 Dennis Coyne

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 2 Outline Purpose: »Outline a top level plan as a starting point for discussion »Flesh out details with feedback from subsystem leaders and observatory staff »Determine if there are any significant implications on schedule or costs compared to the current costbook »Propose a definition for installation readiness Subsystem Basic Tasks/Activities »Facility Requirements »New Equipment &/or Facility/Space Needs Available Facilities/Spaces »Assembly »Storage »Clean Rooms »Identify Shared Spaces Task Sequencing for Assembly Installation Basic Tasks/Activities and Sequence

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 3 Basic Assembly Tasks (COC/IO, SUS/IO, SEI)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 4 Essential on-site tasks vs. off-site tasks? Limited space and limited availability of observatory staff during science runs for assembly Perform assembly tasks which do not need to be done at the observatory at CIT, MIT, UFL, … or the other observatory? »Risks! e.g. Integration of an ISC Table at MIT and shipping as an assembly was found to be a poor choice in initial LIGO »Rather limited space available at CIT, MIT – especially clean room space (but not insignificant) »Possible tasks to be performed off-site: –HEPI pier assembly –Electronics module stuffing, testing –Electronics rack, crate assembly –Optical lever modules –AOS telescope assembly –Others? »For the chosen tasks/sub-assemblies, Post assembly shipment should not impose difficult design requirements or significant cost or risk –i.e. this is a litmus test for tasks best done at the observatory

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 5 Ultra-High Vacuum (UHV) Preparation Proposed requirements (not yet approved by the VRB) are more stringent than for initial LIGO (see T040001) »~100 x lower partial pressure for high molecular weight hydrocarbons »Plan to achieve this performance by cleaner bake loads, not added pumping capacity – this approx. at the limit of the sensitivity of the RGAs used on the UHV bake ovens to date Exploratory large vacuum bake oven being pursued by Larry Jones & Oddvar Spjeld »Will build unit soon, if funds are approved by the CCB »Sized to fit the upper quad structure »Placed within an oven to reduce temperature gradients »Higher temperature (empty oven) bake Baseline assumptions: »one each of these new ovens per observatory, placed into the high bay space (for possible use of electric forklift in loading) »use of existing ovens (LLO, LHO, CIT) »Addition of 2 new small ovens at each observatory »Large SEI parts are ultrasonically cleaned, air baked & FTIR tested »Class B tools are ultrasonically cleaned, air baked (as before)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 6 Proposed New Large UHV Bake Oven

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 7 Basic Assembly Tasks (COC/IO, SUS/IO, SEI) Not shown, yet: PSL AOS ISC DAQ LDAS SEI/HEPI

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 8 Limited use of the OSB & LVEA during Science Runs Rules to be verified/reviewed with Observatory staff, … OSB Labs: »No use of the vacuum bake oven in the OSB UHV preparation lab »No use of the HEPI filters (clean rooms) in the OSB optics labs »Assembly in the electronics shop is OK »Access to storage areas (shelving) in OSB labs and OSB receiving area is OK for small (hand carried items) – no forklifts LVEA and VEAs: »No access for personnel (walking in the vicinity of the chambers can break lock) »No movement of large loads on the LVEA/VEA slab (can shift alignment) »No use of overhead cranes »No use of clean rooms (acoustic and electromagnetic disturbance)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 9 Optics (COC & IO) Assumption (under review): No metrology at the observatories »Polisher/Coater perform all acceptance & characterization measurements »Some measurements/checks possible at Caltech »Purpose is to minimize exposure Clean Room Requirements: “better than for initial LIGO at all steps”  Implementation considerations are TBD » Assume for now that LIGO Lab spaces plus Class100 clean room erected within is adequate Optic Cleaning Procedures are TBD »Warm liquinox cleaning is no longer acceptable (etches coating) »Particulate cleaning: Ionized, particulate free airflow over benches is planned Basic Paradigm: The optical surfaces are only exposed when absolutely necessary. »Special covers to be (essentially) in place at all times »More care in keeping particle count down in clean rooms »Improved HEPI filtration of lab spaces, work benches »Perhaps changed wall & ceiling materials in COC lab space? Ergonomic Arm for handling large, heavy optics

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 10 ERGO ARM

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 11 Optics Basic Tasks Receive, Inspect, Inventory »Limited inspection to assure no damage in shipment »Standard LIGO Lab equipment, plus Ergo Arm (high intensity lamp, microscope, …) »Performed in the Staging Building Optics Lab under erected clean room, better than Class 100 Store »Special shipping outer crates in “dirty” receiving storage area (OSB) »Optics remain in custom shipping containers on shelves in the OSB clean room –Approx. 45 large masses max. at any given point in time COC optics for triples, quads, penultimate masses, reaction mass & reaction penultimate/compensation-plate, large element of IMMT & OMMT ~22” dia. X ~8” high, or ~23 lower shelves in wall cabinets –Approx. 20 small optics Singles & triples (IMC, IMMT, OMMT)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 12 Optics Basic Tasks continued Bond Magnets »Single pendulum optics (MMT, SM), penultimate masses »Similar procedure as used in initial LIGO, with new fixtures Bond Ears »New process/procedure & tooling (hydroxy catalysis bonding) »Clean bench space in OSB optics lab »Long room temperature cure (many days); Bond ears, then store again

