10th CMAS Conference Special Session on AQ Modeling Applications In Memory of Dr. Daewon Byun.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EC Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System (RAQDPS) Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario Mtg on AQ.
Advertisements

CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
A Comparative Dynamic Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modeling Systems Steven Smyth a,b, Michael Moran c, Weimin Jiang a, Fuquan Yang a,
Page 1 – July 3, 2015 Assimilation of surface chemical species observations into the Canadian GEM-MACH model using optimal interpolation Alain Robichaud,
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Science Question 3: Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction Aspects of Forecasting Alberta Thunderstorms.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Transitioning CMAQ for NWS Operational AQ Forecasting Jeff McQueen*, Pius Lee*, Marina Tsildulko*, G. DiMego*, B. Katz* R. Mathur,T. Otte, J. Pleim, J.
Modeling BC Sources and Sinks - research plan Charles Q. Jia and Sunling Gong University of Toronto and Environment 1 st annual NETCARE workshop.
Operational Air Quality and Source Contribution Forecasting in Georgia Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Muntaseer Billah, Satoru Chatani and Kengo Sudo Department of Earth and Environmental Science Graduate School of Environmental Studies Nagoya University,
CMAS Conference, October 16 – 18, 2006 The work presented here was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with partial.
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
COMPARISON OF LINK-BASED AND SMOKE PROCESSED MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS OVER THE GREATER TORONTO AREA Junhua Zhang 1, Craig Stroud 1, Michael D. Moran 1,
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Algorithms and chemical data assimilation activities at Environment Canada Chris McLinden Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada 2 nd TEMPO.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Status of the New Canadian Air Quality Forecast Model: GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran 1, Donald Talbot 2, Sylvain Ménard 2, Véronique Bouchet 1, Paul Makar 1,
Implementation of GEM-MACH10, A New Higher-Resolution Version of the Canadian Operational Air Quality Forecast Model Mike Moran 1, Sylvain Ménard 2, Radenko.
Analysis of TraceP Observations Using a 4D-Var Technique
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service Météorologique du Canada Two aspects of Environmental Information Air.
Impacts of MOVES2014 On-Road Mobile Emissions on Air Quality Simulations of the Western U.S. Z. Adelman, M. Omary, D. Yang UNC – Institute for the Environment.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Environmental Programs Models-3 Adel Hanna Carolina Environmental Program University of North Carolina.
Comparing GEM 15 km, GEM-LAM 2.5 km and RUC 13 km Model Simulations of Mesoscale Features over Southern Ontario 2010 Great Lakes Op Met Workshop Toronto,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Using Dynamical Downscaling to Project.
Evaluation of Emission Control Strategies for Regional Scale Air Quality: Performance of Direct and Surrogate Techniques Presented at the 6 th Annual CMAS.
A Comparative Performance Evaluation of the AURAMS and CMAQ Air Quality Modelling Systems Steven C. Smyth, Weimin Jiang, Helmut Roth, and Fuquan Yang ICPET,
EVALUATION OF THE CMAQ5.0 IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE CALIOPE AIR QUALITY FORECASTING SYSTEM OVER EUROPE M.T. Pay 1. J. M. Baldasano 1,2, S. Gassó.
INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT OF OZONE AND ITS SEASONAL VARIATIONS IN EUROPE Dick Derwent rdscientific 2 nd ICAP Workshop Chapel Hill, North Carolina October.
CMAS Conference 2011 Comparative analysis of CMAQ simulations of a particulate matter episode over Germany Chapel Hill, October 26, 2011 V. Matthias, A.
Evaluation and Application of AMSTERDAM: Focus on Plume In Grid Prakash Karamchandani, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Shu-Yun Chen and Rochelle Balmori Atmospheric.
Post-processing air quality model predictions of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at NCEP James Wilczak, Irina Djalalova, Dave Allured (ESRL) Jianping Huang,
Presented at the 7th Annual CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC, October 6-8, 2008 Identifying Optimal Temporal Scale for the Correlation of AOD and Ground.
WP 5 : Air Quality Forecasting Bas Mijling Ronald van der A Arjan Lampe AMFIC Progress Meeting ● Barcelona ● 24 June 2009.
A Five-Year Performance Evaluation of Environment Canada’s Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System M.D. Moran 1, J. Zhang 1, R.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Eskes, TROPOMI workshop, Mar 2008 Air Quality Forecasting in Europe Henk Eskes European ensemble forecasts: GEMS and PROMOTE Air Quality forecasts for.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
A ir Quality Research Branch Meteorological Service of Canada Environment Environnement Canada Performance Evaluation of AURAMS for Multiple Cases Michael.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
Advances in Support of the CMAQ Bidirectional Science Option for the Estimation of Ammonia Flux from Agricultural cropland Ellen Cooter U.S. EPA, National.
Assimilation of surface chemical species observations into the Canadian GEM-MACH model using optimal interpolation Alain Robichaud, Richard Ménard ASTD/ARQD.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Developing a Vision for the Next-Generation Air Quality Modeling Tools: A Few Suggestions Mike Moran Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada,
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
ADAGIO (Atmospheric Deposition Analysis Generated by optimal Interpolation from Observations): Project plans and status A.S. Cole1, A. Robichaud2, M.D.
Overview of Deterministic Computer Models
IWAQFR 2017, Toronto, Didier Davignon1
Improvements to Wintertime Particulate-Matter Forecasting with GEM-MACH15 Michael Moran1, Sylvain Ménard2 Paul Makar1, Radenko Pavlovic2, Mourad Sassi2,
Recent Updates to the Canadian Operational Regional Air Quality Deterministic Prediction System Michael Moran, Sylvie Gravel, Verica Savic-Jovcic, Alexandru.
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
10th CMAS Conference, Chapel Hill, NC 2010 October 11-13
Junhua Zhang and Wanmin Gong
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Joanna Struzewska Warsaw University of Technology
Presented by: Sophie Cousineau
Presentation transcript:

