INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Water Apportionment Accord 1991, Indus River System Authority”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation made at LEAD Pakistan, Islamabad on
Advertisements

Environmental Flow Issues in Ganga Basin ByN.N.Rai Director, Hydrology Central Water Commission.
PAKISTAN POWER SECTOR BACK-GROUND, PRESENT SITUATION & FUTURE PLANS.
Transboundary Water Resources Paula Kulis Indus River
Water Resources situation in Pakistan by murtaza zulfiqar (17)
Water for Nature in the Downstream Areas DR. BASHIR AHMAD.
COMPARISON BETWEEN BHASHA AND KALABAGH DAMS By Engr. Amjad Hussain Malik Chairman Institution of Engineers, Pakistan (IEP)
PRESENTATION ON MANGLA DAM MADE BY: SYED ALI ZULQADAR. ROLL NO: 37.MAJOR: SES 5 th.
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Inter Provincial Water Distribution and the Need for Reservoirs” Rao Irshad Ali Khan Member IRSA Punjab December.
Colorado River Overview February Colorado River Overview Hydrology and Current Drought Management Objectives Law of the River Collaborative Efforts.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update November 20, 2014.
Chenab River.
“Thousands have lived without love, no one without water.”
By: Alizar Rizvi Fatima Raza VIII-A. Mangla Dam is located on the Jhelum river. Kashmir, Pakistan. It is the 16th largest dam in the world. It was built.
Water Storage, Losses And Developing underground Water Usman Chopra Usman Chopra 2008-ag ag-1916 Agronomy 7th Agronomy 7th.
Water Scenario of PAkistan
BALOCHISTAN POLITICALY DIVIDED IN TO THREE STATES (P.I.A) STATE AREA PAKISTAN 347,000. Sq Km PAKISTAN 347,000. Sq Km IRAN 280,000. Sq Km IRAN 280,000.
Interprovincial Water Cooperation for Sharing Shortages
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 8, 2011.
COMBATING WATER CRISIS Challenges & Opportunities Mushtaq Ahmad Gill (T.I.) Executive Director South Asian Conservation Agriculture Network (SACAN)
MINISTRY OF WATER & POWER FEDERAL FLOOD COMMISSION FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN JULY 12, 2012 FLOOD MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN JULY 12, 2012.
Safe Drinking Water Permit and Capacity Requirements Developer Services Summit November 16, 2010 Engineering - Asset Planning Vince Monaco.
Flood Management Architecture In Pakistan Ashfaq Mahmood.
RIVERS OF PAKISTAN INDUS JHELUM CHENAB RAVI SUTLEJ BEAS WESTERN RIVERS EASTERN RIVERS AFGHANISTAN INDIA IRAN.
Boise River Accounting Liz Cresto February 26, 2013.
Eastern Snake River Plain Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan (CAMP) Progress Report ESHMC January 13, 2009.
Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015 Managing the Colorado River during Drought.
We closed our last lecture seeing that the Indo-Pak subcontinent historical basis created a multi- cultural and socially diversified society with strong.
Diversion of Flood Water from Ganga at Kanpur.  Introduction  Study Area  Flow Pattern of Ganga at Kanpur  Quantification of Divertible Flood  Downstream.
LINING IMPACT ON WATER LOSSES IN WATERCOURSES Dr. M. Arshad Dr. Q. Zaman Dr. A. Madani.
Assessment and planning of the water resources under various scenarios in the Ganges and Indus basin: Glaciers contribution and WEAP modelling Devaraj.
Nishesh Mehta 27 th March Geography Originates in China India – upstream Pakistan – Downstream Main tributaries Ravi Jhelam Sutlej Chenab Beas.
WATER RESOURCES OF PAKISTAN
IMPACT OF 18th AMENDMENTS ON ENERGY SECTOR GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
1 Water Resources Management - DEQ’s Role in Water Supply - State Water Commission October 1, 2002.
By Pervaiz Amir (GWP) Building Resilience through sustainable management of Mountain Water Resources and closing the gap between policy and implementation.
Water Resources in the Indus-Gangetic Basin
ICAP SAFA Conference 2016 South Asia: Corridor of Opportunities Lahore, January 30, 2016 Mirza Hamid Hasan.
THE INDUS BASIN – AN OVERVIEW
Negotiations and Agreements Between Ganges River Basin Riparians Khalid Khan Khalid Saifullah Muhammad Arif Goheer.
IMPACT OF FUTURE WATER USES OF AFGHANISTAN ON PAKISTAN 26 Augist 2015.
Urban Water Institute Colorado River Lower Basin Issues Tanya Trujillo Colorado River Board of California February 10, 2016.
1991 Water Accord Issue— Water Sharing. 2 Provisions Of 1991 Water Accord.
CRFS Technical Committee Fall Meeting LC Operations Update December 8, 2015.
IDPs Hosting Areas and Functional Camps Beginning of Monsoon And Monsoon Contingency Plan.
PRESS BRIEFING WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY December 16, 2005 MEGA DAM PROJECTS.
The Azerbaijani Republic The Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources WATER RESOURCES OF AZERBAIJAN, THEIR MANAGEMENT AND BILATERAL AGREEMENTS Matanat.
Reclamation and Hoover Dam It’s All About The Water.
Naseer Ahmad Gillani FIE. Threats Glaciers Depletion Water Pollution Siltation In Mega dams Increasing Water Deficit Water Sharing Issues Climate.
Mahakali. Sarada Agreement 1920 sharing of the Mahakali River India exchanged 4000 acres of land for 2898 acres of land of Nepal Maintenance, Operation,
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update November 14, 2012.
CRFS Technical Meeting LC Operations Update March 27, 2014.
CLIMATE CHANGE AND WATER RESOURCES OF PAKISTAN
POTENTIAL FOR IMPROVEMENT IN CONJUNCTIVE MANAGEMENT OF SURFACE AND GROUND WATER SUPPLIES IN IBIS Muhammad Basharat, IWASRI-WAPDA,
KALABAGH DAM PROJECT General Reservations of Provinces on KBD Feasibility PROJECT BY RABIA RASHEED SHEHRBANO AKBAR ZIL-E-HUMA AKBAR.
Yuma Agriculture Water - Rights and Supply Terry Fulp Director, Lower Colorado Region Yuma Agriculture Water Conference January 13, 2016.
CRFS Technical Committee Spring Meeting LC Operations Update March 15, 2016.
Ayesha Khan Marina Hafza
Nepal’s Water Resources at a Glance
The Indus River WATER Basin Dispute
WELCOME!. AISHA BAWANY ACADEMY GIRLS MATRIC SECTION ISA PROJECT IN COLLABORATION WITH BRITISH COUNCIL.
Beijing-Yichang-Wuhan, Peoples Republic of China
INDUS BASIN CHALLENGE – THE NEED FOR A COLLECTIVE RESPONSE
INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Inter Provincial Water Issues − Challenges and Opportunities ”
HYDRO ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS BY Prabhakaran.T AP/MECH
Rivers of Pakistan By Ayesha, Noori, Emaan.
MUHAMMAD SAQIB ag-2004 B. Sc. (Hons
Selection of Site for Hydrokinetic
KASHMIR DISPUTE And Water Dispute
Presentation transcript:

