Results of Canadian DSL Categorization Activities – What’s Next CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
December 2005 EuP Directive : A Framework for setting eco-design requirements for energy-using products European Commission.
Advertisements

March, 2009 An Overview of the Chemicals Management Plan.
ComET Peer Input Meeting Context & Objectives Nov. 8th, 2004 B ette Meek, Health Canada
Canada/Australia Issues being faced in the regulation of nano-materials Deborah Willcocks – Department of Health and Ageing, Government of Australia Anne-Marie.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.
1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.
1. Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholders - Webinar Session January 14 th, 2014.
Page 1 Regulating Nanomaterials under CEPA CIELAP Workshop February 22, 2008 Bernard Madé, New Substances Program Environment Canada.
Presented by: Jake Sanderson Environment Canada Examining the Linkages between International HPV Programs and Canada December 11-14, 2006 HPV Conference.
POULTRY BRINE INJECTION DAFF AND DTI PRESENTATION Dr. NTSHABELE DIRECTOR: FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY.
Canada’s approach to Chemicals Management under the CMP – Domestic Update CEC SMOC Public Session San Antonio April 1&2, 2009.
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Helping the people of Canada maintain and improve their health Aider les Canadiens et les Canadiennes à maintenir et à améliorer leur état de santé Path.
Hazcom 2012 – The Right to Understand What is the GHS? The GHS is an acronym for The Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals.
Canada Consumer Product Safety Act (CCPSA) Helen Ryan, Consumer Product Safety Directorate, Health Canada Presentation for CSA – June 11th – 12th, 2012.
PENNSAFE ONLINE HSSF Pennsylvania Worker & Community Right to Know Act
GEMI Survey EHS Risk Management
INTERNATIONAL POLICY CONFERENCE “COMPETITIVENESS & DIVERSIFICATION: STRATEGIC CHALLENGES IN A PETROLEUM- RICH ECONOMY” Oil & Gas Development & Health in.
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
Design and Development of an Inventory of Chemical Substances in Mexico General Bureau of Urban and Regional Pollution Research Bureau of Chemicals and.
1 International/OECD Nanotechnology Activities EPA/DoD Meeting on Nanotechnology March 9, 2007 Jim Willis, EPA/OPPT.
Experiences with registrations - 5 years on the road On the REACH Road 23 November 2011 Kevin Pollard ECHA – Dossier Submission and Dissemination.
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Overview of the Rotterdam Convention. Sub-regional Consultation for DNAs 2 Overview of the Rotterdam Convention Structure of the presentation Part 1 -Introduction.
Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) March 4 th – 7 th, 2008 Tucson, Arizona Update on Canada’s Domestic Chemicals Management Plan.
Results of Categorization and Next Steps George Enei Director, Existing Substances Division May, 2006.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
Review of the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) – an Update CCAC National Workshop 2010 Crowne Plaza Hotel, Ottawa, ON Presented by:
Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY NGĀ KAIWHAKATŪPATO WHAKARARU TAIAO What is happening in 2005? Hazardous Substances.
1 Understanding CQC registration Summer Introduction to CQC.
Communication in the Supply Chain
1 Chemical Assessment and Management Program Tala Henry, ChAMP Coordinator Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
1 Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Update on Preparations for the CEPA 1999 Parliamentary Review September, 2005 Presentation to the Canadian.
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coatings Public Workshop Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM)
CHEMSTEWARDS SOCMA COMPLIANCE MORE FOR MEMBERS - VISIT SIEF and Consortium Management Issues under REACH Dr. C. T. Helmes Senior Director.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
1 Pollutant Release & Transfer Registers The Canadian Government Experience National Workshop on PRTRs Santiago, Chilé - May 29, 2002.
Chlorinated Paraffins
Categorization and Screening of the Domestic Substances List Path forward towards ecological prioritization of substances for assessment Existing Substances.
HC Screening State of the Science Reports Update to the ICG February 14th/05 Presented by: Bette Meek Existing Substances Division Health Canada.
1 Montebello announcement On August 21, Leaders of North America committed to strengthening regulatory cooperation in the area of chemicals –Leaders have.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
1 Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program Environmental Summit May 20, 2008 Jim Alwood Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
Industry Perspective on TSCA Modernization ABA Conference June 11, 2010.
Prioritization Process and Development of the Hazard Characterization Documents Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection.
HERA Second European Stakeholder Workshop July Human & Environmental Risk Assessment An A.I.S.E and CEFIC initiative on targeted risk assessment.
Dr. E.Kunz Head of Global Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals Corporate Product Stewardship GPS Safety Summary and Safety Data Sheets OBJECTIVES.
Health and Food Safety EU strategy for Pharmaceuticals in the Environment Patrizia Tosetti DG SANTE European Commission China/EU Pharmaceutical Industry.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Alberta Region Winnie Cheng Sr. Risk Manager Safe Environments Program Aboriginal Children Health & Environment Workshop February 25, 2010 Your health.
Lowell Randel Global Cold Chain Alliance/ International Institute of Ammonia Refrigeration.
Food Additives Project
ดูแลด้วยความรับผิดชอบ
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
Outline Part 1: Inventory Updates (IU) Approach and overview of the 2017 IU Part 2: Walkthrough of the 2017 IU online reporting tools HTML Excel 2.
The Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) & Integration Joint Boards
Chemical substances self – classification issues Lithuanian approach
Categorization of the Canadian Domestic Substances List
European Social Dialogue Agreement on Silica Claire Lanne (IMA-Europe)
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Canada’s Chemical Management Plan – post categorization of the DSL
International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Results of Canadian DSL Categorization Activities – What’s Next CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada

2 What is Categorization? Mandate under Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA 1999) Ministers of Environment and Health are required to categorize the 23,000 substances on the Domestic Substances List by September 14, 2006 Categorization is a priority setting exercise that involves the systematic identification of substances on the DSL that should be subject to screening assessment This includes identifying substances, based on available information that: –May present, to individuals in Canada, the greatest potential for exposure (GPE); or –Are persistent (P) or bioaccumulative (B), in accordance with the P and B regulations, and inherently toxic to humans or to non- human organisms, as determined by lab or other studies

Substances not Requiring Further Work for Human Health (331 substances) Categorized “In” List (762 substances) Oct Draft Human Health Maximal List Sep Human Health Aspects of DSL Categorization/Prioritization Other Priorities (492 substances) for Assessment for Human Health Consider Risk Management LPE High Hazard Moderate Priority GPE/IPE-PorB Hazard Unknown (722 substances) Substances Prioritized For Assessment Highest Priority for Screening Health Assessment GPE/IPE High Hazard (258 substances) Post 2006 No further action Priority setting IPE = Intermediate potential for exposure LPE = Low potential for exposure

4 Ecological Aspects of Categorization Results to Date Of the 22,400 substances for which we have preliminary categorization decisions, there is evidence that: 3700 meet ecological categorization criteria ~200 PBiT with data of higher/medium certainty ~200 PBiT with data of lower certainty ~500 High volume PiT or BiT ~1600 Medium Volume PiT or BiT ~1100 Low Volume PiT or BiT (<1000kg) ~100 PiT or BiT unknown volume A further 1900 substances are Uncertain because they do not have or data is conflicting Exposure/entry information not considered at this point

5 Ecological Categorization Human Health Categorization Communicate Ecological Priorities* Human Health priorities* Joint Schedule for Assessment Joint Schedule for Data Gap Filling Ecological Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment Report Progress/ Results to the Public Communicate * Where we are currently

6 Next Steps – Prioritization Large number of substances meet the criteria for categorization Assessment is not the appropriate next step for many substances Based on the information collected through categorization, the following actions have been identified: –Screening assessment –Data gap filling –Cooperation with other initiatives and jurisdictions –Early rapid screening

7 Highest priorities for action Substances with greatest and intermediate potential for exposure and hazardous to humans (~260 subs.) Substances that are inherently toxic, and both persistent and bioaccumulative (PBiT) (~ 400 subs) –Included on s.71 Survey Notice

8 Industry Engagement June 2004, Canada launched an 18 month voluntary challenge to industrial stakeholders and interested parties to submit experimental study or other information that could help refine categorization decisions So far, we have received approx 20 larger data submissions for consideration and 375 individual P, B or iT aquatic toxicity studies –Submission by CPPI significantly reduced number of petroleum substances meeting the categorization criteria Approx. 20 submissions have been received covering the human health aspects of categorization

S.71 Notice with Respect to Selected Substances identified as Priority for Action CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada

10 S.71 Notice with Respect to Selected Substances identified as Priority for Action First action being taken on early results of categorization of the Domestic Substances List Legal Survey Notice issued in Canada Gazette on March 4, 2006 Compliance deadline June 22, 2006 Requires Canadian companies who manufactured or imported >100 kg of the listed substances in 2005 to respond ~500 substances in the notice (by CAS#) Courtesy copies mailed to ~6000 companies and industry associations

11 S.71 Notice with Respect to Selected Substances identified as Priority for Action Survey designed to: –Identify which substances are manufactured in or imported into Canada –Identify stakeholders and sectors before action is taken on these substances Quick action will be taken on substances found to no longer be in commerce in Canada “Extraction” is considered to meet the definition of manufacture under the notice Reporting of information that companies “reasonably may be expected to have access to”

12 Where do I start? Read the Notice and Guidance Document Using the list of 497 substances (by CAS#) identify: –Do I manufacture any of these substances? Includes production of the substance Includes incidental production and byproducts Manufacture includes “extraction” –Do I import any of these chemicals? Alone, in a mixture or product From outside of Canada Includes “manufactured items”

13 Who can help? Your purchasing staff may be able to help you identify which products are purchased from outside Canada e.g. products used in oilfield or process units Review Material Safety Data Sheets You may wish to consult with your suppliers outside of Canada to identify proprietary ingredients Sharing of expertise within your industry sector EC can answer questions on how to fill out the Notice, but the expertise on what to answer comes from you!

14 S.71 Notice with Respect to Selected Substances identified as Priority for Action If you meet the requirements to report (Sch. 2) –Fill in Identification and Declaration form and the survey form (as outlined in Sch. 3) in the Notice. –Send us the original! If you did not meet the requirement to report –You may wish to send us the Declaration of Non- Engagement (DNE). We will then stop sending you reminders about this Notice If you were under the threshold for reporting –You may wish to fill in the Stakeholder section on the DNE so we can keep you informed about decisions relating your substances of interest

15 Simplified S.71 Notice

16 Response To-Date (Friday April 21) Heard from >1430 companies – s, calls, DNEs or submissions Received over 440 inquiries ( or phone) –>90% completed in 1 day –May take several days to reach the inquirer Requests for presentations from 3 associations (CAPP, CPPI, CPMA)

17 Contact us at: Existing Substances Program Environment Canada T: (in Canada) or (819) F: (819) Health Canada T: (613) F: (613) semt/contaminants/exist sub/index_e.html