PHEOS PSRR PSRR Objectives: Show that all system requirements have been defined and are traceable to top level science objectives. Further, all requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Performance and Operations Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Advertisements

Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
ESA SSA Programme Objective:
Resolution Resolving power Measuring of the ability of a sensor to distinguish between signals that are spatially near or spectrally similar.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
PHEOS PSRR Concept of Operations. 2 Scope The purpose of the PCW-UVI Concept of Operations (ConOps) is to communicate how mission systems will operate,
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
1 08 January 2015 Stephen Horan Cube Quest Kick-off: Communications Rules PI for Avionics Space Technology Mission Directorate.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
May 15, 2013 Space Weather Product Team (SWPT) Making Sense of the Nonsensical.
EVM-2 Notice of Partnership Questions and Answers January 23, 2015.
Data Processing and User Software Ken Ebisawa (Astro-E2 GOF) presentation and demonstration.
1ESDIS HDF-EOS Workshop IV Landover, Maryland, September 20, 2000 The Landsat 7 Processing System ( LPS ) Level Zero-R Science Products Michael R. Reid.
The Field Camera Unit Project definition, organization, planning S. Scuderi INAF – Catania.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Operations Concept Richard Saylor Jr. HTSI/Code 444 August 16-17, 2005.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Data Management Subsystem Jeff Valenti (STScI). DMS Context PRDS - Project Reference Database PPS - Proposal and Planning OSS - Operations Scripts FOS.
Aquarius Project Status 7 th Aquarius/SAC-D Science Team Meeting 11 April 2012.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
MG 1/10/01 1 PCS SMOV-3B Review Objectives Overview Activity Descriptions Requirements.
October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Use of GIS Methodology for Online Urban Traffic Monitoring German Aerospace Center Institute of Transport Research M. Hetscher S. Lehmann I. Ernst A. Lippok.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
DSL Distributed Systems Laboratory ATC 23 August Model Mission: Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission Goal “To study the microphysics of three.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
Page 1JSOC Peer Review 17Mar2005 HMI & AIA JSOC Architecture Science Team Forecast Centers EPO Public Catalog Primary Archive HMI & AIA Operations House-
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
ATT Contribution to GEO Archive Task Team WGISS – 22 Sep 11 – 15, 2006 Annapolis, USA.
SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE Operated for NASA by AURA SMOV4 Requirements Review Cosmic Origins Spectrograph Scott D. Friedman STScI 30 July 2003.
VIIRS Product Evaluation at the Ocean PEATE Frederick S. Patt Gene C. Feldman IGARSS 2010 July 27, 2010.
1 MAVEN PFP ICDR May 23-25, 2011 Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission Particles and Fields Science Critical Design Review May ,
THEMIS/GBO 1 Banff, March 29, 2006 Agenda – GBO Review.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
1 Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite Daryl Swade Archive Team Meeting June 16, 2014.
Dec 1, FIELDS Top Level Requirements Review S. Harris (UCB)
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Use of the Moon as a calibration reference for NPP VIIRS Frederick S. Patt, Robert E. Eplee, Robert A. Barnes, Gerhard Meister(*) and James J. Butler NASA.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
Zou Ziming 1 Ma Wenzhen Li Lei Zhao Hua Wang Chi 1: Center for Space Science and Applied Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Moscow ·
GIST, Boulder, 31/03/2004 RMIB GERB Processing: overview and status S. Dewitte Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium.
From Missions to Measurements: an Ocean Discipline Experience.
Interactions: atmosphere EG2234 Earth Observation.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Charles Acton NAIF Manager JPL July 18, 2007
TEMPO Instrument Update
I&T&C Organization Chart
Svom Ground-segment Meeting CNES
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Mission Planning Updates
TEMPO Instrument Update
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Measurements of the Moon by CLARREO Pathfinder and ARCSTONE
Jesper Schou Instrument Scientist
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
HMI Top Level Requirements
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

PHEOS PSRR PSRR Objectives: Show that all system requirements have been defined and are traceable to top level science objectives. Further, all requirements can either be met with the baseline design (or compliance issues have been identified).