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 13 LLO Corner Plot Plan to Y-END STATION to X-END STATION

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 14 LHO LVEA STAGING/STORING AREAS PSL OUTER & INNER ENCLOSURES LARGE ITEM ACCESS ROUTE ELECTRONICS RACK ENCLOSURE FOR THE FOLDED INTERFEROMETER ISC TABLE ASSY AREA SEI & SUS CLEAN ROOM CARTRIDGE ASSY AREA BSC & HAM SEI ASSY. IN CRATES SUS ASSY. IN CRATES HEPI PUMP STATION AREA

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 15 End Station Electronics Racks in “cleaning area” (part of the RFI & acoustic mitigation) may block entry for staging SEI into VEA SEI crate placed in VEA, or large access entry room if Rack cluster blocks entry BSC CHAMBER RELOCATED FROM MID- STATION STAGING AREAS

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 16 LVEA/VEA STORAGE & STAGING AREAS Subsystem post-assembly, long-term, storage and staging areas are in the LVEA and VEA Access is through the large item access route (or the main corner station receiving/cleaning areas) Floor space in the LVEA and VEA is adequate Access during Science Runs is strictly prohibited except for brief down times (planned or unplanned) »Planned down time for LN2 replenishment, cryo-pump regeneration, OS patch reboots, etc. is approx. 1 day/month (TBR) »Sufficient temporary storage is available in the staging building in the interim periods (TBR) Alternative/additional storage & work space location at LHO: »The large storage building across from the OSB »Unconditioned space »Suitable for HEPI pier assembly, optical lever piers, etc. »No equivalent at LLO

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 17 LLO Staging Building N.B.: Dimensions from early, preliminary drawings; Must be checked against as-built. AOS, IO, SUS CLEAN ROOM ASSY AREA COC CLEAN ROOM PREP/BOND AREA SEI CLEAN ROOM ASSY AREA SUS CLEAN ROOM ASSY AREA ACCESS STAY CLEAR AREA UHV BAKE AREA & FIBER/RIBBON PULLING AREA WRAPPED/BOXED CLEAN STORAGE MORE STORAGE SPACE & NON- CLEAN ROOM ASSEMBLE SPACE POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE IN LARGE “CONFERENCE ROOM” & LABS

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 18 LHO Staging Building LHO Staging building space is less than at LLO »LHO high bay space is ~60’ x 40’ »LLO high bay space is ~80’ x 41’ »Can simultaneously support 2 BSC clean room stations for either SEI or SUS Assembly LHO Optics clean room is in separate new office/auditorium bldg storage space SEI & SUS high bay assy area clean assy area

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 19 Basic Assembly Tasks (COC/IO, SUS/IO, SEI)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 20 BSC “Cartridge” Assembly overhead crane Clean room Clean cover frame SEI BSC SUS quad (without structure shown) In general the entire BSC optics table payload and all counterbalance mass is installed as part of the “cartridge”

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 21 BSC “Cartridge” Insertion

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 22 Assembly prior to installation does not include the BSC “cartridge” assembly Assembling BSC “cartridges” and wrapping/storing these assemblies would save some assembly time later during installation However at the price of: »A much more unwieldy assembly, »Requires multiple large support fixtures to permanently support the heavy assembly »Likely exceeds our lifting capacity for transport to the LVEA/VEA, »Requires more up front coordination of delivery schedules from all involved subsystems to complete each assembly

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 23 Installation Readiness An installation readiness review will be held prior to switching off an operating observatory The proposed litmus test for readiness, applied by the review committee: »Agreement between the LSC and the LIGO Laboratory that switching off a working LIGO interferometer is not crippling to the overall effectiveness of the world-wide network of gravitational wave observatories. »All assembly and installation procedures have been written and reviewed. Critical assembly and installation activities and tooling have been tested within the LIGO Laboratory. In particular it is the intent of the laboratory to utilize the LASTI testbed to check out challenging or new procedures to the extent possible and provide some familiarity and training to installation personnel. »Sufficient assembly, check-out and delivery of subsystem components has been completed and accepted, so that installation is not predicted to be supply chain limited, i.e. INS is self-limited in its schedule and not limited by manufacturing or assembly rates. Sufficient should be deemed to be ~3 month schedule buffer.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 24 Manufacturing & Assembly Rates To be reviewed Will use to project the “equipment readiness for installation” date

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 25 Aggressive Install/Commiss Schedule

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory 26 Follow up -- Input from Subsystem leads & Observatory Personnel Confirmation of assumptions regarding impact of LIGO science running on assembly and staging Per Subsystem: Space and special equipment needs and duration for assembly at the observatories Walkthrough of installation procedures: »There are no plans to perform HAM in-chamber installation exercises at the observatory prior to installation »A practice BSC cartridge installation could be performed in the staging building at the observatory to walkthrough procedures & tooling –for the configuration in a particular chamber or two, not all –Perhaps with fiber welding to ersatz optics –Up to lifting off the SEI/cartridge support frame (no insertion into a BSC chamber) »LASTI is the full scale testbed at which challenging assembly/installation procedures are to be developed/tested »Provides an opportunity for training »LASTI plan to date is focused on SEI & SUS prototype install & test –Do we anticipate the need for additional installation exercises? Cleanliness issues for core optics »Make “better than initial LIGO” more definitive