10th CMAS Conference Special Session on AQ Modeling Applications In Memory of Dr. Daewon Byun

View of NCAR Mesa Lab, Boulder, Colorado

1986 NCAR Summer Supercomputing Institute

IMA Workshop on Atmospheric Modeling March 15-19, 2000 Organizers David P. Chock Gregory R. Carmichael Ford Motor Company University of Iowa This workshop will focus on the mathematical problems which arise in the management of air quality. Presently mathematical modeling is an integral part of air quality research and management programs. Present air quality models involve complex and coupled phenomena including coupled transport, chemistry, radiative, and mass transfer process. These three-dimensional models pose great mathematical challenges, because they involve complex physical domains, highly stiff sets of equations, and large number of grids. In this workshop the focus will be on various aspects of air quality modeling, related to improving the computational quality and extended uses of air quality modeling, which can only be accomplished if significant advances are made in the models. Topics to be discussed include new techniques for solutions of stiff ODEs, new methods for solving the governing PDEs including multigrid and irregular grids; sensitivity analysis tools including automatic differentiation, and optimization and inverse modeling applications. Parallel computing, compiler tools, and visualization will also be discussed. The workshop will bring together experts in modeling, analysis, and numerical analysis.

Two Years of Operational AQ Forecasting with GEM-MACH15: A Look Back and a Look Ahead M.D. Moran 1, J. Chen 2, S. Ménard 2, R. Pavlovic 2, H. Landry 2, P.-A. Beaulieu 2, S. Gilbert 2, P.A. Makar 1, W. Gong 1, C. Stroud 1, A. Kallaur 3, A. Robichaud 3, S. Gong 1, and D. Anselmo 2 1 Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 Air Quality Modelling Applications Section, Environment Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 3 Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 10 th CMAS Conference, October 2011, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

AQHI + Canadian AQ Forecasting System Short GEM-MACH15 Overview Selected 2-Year Evaluation Results – more results in extended abstract Next Steps and Future Plans Talk Outline

Follows example of Canadian national UV index Year-round, health-based, additive, no-threshold, hourly AQ index Developed from daily time-series analysis of air pollutant concentrations and mortality data (Stieb et al., 2008) Weighted sum of NO 2, O 3, & PM 2.5 concentrations 0 to 10+ range AQHI: Canada’s National Air Quality Health Index

Primary messaging tool is the AQHI Main target is urban areas > 100,000 population GEM-MACH15 coupled AQ / Wx forecast model provides guidance on AQHI component values (NO 2, O 3, PM 2.5 ) and met fields UMOS-AQ/MIST statistical post-processing package combines GEM-MACH15 predicted AQ and met fields with previous day’s measured AQHI component values to forecast hourly AQHI component values (  large reduction in bias) Canadian AQ Forecasting System