PHEOS PSRR Mission Systems and Requirements

3 Mission Systems

Physical Payload – Twin camera system – Electronics – Cabling Baseline design to be discussed this afternoon 4 Instrument System

Science Operations Centre is responsible for Primary Mission Management, this includes; Interfacing with PCW Ground Systems Command generation and telemetry processing Raw (instrument) data processing (through Level 0) Level 0 data relay to Science Data Centre Mission operations (includes instrument health/safety and performance monitoring, payload performance trending, anomaly detection & resolution, procedure development, payload resource accounting, special operations planning) Interface with engineers regarding trending results Mission scheduling and planning Image Registration monitoring operations (alignment) Routine inflight instrument calibration support and Product Monitoring Instrument raw data temporary storage (relay to SDC) Spacecraft telemetry data archive and remote access to telemetry 5 Science Operations Centre

Subsystems – Product Monitor (likely linked to SDC) Automated display systems for Level 1B data produced by the SDC – Telemetry Monitor Automated display (and alarm) systems for instrument health and safety data – Instrument Simulator Enable verification of payload command structures and format Flight operations procedure development and validation (routine and contingency) End-To-End testing of procedures – Telemetry Data Archive Provide open access to all instrument health data for trending analysis and engineering support – Temporary Archive Staging of Level 0 data for SDC 6 Science Operations Centre

Science Data Centre is responsible for Data Product Management, this includes; Interfacing with Science Operations Centre Product Generation (Level 1b through Level 3) – Perform radiometric calibration and image correction – Integrate PCW satellite attitude and pointing information to product geographic reference grids for each image – Integration of images from both spacecraft Maintain Calibration Database Monitor Instrument Calibration – Analyze on-orbit calibration and contribute to calibration procedures and scheduling Product Distribution – Maintain an open access data archive of all data products – Maintain targeted access for specific user groups (if required) For example, customized rsync access or movie generation Design and Maintain End User Software – For example, mapping programs based on standard PCW-UVI data products. These would be targeted to the scientific community to increase the usability of the PCW-UVI data Respond to end user requests for data products and/or support Copy data to an off-site backup (likely WestGrid) 7 Science Data Centre

Calibration and Characterization System is responsible for; Providing Sufficient Information to Enable the Generation of Data Products (Level 1b through Level 3) – Perform radiometric calibration – Flat field characterization – Point spread function characterization – Image distortion map – System filter response – Dark count characterization Instrument Calibration and Characterization Procedure Development – Pre-flight – On-orbit Development of Instrument Interface Software for Ground Calibration Command and Control Sequences for On-Orbit Calibration Modes – Interface with SOC to test and validate procedures Distribute Calibration Information to SOC and SDC 8 Calibration and Characterization

9 Requirement Flow

There are no orphaned requirements. Each requirement is applicable to only one mission system. Each MRD can be traced back to a Measurement Need in the Science Objectives and User Needs Document. In a lot of cases (particularly with the requirements on the instrument systems) we have had to use PCW information as well. For example, 10 Traceability MN1. Global Auroral ImagesPCW CoO + CSA

11 Requirement Traced From: Measurement/Da ta Need CDRL SC1 Section No. Addresses Objective Mission Component MRD8. The FOV of the LBH-S and LBH-L image channels shall be 20 degrees ±1 degree. MN1. Global Auroral Images / PCW CoO CDRLSC Op.Obj.1 Sci.Obj.1 Sci.Obj.2 Sci.Obj.3 IS MRD9. The Field of View (FOV) of the LBH-S and LBH-L image channels shall be sufficiently similar to co-register data from both channels without re-binning. MN1. Global Auroral Images /MN4. Energy and flux CDRLSC Sci.Obj.1 Sci.Obj.2 Sci.Obj.3 IS Traceability For each MRD, we have included the Measurement/Data Need that it is derived from, the section of CDRL SC1 that discusses the topic, the Mission Objective that the MRD is applicable to, and the mission component to which applies.

There are 10 MRDs that are not derivable from the Science Objectives and User Needs Document. – ALL of these relate to extended imaging duration, data distribution, resource allocation, or product assurance requirements – none of which are discussed in CDRL SC1. – Data distribution requirements are expected to evolve as the mission progresses, but we have included our intentions in the current MRD. – We are still investigating the conjugate imaging possibilities.... Since the orbit space is wide open, there are a lot of options. 12 Traceability

Data Product Content and Levels Image Attribute, Content and Quality Requirements Imaging Operation Requirements Spatial Coverage Spatial and Temporal Resolution Spectral Requirements Extended Duration Imaging Product Data Latency Processing and Distribution Archiving Requirements Data Sharing and Ground Segment Considerations Calibration, Validation and Characterization Requirements Launch Window Requirements 13 Mission Requirements

14 Data Product Content and Levels Data Product Spatial Resolution (km) [target/threshold] Accuracy [target/threshold] Detection Threshold [target/threshold] Luminosity of the LBH-S ( mn) aurora 30/40km nadir 15/30% [TBC]20/100R Luminosity of the LBH-L ( mn) aurora 30/40km nadir 15/30% [TBC]20/100R Auroral Characteristic Electron Energy 30/100km nadir ---- Auroral Electron Energy Flux 30/100km nadir