INDUS RIVER SYSTEM AUTHORITY (IRSA) “Water Apportionment Accord 1991, Indus River System Authority” University of Agriculture Faisalabad January 10, 2011

Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991 The Water Agreements Indus Waters Treaty 1960 Water Apportionment Accord 1991

Inter-provincial Water Dispute The Inter-provincial dispute on Water Distribution was initiated during the construction of two mega Irrigation Projects i.e. Sutlej Valley Canal Project 1932 Sukkur Barrage 1935

Committees / commissions 1937 Anderson Committee 1945 Rau Commission 1968 Akhtar Hussain Committee 1970 Fazal-e-Akbar Committee 1976 Indus Waters Commission (Anwar-ul-Haq Commission) 1983 Haleem Commission 1991 Water Accord

Indus Tarbela Jhelum Chenab Mangla Kabul Ravi Sutlej C-J Chashma T-P NWFP CRBC C-J Chashma T-P Balochistan Canals Legend Rim Stations: Indus @ Tarbela Kabul @ Nowshera Jhelum @ Mangla Chenab @ Marala Sindh Barrages Punjab Barrages Reservoirs Major Rivers 6 6

Water Apportionment Accord (WAA) was signed amongst the Provinces on 16.03.1991 and approved by the Council of Common Interests (CCI) on 21.03.1991 Total Paras 14 Paras on distribution 03 Development Paras 06 Escapages d/s Kotri 01 Others 04 Under Clause 13 of the WAA ’91, the need to establish an Indus River System Authority was recognized and accepted for the implementation of the Accord. Contd.....

IRSA was established vide Act No IRSA was established vide Act No. XXII of 1992 passed by the Parliament and approved by the President of Pakistan on, the 6th December 1992; One of the prime responsibilities of IRSA is the regulation and distribution of surface waters amongst the Provinces according to the allocation and policies spelt out in the Water Accord 1991; To Settle any question that may arise between two or more Provinces in respect of distribution of river and reservoir waters; Contd…

Any question in respect of. implementation of Water Accord shall Any question in respect of implementation of Water Accord shall be settled by the Authority by the votes of the majority of members and in case of an equality of votes the Chairman shall have a casting vote ; A Provincial Government or the Water and Power Development Authority may, if aggrieved by any decision of the Authority, make a reference to the Council of Common Interests (CCI). 9

PROVISIONS OF WATER ACCORD 1991 PERTAINING TO DISTRIBUTION OF WATER

Para 14 (b) The record of actual average system uses for the period 1977-82, would form the guide line for developing a future regulation pattern. These ten daily uses would be adjusted pro-rata to correspond to the indicated seasonal allocations of the different canal systems and would form the basis for sharing shortages and surpluses on all Pakistan basis.

