THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Opportunities for RAC Participation. Three Part discussion General presentation; Example of oil and gas decision making; and Panel Discussion of RAC involvement.
Purpose of the Standards
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Financial Intermediaries and Resettlement Planning Instruments.
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Ohio Historic Preservation Office
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Dean McMath Regional Environmental Programs Manager FAA – Southwest Region NEPA Essentials Selected Special.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
ADS 204 – Environmental Procedures. EA Training Course Tellus Institute 2 USAID ADS 204  Authority  Objective è Environmental sustainability.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Mitigation and Impact management
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
1 1 CEQA Scoping Naomi Feger Planning TMDL Section Leader Region 2.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM t Selection and Employment of Consultants Negotiations with Consultants; Monitoring Performance of Consultants; Resolving Disputes.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
BLM Decision Making Process
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Standards and Certification Training
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved

What follows is a presentation text in PowerPoint format. It is being presented that way because the staff of the Tennessee State Historic Preservation Office’s Review and Compliance Section believes you will be able to absorb more of the message of the presentation in this format than if it were presented as a printed text. As such, this presentation lacks much of the “punch” of a normal PowerPoint presentation. But since we are not there to narrate all the needed information for you, this is the best way to transmit the information you need to complete Section 106 review swiftly and successfully.

WHAT ARE THE THE FOUR STEPS IN THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS

Tennessee State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) review of Federal undertakings under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act can be as much as a four step process. The Federal Agency must: A.Initiate Section 106 Review, B.Identify historic properties, C.Assess project effects, and D.Resolve adverse effects.

Step One: Initiate Section 106 review

a) Establish whether the project, program, or activity is an undertaking subject to Section 106 review b) Identify the appropriate SHPO c) Plan to involve the public d) Identify other consulting parties as defined at 36 CFR 800.2

Step Two: Identify historic properties

a) Determine scope of efforts b) Identify historic properties c) Evaluate historic significance

Step Three: Assess effects

a)Apply the Criteria of Adverse Effect found at 36 CFR 800.5

Step Four: Resolve adverse effects

a) Continue Consultation to Resolve Adverse Effects

WHO BEGINS THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS?

THE FEDERAL AGENCY OFFICIAL

36 CFR 800.2(A) AGENCY OFFICIAL. It is the statutory obligation of the Federal agency to fulfill the requirements of Section 106 and to ensure that an Agency Official with jurisdiction over an undertaking takes legal and financial responsibility for Section 106 compliance in accordance with 36 CFR through.7. The Agency Official has approval authority for the undertaking and can commit the Federal agency to take appropriate action for a specific undertaking as a result of Section 106 compliance. The Agency Official has the authority to commit the Federal agency to any obligation it may assume in the implementation of a program alternative. The Agency Official may be a State, local, or tribal government official who has been delegated legal responsibility for compliance with Section 106 in accordance with Federal law.

WHAT ARE THE FEDERAL AGENCY OFFICIAL’S SECTION 106 RESPONSIBILITIES?

To complete the appropriate number of steps in the Section 106 process relative to a specific undertaking promptly and successfully and in consultation with the Tennessee SHPO and other consulting parties.

To do so, Federal Agency Officials and applicants for Federal assistance must make informed decisions about: 1)Lists of Consulting Parties (36 CFR 800.2). 2)The Undertaking’s Areas of Potential Effects (36 CFR 800.4). 3)National Register of Historic Places eligibility (36 CFR 800.4). 4)Project effects upon Historic Properties (36 CFR 800.5). 5)Resolution of adverse effects (36 CFR 800.5).

HOW?

Agency Official consultation with the SHPO : 1)Helps define the Consulting Party list. 2)Helps define Areas of Potential Effects. 3)Helps make consensus determinations of National Register eligibility/non-eligibility. 4)Helps make consensus findings of project effects. 5)Helps make consensus resolutions of adverse effects.

Agency Official Consultation With All Consulting Parties is Successful Risk Management Consultation transfers part of the risk associated with Section 106 review to CONSULTING PARTIES

SECTION 106 CONSULTATION RUNS THROUGH THE ENTIRE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR EACH FEDERAL UNDERTAKING

WHAT ARE THE STANDARD STAGES OF FEDERAL PROJECT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT?

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP ONE Feasibility Analysis – When considering a Federal undertaking, the agency official should consult with the appropriate SHPO to determine whether there are possible effects to historic properties and consider the appropriateness of early consultation with other consulting parties in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP ONE – STEP TWO Project Planning – Agency officials should structure their project timelines and scopes of work to allow for ongoing Section 106 consultation covering existing conditions within the undertaking’s Area of Potential Effects, the overall plan for the proposed undertaking, and the existence of historic properties within the APE. If there is consensus that no historic properties will be affected, the SHPO will formally notify THE Agency Official or applicant that the Section 106 review process has been completed successfully. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP TWO – STEP THREE Conceptual Design – If the Area of Potential Effects contains historic properties, and as an agency official consults concerning the potential undertaking’s concept designs, the SHPO and other consulting parties should consult to identify the effects that those design options may have on the character- defining features and significant spaces within any identified historic properties. Agency officials should also continue consultation to keep the development of the undertaking on schedule, especially for those projects that involve new construction or substantial alteration. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT : STEP THREE- STEP FOUR Conceptual Design – If a historic property may be adversely affected by the undertaking, an agreement documenting the agency’s commitments to avoid, minimize, or mitigate such effects should be executed by the end of this phase, in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. If there is consensus that the undertaking will not adversely affect any historic property, the SHPO will formally notify the agency official that Section 106 review has been completed successfully. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP FOUR Design Development – As the agency official works through design development, the SHPO and other affected consulting parties should attend milestone project meetings to ensure that the design will comply with the agreement previously reached. Continuing consultation with the SHPO and other consulting parties will keep the undertaking on schedule, especially for those undertakings that include new construction or substantial alteration. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP FOUR Construction – As remediation, excavation, and selective demolition plans are drafted, along with other design documents, the SHPO and other affected consulting parties should attend regular milestone walking tours of the in-progress work at the historic property with the agency official, architects, engineers, and contractors. Special inspection tours may be necessary to ensure protection of significant character defining features of an historic property. Design specifications should be provided to the SHPO and consulting parties before any such tours. The SHPO and consulting parties should be given the opportunity to review and comment on any change orders promptly, as appropriate, and should be consulted with regard to unanticipated conditions that may require revising a design already reviewed and approved. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT: INTEGRATED DESIGN MANAGEMENT: STEP FOUR Completion – Before final project close-out and agency official signoff, the SHPO and other consulting parties should attend a special tour to identify any concerns and confirm compliance with the agreement document. ACHP, Sustainability and Historic Federal Buildings, 2011

Following these consultative procedures for each planning and development stage of the project leads to prompt and successful Section 106 review.

END OF INTRODUCTION