15 Data Product Content and Levels Level 0 Raw data after packet reconstruction, in chronological sequence for each imager operating in imaging mode. Level 1b Level 0 data with radiometric corrections applied, time referenced and annotated with ancillary information (e.g. space craft location, calibration version, etc.) Level 3-1 Level 1 data mapped onto a uniform geographic grid using pixels from the spacecraft with the highest spatial resolution. Data will be time referenced (at full temporal resolution) and annotated with ancillary satellite information (e.g. satellite pixel contributions. Level 3-2 Level 1 data mapped onto a uniform geomagnetic grid using pixels from the spacecraft with the highest spatial resolution. Data will be time referenced (at full temporal resolution) and annotated with ancillary satellite information (e.g. satellite pixel contributions. Level 3-3 Derived product. Auroral energy flux and average energy (as a function of geographic location) computed using level3-1. Level3-GNSS Probability of GNSS interruption as a function of geographic location (derived based on Level3-1). Level3-EPOGlobal Auroral Images (based on Level3-1) in various map projections targeted for public use. Data processing level designations are based on the Earth Observing Science Data Information System (EOSDIS) data definitions (see NASA’s Earth Observing Science Data Resource document for a more complete description).

16 Spatial Coverage PCW-UVI Area of Interest (AoI) Target  o Geomagnetic Threshold  o Geomagnetic 100% coverage, 24/7 The S/C pointing and orbit are the largest factor in attaining this. MRD19. PCW-UVI shall provide data products for the contiguous Northern auroral zone between the geomagnetic latitudes of 45 (target of 40) and 90 degrees.

17 Spatial Coverage The orbit space for PCW is wide open... We assumed that apogee would be maintained at a constant altitude over the Yellowknife meridian and that both S/C are in the same orbital plane.

18 Spatial Coverage

19 Image Attribute, Content and Quality Requirements 20 degree field of view (MRD8), for both channels (MRD9) Same image scene and resolution (MRD10) Image distortion and PSF minimized (MRD11) **Stray light minimized** (MRD12.1) with a solar exclusion angle of 25 degrees (MRD12.2) Saturation limit of 30kR, and detection threshold of 20R (MRD13) Dynamic range of 1500 (MRD14) SNR of greater than 1 (target of 2) at detection threshold and lowest imaging frequency (MRD15) MRDs 12,13,14 and 15 apply to all imaging conditions (including the sunlit portion of the Earth)

20 Spatial and Temporal Resolution MRD20. Image frames shall be acquired by UVI-IS at a minimum frequency of 0.05Hz (20 s images). MRD21. Image frames may be acquired at integration times from 1s to 60s. The nominal maximum integration time will be 19s, however the additional 41 s shall provide for margin. MRD22. Image frames shall be acquired with a minimum ground sampling distance of 40 km at nadir (target of 30 km). MRD23. If sub-exposure (sub-images) are utilized it shall be possible to acquire sub-images with an integration time from 0.1 s to 60 s. The nominal sub-image integration time may be 0.1 s to provide maximum performance, however with reduced performance the instrument shall be able to acquire a sub-image with an integration time up to 60s. This provides margin to reduce or remove the use of subframes for image acquisition.

21 Spectral Requirements MRD26. The instrument shall provide coverage over two adjacent spectral channels, and implemented as follows; MRD26.1. The full width half maximum wavelength for LBH-S channel shall be 140 nm (+/- 2 nm) to 160 nm (+/- 2 nm) MRD26.2. The full width half maximum wavelength for LBH-L channel shall be 160 nm (+/- 2 nm) to 180 nm (+/- 2 nm) MRD26.3. The response of the system at wavelengths greater than 350 nm shall be 10E-10 of the maximum in-band response for the both image channels. MRD26.5. The spectral overlap of the two channels should be minimized MRD27. UVI-IS shall acquire temporally synchronized LBH-S ( nm) and LBH-L ( nm) images. Synchronization shall occur to within at least 1% of the exposure time (for a nominal 20 s exposure, images will be synchronized to within 0.2 s).

22 Requirements on Mission Systems MRD42.1. PCW-UVI shall be calibrated prior to launch. Calibration shall be sufficient to enable the target accuracy requirements in table 1. The allocation to the ground calibration process is 50% of the value in table 1 [TBC]. [Requirement coupled to MRD42.2] MRD43. UVI-IS shall be characterized prior to launch. At a minimum the following parameters shall be determined; spectral bandpass, system throughput, image field distortion, point spread function across the image field, and thermal response. MRD46. The PCW-UVI system should be capable of on-orbit calibration (for example, using stellar sources or low Earth orbit satellite underpasses). Calibration Systems