Para 14 (b) (MAF) Province MAF % Punjab 54.51 53.06 Sindh 43.53 42.37 Balochistan 1.63 1.59 KPK 3.06 2.98 Total 102.73 100.00

Para 2 Province Kharif Rabi Total Punjab 37.07 18.87 55.94 Sindh * In the light of the accepted water distributional principles, the following apportionment was agreed to: (MAF) Province Kharif Rabi Total Punjab 37.07 18.87 55.94 Sindh * 33.94 14.82 48.76 NWFP (a) 3.48 2.30 5.78 (b) Civil Canals ** 1.80 1.20 3.00 Balochistan 2.85 1.02 3.87 77.34 37.01 114.35 + * Including already sanctioned Urban and Industrial uses for Metropolitan Karachi. ** Un-gauged Civil Canals above the rim stations.

Comparison of Para 2 vs Para 14 (b) (MAF) Province Para 2 Para 14 (b) Difference MAF % MAF (2-4) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Punjab 55.94 48.92 54.51 53.06 1.43 12 Sindh 48.76 42.64 43.53 42.37 5.23 45 Baloch: 3.87 3.38 1.63 1.59 2.24 19 KPK 5.78 5.06 3.06 2.98 2.72 24 Total 114.35 100.00 102.73 11.62 100

Para 4 Balance river supplies (including flood supplies and future storages) shall be distributed as below: Punjab 37 % Sindh 37 % KPK 14 % Balochistan 12 % Total 100 % 15

Present Distribution Mechanism of IRSA (THREE TIER FORMULA SINCE 2003) Scenario I Water Availability < Actual Average System Uses 77-82 Distributed as per 14 (b) of the WAA 1991 Scenario II Water Availability > Actual Average System Uses 77-82 but < Para 2 of WAA 1991 Actual Average System Uses are protected Balance available as per Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI Scenario III Water Availability > Para 2 of WAA 1991 Para 2 i.e. 10-daily approved by CCI are protected Balance as per Para 4 of the WAA 1991 Note: KPK & Balochistan are exempted from shortages 16

Para 6 The need for storages, wherever feasible on the Indus and other rivers was admitted and recognised by the participants for planned future agricultural development. 17

Total Western & Eastern River Western & Eastern Inflows & D/S Kotri Post Tarbela Average (1976.77 to 2009.10) (MAF) Max Min Avg Western River Indus @ Kalabagh 112.18 66.81 89.71 Jhelum + Chenab 64.69 29.70 48.68 Total 176.87 96.51 138.39 Eastern River Ravi @ Balloki 10.95 0.29 4.23 Sutlej @ Sulemanki 10.62 0.01 2.59 21.57 0.30 6.82 Total Western & Eastern River 198.44 96.81 145.21 D/S Kotri 91.86 30.67 D/S Kotri (Apr 1, 2010 to Jan 6, 2011) 54.42

Provincial Canal Head Wdls (Post Independence to to-date) Year Canal Withdrawals (MAF) 1947 69.1 1965 88.4 1967-76 (Post-Mangla) 96.0 1977-82 (Post-Tarbela) 105.0 1990-1999 107.0 2000-2009 93.5 19

Reservoir Sedimentation (MAF) Designed Live Storage Present Live Storage Sedimentation % Tarbela 9.68 6.77 2.91 30 Mangla 5.34 *4.54 0.80 15 Chashma 0.77 0.263 0.51 66 Total 15.79 11.573 4.22 27 20 * Excluding raising component. After raising additional 2.99 MAF would be available

Historical vis-à-vis Present Peaks at Different Rivers/Barrages Since 1947 (Cs) Reservoir/ Barrage Designed Capacity Historical Peak /Year Present Peak /Date Remarks Tarbela 15,00,000 510,000 (89) 607,000/(30/07) Exceptional Nowshera 138,000 (06) 400,000 (30/07) Attock 6,70,000 (58) 11,94,600 (30/07) Kalabagh 9,50,000 8,62,000 (76) 9,36,000 (30/07) Chashma 7,86,600 (76) 10,38,874 (1/8) Taunsa 11,00,000 7,89,000 (58) 9,60,000 (2/8) Guddu 12,00,000 11,99,672 (76) 11,48,200 (8/8) Sukkur 11,66,574 (86) 11,24,720 (9/8) Kotri 8,75,000 9,80,329 (56) 9,39,442 (27/8) 21

Issues 22

Presently, due to sedimentation heavy shortages are being faced by the provinces during Late Rabi (March) as well as Early Kharif (Apr – Jun) periods (Creating provincial disharmony); Reservoirs normally touch the dead level in Late February & March (Critical period for Wheat maturity); Lean flows / erratic flows are being experienced in Early Kharif (Disturbing the sowing of Cotton Crops); The present storage component does not cater for the requirements of Existing Irrigation Infrastructure; Storage, as envisaged under Para 6 of the Accord, should be constructed on war footing basis; No feasible site at Chenab; Mangla has already been raised; Only Indus waters can be stored at different locations Contd…

Storages are required to reverse the 70 – 30 % ratio; Pakistan Hydel Generation Potential is 65,000 MW Storage for managing the floods; India total storage of 81 reservoirs is 151.77 BCM; (123 MAF) Indian Hydel Generation 37,000 MW (Potential 84044 MW) Period Hydel Thermal & Others 80’s 70 % 30 % 90’s to to-date

THANK YOU