David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 1 / 15 David P. Lusch, Ph.D. Distinguished Senior Research Specialist Michigan State University Dept. of Geography, Remote Sensing & GIS Research and Outreach Services Group Institute of Water Research Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process and Using the WWA Tool for Planning and Watershed Management and

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 2 / 15 Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management The Great Lakes Compact: why Michigan is regulating large-quantity water withdrawals Brief review of Michigan Water Law Tutorial on some key hydrologic terms and concepts

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 3 / 15 Michigan Water Rights –Part of the “bundle of legal rights” enjoyed by a property owner. –Most water rights are not absolute; rather, they are qualified rights, subject to the reasonable use doctrine, the correlative rights rule and, possibly, other restrictions. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 4 / 15 Reasonable use doctrine –Permits a landowner to make use of water on, adjacent to, or under their property, so long as such use does not 1) unreasonably interfere with the rights of adjacent or neighboring landowners to the reasonable use of water from their property, 2) decrease the value of the adjacent or neighboring land for legitimate uses, and Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 5 / 15 Reasonable use doctrine –Permits a landowner to make use of water on, adjacent to, or under their property, so long as such use does not 3) unreasonably impair the quality of the water leaving their property. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 6 / 15 Reasonable use balancing test –Is a case-specific inquiry, with three underlying principles: Ensure a “fair participation” in the use of water for the greatest number of users. Only protect a use that is reasonable. Will only redress unreasonable harms. A plaintiff must be able to demonstrate that the defendant’s use of the water interfered with the plaintiff’s own reasonable use to a substantial degree. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 7 / 15 Correlative rights rule –Holds that in addition to being reasonable, water use must also be prorated among all users during times of shortage, depending on the type of use. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 8 / 15 Michigan Groundwater Rights –“… in order to recognize the interconnected nature of water sources and fully integrate the law applicable to water disputes, we adopt the reasonable use balancing test first stated in Dumont v Kellogg, 29 Mich 420 (1874) as the law applicable to disputes between riparian [i.e., surface water] and groundwater users.” Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management State of Michigan Court of Appeals ruling of November 29, 2005 in the case of Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation, R. and B. Doyle, and J. and S. SAPP v Nestle Waters North America Inc.

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 9 / 15 Recent Water use legislation – PAs 33 – 37, 2006 – PAs 179 – 190, 2008 – Build upon existing surface water and groundwater common law Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 10 / 15 PA 33 ( 2006) –Except as authorized by the public health code (1978 PA 368, MCL to ), a local unit of government shall not enact or enforce an ordinance that regulates a large quantity withdrawal. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 11 / 15 New legal terms – Withdrawal The removal of water from its source (surface water or groundwater) for any purpose, other than for hydroelectric generation at sites certified, licensed, or permitted by the federal energy regulatory commission. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 12 / 15 New legal terms – Large quantity withdrawal One or more cumulative total withdrawals of over 100,000 gallons of water per day average in any consecutive 30-day period that supply a common distribution system. 100,000 gpd = 70 gpm pumping capacity Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 13 / 15 New legal terms – Increased large quantity withdrawal an increase of over 100,000 gpd average in any consecutive 30-day period beyond the baseline capacity of a withdrawal. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 14 / 15 New legal terms – Baseline capacity means either: The withdrawal capacity as reported in the April 1, 2007 annual report or water use conservation plan, or The system capacity used or developed to make a withdrawal on July 9, 2008, included in an annual report, or The highest annual amount of water withdrawn as reported under this part for calendar year 2002, 2003, 2004, or 2005, if the withdrawal does not report. Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management

David P. Lusch, Ph.D. 15 / 15 The next segment – Hydrology Tutorial Michigan’s Water Withdrawal Assessment Process for Planning and Watershed Management