19 th Annual Plus International Conference Primary Liability for Secondary Actors David H. Kistenbroker Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP 525 West Monroe Street.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Common set of standards for U.S. accounting Not laws, but nearly treated as such Developed primarily by Financial.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Enron – Shareholders Aaron Palmer Seyoung Park. Shareholders Common shareholders - saw their holdings dwindle to almost nothing Employees - lost 401(k)
Regulation FD Adopted and became effective on 23 October 2000.
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | ATTORNEYS AT LAW | ©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. Application of the Federal Securities Laws.
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OFFERINGS UNDER THE JOBS ACT GEORGE LEE LEE & STONE LLP June 25, 2012 copyright 2012 Lee & Stone LLP.
Chapter Twelve Financial Reporting and the Securities and Exchange Commission Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction.
19 U.S.C Penalties for Fraud, Gross Negligence, and Negligence
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter 20 CHAPTER 20 LEGAL LIABILITY.
The Advisers Act Custody Rule
Anti-Money Laundering and OFAC Compliance for Transfer Agents SSA Annual Conference July 25, 2008.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Chapter 51 Accountants’ Duties and Liability
1 Chapter 51 Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals.
Topic 5 Function, Purpose and Regulations of Financial Institutions.
V. Conferencia Internacional Antilavado de dinero y Contra el Financiamiento al Terrorismo Anti-Money Laundering Compliance for Broker/Dealers Current.
The Many Faces of Disclosure
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 52 Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals Chapter 52 Liability.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
Securities Law Historical background –Regulation followed 1929 crash –Little disclosure –Lots of fraud.
Four tips to mitigate Mobile fraud in the future.
Texas House of Representatives Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence Testimony of Randall S. James Banking Commissioner Texas Department of Banking August.
1-1 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
P A R T P A R T Corporations History & Nature of Corporations Organizational and Financial Structure of Corporations Management of Corporations 10 McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Copyright © 2008 by West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 46 Securities Regulation Twomey Jennings Anderson’s Business.
Chapter 3 (BKM)1 How Securities Are Traded Chapter 3 (BKM) Finance 650 Spring 1999 Lecture notes prepared by: Dr. Susan D. Jordan.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Taking Stock: Insuring Securities Broker/Dealers in the New Millennium in the New Millennium.
Chapter 01 The Role of the Public Accountant in the American Economy McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 3 How Securities are Traded.
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 5E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 27 Investor.
Securities Fraud Defendants Aiding and abetting “Primary violator” Control perons (last updated 24 Apr 12)
Online banking security best practices Access via ‘transaction devices’
Chapter 04 Legal Liability of CPAs McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 40: Securities Regulation By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 3-1 How Securities Are Traded Chapter 3.
Defying the Laws of Physics- Risks & Exposures for Financial Institutions Raymond DeCarlo- Moderator AIG - National Union R. Damian Brew Marsh FINPRO Dr.
SEC -is the primary regulatory over the capital markets and their participants.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Regulation of Securities, Corporate Governance, and.
1 A Presentation for Members of the Bank Compliance Association of Connecticut (BCAC) June 12, 2008 Rebecca Williams FDIC Case Manager (Special Activities)
Bank Secrecy Act. Many Laws Make Up “BSA” Bank Secrecy Act Money Laundering Control Act Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting USA PATRIOT Act.
1. 2 Learning Outcomes Chapter 3 Describe the role that financial markets play in improving the standard of living in an economy. Describe how various.
ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING COMPLIANCE PROGRAM FCM TRAINING
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.17-1 Chapter 17 Investor Protection and E- Securities Transactions.
Chapter 41 Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Essentials Of Business Law Chapter 27 Conducting Business In Cyberspace McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Securities Fraud Rule 10b-5 SFCA: circularity Plaintiff standing (and lead counsel) “In connection with” requirement (last updated 21 Mar 13)
Chapter 41 Investor Protection, E-Securities, and Wall Street Reform.
Chapter 17.  The federal and state governments have enacted statutes that regulate the issuance and trading of securities  Primary purpose  To promote.
© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall 1 ACCOUNTANTS’ LIABILITY © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Prentice-Hall CHAPTER.
AUDITING CHAPTER 5 Legal Liability By David N. Ricchiute.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 20 Legal Liability.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
US Securities Class Actions: Business Risks and Litigation Strategies Marc J. GottridgeMichael M. Yi Lovells Yi Cho & Brunstein, LLC New York OfficeNew.
LAWYERS AND CAPITAL MARKETS
Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals
Securities Regulation
Customized by Professor Ludlum December 6, 2016
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act
Chapter 20 Legal Liability
Module C Legal Liability
Legal Liability of CPAs
Liability of Accountants and Other Professionals
Corporations: Securities and Investor Protection
Hot Topics in Single Family Lending Annual Conference of the
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Chapter 46 SECURITIES REGULATION
Presentation transcript:

19 th Annual Plus International Conference Primary Liability for Secondary Actors David H. Kistenbroker Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP 525 West Monroe Street Suite 1900 Chicago, Illinois

2 Primary Liability for Secondary Actors  Civil liability for banks, issuers, broker-dealers and other “secondary” actors. –Primary liability under the evolving theory of “scheme” liability.  Liability under SEC enforcement provisions –Primary liability under securities laws –Secondary liability under traditional theories of aiding and abetting and “causing” primary violations. –Liability under the USA Patriot Act

3 Primary Liability for Secondary Actors  Civil liability under § 10b for financial institutions and other secondary actors –Traditional Rule 10b-5 claim requires a material misstatement or omission –“Speaker” faces primary liability for a primary violation  Historically, financial institutions faced only secondary liability –aiding and abetting the fraudulent statements of others

4 Primary Liability for Secondary Actors  Central Bank of Denver (1994) –No private action for aiding and abetting –A financial institution may still face potential liability as a “primary violator” The Battle Line: Primary liability versus non-actionable secondary actions –Courts have utilized three tests “Bright Line” test – secondary actor must directly or indirectly make fraudulent statement: Wright v. Ernst & Young, LLP (2d Cir. 1998) “Substantial Participation” test – significant role in preparing fraudulent statements: In re Software Toolworks, Inc. Sec. Litig. (9 th Cir. 1994)

5 Primary Liability for Secondary Actors  “Creation of Misrepresentation” test –First advocated by SEC in 1998 in amicus brief in Klein v. Boyd (3d Cir. 1998) –Focus is on secondary actors’ conduct rather than actual misstatements –Relies on 10(b)-5(a) and (c) “device, scheme or artifice to defraud” –First adopted in In Re Enron Corp. (2002) Lawyers drafted/approved false SEC filings intimate involvement with transactions supported allegation they “created” the misstatements

6 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  “Scheme” liability and the courts  Appellate courts reject “scheme” liability: –8 th Circuit – In re Charter Communications, Inc. –9th Circuit – In re Homestore.com, Inc. Third party vendors/arm’s length transactions – no other role Primary defendants failed to properly account for transactions No misstatements, “deceptive” device or “manipulative” conduct

7 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  District courts mixed on “scheme” liability –In re Dynegy (S.D. Texas 2004) - claim rejected Bank set up, executed two loans disguised as investment and cash flow No role in accounting/reporting transactions No allegations deceptive acts “coincided with sales of Dynegy securities.” –Quaak v. Dexia, S.A. (D.Mass 2005) – claim survives Bank financed “sham” entities used to record fictitious revenue “Substantial participation” -- bank a ‘primary architect’ of the scheme. Plaintiff subsequently filed amended complaint alleging direct liability; First Circuit vacated leave to appeal

8 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  District courts mixed on “scheme” liability –In re Parmalat (SDNY 2005) – mixed outcome Sham versus legitimate transactions –The securitization and factoring of duplicate invoices for same goods was “deceptive device” –Loans disguised as investments; deception resulted from company’s description, therefore Citigroup/BoA’s conduct not actionable – No showing of reliance required in actionable transaction – no direct reliance is needed

9 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  District courts mixed on “scheme” liability –In re Mutual Fund Investment Litig. (D. Md. 2005) – mixed outcome Broker-dealers facilitated market-timed transactions No liability for knowingly financing or clearing late trading Liability for providing after-hours trading system, disabling time-stamp function

10 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  Line between primary and secondary liability remains undefined –Legitimacy of underlying transaction Transaction has true business purpose Fraud is in accounting/reporting –Direct or substantial participation in deceptive acts “substantial participation” in Quaak “orchestrating” in Mutual Fund Litig. –SEC Liability for “aiding and abetting” remains

11 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  31 C.F.R Implements § 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act –Final rule took effect on June 9, 2003, although broker-dealers had until October 1, 2003, to implement –The rules seek to protect the U.S. financial system from money laundering and terrorist financing. –Parallel rules exist for banks under § and futures commission merchants and introducing brokers under §

12 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  Requires Customer Identification Program (CIP) that, at a minimum, includes: –Identity verification procedures –Recordkeeping –Comparison with government lists –Customer notice –Reliance on another financial institution

13 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  On May 22, 2006, the SEC announced its first-ever enforcement action under the USA PATRIOT Act –Action was brought against Crowell, Weedon, a broker- dealer. From 10/03 to 4/04, Crowell opened approximately 2,900 accounts. In verifying customer’s identities, Crowell relied on its registered reps’ attestations that they had personal knowledge of the customers opening the accounts The practice not documented in the firm’s written customer identification program (CIP). Rather, the CIP stated the firm would verify the identity of new customers using certain non-documentary and documentary procedures, such as public data base searches and reviewing government issued identification.

14 Developments in Secondary Actor Liability  Violation –By failing to accurately document its CIP, Crowell violated the record-keeping and record retention requirements under the rule. –Crowell consented to the issuance of an order that it cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 17a-8 thereunder.