Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Route 30 Environmental Impact Statement & Phase I Design Report Community Advisory Group Meeting Thursday May 8, 2008.
Advertisements

Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
Oregon 62: I-5 to Dutton Rd. (Medford) for Jackson County Planning Commission May 9, 2013.
PUBLIC MEETING May 12, 2011 P U B L I C I N V O L V E M E N T Project Status PHASE III Construction PHASE II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition.
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Engineering Public Scoping Meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2011,
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
Friends of the Fox River November 9, 2014 Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
U.S. 33 Northern Connector Alternative
December 13, 2010 Developing Bicycle Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
The US 101 Mobility Study will -  Examine current and future conditions, identify key deficiency areas and propose multi-modal improvement packages along.
Public Open House February 6, Study Overview - Study Area South North.
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
Feasibility Study FOREST GLEN PASSAGEWAY April 10, Isiah Leggett Montgomery County Executive Arthur Holmes, Jr. Director Department of Transportation.
U.S. 231 Intersection Improvement in North Spencer County Heritage Hills High School Thursday, April 30, 2015.
Longmeadow Parkway Fox River Bridge Corridor
I-65 Added Travel Lanes Project in Tippecanoe County
S.R. 144 Intersection Improvement and Road Reconstruction Project Tuesday, October 11, :30pm Presentation Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School 1000.
Public Involvement Meeting June 11,  Introduce the project  Provide history and current status of the project  Explain the benefits of the project.
EAST DON TRAIL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Project Overview Ward 31 Ravine Meeting November 4, :00 to 9:00 p.m. Presteign-Woodbine United Church.
Oversight Team Meeting December 11, INTRODUCTIONS (15 MINUTES) Name and affiliation Purpose of meeting/ review agenda Edits to September’s Oversight.
Meeting Agenda Stakeholder Participation Panel July 14, 2003 Welcome/Introductions Study Overview Tasks/Products/Schedule Traffic Patterns Break Key Project.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
US 101 Corridor Plan Prepared by: Oregon Department of Transportation May 2013.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road April 11, 2013 Welcome!
Workshop 2 – Administrative Structure Recycled Water Feasibility Study Rancho Murieta Community Services District January 8, 2008.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
U.S. 31 at C.R. 400 South Intersection Improvement Clifty Creek Elementary School May 22, 2014, 6:00 p.m.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
Andrew Winga, P.E. – WisDOT Project Manager.  Background on numerous Transportation Studies  What is a Planning & Environment Linkage Study  Problem.
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
S.R. 930 and Green Street Intersection Improvement Project Tuesday, May 22, :00 p.m. Presentation Park Hill Learning Center Auditorium New Haven,
Project Overview O CTOBER 27 TH, 2009 Presented to:
U.S. 33 Road Reconstruction Goshen High School Auditorium 6 p.m. Wednesday, August 20, 2014.
Oregon Passenger Rail Leadership Council Meeting June 6, 2012.
Phase I Engineering and Environmental Studies Project Development Flowchart US Route 45; IL Route 132 to IL Route 173 and Millburn Bypass CSS
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE 2040 LRTP Update – Needs Plan Development October 6, 2015 City of Lynn Haven.
Public Involvement Meeting December 10,  Introduce the project  Explain the benefits of the project  Discuss tasks completed since last public.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
US 25 Corbin to London Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting December 2011.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, August 13, 2015.
Project Briefing for BROOKS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT STUDY and SANTA ROSA SOUND ALTERNATE CROSSING STUDY April 2015 SPEAKER: BOB.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6:00pm Monday, October 1, 2012 South Grove Intermediate School Beech Grove, Indiana.
U.S. 20 Intersection Improvement Project at Waverly Road Porter Town Hall Thursday, January 21, 2016.
South/West Corridor Transit Improvements ZARZAMORA AND MILITARY PRIMO BRT PROJECTS ENVIRONMENTAL AND PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE September 9, 2014 VIA Community.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Public.
I-465 at I-65 Interchange Modification Public Meeting 6 p.m., Thursday, August 14 South Grove Intermediate School, Beech Grove, IN.
Community Outreach Spring A New Way to Think Transportation vs. Mobility Photo credits: Top right, Richard Masoner, Flickr; bottom right: Wldehart,
Planning and Environmental Linkages MPO/COG Conference February 24, 2016.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District U.S. 181 Harbor Bridge Project Environmental Documentation and Schematic Development Citizens.
All information presented is preliminary and subject to revision I-515 Alternatives Development Study Public Information Meeting March 31, 2016 Welcome.
County Road 19(Manning Road) & County Road 22 Improvements Environmental Study/ Preliminary Design Report November 2008.
Technical and Public Advisory Committee Meeting #3
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
Rail Program Management Services
I-85 Widening Project MM Cherokee County Public Hearing March 14, 2017.
S.R. 26 Road Rehabilitation in Clinton County
Executive Order No. 23 Update Air & Waste Management Association Conference November 16, 2018 Presentation will focus on the latest policy development.
S.R. 261 Intersection Improvement at Fruitwood Lane in Newburgh
U.S. 20 at State Road 2 New Interchange
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Barrington Road at Jane Addams Memorial Tollway (Interstate 90) Interchange Improvement Study Hoffman Estates Village Hall June 27, 2012

Purpose of today’s meeting: What will I learn today?  Gather input regarding transportation needs within the project study area  Discover opportunities to become involved  Provide description of project  Outline the study planning process using Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS)

Where is this project located?