Acronym “GEM-MACH” Stands For modèle Global Environnemental Multi-échelle – Modélisation de la qualité de l'Air et de la CHimie et / and Global Environmental Multiscale model – Modelling Air quality and CHemistry

GEM-MACH is a multi-scale chemical weather forecast model composed of dynamics, physics, and in-line chemistry modules GEM-MACH15 is a particular configuration of GEM-MACH chosen to meet EC’s operational AQ forecast needs; its key characteristics include: –limited-area-model (LAM) grid configuration for North America –15-km horizontal grid spacing, 58 vertical levels to 0.1 hPa –2-bin sectional representation of PM size distribution (i.e., and μm) with 9 chemical components –forecast species include O 3, NO 2, and PM 2.5 needed for AQHI GEM-MACH and GEM-MACH15

GEM-LAM15 is EC’s limited-area regional weather forecast model GEM-MACH15’s grid points are co-located with GEM-LAM15 grid points GEM-LAM15 supplies meteorological initial conditions and lateral boundary conditions to GEM-MACH15 GEM-LAM15 and GEM-MACH15 Grids GEM-LAM15 core grid (blue); GEM-MACH15 grid (red)

Operational GEM-MACH15 Chronology June 2009: GEM-MACH15 parallel run begins Nov. 2009: CHRONOS replaced by GEM-MACH15 Mar. 2010: New emissions files introduced with modified primary PM 2.5 spatial distribution over some Cdn provinces Oct. 2010: Piloting model changed from GEM15 to GEM-LAM15 Tomorrow: New operational version of GEM-MACH15 with new emissions

Considered 2-year period from 1 Aug to 31 July 2011 Looked at Year 1 ( ) vs. Year 2 ( ) Used archived near-real-time hourly O 3, PM 2.5, and NO 2 Canadian data from National Air Pollutant Surveillance (NAPS) network stations and hourly O 3 and PM 2.5 U.S. data from AIRNow Performed some limited screening for outliers 2-Year Performance Evaluation Results

Minimum number of available Canadian and U.S. stations in for O 3, PM 2.5, and NO 2 in the Oct.–Mar. and Apr.–Sept. periods Country/SpeciesO3O3 PM 2.5 NO 2 Canada summer Canada winter U.S. summer1,128597N/A U.S. winter N/A

Year 1 Annual Correlation (R) Values O3O3 PM 2.5 NO 2

Year 1 & Year 2 Annual Time Series Of National-Average Daily Maximum 1-h O 3 Concentrations At Canadian & U.S. Stations Cda Year 1 U.S. Year 2 U.S. Year 1 Cda Year 2

Year 1 & Year 2 Annual Time Series Of National-Average Daily Max’m 1-h PM 2.5 Concentrations At Canadian & U.S. Stations

Year 1 & Year 2 Annual Time Series Of National-Average Daily Maximum 1-h NO 2 Concentrations At Canadian Stations Cda Year 1 Cda Year 2

Regions for Model Evaluation EUSA ECANWCAN WUSA

Monthly Variation Of Regional Mean NMB For Daily Maximum PM 2.5 For 4 Regions For Full 2 Years

Other statistics can be found in extended abstract

Introduction of new operational version of GEM- MACH15 this month – Host model has been upgraded from v3.3.0 to v3.3.3 – Improved emissions based on U.S projected emissions inventory (decreased mobile and point source emissions, increased marine emissions) Upgrade of back-end computer from IBM air-cooled p5 to water-cooled p7 architecture this winter Next Steps

Average Summer NO Emissions (Ktonnes) and O 3 Concentration (ppbv) Differences emisNO Difference (V1-V2) [O3] Difference (V1-V2) V1: Operational G-M15 version (v330) V2: New G-M15 version (v333)

Migration to GEMv4 (new staggered vertical discretization, updated chemistry bus, piloting at top of limited-area grid) Further improvements to emissions files Improved process representations Improved initialization using objectively-analyzed model-measurement fields Longer forecasts (48  72+ h) Reduced grid spacing (15  ? km) Future Plans

GEM-MACH15 has been running operationally in Canada for more than two years Year-to-year performance is quite similar except for improved PM 2.5 performance in Canada due to use of improved primary PM 2.5 emissions in Year 2 New operational version being introduced this month uses 2012 projected U.S. inventory Further improvements are expected next year related to improvements in model emissions, initialization, and process representations Conclusions

Thank you for your attention