Consider additional access to I-90 due to:  Population growth to the west  Travel demand for current and future conditions  Emergency vehicle response times  Crash location access along I-90  Economic revitalization of Barrington Road corridor What is this project?

 Northbound Barrington Road ramp to Eastbound I-90  Southbound Barrington Road ramp to Eastbound I-90  Westbound I-90 ramp to Northbound Barrington Road  Westbound I-90 ramp to Southbound Barrington Road What are the existing access conditions?

How are roadway projects implemented? Phase II Contract Plan Preparation & Land Acquisition Phase III Construction Phase I Preliminary Engineering & Environmental Studies Current Phase

What is the Phase 1 study timeline? Data Collection Purpose and Need Alternative Analysis Preferred Alternative Public Involvement Summer 2012 Spring 2012 Fall 2012 Winter 2012/2013 We Are Here

What are the Phase 1 Elements? Human and Natural Environment Hydraulics, Drainage & Bridge Roadway, Geometrics & Traffic Vehicular/ Pedestrian Safety Vehicular/ Pedestrian Safety Stakeholder Outreach Data Collection Purpose and Need Purpose and Need Evaluate Alternatives Define Alternatives and Evaluation Criteria Select Preferred Alternative

 Collect data to identify transportation issues and concerns:  Existing roadway and land use plans  Traffic, crash, bicycle and pedestrian data  Population and employment forecasts  Local and regional comprehensive plans  Solicit input from stakeholders What is the current study step?

How is the collected data used? Transportation Needs Transportation Needs Community Concerns Community Concerns Traffic Analysis Traffic Analysis Safety Analysis Safety Analysis Data Collection Data Collection Problem Statement Problem Statement Technical Evaluation Technical Evaluation Purpose and Need Purpose and Need

Anyone that lives or works within, owns property or has a vested interest in, or travels through the project area, such as:  Property Owners  Residents  Businesses  Non-Profit Organizations  Elected Officials  Regulatory Agencies  Policy Advocates  Travelers Who are the stakeholders?

Stakeholder Involvement Plan (SIP)  Framework for stakeholder involvement  Identifies roles and responsibilities of participants  Establishes timing of stakeholder activities  Continuously evolving document  SIP is available for review tonight and is on the website for review at any time How are stakeholders involved?

 Form the Community Advisory Group  Analyze existing conditions and deficiencies  Identify issues and concerns  Integrate the technical analysis with the community context evaluation  Define the “Problem Statement” and “Purpose and Need” of the project What are the next study steps?

 Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) involves stakeholders in the project development process  CSS reflects the project surroundings – its “context”  CSS addresses all aspects of a project:  Safety and mobility  Community  Environment  Usability What is Context Sensitive Solutions?

 Understand stakeholders’ key issues and concerns  Involve stakeholders in the decision making process  Apply flexibility in design to address stakeholder concerns  Achieve a general understanding of agreement among the stakeholders What are CSS goals?

A general understanding of agreement has been reached when the stakeholders agree that their input has been heard and duly considered, and the process as a whole was fair. What is a CSS general understanding of agreement?

Who participates in CSS? Community At Large Community At Large Project Study Group (PSG) Project Study Group (PSG) Community Advisory Group (CAG) Community Advisory Group (CAG)

What is a Project Study Group? Project Study Group (PSG) Project Study Group (PSG) Group Members  Village of Hoffman Estates  Illinois Tollway  Illinois Department of Transportation  Federal Highway Administration  Crawford, Murphy & Tilly, Inc. (Project Consultant) Project Role  Collects and analyzes data  Promotes partnership  Ensures requirements are met  Renders the final decisions

What is a Community Advisory Group? Community Advisory Group (CAG) Community Advisory Group (CAG) Group Members  Property Owners  Residents and Businesses  Non-Profit Organizations  Commuters  Local Government and Agency Representatives Project Role  Provides insight into issues and concerns  Identifies potential solutions/implementation  Meets in a workshop format

Please join us in the next room to…  View exhibits  Talk with Project Study Team members  Note issues and concerns directly on the aerial exhibit What is next this evening?

 Available forms for your input: How do I provide feedback? Tuesday, July 3rd  Forms may be dropped in the box today, returned via mail or ed to be part of the public meeting record. Wednesday, July 11th Comment Form Community Context Audit Form Community Advisory Group Application

How is information communicated? Public Meetings and Hearings Community Advisory Group Small Group Presentations Media Tollway, IDOT and Village Websites Project Study Group

Thank You! The presentation will restart in 3 minutes

Welcome! The presentation will begin in 2 minutes

Welcome! The presentation will begin in 1 minute